ThinkProgress Logo

Education

Senate Democrats Propose Unproductive Cut To The Teacher Incentive Fund

Our guest blogger is Cindy Brown, Vice President for Education Policy at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.

In the latest update to the continuing Fiscal Year ’11 budget saga, the Senate Democrats countered the Republicans’ slash-and-burn H.R. 1 with their own proposal, released Friday. Although the measure wisely provides support for the key Title I, Race to the Top, and Investing in Innovation and Promise Neighborhoods programs, it shortsightedly cuts $150 million from the Teacher Incentive Fund (TIF).

A viable budget proposal should at least maintain the current funding level of $400 million for TIF, a federal program that supports compensation reforms for educators in high-need schools. The program catalyzes the kinds of reforms human capital systems in our schools need. For instance, it requires participating states and districts to develop comprehensive and aligned approaches to attracting, evaluating, and developing educators.

This alignment is particularly important because recent research supports the view that compensation reforms that are not combined with and aligned to other district reform strategies — such as professional development and high-quality evaluation — are not likely to improve teacher practice or student achievement.

Researchers at the National Center on Performance Incentives at Vanderbilt University conducted a rigorous study that evaluated the impact of a performance pay program in Nashville. It found that paying middle school mathematics teachers performance incentives based solely on test scores without other supporting strategies like strong evaluation systems or aligned professional development had no impact on student achievement:

[We] tested a particular model of incentive pay [and found that] it simply did not do much of anything. Our negative findings do not mean that another approach would not be successful. It might be more productive to reward teachers in teams, or to combine incentives with coaching or professional development.

In contrast, a recent analysis of the Teacher Advancement Program found the program had a positive impact on student achievement gains. TAP is a comprehensive school reform that includes performance pay, professional development, rigorous evaluation, and career advancement opportunities for teachers. A Stanford student studied TAP’s effect on student growth in 151 TAP schools in 10 states and found greater achievement gains in mathematics and reading in TAP schools than non-TAPs. Several of the TIF programs implement the TAP program.

The TIF program allows continued experimentation with promising approaches that produce results for students. States and districts are often forced to spend all their dollars to maintain existing programs in difficult economic times, and many are unable to free new dollars to invest in innovations that will yield dividends in the future. Fortunately, that’s a perfect role for a federal government that has its priorities in the right place.

Security

Rand Paul And Mike Lee Blast Indefinite Detention: ‘Let’s Go Ahead And Have Trials And Have Justice’

Today, President Obama announced that he “will resume military tribunals to try suspected terrorists held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, but officials made clear they’re not giving up on trial in civilian courts and are still considering their options for trying Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four other accused 9/11 plotters.” Obama also “signed an executive order formalizing a process for the United States to continue indefinite detentions of suspects without trial.”

Also today, Fox News contributor Andrew Napolitano, subbing for Glenn Beck on his television show, hosted Sens. Rand Paul (R-KY) and Mike Lee (R-UT) to talk about a variety of issues. At one point, Napolitano mentioned Obama’s announcement and queried the two senators about their positions on indefinite detention. Lee and Paul both broke with the standard positions of their party, slamming the policy and endorsing trials for terrorism suspects instead. Paul said that he had met with a mother of a 9/11 victim who said that what she really wanted to see was justice, and that the best way to do that was to “have trials.” Lee said that detaining someone who “has been tried and found not guilty” is “particularly problematic”:

NAPOLITANO: Today the president signed an executive order calling for indefinite detention for people at Guantanamo Bay. Stated differently, he wants to hold them there as long as he wants to hold them there. Something he spoke out against when he was in the Senate. Will the Senate go along with that?

PAUL: The interesting thing is I spoke to a mother who lost her someone on 9/11 in the Twin Towers attacks. She said to me she wants justice. And justice should be a trial against the people who are responsible for this. So indefinite detention I don’t think is a good idea. Let’s go ahead and have trials and have justice.

NAPOLITANO: Last question Senator Lee. I know in your youth you clerked for a justice of the supreme court of the United States. Do you think the Supreme Court would ever go for something no western government has ever claimed? The power to detain to incarcerate after acquittal? After a jury finds them no guilty? They still go back to jail? What’s the sense of having a trial?

LEE: It certainly seems very unlikely given the tea lives that have been over the past few years. Particularly in light of the scenario that you painted just a minute ago in your question to Senator Paul, when you have someone who has been tried and found not guilty — ongoing detention after that seems particularly problematic.

Watch it:

Economy

Florida Gov. Rick Scott and GOP Lawmakers Move to Gut Unemployment Benefits

This week, Florida lawmakers plan to vote on a bill that would dramatically cut both state and federal unemployment insurance, making the state’s already meager unemployment benefits the most restrictive in the nation. Even while they pursue massive tax breaks for corporations, Republican lawmakers are moving forward on legislation that would shorten state unemployment benefits from the 75-year national standard of 26 weeks to 20 weeks. The proposed change would also reduce federal benefits by thirteen weeks, effectively cutting jobless benefits twice.

According to the National Employment Law Project, the proposed reforms would leave the state’s one million unemployed workers “with much less economic protection than unemployed workers in any other state in the country.” Gov. Rick Scott (R) has endorsed the House’s bill, telling lawmakers that it advances his goal of limiting eligibility for unemployment benefits.

Since his corporate-funded inauguration in January, Scott and the Florida GOP have proposed a variety of reforms that “cast jobless workers in Florida as lazy, shiftless drug addicts” and would reduce and undermine unemployment insurance in the Sunshine State. In the past two months, Scott and his conservative allies have proposed legislation that would:

Require jobless workers who had been receiving unemployment benefits for more than twelve weeks to work at community colleges.

– Force unemployed workers receiving benefits to accept low-paying jobs.

Mandate volunteer service from jobless workers.

Administer drug tests to unemployed workers receiving benefits.

— Reject an extended grace period on federal loans Florida received to pay jobless benefits. Instead, Scott wants to immediately reduce jobless benefits and begin paying back Florida’s debt to the federal government.

Despite their pro-growth, business-friendly rhetoric, the Florida GOP’s dismantling of Florida’s unemployment insurance could actually derail the state’s economic recovery. A new study from the Research Institute on Social and Economic Policy shows that since the start of the recession, unemployment benefits have been a “key stimulus” — adding more than $9 billion into the state’s beleaguered economy. And George Wentworth of the National Employment Law Project argues that instead of cutting unemployment benefits, Florida should be taking advantage of federal stimulus dollars to modernize its unemployment insurance system, which is largely inaccessible to the state’s large population of temporary and low-wage workers.

But Scott has failed to pursue these necessary, and effective, reforms, instead lavishing more than $2.5 billion in tax expenditures on corporations. But Floridians are now pushing back against this corporate, right-wing agenda. Tomorrow, two days before the expected vote on the bill, thousands will take to the streets in rallies across the state to urge “state legislators to reject budget cuts and invest in Floridians again.”

Kevin Donohoe

Politics

28 House Members — And Counting — Oppose King’s Radicalization Hearings

Reps. Pete Stark and John Dingell

In only three days, Rep. Peter King’s (R-NY) controversial hearings into the threat of radical Islam will begin on Capitol Hill. Already, hundreds of faith leaders in King’s district and in California have asked him to cancel the hearings. Protests at his district office and in Times Square have drawn hundreds of demonstrators, and one member of Congress who spent time in a World War II-era Japanese-American internment camp has pleaded with King not to “divide or target Americans simply on the basis of their faith or ancestry.”

Now, more lawmakers on Capitol Hill are speaking out. Twenty-six House members have signed onto a letter being circulated by Reps. Pete Stark (D-CA) and John Dingell (D-MI) that expresses “[deep concern] that the stated narrow scope and underlying premises of these hearings unfairly stigmatizes and alienates Muslim Americans.” The letter, a copy of which was provided to ThinkProgress, asks King to “reconsider” the hearings:

Dear Chairman King:

We are writing regarding the Homeland Security Committee’s upcoming hearings, which you have stated will focus exclusively on radicalization among Muslim Americans and homegrown terrorism. We agree that Congress and all levels of government have a duty to protect America from terrorism, whether from abroad or homegrown. We are, however, deeply concerned that the stated narrow scope and underlying premises of these hearings unfairly stigmatizes and alienates Muslim Americans. We ask that you reconsider the scope of these hearings and instead examine all forms of violence motivated by extremist beliefs, rather than unfairly focusing on just one religious group.

We believe that the tone and focus of these hearings runs contrary to our nation’s values. Muslim Americans contribute to our nation’s wellbeing in many professions including as doctors, engineers, lawyers, firefighters, business entrepreneurs, teachers, police officers and Members of Congress. Their hard work helps to make our country exceptional.

Signatures are still being collected until the close of business tomorrow. Current co-signers of the letter are Reps. Baldwin (D-WI), Blumenauer (D-OR), Chu (D-CA), Conyers (D-MI), Edwards (D-MD), Frank (D-MA), Fudge (D-OH), Grijalva (D-AZ), Gutierrez (D-IL), Hirono (D-HI), Holt (D-NJ), Honda (D-CA), Jackson (D-IL), Jackson-Lee (D-TX), Kucinich (D-OH), Lee (D-CA), McCollum (D-MN), McDermott (D-WA), Meeks (D-FL), Moran (D-VA), Polis (D-CO), Rush (D-IL), Schakowsky (D-IL), Scott (D-VA), Serrano (D-NY), and Waters (D-CA).

Elsewhere, Rep. Andre Carson (D-IN), one of two Muslim members of Congress, and who used to work in the anti-terrorism unit of the Indiana Department of Homeland Security, told NPR that he also felt the hearings are too narrowly focused. “Are there Islamic bozos out there who really want to see harm done to Americans? Absolutely,” Carson said. “And we have to act and isolate the threat and deal with the threat effectively. However, there are other groups, particularly racial supremacist groups, who pose a greater threat to our internal security.”

The full letter is after the jump: Read more

Yglesias

The Missing Front Runner

Chris Cillizza observes that not only is it a bit unusual that we don’t have any formally announced GOP presidential candidates yet, we’re also lacking a front-runner:

And now, new data from Gallup suggests the decided lack of a leader of the pack is a historic anomaly of major proportions. In the ten contested Republican presidential primary races between 1952 and 2008 — nine open seat fights and the 1976 face-off between President Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan — Gallup polling has always shown a clear frontrunner by this time.

And, in eight of those ten contests, the polling frontrunner at that moment went on to be the party’s presidential nominee. (The exceptions: Barry Goldwater trailed Richard Nixon at this point in the 1964 election and John McCain trailed Rudy Giuliani at this point in the 2008 election.)

As Cillizza notes “national polling at this point in a presidential race is almost entirely a function of name identification” rather than anything deeper. But that’s interesting on its own terms. The normal pattern is for someone—the front-runner—to be a reasonably well-known national figure. Sometimes the front-runner ends up losing to someone who starts out much more obscure (Barack Obama, for example) but that’s the foundation for front-running. What seems to me to be happening with these numbers is that Mitt Romney, Mike Huckabee, and Sarah Palin are all about equally well-known, preventing anyone from consolidating a leadership position. But if Huckabee and Palin both decide not to run (which seems likely), then Romney starts to look like a classic “next in line” Republican front-runner. Then the only thing standing between him and the nomination will be his record as governor and his religion.

Economy

As A Record Number Of Children Slide Into Poverty, The GOP Budget Cuts Vital Programs For Low-Income Children

The nation has witnessed “record numbers” of American families fall out of the middle class since the start of the Great Recession. The combination of lost jobs and millions of home foreclosures has left countless Americans “homeless and hungry for the first time in their lives.”

But the latest faces of poverty are those of American children, as “it is estimated the poverty rate for kids in this country will soon hit 25 percent.” These children will be “the largest American generation to be raised in hard times since the Great Depression”:

The government considers a family of four to be impoverished if they take in less than $22,000 a year. Based on that standard, and government projections of unemployment, it is estimated the poverty rate for kids in this country will soon hit 25 percent. Those children would be the largest American generation to be raised in hard times since the Great Depression.[...]

Nationwide, 14 million children were in poverty before the Great Recession. Now, the U.S. Census tells us its 16 million — up two million in two years. That is the fastest fall for the middle class since the government started counting 51 years ago.

Rather than bolster the safety net beneath this staggering number of children, House Republicans took their budget scissors to it in the continuing resolution they passed last week. By drastically slashing programs including Head Start services and the Nutrition program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), the GOP cut off thousands of children from vital food packages; 218,000 children from comprehensive health, educational, and family support; 975,000 low-income students from academic support; 5 million children from access to anti-poverty services; and leave “in the lurch thousands of families who rely on child care assistance to work.”

So on top of workers, pregnant women, veterans, the sick and the disabled, Republicans are adding impoverished children to the list of those who must sacrifice in order to reduce a deficit they didn’t cause. Of course, notably missing from the shared sacrifice list is the top one percent of wealthiest Americans who took home 25 percent of the nation’s income in 2009. The GOP offered them the Bush tax cuts instead — one year of which, as the Center For American Progress Action Fund’s Melissa Boteach notes, “is worth more than twice as much in deficit reduction as the cuts inflicted on programs assisting low-income families combined.”

As CBS News Scott Pelley notes, kids in poverty “tiptoe in a world of insecurity, hoping to be invisible.” Given the callous nature of their cuts, it seems House Republicans are compelling them to stay that way.

Climate Progress

Arctic ice loss moves phytoplankton peak up to 50 days early, could “lead to crashes of the food web”

Fish, shellfish, sea birds, and marine mammals are at risk

Scientists … plotted the yearly spring bloom of phytoplankton””tiny plants at the base of the ocean food chain””in the Arctic Ocean and found the peak timing of the event has been progressing earlier each year for more than a decade. The researchers analyzed satellite data depicting ocean color and phytoplankton production to determine that the spring bloom has come up to 50 days earlier in some areas in that time span.

The earlier Arctic blooms have roughly occurred in areas where ice concentrations have dwindled and created gaps that make early blooms possible, say the researchers, who publish their findings in the March 9 edition of the journal Global Change Biology.

Significant trends toward earlier phytoplankton blooms (blue) were detected in about 11 percent of the area of the Arctic Ocean closest to the North Pole, delayed blooms (red) were evident to the south.

That’s from the news release at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography (where I did my Ph.D. thesis research).  The study itself is here:  “Are phytoplankton blooms occurring earlier in the Arctic?” (subs. req’d).

The figure on the right shows, “Significant trends toward earlier phytoplankton blooms (blue) were detected in about 11% of the area of the Arctic Ocean closest to the North Pole, delayed blooms (red) were evident to the south.”

Human activity is greatly disrupting the entire ocean ecosystem, as the scientific literature makes increasingly clear (see “Geological Society: Acidifying oceans spell marine biological meltdown “by end of century”).  The risks are enormous (see Nature: “Global warming blamed for 40% decline in the ocean’s phytoplankton”:  “Microscopic life crucial to the marine food chain is dying out. The consequences could be catastrophic”).

The Washington Post has a good article on this study, which quotes a number of leading experts raising concerns about the disruption these early blooms may cause:

Read more

Politics

Waxman: ‘All That Seems To Matter Is What Koch Industries Think’

Speaking at the Center for American Progress Action Fund today, House energy committee ranking member Henry Waxman (D-CA) railed against the toxic influence of Koch Industries on efforts to fight global warming. Waxman, who fought polluters to pass the Clean Air Act of 1990, is dismayed by the level of outright science denial among the Republican Party today, exemplified by their votes to slash and burn environmental protection, and the Upton-Inhofe bill to reverse the scientific finding that carbon pollution threatens public health:

It apparently no longer matters in Congress what health experts and scientists think. All that seems to matter is what Koch Industries thinks.

Watch a compilation of Waxman’s remarks:

“The new Republican majority has a lot of leeway to rewrite laws,” Waxman also said, “but they don’t have the ability to rewrite the laws of nature.”

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up