ThinkProgress Logo

Security

Inhofe, Beck, And Pat Robertson Defend Brutal Ivory Coast Dictator

Fighting is raging in the Ivory Coast capital Abidjan today after forces loyal to opposition leader Alassane Ouattara — who won last year’s presidential election according to the U.N., the African Union, and other international observers — have pinned down Laurent Gbagbo, the incumbent president who refuses to relinquish power, in “a bunker beneath his residence.”

The international community and the U.S. government have been united against Gbagbo, who has been fighting tooth and nail to retain power, and is accused of committing numerous war crimes. Gbagbo has even attacked U.N. personnel and facilities, prompting the international body to launch a rare offensive against his beleaguered forces last night. Now, Gbagbo is reportedly negotiating a surrender and the conflict, which analysts just days ago feared could spin out of control, could now come to an end within “hours.”

That is, unless some in the American Christian right, who want to turn this into a religious battle, have their way. Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-OK) took to the Senate floor yesterday to give a lengthy speech in defense of incumbent Gbagbo and his powerful wife, whom Inhofe called “good friends.” Inhofe painted a picture of the conflict in polar opposition to the facts on the ground, accusing challenger Ouattara of “rigg[ing]” last November’s elections, and ludicrously claiming that Gbagbo’s forces “don’t have any weapons.” Thus, Inhofe demanded an immediate ceasefire in the conflict, even though Gbagbo’s forces have already been routed. Watch a portion of Inhofe’s speech:

Why would Inhofe defend a war criminal tyrant in contradiction to every international human rights organization and his own government? As Salon’s Justin Elliott reported last week, Gbagbo, an evangelical Christian, has “longtime ties to the Christian right in the United States,” in part through a secretive international network of powerful evangelical Christians known as the Fellowship. Inhofe and many of his colleagues have reportedly lived in the Fellowship’s congressional boarding house on C Street in Washington.

But Ouattara is Muslim. So last night, Fox News Host Glenn Beck defended “the current Christian president” Gbagbo, downplaying the atrocities he has committed, and excusing his refusal to leave office by saying that “he fears that [Ouattara] is going to round up all of [his] supporters and kill them all.” Beck also attacked President Obama for supporting Ouattara, noting the challenger is “a Muslim.”

And today, Christian broadcaster Pat Robertson, who has repeatedly defended the dictator, said that Gbagbo’s impending departure is a “great tragedy” because the country is now “going to be into the hands of Muslims.”

While it seems clear now that both sides in the Ivory Coast have some blood on their hands, according to human rights monitors, Gbagbo has much much more, and is clearly violating the will of his people. But to Inhofe, Beck, and Robertson, it seems this doesn’t really matter, as long as he’s not Muslim.

LGBT

Prop 8 Plaintiffs Targeted During Same-Sex Marriage Debate

Opponents of same-sex marriage have responded to the public’s growing support for marriage equality by portraying themselves as victims of anti-religious (specifically anti-Christian) hate crimes and intolerance. While isolated incidents may occur, on the whole, these claims are ironic because anti-gay groups often complain about the very kind of abuse that the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender community has experienced for decades through direct violence and unequal social policies.

For instance, yesterday, the Advocate’s Andrew Harmon reported that Prop. 8 plaintiffs Kristin Perry and Sandra Stier “were subjected to more than a dozen antigay voice mails during the 2010 trial from a man who was later convicted of making threatening telephone calls to Nancy Pelosi”:

You stinkin’ lesbos make me sick,” the caller, identified by multiple sources as Giusti, said in one voice mail to Stier and Perry. “I hope you lose your case. … Marriage is between one man and one woman only. That’s the way God arranged it, set it up. Two people of the same sex cannot procreate. And no, getting yourself artificially inseminated is not procreation in God’s eyes. Or two faggots can’t procreate no matter how much you want to [expletive] each other.”

In another, Giusti told the couple, who have children, “I think that’s really disgusting that you’re raising, um, kids, I think the law should state lesbos and faggots shouldn’t be around kids. …

“I hope you enjoy burning in hell, for that’s where you’re going to go when you die, for the Bible clearly states that lesbianism and homosexuality is an abomination in God’s eyes,” Giusti said. “And you can tell those other faggots doing the case with you that I hope they both die of AIDS.”

This is far from an isolated incident. Crime statistics indicate that hate incidents typically increase during politically charged debates about gay rights. For instance, hate crimes in California dropped 2% overall in 2008, but anti-LGBT related crimes increased by nearly 17%, raising recorded incidents from 132 to 154. Similarly, “sexual-orientation-related hate crimes in states with marriage amendments on the ballot in 2004 saw a 47% increase in these crimes from the previous year.”

Anti-gay bigotry is also taking taking a heavy, if unseen, toll on lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender Americans and compounds over time. For instance, older lesbians, gays, and bisexuals reported higher rates of high blood pressure, diabetes, physical disabilities, and psychological stress and often experience higher rates of poverty, homelessness, and depression due to the inequities of marriage inequality, sexism, and a lifetime of stigma. Today’s Progress Report has more on the health consequences of anti-LGBT rhetoric and actions.

Security

Oklahoma Sponsor Of Arizona Copycat Law Accuses Latinos Of ‘Invading The Culture’

Today, CNN posted a generally feel-good story on Oklahoma’s rising Latino population, noting that “Latinos now account for 9% of Oklahoma’s 3.8 million residents, and are the largest minority group, surpassing the number of Native Americans.” The reporters also point out that, as the state’s Latino population has grown from 179,000 in 2000 to more than 332,000 in 2010, state lawmakers have passed a series of anti-immigrant laws. One of those lawmakers is state Sen. Ralph Shortey (R).

Shortey recently introduced a bill which would reinterpret the 14th amendment’s citizenship clause to deny the U.S.-born children of undocumented women citizenship. He is also the leading sponsor of the “Arizona-plus” bill which would go beyond Arizona’s controversial immigration law by allowing police to confiscate property belonging to those in the country illegally. Shortey shared his own views on the growing Latino population in his state with CNN:

Republican state Sen. Ralph Shortey said he’s not surprised by the increasing number of Latino residents; Oklahoma can be a comfortable, prosperous place to move, legally or illegally, he said. [...]

Culturally, Shortey said, Oklahoma isn’t changing. Latino residents “are not assimilating and enriching the culture of Oklahoma. They are invading the culture,” Shortey said. “Oklahoma is not the melting pot…(Latinos are) not doing their culture any favors when it’s shoved into Oklahomans’ faces.”

In the past, Shortey has also complained that Latinos “won’t call the police. They’ll call the local gang dealer to help them with a problem.” He also indicated that Native Americans have “already lost this country once” and some of his “friends” fear “losing this country again.”

Proponents of the immigration bills that Shortey has sponsored claim that their position is all about public safety, economic fairness, and the rule of law. Meanwhile anti-immigrant legislation that was passed in Oklahoma in the past has had a terrible effect on the state’s economy. Although, based on Shortey’s statements which seem to suggest that his qualms with immigration are largely cultural, past bills may be considered successful on the basis that they drove thousands of Latinos out of the state.

And as Shortey accuses Latinos of shoving their culture in people’s faces, CNN’s story focused on a Mexican immigrant turned U.S. citizen who built “a small empire of businesses feeding Oklahoma City’s appetite for Tex-Mex.”

Politics

As Taxpayers Pad Big Oil’s Soaring Profits, Landry Praises Excessive CEO Compensation As ‘The American Dream’

By Christy Goldfuss, Public Lands Project Director at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.

For freshman Rep. Jeff Landry (R-LA), record pay for oil CEOs as Americans suffer from surging gas prices is the realization of the American Dream. According to an AP analysis, the pay package for ConocoPhillips’ top executive, Jim Mulva, went up by 25 percent last year to $17.9 million, money sucked from taxpayer subsidies and drivers’ wallets. “Mulva was paid a $1.5 million salary, stock awards of $6.2 million and option awards worth $5.7 million. He also received perks of $294,000, including the personal use of company cars and aircraft, life insurance premiums and medical services.”

In a House Natural Resources Hearing last week, Landry had a remarkable exchange with Michael J. Fox (a lobbyist for gas station owners, not the actor). Pressed on Big Oil’s supposedly low profit margins, Fox pointed out that Exxon CEO Lee Raymond’s retirement package was “$450 million dollars for doing a 90 hour job,” and the service station retailer gets paid $60,000 for doing a 90 hour job. Landry responded by claiming that’s just the American Dream, and that Big Oil executives must be smarter and better than everyone else, including small business owners:

LANDRY: But isn’t that what America is all about, about that American dream, about that kid who might not have it real good and grows up in a poor family and works his way to the top, and shouldn’t he be able to make as much money as he possibly can and work as less hours as he possibly can, if he’s that smart and that good? Should we destroy the American dream to put your equation into play here?

FOX: He’s not “that smart” or “that good.”

Watch it:

 

 

Rep. Landry’s equation for the American dream includes $4 billion dollars a year in taxpayer subsidies to corporations that continue to make record profits. Over the past decade, the big five oil companies – BP, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, ExxonMobil, and Shell – made nearly $1 trillion in profits. The companies had record profits in 2008, which was the same year that oil reached all-time high of $147 per barrel (USA Today link). In 2009, ExxonMobil did not pay any federal taxes, because of all the federal help it received.

The oil and gas industry spent $146 million lobbying Congress last year, including $87,450 to Landry’s campaign, making oil and gas his largest single industry contributor. Mr. Landry and his Republican allies have voted unanimously to protect the oil and gas subsidies. For most, the American Dream means working hard, playing by the rules, and achieving success, not on the backs of other hardworking taxpaying citizens.

Transcript: Read more

Health

Paul Ryan: Medicare ‘Premium Support’ Is Vouchers Under A Different Name

After initially offering a proposal that would convert the existing Medicare system into a voucher program, Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) has recently backed away from the v-word and has instead begun referring to his proposal as “premium support.” But today, after a speech at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), Ryan clarified to the Washington Examiner’s Phil Klein that “premium support” is essentially a euphemism for voucher:

KLEIN: You’ve made a point of drawing a distinction between vouchers and premium support. Now, while I get the mechanical difference, that they wouldn’t be a voucher that people would then purchase insurance with, it would go to the plans that they choose, but though there is a mechanical difference, it is hard to see what the effective economic difference would be.

RYAN: It achieves a similar scoring result. So, they achieve the same kind of savings path. My Roadmap does have vouchers, but I worked with Alice Rivlin…we agreed on a structure that is not the voucher structure, but is a premium support structure. So it mechanically works a lot different and CBO calls it not a voucher, but premium support. The whole point is it works more like programs people are already familiar with. It works like the Part D benefit seniors are familiar with, it works like the Federal Employee Benefit Plan, that I’m very familiar with as a federal employee and it’s important to make these distinctions, I think….from a budget standing standpoint…it achieves the same result.

Watch it:

First, it’s good to hear Ryan agree that his premium support proposal is almost identical to a voucher in all but the most mechanical of ways — sending the voucher to the insurer rather than the beneficiary would also help decrease instances of fraud and probably save extra money — and as such it will provide seniors with a predetermined amount to purchase private coverage: $8,000 in 2022. All of the financial risk is shifted from the federal government to the beneficiaries and if premiums suddenly increase, seniors would have to pay the difference between the rise in premiums and the $8,000 contribution, making coverage unaffordable. (And it will be increasingly so since the voucher does not keep up with health care spending.)

Secondly, Ryan can continue to say that this system is identical to FEHBP or Medicare Part D, but that won’t make it any more true. Both D and FEHBP reflect increases in premium levels. Ryan, meanwhile, is constraining the rate of growth — seniors will only get a predetermined amount — regardless of the actual growth of costs.

Politics

Peter King Calls For Ethnic Profiling In Addition To Religious Profiling

Rep. Peter King (R-NY) has caused an uproar with his relentless scapegoating of Muslim Americans. As chairman of the Homeland Security Committee, he refused to broaden his terrorism hearings into any non-Muslim groups. And given many of King’s public statements about Muslim Americans, including an argument that Muslim Americans aren’t Americans when it comes to war, many have accused him of prejudice.

In a public television appearance aired today with Rep. Bill Pascrell (D-NJ), King elaborated on his exclusive focus on Muslim Americans as terrorist threats. In his remarks, King justified racial or ethnic profiling as well as religious profiling. King reasoned that if racist white terrorists were suspected of an attack on an African American community, the same standard against Muslims could be applied to “a white guy walking down around Harlem”:

KING: I’m just saying, a person’s religious background or ethnicity can be a factor, one of the things to look at. For instance, if I’m told the White Citizens Council, the Ku Klux Klan, is going to attack Harlem, I’d be more suspicious of a white guy walking down around Harlem in a very African American neighborhood. To me, that’s a logical a thing. Should you harass? No.

PASCRELL: We gotta be above it as leaders. I know you are, I would think most of the time, you have to be above what the suspicion ordinarily should be and point out what is right and what is wrong.

KING: There can be reasonable suspicion though. There can be reasonable suspicion though.

Watch it:

King’s argument for arguably unconstitutional racial and religious profiling — rather than behavioral profiling — is curious given America’s recent history with terror threats. As ThinkProgress’ Zaid Jilani has reported, there have been twice as many non-Muslim terrorist plots in the U.S. since 9/11 than plots by Muslims. For instance, there have been 27 terror plots by white supremacist groups. So King’s white terrorist hypothetical is real, yet he has never called any hearings on white supremacist terrorism, or called for whites to be ethnically profiled.

Moreover, profiling doesn’t work and wastes law enforcement resources. Even President Bush Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff has called profiling “dangerous” and “foolish[].”

Climate Progress

Science: “Peak oil production may already be here”

HSBC Bank: Oil will be gone in 50 years

peak_oil2.jpg

Perhaps the most sobering outcome of a non-OPEC plateau might be reminding everyone that even planet-scale resources have their limits. And that when you are consuming them at close to 1000 gallons a second, the limits can catch you unaware. The next 5 years, assuming oil prices remain on the high side, should show who the realists are.

That’s from the 3/25 issue of Science magazine, which has long been warning of peak oil (see “Science/IEA: World oil crunch looming? Not if we can find six Saudi Arabias!“).  None of this is a surprise to CP readers (see “Peak oil production coming sooner than expected“).

More and more serious analysts are warning that conventional oil is at or near peak production levels (see “WikiLeaks bombshell: Saudi reserves overstated by 40%, global production plateau immiment” and “German military study warns of peak oil crisis” and World’s top energy economist warns: “We have to leave oil before oil leaves us”).

Now the British bank HSBC, the world’s second largest in assets, joins those who warn we’ve run out of time, as CNBC reported (with video):

Read more

Yglesias

Endgame

Newspapers spread around:

— Joel Kotkin loves garden cities, but doesn’t know what they are.

— Congress ceded its warmaking powers long ago.

— Urban highway teardown in Seattle.

— Immigration fuels economic growth.

Thought experiment on the DC Height Act.

“They’ve failed not because they were unserious, but because even these less drastic measures were too politically unpopular.”

Inefficient pricing at Yankee Stadium.

It’s the anniversary of Kurt Cobaine’s death, so here’s Nirvana “Paper Cuts”

Climate Progress

Inhofe to Dems defending EPA, clean air: “Get a life.” Markey replies, “More like ‘save a life’.”

So Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-VA) proposed changing the title of the GOP’s anti-EPA bill to the “Koch Brothers Appreciation Act,” as TP reported.  Then Sen. James Inhofe (R-OIL) responded by telling House Dems this afternoon to “Get a life” — a standard refrain for the pro-pollution Oklahoman.

Since the health impacts of unrestricted carbon pollution have been widely documented, Ed Markey (D-MA) took the opportunity to tweak and tweet Inhofe back,

Get a life? More like “save a life.” http://politi.co/gA5wet That’s why defeating the Upton-Inhofe #DirtyAirAct is job one.

Snap!

Here’s more from TP on the “Koch Brothers Appreciation Act”:

Read more

Education

House GOP Budget Slashes Billions From Pell Grants, Bumps Millions Of Students Out Of The Program

The budget that House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) released today would gut the social safety net as we know it, dismantling Medicare and Medicaid, even as it cuts taxes for the wealthy and corporations. It doesn’t ask the most well-off Americans or the country’s corporate titans to make any sacrifice, instead leaving the burden of deficit and debt reduction on the middle-class.

The budget lays out little in terms of cuts to specific programs, instead simply decreeing caps on levels of spending. But one cut is explicitly proposed in the document — a cut to the Pell Grant program, which provides college tuition assistance to low-income students. Here’s what the budget plan has to say on Pell Grants:

Return Pell grants to their pre-stimulus levels to curb rising tuition inflation and make sure aid is targeted to the truly needy…This budget takes the necessary next steps to ensure Pell spending is brought under control and targeted to the truly needy instead of being captured in the form of tuition increases.

While the cut is presented in vague language, the practical implications are:

– Eliminating only the Recovery Act Pell Grant funding amounts to a $17 billion cut, while returning to the 2008 level cuts another $9 billion;

– The maximum grant would be cut by $845 (15.2 percent);

1.7 million currently eligible students would be rendered ineligible for grants.

If implemented, this would be the largest reduction in Pell Grants in history, more than eight times higher than the previous record, which was a $100 reduction in the maximum award in 1994. These cuts “will reduce the number of low income students receiving Bachelor’s degrees each year by about 61,000.”

Ryan justifies this cut by claiming that “recent studies have demonstrated that increases in Pell grants appear to be matched nearly one for one by increases in tuition at private universities.” The citation for this claim is a 2005 study (not exactly recent), which says that, while private universities have increased tuition alongside increases in Pell Grants, “we find little evidence that increases in federal Pell grants are positively linked to increases for in-state tuition at public universities.” As of 2009, far more Pell recipients attend public universities than private.

Pell Grants are key to the country’s economic competitiveness and to boosting an educational attainment rate that has stagnated. Cutting them in this way provides little in terms of real budgetary savings, but undermines economic competitiveness and the nation’s supply of human capital.

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up