ThinkProgress Logo

LGBT

Soldier Discharged Through E-mail Responds To McCain: ‘I’m Just Dumbfounded’ By His Statements

Major Mike Almy, a 13-year veteran of the Air Force who was relieved of his duties after a routine search of computer files uncovered emails to his same-sex partner, appeared on MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow show this evening to respond to Sen. John McCain’s (R-AZ) rather hysterical allegations that the military does not seek out gay soldiers or search private emails. That exchange, with journalists Kerry Eleveld and Chris Geidner, occurred only moments after Republicans successfully filibustered the 2011 National Defense Authorization Act.

“I was literally quite stunned when I first heard it,” Almy told Maddow. “As you know, I testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee in March and told my story”:

ALMY: Senator McCain was there. He sat 20 feet away from me and he listened to every word of my testimony. For him to make that statement today that the military does not search private e-mails tells me that he either didn’t listen to my testimony in this past March, he forgot what I said, or he’s being deliberately deceptive with the American public about the true nature of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell and using partisan politics over the interests of national security. The simple truth is the Air Force searched my private e-mails in 2005 in Iraq. During the height of the insurgency they launched an investigation solely to look into my private e-mails, solely to determine if I had violated Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell and to find whatever evidence they could use against me. [...]So for Senator McCain to make that allegation, I’m just dumbfounded about where he comes up with that type of explanation, that type of an answer to a reporter and to be quite honest with you, I’m very angry at that statement today.

Watch it:

Earlier in the show, Maddow spoke to DADT scholar Nathaniel Frank about what the Democrats can now do to eliminate the policy. Frank laid out three paths: the Senate can try to pass repeal during the lame duck session, President Obama could issue an executive order ending implementation of the policy, or the Justice Department could refuse to appeal a recent federal district court decision which found DADT unconstitutional. “The court case, I think, is one of the more likely now, for the President to say, this actually is unconstitutional and although there is a tradition of defending standing law, it’s not obligated to defend a policy that it believes is unconstitutional,” Frank said.

Politics

Right Wing Foments Voter Fraud Conspiracies, Hatches ‘Voter Caging’ Plot To Suppress Minority Votes In WI

voter_cagingDocuments and audio recordings released yesterday by One Wisconsin Now document an apparent plot by the Wisconsin Republican Party, Koch-funded Americans for Prosperity (aka Fight Back Wisconsin), and various other tea party groups to suppress votes from minorities and students in this year’s elections using a well-documented — and illegal— practice known as “voter caging.” The alleged plot offers fresh evidence that long-discredited right-wing conspiracy theories about massive voter fraud supposedly perpetrated by minorities and others remain alive and well in both the official GOP establishment and its tea party base.

“Voter caging” is a means of voter suppression and intimidation that involves sending mail to a list of voters, compiling a list of mail pieces returned as undeliverable, and then challenging those voters at the polls or otherwise attempting to remove them from the voter rolls. The mere process of challenging voters can intimidate from voting even if they are eligible, cause long lines to form at polling places that will then discourage others from voting, and may result in eligible voters casting provisional ballots which stand a high likelihood of not being counted in the final tally.

In the alleged conspiracy uncovered in Wisconsin, Koch-funded Americans for Prosperity, whose Wisconsin state chair was previously banned from politics in Wisconsin for three years, would finance a test mailing and other costs associated with compiling the caging list and then coordinate with the Wisconsin Republican Party to undertake an elaborate process to remove voters from the rolls ahead of the election, if possible, or at the polls on Election Day. Tea party groups were to provide the volunteer labor and cover for the activity — with all participants signing an extensive non-disclosure agreement under which they agreed to publicly operate in the name of Wisconsin GrandSons for Liberty, who would also provide some funding for the plan. The Wisconsin GOP would also provide additional funds, trainers for the tea party volunteers and would have a team of lawyers “standing by” on Election Day to respond to tea party volunteers and “bring the police” if necessary. As is typically the case in voter caging operations, the plotters appeared intent on targeting minorities, students, and others from heavily-Democratic areas of the state.

Audio recordings of the tea party meeting where the alleged voter suppression plot was discussed include numerous references by presenters to supposed instances of minorities and college students voting illegally. Tim Dake, a prominent tea partier in the state who belongs to Wisconsin GrandSons of Liberty, cited an anecdote about busloads of out-of-state voters voting multiple times in previous elections, then went on to discuss “the racial thing”:

“So, the problem is now you see elections being stolen and we have to get these guys fired up about it, which is not happening. The other thing is you run into the racial thing. You have people screaming, ‘Oh, you’re denying the minorities their right to vote.” No, we’re denying their right to vote multiple times.’”

“No, we’re not even denying the minorities anything, we’re denying fraud,” added an unidentified attendee of the meeting.

Later in the meeting, Dake offered up another anecdote that included a comment implying that individuals with Vietnamese surnames had committed voter fraud. He described how after moving into a “brand new condo” in 2004, he attempted to vote and was told that there were already twelve others registered to vote at his address:

“They said, ‘Wow, you must have a big family.” And I’m looking at names and going, ‘No, there’s nobody named “Nguyen” and “Din” and that sort of thing in my family.”

Considering that the voter rolls used to check voters in at the polls are typically organized by last name, it’s unclear how a poll worker could have immediately discovered this information or why they would have chosen to share it.

Read more

Health

Defying GOP Predictions, CMS Predicts Seniors Will Retain Access To Medicare Advantage In 2011

In what is one of the few items of good news for health care reform advocates, HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius announced this morning that “despite projections of gloom and doom,” virtually all of the 11 million seniors enrolled in the Medicare Advantage will retain access to the program. On average, seniors will pay 1% or $0.45 cents less in premiums, than they did in 2010, Sebelius said on a conference call with health reporters that the Wonk Room attended:

SEBELIUS: For 2011, Medicare beneficiaries will be able to participate in a more robust Medicare Advantage and prescription drug program. As a result of the Affordable Care Act, they’ll benefit from stronger oversight and management by out Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Despite last year’s projections of gloom and doom… virtually all Medicare beneficiaries will be able to chose among Medicare Advantage plans…Average premiums are expected to be lower in 2011 than in 2010, 1% lower. [...]

Under the new authority provided by the Affordable Care Act, CMS negotiated with plans to improve benefits and to make sure seniors costs were low. For example, all Medicare Advantage plans will offer an annual out of pocket limit on cost sharing….The health plans participating in Medicare expect enrollment to actually grow in 2011… Medicare Advantage enrollment is expected to grow by about 5%.

Indeed, throughout the reform process, Republicans repeatedly warned seniors that health reform’s cuts to the Medicare Advantage program would chase plans out of the market, leaving seniors without a choice of private coverage. The GOP introduced numerous amendments and motions instructing Congress to remove the $136 billion in cuts to the Medicare Advantage program and Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) famously urged senior citizens to rip up their AARP cards in protest of the organization’s support for the the legislation.

But CMS projects that 99.7% of seniors will continue to have access to a Medicare Advantage plan and that only a small number of fee-for-service plans will leave the market. CMS Administrator Don Berwick attributed their departure to a 2008 bipartisan bill that required issuers to establish provider networks. Their departure will leave some 2,3000 beneficiaries in Colorado and Utah without a Medicare Advantage option.

The government also estimates that as a result of CMS negotiation, “plans improved their benefits by $13 per member per month (5 percent) on average,” resulting in savings of “about $155 per member per year for the 966,000 beneficiaries enrolled in these plans.”

Last month, CMS announced that most seniors will pay about the same for prescription premiums in 2011, while those with the highest costs will pay less — further defying GOP predictions.

Security

DREAM Act Student’s Message To McCain: ‘I’m Willing To Defend This Country As You Did’

This afternoon, the Senate failed to get the 60 votes needed to move forward on the defense bill and attach the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors (DREAM) Act to it as an amendment. For the first time in 48 years, the defense reauthorization bill failed to make it to the Senate floor debate following a 56-43 motion to proceed vote.

After the vote, I got the chance to speak with 21 year-old Michael Nazario, a former member of the Junior ROTC and the lead organizer of “DREAM Army.” Nazario is an undocumented immigrant who was brought to the U.S. by his parents 14 years ago in 1996. Nazario has dreamed of enlisting in the military but is unable to due to his immigration status. For the past few days, Nazario has led other young undocumented immigrants like him in staging a mock “DREAM Army” boot camp in front of Sen. John McCain’s (R-AZ) Phoenix office. McCain, who supported the DREAM Act in the past, voted against proceeding with the defense authorization bill. Nazario hopes McCain will reconsider his opposition in the future and thinks the two of them have a lot in common:

We decided to confront Senator McCain about this issue and tell him our stories. Tell him that not only do we want to protect this nation, we have so many things in common. We love this country, we cherish what we have in life. We’re not criminals, if anything we want the opportunity to protect and serve. [...]

I hope Senator McCain really looks at that. Right now I just want to give him a message if it’s possible for him to even get this. I feel like I am prisoner of this [immigration] war. I feel like I’m tied to this battle to these four walls and he has the key to this cell’s door. And all I’m asking for is to be free. I’m no different than you are. Get to know and if you do you’ll find out we love those country and I’m willing to defend this country as you did.

Watch it:

Nazario and other DREAMers I talked to hesitated to place blame on either political party. However, immigration advocates pointed to the fact that not a single member of the GOP voted to proceed with the defense authorization bill. Frank Sharry, Executive Director of America’s Voice stated, “The best and the brightest of our nation’s immigrant community – who want to go to college and serve in our military – just had the door slammed in their face by the GOP.”

The largest Latino civil rights group in the U.S., National Council of La Raza, issued senators like McCain who have supported the DREAM Act in the past but voted “no” today a warning: “Today, more than a dozen so-called supporters of the ‘DREAM Act’ chose to use a procedural maneuver to avoid an up-or-down vote on the legislation, keeping the lives of young people in legal limbo. Some senators might think that they can flip-flop on this issue or hide behind such Washington-speak as ‘I support it but I won’t vote for it.’ They should be advised that the Hispanic community will not stop its push for the ‘DREAM Act’ and broader immigration reform, and the rapidly growing number of Latino voters will remember this vote in November.”

Politics

‘Birther King’ Joe Farah Debates Gay Conservative Group; Questions Conservatism Of Coburn, Thune

In the past two years, WorldNetDaily (WND) publisher Joseph Farah — the self proclaimed “Birther King” — has made a name for himself promoting “birther” conspiracy theories and sponsoring billboards questioning President Obama’s citizenship. But in August, Farah made news by booting Ann Coulter from her speaking role at his “Taking Back America” conference after learning that she planned to address GOProud, a right-wing group for gay conservatives. Reacting to her dismissal, Coulter mocked Farah as a “publicity whore” who peddles “birther nonsense.”

Because of the Coulter controversy, GOProud sent one of its founders, Chris Barron, to debate Farah over the topic, “Is GOProud conservative?” That debate took place last weekend at the WND conference in Miami attended by ThinkProgress. In full display of his paranoid style, Farah called in security officers to wave metal detectors over members of the audience before the debate. Several audience members and loyal WND readers told ThinkProgress that the extra security was warranted because Barron could bring his “radical gay” supporters to the debate.

During the debate, Farah called into question the conservative credentials of Sens. Tom Coburn (R-OK) and John Thune (R-SD) for associating themselves with GOProud. He also called for an outright ban on any gays serving in the military — openly or not:

FARAH: I would actually agree with you. I’d like to repeal Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell also. But I think we should go back to banning from the military.

BARRON: I’m sure you can understand as a veteran of the United States Air Force reserves, I find that more than just a little insulting.

FARAH: Well, you know, lots of military leaders who have looked at this. Commissions and others have determined that they’re getting the best and the brightest without recruiting from homosexuals.

Watch it:

Before the event, ThinkProgress spoke to GOProud board member Jimmy LaSalvia, who said WND is “clearly out of the mainstream.” He also expressed disbelief that WND had ordered additional security for the event.

Climate Progress

Climate disruption caused by global warming driven by human emissions of greenhouse gases

By any other name, it’s still Hell and High Water

Holdren1

Last week Fox News and other conservative media outlets tried once again to fabricate controversy over climate science when they pounced on a presentation made by the President’s science adviser Dr. John Holdren in Oslo. In it, Holdren makes the case (for the umpteenth time) that it’s time to move past the oversimplified term “global warming” and start facing the painful reality that without sharply reducing our carbon pollution, we face something more akin to a “global climate disruption.”

Sadly, even the Atlantic monthly (which is seen as center-left but is center-right on climate) repeated the right-wing narrative that the White House was somehow pushing new rhetoric in place of real science with its stenographic post, “Right Has Field Day With New ‘Global Warming’ Term.”  Ironically, the Atlantic criticized Holdren’s phrase  “global climate disruption” while its own construction “the scientifically supported but nevertheless controversial theory of global warming” is risible.  Yes, well, it is only “controversial” if one buys into and keeps repeating right-wing anti-science talking points.

I’ve been writing about efforts to come up with a better term than “global warming” for a long time (see “Is ‘Global Weirding’ here? Humans are warming the globe and changing the climate. But what should we call it?”).  I myself tried to coin the term “Hell and High Water” a few years ago, since that is a more accurate description of what is to come if we stay on or near our current emissions path.  It didn’t take — even though Time magazine used the phrase for its Pakistan flooding story, which didn’t mention global warming and which wasn’t shared with U.S. readers anyway!

It was GOP strategist and wordmeister Frank Luntz who counseled in a confidential 2003 memo that the Administration and conservatives should stop using the term “global warming” because it was too frightening:

It’s time for us to start talking about “climate change” instead of global warming and “conservation” instead of preservation.

1) “Climate change” is less frightening than “global warming”. As one focus group participant noted, climate change “sounds like you’re going from Pittsburgh to Fort Lauderdale.” While global warming has catastrophic connotations attached to it, climate change suggests a more controllable and less emotional challenge.

So let’s set the record straight on two points.  Holdren’s speech focused on laying out the rock-solid and increasingly dire science (must-see PPTs here).  And the term he was recommending is essentially identical to one that he and many other scientists suggested 13 years ago:

Scientists’ Statement
Global Climatic Disruption

June 18, 1997

Read more

LGBT

McCain Ignores Testimony Before His Committee, Claims Military Doesn’t ‘Seek Out’ Orientation

This afternoon, immediately after the Senate failed to invoke cloture on a defense authorization measure which included an amendment to gradually repeal Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, a group of journalists met with Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) to discuss the vote. Pressed by The Advocate’s Kerry Eleveld and Metro Weekly’s Chris Geidner about instances when the military actively sought to out gay troops, McCain grew defiant and insisted that the military does not “go out and seek to find out if someone’s sexual orientation”:

MCCAIN: We do not go out and seek. Regulations are, we do not go out and seek to find out if someone’s sexual orientation. We do not!

ELEVELD: But senator, that’s not…

MCCAIN: That is the fact! That is the fact. Now ma’am, I know the military very well, and I know what’s being done. And what is being done is that they are not seeking out people who are gay. And I don’t care what you say, I know it’s a fact.

ELEVELD: It’s not what I say.

MCCAIN: I dont’ care what you say! And I don’t care what others say. I’ve seen it in action. I’ve seen it in action. I have sons in the military, I know the military very well. So they’re not telling you the truth.

ELEVELD: Senator, just to make sure…

MCCAIN: Just to make sure. We do not go out and seek out and find out….

ELEVELD: Private emails are not being searched? Private emails are not being searched?

MCCAIN: …See if someone is gay or not. We do not go out and see whether someone is gay or not.

ELEVELD: There are documented cases…

MCCAIN: They do not, they do not, they do not. You can say that they are, you can say [inaudible] it’s not true!… Yea, I’d like to see…

GEIDNER: It is the case of Mike Almy, Senators.

MCCAIN: Bring them to our office. It is not the policy, it is not the policy, it is not the policy.

GEIDNER: But it is the case that it’s happening, Senator.

MCCAIN: It is not the policy, it is not the policy, it is not the policy You can say that it is the policy, sir if you choose to. It is not the policy. I would be glad to get that to you in writing.

Watch it:

While the Defense Department did adopt higher standards for discharging gay and lesbian soldiers in March, the military has dismissed servicemembers after discovering their sexual orientation in email records. For instance, Major Mike Almy — a 13-year veteran of the Air Force — was relieved of his duties after a routine search of computer files uncovered emails to his same-sex partner.

In fact, as Almy explained in testimoney before McCain’s own committee (Senate Armed Services): “In Iraq, during the height of the insurgency, someone in the Air Force ordered a search of my private emails solely to determine if I had violated “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”, and to gather whatever evidence could be used against me.” “I was relieved of my duties, leading nearly 200 Airmen, my security clearance was suspended and part of my pay was terminated. Even as my commander was relieving me of my duties, he assured me this was in no way a reflection of my performance or my abilities as an officer,” Almy testified.

Yglesias

Endgame

Can’t meet there demands:

— Would be better if progressive pundits could muster non-ironic, non-meta outrage about conservatives filibustering funding for the troops.

— If “family instability” is really the root of all evil as Reihan Salam says, then what are we supposed to do about it?

— I want to read this paper but don’t have access to it.

— Sarah Palin’s dismal poll numbers seem inconsistent with frontrunner status.

— Bill Clinton defends Paul Kagame.

— Jamelle Bouie takes me to school on Christianity and lying.

I love Sleigh Bell’s “Infinity Guitars” but between the bad lip synching and the “fire! fire!” the video makes me wish Beavis & Butthead were still around.

Media

Right-Wing Media Pushes Koch Industries’ Talking Point That White House Acted Illegally

Yesterday, the conservative Weekly Standard leveled what Politico described as an “explosive” accusation against the White House, accusing its operatives of improperly snooping on the tax returns of Koch Industries, the giant oil and gas conglomerate owned by right-wing mega-donors Charles and David Koch.

Based solely on the account of the Koch’s general counsel, the Weekly Standard alleged that the White House had obtained, and subsequently revealed, private tax data about the company. According to the Standard, during a conference call with reporters last month, an unnamed administration official suggested Koch was one of a “series of entities that do not pay corporate income tax.” Indeed, many companies that are privately owned do not pay corporate taxes, but instead “pass through” their profits to the company’s owners, who then pay personal income tax on the profit.

A company’s tax status is confidential, so Koch’s lawyer and the Standard — noting that the White House and the Koch brothers have clashed publicly in the past over their funding of right-wing attack groups — are suggesting that the White House learned of Koch’s status by illegally obtaining information from the IRS. Other right-wing blogs piled on, and by this afternoon, Fox News dutifully chimed in to defend Koch. Almost entirely ignoring the actual details of the story, host Megyn Kelly and legal analyst Peter Johnson Jr. wondered if “this is a return to the Nixon’s enemy list,” and suggested that the White House is trying to “intimidate” its “political rivals”:

Koch’s lawyer is not denying the claim that the company doesn’t pay corporate taxes, but rather is concerned about how the White House knew. But as the White House noted in a statement to Politico, this assumption could be easily made by merely visiting the company’s website, which explains that most of its subsidiaries are the types of companies that are generally “pass-through entities,” and thus do not pay corporate taxes. Rather, they pass profits onto the owners who in turn pay personal income tax. The White House flatly denied any wrong doing, further explaining that several experts testified before a presidential economic board about Koch’s tax status. “If this information is incorrect, we are happy to revise statements,” the White House statement continued.

Of course, this kind of wild conspiracy theorizing is nothing new for Weekly Standard, which has implicated the Obama White House in nefarious (and entirely fabricated) schemes to blackmail Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE) into voting for the Affordable Care Act, buy Rep. Jim Matheson’s (D-UT) vote on the bill, and bribe Rep. Joe Sestak (D-PA) to drop out of a Democratic primary. None of these false charges have prevented more mainstream outlets from repeatedly turning to the Weekly Standard as a reliable source. But the tax status of Koch Industries speaks to a much larger issue than the right-wing media’s attempt to baselessly implicate the White House in illegal activity.

In the ongoing debate about extending the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, Republicans repeatedly insist that “small businesses” will be dangerously impacted by the tax rates resetting to a higher level. In reality, as House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) himself has admitted, just three percent of small businesses would actually be affected. Moreover, many of the “small businesses” Republicans whine about are actually huge corporations, such as accounting giant PriceWaterHouseCooper, engineering juggernaught Bechtel Corp., and — if it is indeed a “pass-through” company — Koch Industries, the nation’s second-largest private company.

Yglesias

Summers Departing

White House press office today confirms that Larry Summers will be stepping down as head of the National Economic Council at the end of the year:

Dr. Summers said “I will miss working with the President and his team on the daily challenges of economic policy making. I’m looking forward to returning to Harvard to teach and write about the economic fundamentals of job creation and stable finance as well as the integration of rising and developing countries into the global system.”

I think it’s easy to make too much of these staff comings-and-goings. The fact of the matter is that White House senior staff never stick around forever. Jason Furman, one of Summers’ deputies, is the guy I thought would do the job in the first place and I think would be a natural fit. I know less about the other deputy, Diana Farrell, but tapping her would avoid an all-boys economic policy team.

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up