ThinkProgress Logo

Politics

New York Radio Station WOR Drops Glenn Beck’s Radio Show From Its Lineup

Today, the New York radio station WOR announced that Glenn Beck’s nationally syndicated radio show will be dropped on January 17, 2011, and hate radio host Mike Gallagher, a familiar New York name, will be taking Beck’s spot. According to Scott Lakefield, the WOR program director, the reason is due to Beck’s drop in ratings. Scott explained that the “show wasn’t getting what we wanted”:

WOR (710 AM), one of the city’s two biggest talk radio stations, said this morning it is dropping Beck’s syndicated show as of Jan. 17 and replacing him with a familiar New York name: Mike Gallagher.“The reason is ratings,” said WOR program director Scott Lakefield. “Somewhat to our surprise, the show wasn’t getting what we wanted.”

Beck’s drop in popularity isn’t new, as seen by the plethora of major companies who have dropped advertising from Beck’s show on Fox News. Additionally, Beck’s show in the U.K. ran without any advertisements for five consecutive days during February 2010, and according to Color of Change, a total of 81 companies have withdrawn their advertising to date.

Paul Breer

LGBT

LGBT Groups Look Beyond Congress, Will Focus On Courts, States While GOP Has Majority

The take away from Amanda Terkel’s piece on the outlook for LGBT initiatives for the next two years is that most of the action will be happening in the states and the courts, since the Republican majority in the 112th Congress is showing little interest in taking up equality legislation:

One branch of government that could hold major victories (or upsets) for the LGBT community: the judicial system. There currently are two major cases making their way through the courts, one challenging the constitutionality of DOMA, the other the constitutionality of California’s same-sex marriage ban. Either could end up at the Supreme Court.

There will also be action at the state level, with Maryland, New York and Rhode Island looking to advance marriage equality bills, and states like Tennessee, Arizona and Florida likely considering legislation to restrict adoption rights for same-sex parents.

To be sure, LGBT activists will still be pushing smaller initiatives like the Elementary and Secondary Education Act to address bullying and harassment, the Older Americans Act and the Tax Equity for Health Plan Beneficiaries Act, but the larger big ticket items (ENDA, DOMA) are on hold — at least temporarily. Equality groups now have a real opportunity to build awareness of these initiatives and work to support (or protect) the expansion of LGBT equality in the states.

As Terkel points out, Rhode Island and Maryland are poised to pass marriage-equality bills and Hawaii may very well secure a civil unions legislation. While the new Republican Governor in Iowa doesn’t seem very interested in recalling the remaining pro-marriage judges, Republicans in the New Hampshire legislature could have the two-thirds majority necessary to override Gov. John Lynch’s veto of a bill to repeal same-sex marriage, and Republican legislators in Wyoming could reintroduce a defense of marriage law that would bar the state from recognizing same-sex marriages from other states. Still, with support for equality steadily rising, it’s unclear how eager Republicans will be in litigating an anti-gay agenda. One would only hope that elected Democrats — I’m looking at you President Obama — will start using the increasing support to speak out in favor of an equality agenda.

LGBT

Conservative Groups Split Over Participation Of GOProud At Annual CPAC Conference

The Family Research Council and a few other social conservative organizations like Concerned Women for America, American Principles Project and American Values are refusing to attend next month’s Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) to protest the participation GOProud, a gay rights group. But Focus on Family is staying put, at least for now:

“They made a mistake,” CitizenLink spokesman Tom Minnery said Tuesday of the conference organizer, The American Conservative Union. “We’re not happy about it. We’ve got to see a better result next year or our participation is in doubt.”

Minnery said he believes discussions are underway to change the situation for next year.

“We’re encouraged to stick it out this year,” Minnery said. “It’s important for organizations like ours, for social conservatives, to be involved in the conversation.”

GOProud will be a “participating organization,” at the conference, “the second highest level of participation and will have a voice in planning the conference.” All this is too much for some conservative attendees, who are interpreting the group’s inclusion as an abandonment of conservative principles. “By bringing in GOProud, CPAC was effectively saying moral opposition to homosexuality is no longer welcome in the conservative movement,” Americans for Truth about Homosexuality president Peter LaBarbera, said. Mat Staver, president of Liberty Counsel, concurs, “We said GOProud is not a conservative organization. They are undermining the military” by promoting open homosexuality, and “undermining marriage” by opposing the Defense of Marriage Act, which preserves the traditional definition of marriage by limiting it to one man and one woman. The conservative news site WorldNetDaily, a major cheerleader for the groups boycotting CPAC, is even “giving right wing activist Frank Gaffney a platform to charge the ACU with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, a radical Islamist group.”

Last year, David Keene, the head of CPAC’s main organizing group, tried to calm a very similar boycott by assuring conservatives that GOProud would not have a speaking spot and that gay rights issues would not be “open to debate.” CPAC has historically focused less on far-right social priorities than other conservative conferences, but the presence of GOProud at last year’s event caused somewhat of a civil war among the attendees. A speaker who thanked the organizers for allowing GOProud to co-sponsor the conference was met with angry boos and heckling from the audience. A few minutes later, another activist slammed GOProud and engaged in a hostile shouting match with pro-gay rights students in the audience. Watch that exchange here.

Politics

Why Is Jeff Sessions Blocking A Child Sex Trafficking Bill?

In the waning days of the lame duck session, the Senate had the opportunity to pass the Domestic Minor Sex Trafficking Deterrence and Victims Support Act. Aimed at creating “a comprehensive, victim-centered approach to addressing the sex trafficking of minors,” the bill is “the first of its kind to deal with young trafficking victims domestically” by providing $12 million in off-set funding for state and local law enforcement to shelter, rehabilitate, prevent, and protect child victims of the sex trade.

Originally introduced by Sens. Ron Wyden (D-OR) and John Cornyn (R-TX) in 2009, the Senate Judiciary Committee adopted, amended, and passed the House version of this bill last summer which then passed the Senate by unanimous consent on December 9, 2010. The bill returned to the House, underwent further revision, and finally passed by voice vote on December 21, 2010. But when the Senate attempted to pass the bill again by unanimous consent, Sen. Jeff Sessions put a hold on the bill. The sole objector, Sessions effectively defeated its passage in the 111th Congress.

Sessions is pushing back against claims that he believes child victims deserve to be arrested as prostitutes, something the conservative Concerned Women of America alleged. In defending Sessions’ decision, a Republican Judiciary aide told ThinkProgress that Sessions was instrumental in helping the bill clear the Senate Judiciary Committee but had to object after the House removed two of his amendments that he said toughened the bill. One measure required a mandatory minimum sentence “for transporting, receiving or distributing” child pornography. The other expanded subpoena authority to the U.S. Marshals Service over unregistered sex offenders. But because the House removed these measures in its final revision, the Senate aide indicated several members opposed the new version. Thus, the staffer told us that, as the Ranking Member of the committee, Sessions had to be the one to block the bill.

According to his spokesman Ron LeGrand, Rep. Bobby Scott (D-VA) — the outgoing Chairman of the House Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security — dropped the subpoena position because there already was a precedent established for law enforcement agencies to receive subpoena authorization through the Department of Justice. Scott also dropped the mandatory minimum measure because minimums are “irrelevant, ineffective” sentences that “tend to have a very negative impact on people of color.” LeGrand said no one has ever presented Scott with “evidence-based research instead of knee-jerk slogan and soundbites” as rationale for the minimums, and in “the closing weeks of his chairmanship, that was still the case.” In removing the measures, LeGrand said Scott “stood on principle.”

But the Republican aide said their removal required Sessions to act on principle too. The hotlining process prevents members from changing the bill. Believing the bill to be brought up at the midnight hour of lame duck session, the aide said Sessions would not clear a watered down bill and preferred to take it up in the new session.

This is certainly not the first time a procedural impasse has jeopardized important legislation, nor is it the first time the GOP used time as an excuse to “run out the clock.” But anti-sex trafficking advocates said this time the procedural stalemate forced the sacrifice of the greater welfare of abused children. “Though we did not object to the Sessions amendments, we would have liked for Senator Sessions to put aside his objection to their removal in the House,” said Shared Hope International’s Senior Director Samantha Healy Vardaman.

Advocacy groups worked hard “to carefully craft a bill that provided solutions to the gaping problem of lack of shelter for child victims of sex trafficking and bolster support for law enforcement entities eager to investigate and prosecute these crimes,” she said. The Senate’s failure “results in a further delay in fulfilling the promise of the federal trafficking act to protect and restore victims of domestic minor sex trafficking.”

Still, Vardaman is “optimistic” that the momentum from last year “is sufficiently high in Congress to allow the bill to pass quickly in this new session.” While new efforts are likely to start in the House under the new Chairman Lamar Smith (R-TX), the Republican aide insisted that Sessions is supportive of the Senate bill and will work to see it passed this year. However, given the Senate GOP’s penchant for obstruction, advocates might need more than optimism.

Climate Progress

Global Boiling: Biblical Australian Floods Send Coal Prices Skyrocketing

As the planet warms from fossil fuel pollution, climate catastrophes grow. In Australia, record floods caused by unrelenting months of rain are threatening the nation’s economy, with global repercussions. Global manufacturers have been shocked by the shutdown of Queensland’s rich coal mines, with as much as 10 million tons of high-grade metallurgical coal taken off the market:

BHP, Rio, Macarthur Coal Ltd. and Anglo American Plc are among producers that have declared force majeure, a legal clause invoked by companies when they can’t meet obligations because of circumstances beyond their control. Record rainfall has spread floods across an area the size of France and Germany, forcing the evacuation of towns, closing mines and spoiling crops.

About fifty-nine percent of seaborne metallurgical coal comes from Queensland, bound for steelmakers in Japan, India, and China. The price of metallurgical coal may surge by 33 percent to $300 a ton, a price not seen since before the global recession.

“In many ways, it is a disaster of biblical proportions,” Queensland Treasurer Andrew Fraser told reporters in the flooded city of Bundaberg. “The extent of flooding being experienced by Queensland is unprecedented and requires a national and united response,” Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard said. ”Australia recorded its third-wettest year on record in 2010,” and the torrential rains are “set to last another three months.”

The record flooding is expected to cause Australia’s gross domestic product to fall by $2.5 billion.

The floods are powered by the hottest atmosphere and oceans in recorded history, which have been warmed by the very coal extracted from Australia’s mines. Although these rains are devastating on a national scale and have global repercussions, the shutdown of Queensland mines for a few months — and the 29 million tons of carbon dioxide that won’t be released — is only one one-thousandth of the 29 billions tons of carbon dioxide pollution produced globally each year.

Yglesias

Endgame

Things that weren’t very nice:

— Jonathan Strong tries to take down Jane Mayer, fails.

— Given widespread hostility to almost all specific proposals for change, it’s strange how few people will explicitly embrace the status quo.

— Bernard Finel wants more links.

— Airpower, COIN, and interservice rivalry.

— More detailed version of the argument about robots and taxing natural resources.

For the House GOP’s return to power with a social democratic twist, it’s the Raveonettes’ cover of “My Boyfriend’s Back”.

LGBT

Rick Scott’s Non-Discrimination Order Excludes Sexual Orientation, Age, Handicap

South Florida Gay News is reporting that newly-inaugurated Florida Gov. Rick Scott is kicking off his term by issuing a narrow non-discrimination order for state employees. Executive Order 11-04 address only race, gender, creed, color and national origin and ignores the existing protections in the Florida Civil Rights Act, which prohibit discrimination based on “race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, handicap, or marital status.”

In anticipation of the order — which is customary amongst governors — the Palm Beach County Human Rights Council urged Scott to adopt comprehensive anti-discrimination protections that went beyond current Florida law and included protections for “sexual orientation, gender identity or expression.” But Scott fell short of the existing protections. “Governor Scott’s limited view of diversity is very discouraging,” Rand Hoch, President of the Council told the Miami Herald, setting a less than welcome tone from the new administration. The order does not negate the existing Florida law, but acts as a statement of administration policy and intent. “It’s a message to us that it’s not going to be a gay friendly administration in Tallahassee,” Hoch told me in a phone interview and suggested that Scott’s order sets the state back decades. The Act was last amended in 1992 to prohibit discrimination against marital status — a protection Scott did not include. Meanwhile, the Council has been urging the Florida government — including former Governor Charlie Christ — to add sexual orientation to the list of protected peoples.

Scott positioned himself as a social conservative during his election campaign, although he rarely addressed equality issues on the stump. He reiterating his support for the state’s now defunct anti-gay adoption law, saying he opposed to “single sex adoption” and insisting that “Children should be raised in a home with a married man and a woman.” His campaign website also says that marriage should be between one man and one woman. During his well publicized brawl with primary challenger and former Attorney General Bill McCollum, Scott attacked McCollum for endorsing the “pro-homosexual rights candidate Rudy Giuliani for president in 2008.″

Politics

Tea Party Billionaire David Koch Entertains Newly Elected Republicans On The First Day Of The New Congress

Today, as Rep. John Boehner (R-OH) was sworn in as the Speaker of the House for the 112th Congress, ThinkProgress witnessed a group of Koch Industries lobbyists entering the Capitol along with members of Congress and their families. Tim Phillips, a former business partner to Jack Abramoff who now leads the Koch front group Americans for Prosperity, was with Nancy Pfotenhauer, a former corporate lobbyist for Koch Industries. ThinkProgress learned that David Koch, the polluter billionaire who has bankrolled groups organizing the Tea Parties and much of the modern conservative movement, was also in attendance in the Capitol for Boehner’s swearing-in event.

After the ceremony, David Koch walked up to Rep. Frank Guinta (R-NH) — a freshman Republican Koch helped to elect using his front group, Americans for Prosperity — and asked him to confirm that he will be attending a party that Koch is hosting for Republicans. Guinta said he would be at the party, which began at 5:00pm today.

Koch has been one of the most active players in Republican politics in the Obama era. His group Americans for Prosperity helped orchestrate much of the Tea Party movement; he funds many of the top conservative think tanks, like Heritage and the American Legislative Exchange Council; and, he also ran tens of millions of dollars in attack ads to elect the new Republican Congress. As ThinkProgress reported, Koch convened a secret meeting of top business leaders — mostly bankers, industrialists, and oil men — to meet with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and Glenn Beck to plan the midterm election in June 2010.

ThinkProgress also spoke to Mr. Koch, and will post a video of the interview soon.

Yglesias

Wednesday Meta-Ethics Blogging

Dev James has a meta-ethical query:

I would like a post discussing the tension between your anti-realist views in meta-ethics (or your quasi-realist views) and your ethical claims that are said as if there are right and wrong answers to ethical questions.

I don’t think there’s any tension here. Only misguided realists think there’s a tension. And I’d say that regular participation in normative controversies helps indicate how beside the point realist efforts to motivate their favorite questions are. I have a Wittgensteinian take on this.

Suppose I say, “DC’s barber licensing rules are bad.” You ask, what do you mean by that? Well, they reduce competition in the barbering field, leading to higher prices and worse service for customers. They reduce tax revenues and employment opportunities. They’re, you know, bad. No, no, no you say, what do you mean “the rules are bad?” Maybe you mean to ask if I think licensing is bad in principle, or it’s just that the implementation is bad. So I explain that if you assume an omniscient and benevolent regulator, you can posit a more optimal outcome than what the market provides, but in the real world this kind of commission is bound to become a playground for special interest capture.

Godamnit, I want you to tell me what it means for a law to be a bad law.

It’s bad. I disagree with it. I think its consequences don’t serve the public interest. I think it ought to be repealed. Its continuation causes avoidable suffering. Well which is it, huh? Huh? See? No! I refuse to accept your contention that the law should be repealed until you give an account of what “should” means.

At this juncture, I think, you’re just being an jerk and there’s nothing more to say. But in reality, this never happens! Just show the fly out of the bottle.

Education

House Republicans Place A Foxx In Charge Of The Higher Education Henhouse

The incoming Republican majority, as laid out in today’s Progress Report, is bringing with it an extreme fealty to corporate interests. House Financial Services Chairman Spencer Bachus (R-AL) explained that, in his view, Washington’s role is “to serve the banks.” Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA) penned a letter to 150 trade associations, companies and think tanks asking them to identify which government regulations they’d like to see eliminated.

Reps. Bill Young (R-FL), Howard McKeon (R-CA), John Mica (R-FL), Doc Hastings (R-WA), and Bachus (AL) “all have either received substantial contributions from the industries that their committees oversee, or have former staff members lobbying for those same businesses.” And education policy is not immune to this corporatization. As the Chronicle of Higher Education pointed out, Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC) has been placed in charge of the subcommittee overseeing higher education policy; Foxx has already vowed to work to renew corporate welfare in the student loan program and to shield for-profit colleges from regulatory scrutiny:

Ms. Foxx has criticized legislation that ended the bank-based program for supplying federal student loans in favor of 100-percent direct lending, in which students obtain their loans from the Department of Education. She said on Tuesday that the bill “eliminated choice, competition, and innovations from student lending,” and promised hearings aimed at making “improvements to a very flawed law.”

She may also take the lead in Republican efforts to block or overturn recent Education Department rules that could hurt for-profit colleges, though that job could fall to the education committee chairman, John Kline of Minnesota.

That “flawed” law that Foxx wants to revisit is the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act (SAFRA), which cut billions of dollars in senseless subsidies that student loan companies were receiving to originate federal student loans, and plowed the money into deficit reduction and an expansion of the Pell Grant program. Undoing this law would require putting bankers back in between students and their federal loans.

For-profit colleges — institutions like Strayer University and the University of Phoenix — and their congressional allies have been trying to fend off enhanced regulation, even as the schools’ executives line their pockets with taxpayer dollars and they leave students crippled with debt. For-profit colleges have even scammed $521 million from the U.S. taxpayer “by recruiting armed-services members and veterans through misleading marketing.”

Yet Foxx is taking aim at rules written in an attempt to ensure that these schools actually give students an education that is worth the price. With these two positions, Foxx is standing with those who reap profits off of higher education and against students — which puts her right in line with the rest of her House leadership, I suppose.

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up