ThinkProgress Logo

Yglesias

First You Get The Votes, Then You Take The Vote

You’ve sort of got to admire the gritty determination of the Wisconsin GOP. I think when the Democrats first fled the state, the CW in DC was that the public would side with Governor Walker and they’d be forced to cave soon enough. Then when it turned out that the public was actually sided with the unions and the Democrats, the CW quickly became that there would have to be some kind of compromise. But of course there never had to be a compromise . . . the Republicans always had the option of just fiddling with procedure, ramming something through, and hoping they survive the ensuing recall drives. That just didn’t seem to most folks like the kind of thing politicians would do. But they did!

Not to draw an equivalence between a bad bill and a good one, but what it reminds me of is congressional Democrats after Scott Brown’s election. The early CW was that somehow Democrats “had to” back down in the face of their unpopularity. But they didn’t have to do anything. They believed as strongly in universal health care as the Wisconsin GOP believes in crushing labor unions. So they passed the damn bill.

LGBT

Boehner Will Defend Constitutionality Of DOMA

This afternoon, following a meeting of his hastily convened five-member Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG), House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) announced that Congress will defend Section 3 of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, which President Obama has declared unconstitutional. “Today, after consultation with the Bipartisan Leadership Advisory Group, the House General Counsel has been directed to initiate a legal defense of this law,” Boehner said in the statement. “This action by the House will ensure that this law’s constitutionality is decided by the courts, rather than by the President unilaterally.”

The two Democrats on the panel — Reps. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Steny Hoyer (D-MD) voted against intervening — while the three Republicans — Reps. Boehner, Eric Cantor (R-VA) and Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) — supported the move. Following the meeting, Pelosi tweeted this proclamation:

Democrats have accused Republicans of wasting taxpayer dollars on trying to uphold the Constitutionality of the law, but over the weekend former Solicitor General and current Proposition 8 attorney also Ted Olson suggested that Republicans may lack standing to defend the law. “I don’t know. … It’ll be interesting to see whether they have legal standing to do it. That’s another tough question,” Olson told Metro Weekly’s Chris Geidner. It’s unclear if Republicans “will be able to intervene as a party to various DOMA challenges or be limited to filing briefs as an amicus curiae, or friend of the court.”

Significantly, Republicans have remained somewhat muted about their appeal and have avoided the temptation of specifically addressing the implications or so-called dangers of same-sex marriage. Republicans have been trying to focus their message on the economy and are avoiding a discussion of DOMA with a general public that supports marriage equality in increasing numbers. The decision not to hold a vote on the issue on the House floor or announce this panel’s decision in a more prominent manner only reaffirms this perception.

Health

Bachmann: GOP ‘In Twilight Zone’ For Failing To Recognize ‘Hidden’ Health Spending ‘Bombshell’

Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) is frustrated with Republican colleagues who are not more outraged about the alleged “bombshell” of $105 billion in mandatory spending included in the health care law. “This is something that wasn’t known,” Bachmann said on Meet The Press on Sunday. “This money was broken up, hidden in various parts of the bill.” This afternoon, during an appearance on Sean Hannity’s radio show, Bachmann expressed disappointment that Republicans in Congress were failing to heed her alarm:

BACHMANN: I have to say I feel disheartened in that I’m not sensing a lot of outrage about this by other members or…hopefully they just don’t yet know or they just don’t yet realize because the marvelous opportunity we have is within the next week and a half we can get this funding back for Obamacare and effectively repeal it for the next two years if we get this money back, but we got to demand that we put the language in, that we’ve already written, on the next continuing resolution….we can do this, but I’m not sensing yet within the Republicans here in Congress a willingness to do that. It’s inexplicable to me…It’s like we’re in the Twilight zone here. I’m thinking, am I the only one who remembers there was no discussion of this $105 billion?

Listen:

Republicans may be less than surprised about Bachmann’s ‘revelations’ because the mandatory spending was, in fact, openly discussed in the various Congressional Budget Office estimates of health care reform and by Democrats hoping to protect the law from defunding. For instance, this CBO estimate from December 19, 2009 addressed the effects of “mandatory appropriations” for the Prevention and Public Health Fund,” “community health centers” and “the National Health Service Corps.” In an earlier document from November 2009, CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf writes, “For example, the House bill would finance the operations of the insurance exchanges through mandatory appropriations rather than a surcharge on the plans offered in the exchanges. ” (The word “mandatory” is used throughout this CBO compilation of health care related documents).

As Rep. Mike Pence (R-IN) explained to Hannity after Bachmann’s appearance, “with the advanced appropriations they built in there, it exists outside the normal appropriations process, but tell me something I don’t know.” “I don’t think nobody noticed it, I thought most of the estimates we were working off of were….all of our estimates were over the next 10 years,” he added.

In February, Republicans on the House Rules Committee refused to grant a waiver, requested by Rep. Steve King (R-IA), “for the consideration of an amendment to the 2011 funding bill that would bar mandatory spending” for the health law. House rules stipulate that “members cannot legislate on appropriations bills,” which King’s amendment would have done by eliminating $105 billion in mandatory spending from the health law. Republicans on the committee argued that the party would be better served by focusing on the $100 billion in cuts offered in the GOP’s continuing resolution proposal and suggested that King’s amendment would be dead on arrival in the Senate and would therefore jeopardize the party’s cherished spending cuts.

Yglesias

Endgame

Your sanity and wits may all vanish:

— Which active labor market policies work in a recession (PDF)?

— Policymakers aren’t paying enough attention to the risk the recovery will stall.

— The evils of DVD clearance fees.

— Maybe the new styrofoam garbage John Boehner is bringing back to the House should be dumped in his district.

— DC gets its city back.

— Somehow it took Vince Gray six months to conclude that Michelle Rhee’s deputy should fill the vacancy left by Rhee’s firing.

Gogol Bordello, “Start Wearing Purple”.

Security

As King Targets Muslims, There Have Been Almost Twice As Many Plots Since 9/11 From Non-Muslim Terrorists

Tomorrow, Rep. Peter King (R-NY), chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, will hold hearings singling out the Muslim American community for supposedly aiding and abetting domestic radicalization and terrorism.

When asked why he is singling out the Muslim American community and refusing to investigate other forms of terrorism, King has responded by saying that “it makes no sense to talk about other types of extremism, when the main threat to the United States today is talking about al Qaida.”

Yet as a January 2011 terrorism statistics report — compiled using publicly available data from the FBI and other crime agencies — from the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) shows, terrorism by Muslim Americans has only accounted for a minority of terror plots since 9/11. Since the attacks on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, Muslims have been involved in 45 domestic terrorist plots. Meanwhile, non-Muslims have been involved in 80 terrorist plots.

In fact, right-wing extremist and white supremacist attacks plots alone outnumber plots by Muslims, with both groups being involved in 63 terror plots, 18 more plots than Muslim Americans have been involved in. Here is a breakdown of attacks by group, along with a few examples of plots by some of these groups:

Anti-Government/Anti-Tax Extremists: There have been 36 plots by right-wing extremists since 9/11. These attacks include Joseph Stack’s suicide attack on a Texas IRS building and Joshua Cartwright, who became enraged after the election of Barack Obama and “believed that the US Government was conspiring against him.”

KKK/NeoNazi/White Supremacist: There have been 27 plots by white supremacists since 9/11. These attacks include a 2004 letter bombing of the Arizona Office of Diversity and Dialogue that injured three employees.

Unknown/Miscellaneous: There were five attacks that federal crime officials did not categorize.

Christian Extremists/Anti-Abortion: There were three attacks by anti-abortion extremists and Christian extremists. The killing of abortion provider George Tiller is the most prominent of these attacks.

Black Supremacist Cults: There were two plots by black supremacist cults.

Jewish Extremists: There were two plots by Jewish extremists. The most prominent of these was a plot by Robert Goldstein to attack a local Islamic center with home made C4 and other explosives.

Extreme Anti-Immigrant: There were two plots by anti-immigrant extremists. One of these was the attack by Shawn Forde, who murdered a Queens deli clerk and was motivated by racist and anti-immigrant feelings.

Anti-Jewish: There was one plot by an anti-Semitic extremist. Norman Leboon made anti-Semitic threats against Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA).

Anarchist: There was a single plot by an anarchist. Joseph D. Konopka “wreaked havoc in 13 counties by setting fires, disrupting radio and television broadcasts, disabling an air traffic control system, selling counterfeit software, and damaging the computer system of an Internet service provider.”

Given the fact that non-Muslim terrorists account for almost twice as many plots as Muslim terrorists in the United States since 9/11, King’s justification that he is targeting Muslims because they represent the primary threat seems hollow. Additionally, King’s hearings come at a time when Muslim American terrorism and involvement in extremism has actually plummeted in the past couple years, according to a Duke University study put out last month. Moreover, nearly 4 in 10 Al-Qaida related plots in the United States have been broken up thanks to intelligence provided by the Muslim community themselves and 70 percent of recent terror plots in the United States have been foiled by help from Muslim Americans.

Update

On the eve of King’s hearings, authorities have named a white supremacist as the suspect in the case of an attempted bombing of an MLK rally in Spokane, Washington.

Economy

REPORT: Ending Pennsylvania’s Special Interest Tax Breaks Makes Gov. Corbett’s Education Cuts Unnecessary

Gov. Tom Corbett (R-PA), as I outlined earlier, has released a budget that places the brunt of reducing the state’s $4 billion deficit onto the backs of public workers (including teachers), students, and those in the state who depend upon public services. At the same time that he’s proposing $1 billion in cuts to public education, Corbett is trying to cut corporate taxes.

Corbett has made his priorities crystal clear, but his gutting of public education is by no means necessary. CAP Senior Fellow Donna Cooper suggested four ways Pennsylvania could raise revenue by ending special interest tax breaks:

CLOSE CORPORATE TAX LOOPHOLES: Currently, 7 out of every 10 companies incorporated in Pennsylvania don’t pay corporate taxes in the state. A provision of the tax code known as the “Delaware loophole” allows corporations to shift income out of the state and into lower-tax jurisdictions. Closing corporate tax loopholes could raise the state $450 million in annual revenue.

TAX GAS FRACKING: Pennsylvania is the only state in the nation’s top 15 gas producers that doesn’t levy a tax on the environmentally destructive “fracking” industry. A properly structrured tax on the industry could raise more than $400 million annually.

END THE SALES TAX GIVEAWAY: Pennsylvania actually pays companies a bonus for turning in the sales taxes they’ve collected from their customers in a “timely” manner. The tax break primarily benefits companies with sales in the state exceeding $1 billion. Eliminating this practice (which gives no benefit to consumers) would save the state $76 million annually.

TAX SMOKELESS TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND CIGARS: Pennsylvania is the only state in the nation that doesn’t tax smokeless tobacco products and one of only two that doesn’t tax cigars (the other is Florida). Extending the state’s tobacco tax to these products not only makes sense from a public health perspective but could raise almost $50 million annually.

And here are two more:

END THE ONLINE SALES TAX EXEMPTION: Pennsylvania does not levy a tax on online sales, giving out-of-state vendors a leg up on those based in the state. This exemption costs Pennsylvania $62 million annually.

INCREASING TAXES ON NON-WAGE INCOME: Increasing the tax on non-wage income, such as capital gains and dividends, which is largely earned by the wealthy, to just 4 percent would raise more than $350 million annually, according to the Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Center.

These revenue-raising measure would make Pennsylvania’s tax system more equitable and would raise more than enough money to cover the cost of Corbett’s proposed education cuts. Pennsylvania could also look at its personal income tax system, which is one of the most regressive in the nation. Pennsylvania currently has a flat-rate income tax, instead of a graduated progressive tax. At the moment, the poorest 20 percent of Pennsylvania residents pay a state tax rate of 11.2 percent, while the richest one percent of residents pay just 3.9 percent.

Yglesias

“Great Migration In Reverse” aka Black People Doing The Same Thing As Everyone Else

Ta-Nehisi Coates sees a “Great Migration in reverse” lurking in the Census data. He quotes this:

Historically, the South was home to roughly 90 percent of the nation’s blacks from 1790 until 1910, when African-Americans began to migrate northward to escape racism and seek jobs in industrial centers such as Detroit, New York and Chicago during World War I. After the decades-long Great Migration, the share of blacks in the South hit a low of about 53 per cent in the 1970s, before civil rights legislation and the passage of time began to improve the social climate in the region. [...]

The nation’s black population grew by roughly 1.7million over the last decade. About 75 per cent of that growth occurred in the South – primarily metropolitan areas such as Atlanta, Dallas, Houston, Miami and Charlotte, N.C. That’s up from 65 per cent in the 1990s, according to the latest census estimates.

To me that mostly sounds like black people are moving to the same metro areas as everyone else. Atlanta, Dallas, Houston, Miami, and Charlotte in the south and Los Angeles, Phoenix, and Las Vegas outside the south. After all, the basic dynamic of weak job opportunities in the midwest and no affordable housing in the northeast applies regardless of skin color. What’s more, this is really not a reversal of the Great Migration in any meaningful sense. Texas wasn’t a major historic African-American population center and it strains credulity to describe Miami as part of the south. If black people start leaving Chicago to move to rural Mississippi that be a reversal, but this is the same sun/permit-driven migration that everyone’s doing.

Yglesias

The Vilsack Interview

I’ve been trying to think of something to say about Ezra Klein’s brilliant interview with Tom Vilsack on subsidizing rural America.

What I’ve got is that while I don’t think that the subsidization in question is the worst thing in the world, I feel like the failure to appreciate that it’s even happening is a huge distorting influence on our politics. The issues here extend well beyond the direct monetary payments to American farmers to include trade barriers to imported agricultural products, the structure of federal highway spending, special federal programs to subsidize rural broadband internet and rural aviation, numerous targeted state-level rural development programs in mixed states like New York, and failure to appropriately price water and other natural resources. That’s what you get from a political system that says Wyoming, Vermont, North Dakota, Alaska, and South Dakota should have equal representation to California, Texas, New York, Florida, and Illinois (who combine for over 35 percent of the population) and there’s nothing you can do about it.

What you can do, however, is at least have a political culture that acknowledges that this is one of the principle functions of the federal government. Rural America often seems to me to have a bad case of Keep The Government Out of My Medicare Syndrome that we could do without. Under the circumstances, I think Secretary Vilsack’s willingness to acknowledge the basic shape of what’s going on and defend it is a step in the right direction.

Economy

Koch Industries Employs PR Firm To Airbrush Wikipedia, Gets Banned For Unethical ‘Sock Puppets’

Last year, Koch Industries began employing New Media Strategies (NMS), an Internet PR firm that specializes in “word-of-mouth marketing” for major corporations including Coca-Cola, Burger King, AT&T, Dodge and Ford. It appears that, ever since the NMS contract was inked with Koch, an NMS employee began editing the Wikipedia page for “Charles Koch,” “David Koch,” “Political activities of the Koch family,” and “The Science of Success” (a book written by Charles). Under the moniker of “MBMAdmirer,” NMS employees edited Wikipedia articles to distance the Koch family from the Tea Party movement, to provide baseless comparisons between Koch and conspiracy theories surrounding George Soros, and to generally delete citations to liberal news outlets. After administrators flagged the MBMAdmirer account as a “sock puppet” — one of many fake accounts used to manipulate new media sites — a subsequent sock puppet investigation found that MBMAdmirer is connected to a number of dummy accounts and ones owned by NMS employees like Jeff Taylor.

Soren Dayton, a GOP operative and executive at New Media Strategies, is reported to be the contact for Koch Industries at NMS. Reached by phone yesterday by ThinkProgress, Dayton exclaimed, “I’m not going to talk about this, thanks,” before hanging up. Lyndsey Medsker, a senior account director for NMS, spoke to ThinkProgress today. She explained that NMS also maintains the Koch Industries Twitter page, Facebook page, and has an active team working on promoting Koch Industries in the comment section of blogs and news websites.

As ThinkProgress has reported, the billionaire Koch brothers maintain contracts with over a dozen public relation firms and lobbying firms. Pushing back again recent scrutiny, the brothers have also relied on a conservative media infrastructure owned by the Koch brothers or closely linked to them by way of their donor conferences. We have documented how the Koch message machine has targeted ThinkProgress and even placed hit-pieces against a New Yorker journalist investigated the Kochs. But now it seems the Koch brothers are at work manipulating Wikipedia to polish their image.

Update

New Media Strategies at one point tried to lie about its affiliation with Koch Industries. The account “MBMAdmirer” wrote in December on Wikipedia: “I am a citizen who has read about and admires the Koch family. I was not pleased with the way that they have been presented in the media. And I thought that I could come to Wikipedia to try to make sure that there are balancing facts. Nothing I do is in coordination with Koch or authorized by Koch.”

Security

TX Department Of Agriculture Launches Border Vigilante Website

Cindy Casares over at Guanabee reported today on a website launched last week by the Texas Department of Agriculture for border ranchers and farmers. The site, ProtectYourTexasBorder.com, aims to “document the true stories of those who supply our food under the constant danger of criminals who have crossed our border illegally.” In the “About” section, Texas Agriculture Commissioner Todd Staples elaborates on the impetus behind the new project:

Through this website, I implore the federal government to enforce our laws and secure our nation’s borders. We are at war and our federal government must answer its call of duty to protect its citizens and our national security.

Until Washington stands beside us, Texas is prepared to take matters into its own hands to the fullest extent possible. Texas will fight and protect to the best of our ability, but a successful campaign to stop border violence will require Washington to acknowledge this threat as a national security issue and assign the appropriate resources to combat and defeat our enemies. I can assure you a threat to our citizens and food supply is a threat to our national security.

The website also includes a message board where users can register and post their proposed solutions. As Julian Aguilar of the Texas Tribune points out, proposals include calls for violence. “The most well known fighters of our Revolutionary war were not trained, they used hide and shot tactics that would work great today… If we — Americans — start shooting the bad guys, they will get the message!,” wrote one user — jcarrott. Other comments range from “Killem all!!!! They are destroying or great country,” to suggestions that the U.S. deploy “watch groups, community patrols, land mines, tiger traps and roving packs of rabid [weasels]” at the border.

Rep. Silvestre Reyes (D-TX), who referred to the site as a “propaganda campaign,” noted that the anecdotal information it contains doesn’t reflect actual crime statistics at the border. “The website leaves the impression that Texas border communities are dangerous, when, in fact, cities such as El Paso, McAllen, and Brownsville are safer than most other cities in Texas, including Austin,” he said. “Our state is facing a $27 billion budget crisis, and our state leaders are wasting scarce tax dollars to support a platform that portrays rural Texas like rural Afghanistan.”

Counties along the southwest border have some of the lowest rates of violent crime per capita in the nation and those rates have dropped by more than 30 percent since the 1990s while immigration has soared. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Janet Napolitano, along with a coalition of border city mayors, recently called on politicians to stop exaggerating the levels of violence occurring on the U.S. side of the border with Mexico.

Meanwhile, there is some speculation that Staples may have his sights on higher office in 2014.

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up