ThinkProgress Logo

Yglesias

Harper Gets His Majority

Stephen Harper came into the election campaign close to a majority and with tonight’s results he now has one:

Elsewhere in Canada, the separatist Bloc Québécois collapsed almost entirely sending a huge parcel of seats to the NDP.

Outside of Québéc the center-left Liberal Party lost ground to both the NDP and the Conservatives, and vote-splitting between Liberals and the NDP seeks to have given Harper the crucial seats he needed to get over the 50 yard line. Back in the 1990s, a divided right made the Liberals the dominant party in Canadian politics. For the past five years, it’s been just the reverse as divisions on the left keep throwing elections to Harper. It’ll be interesting to see if Canada manages to evolve toward a stable two-party system.

Politics

During Budget Crisis, Texas House Committee Passes Tax Break For Yacht Owners

In response to the worst state budget crisis since World War II, the Texas House has proposed slashing $27 billion from the budget, including huge cuts to education, nursing homes, and health care for the poor. Yet last Friday, the Texas House Ways and Means Committee approved a tax break for those who want to buy yachts costing $250,000 or more.

The bill, HB 2187, was proposed by Houston Republican Rep. John Davis, and would cap the sales tax the state could collect on the sale of a personal boat. According to AP, Davis authored the bill out of fear that yacht owners would start buying their boats in Florida, which has a similar law. Davis described it as “economic development,” while Ways and Means Chairman Harvey Hilderbran (R-Kerrville) said it was “one of those things you have to do.”

The bill was originally estimated to cost Texas $1.4 million annually in lost revenue. It will now move on to be considered by the full House, where several top Republicans have expressed confidence it will pass.

Meanwhile, Democrats are expressing outrage that their GOP counterparts would even consider the bill at a time when they are cutting essential state services:

Rep. Mike Villarreal, D-San Antonio, voted against the measure and lambasted it as wrongheaded at a time when cuts are threatened in areas including education and Medicaid reimbursement rates for health care providers

“With all due respect, sometimes I’m not sure what planet my Republican colleagues live on,” Villarreal said in a statement. “How can they say tax breaks for yachts are a higher priority than supporting our children’s classrooms or keeping nursing homes open?”

Texas faces one of the worst budget outlooks in the country, and amazingly, only about a third of it was caused by the economic downturn. The state has had a chronic shortage of revenue after years of slashing property and business taxes and creating numerous tax breaks and exemptions, just like the proposed one for yacht owners. Yet Republicans still insist on not raising taxes, and as a result have had to rely on draconian cuts to balance the budget.

Under the current proposal, $7.8 billion will be cut from Texas public schools, four community colleges will close, 60,000 students will lose college financial aid, as many as 97,000 teachers and school employees will be laid off, 9,300 government jobs will be eliminated, Medicaid will be shortchanged by nearly $14 billion, and health and human services funding will plummet by a quarter. Despite this devastating toll, Republicans have been reluctant to tap in to the state’s $9.4 billion rainy day fund to alleviate the cuts, even though the fund is one of the most flush in the country.

Security

Fiorina And Whitman Staffers Warn That Republicans Face ‘Political Suicide’

A couple of weeks ago, former Republican gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman admitted that the GOP must change it’s tune on immigration if it wants to win elections in Latino-heavy states and districts. “We as a party are going to have to make some changes, how we think about immigration, and how we talk about immigration,” advised Whitman, whose campaign was marked by unprecedented outreach to the Latino community.

It turns out her staffers agree. Hector Barajas, who led Latino outreach for Whitman’s gubernatorial race, and Marty Wilson, a campaign manager for Carly Fiorina’s failed Republican Senate bid, are quoted in the Wall Street Journal today saying that Republicans who don’t incorporate Latino outreach into their campaigns risk “political suicide.” Yet, according to Wilson, the GOP has an even bigger problem: “[Latino] folks don’t like us [Republicans] very much” and that’s largely due to the party’s immigration platform.

Latinos had good reasons not to like the candidates who Barajas and Wilson worked for. Fiorina supported Arizona’s immigration law, SB-1070, and believed that “[i]t isn’t time to have that conversation” on legalizing immigrants through comprehensive immigration reform.

Whitman spent an unprecedented amount of money on Latino outreach. Yet she opted to say one thing in English, and something completely different in Spanish. Ultimately she couldn’t escape the “tough as nails” on immigration persona that served her well during the Republican primary or the undocumented housekeeper who claimed that Whitman hired and exploited her.

Yet, Barajas and Wilson “see an opening.” As Obama faces sharp criticism from some Latino and immigration advocates for ramping up deportations. Barajas has responded by advising the GOP “to train Spanish-speaking representatives to woo Latino voters by talking about Republican ideas for improving the economy through easing regulations and lowering taxes as well as promoting charter schools, areas where GOP views may be likelier to resonate with Latinos.”

Those who are pressuring Obama to use his authority to halt the deportations of undocumented youth and people with children who are U.S. citizens have warned the White House about how the Obama administration’s immigration policies might hurt the President’s prospects in 2012. Yet, others in the Latino community have questioned whether that tactic might ultimately hurt Latinos more than it helps.

Politics

After Voting To Keep Them, Rep. Joe Walsh Tells Town Hall We ‘Absolutely’ Should Get Rid Of Oil Subsidies

Conservative members of Congress have been feeling the heat all over the country, as a Main Street Movement of everyday Americans have been protesting their efforts to cut crucial services and public investment, including their vote to effectively end Medicare.

Last week, during a town hall in Schaumburg, Illinois, Walsh came face to face with this public anger. A video of the town hall posted on YouTube shows that a constituent asked why we aren’t reforming the laws that give tax dollars to oil companies that are making huge profits. Walsh replied by saying that he “absolutely” wants to get rid of subsidies for oil companies:

CONSTITUENT: You say you want reform, how about reforming the banking system that got us into this mess? How about reforming the laws that give away our tax dollars to giant oil companies making record-breaking profits? And gives tax breaks to multi-millionaires. Your constituency wants Social Security, Medicare, and universal health care including the right to women’s health. [...]

WALSH: The tax code is a convoluted, complicated mess that members of both parties have created, and the only ones who make out like bandits are big corporations and wealthy Americans because they can pay high-priced support from Congress and high-priced lawyers to find every loophole and they end up like GE not paying any taxes. Give me a simple flat low tax. (mix of booing and cheering) Hold on, hold on, raise your hand you can go at it. Energy subsidies. Absolutely. Absolutely. Get rid of subsidies for oil companies.

Watch it:

Unfortunately, the House Republican caucus voted unanimously last month to protect these very subsidies. Joining Walsh in now condemning the subsidies is Rep. Tom McClintock (R-CA), who now says we should end them. The question is whether these members of Congress are really serious about ending these giveaways to the oil industry and would change their positions if they once again came up for a vote. (h/t: McGonagleProductions YouTube account)

Yglesias

Orlando Fact Of The Day

Michael Winerip in the NYT: “There are 2,953 homeless students attending Orange County Public Schools, up from 1,463 in 2008.”

A reminder that you don’t win the future by allowing sky-high unemployment to persist for years.

Climate Progress

While Taking Federal Cash For Wildfires, Rick Perry Complains: ‘Why Are You Taking Care Of Alabama?’

Gov. Rick Perry (R-TX), while taking millions in federal cash to combat epic wildfires, is now accusing President Obama of being overly generous to the victims of the catastrophic tornadoes in Alabama and neighboring states. Perry, who has threatened to secede because of an “oppressive” federal government, is upset that the same government has not honored his request to declare an official state of emergency, but has done so for states like Alabama:

You have to ask, “Why are you taking care of Alabama and other states?” I know our letter didn’t get lost in the mail. There is a point in time where you say, “Hey, what’s going on here?”

Although a state of emergency has not been declared, a significant proportion of the cost of fighting the Texas wildfires is in fact being borne by the federal government Perry loves to scorn. Since February 27th, Texas has received 25 grants under the Fire Management Assistance Grant Program, which provides a 75 percent federal cost share. Texas is also receiving direct firefighting support from “several federal agencies, including the National Park Service,” Reuters reports. Texas Forest Service spokeswoman Holly Huffman informed ThinkProgress that of the estimated $58.9 million in firefighting costs from November 2010 to May 1, 2011 that the service is responsible for, they expect to get reimbursed almost $18.5 million from FEMA.

Although the Texas wildfires — fueled by an historic drought that may become permanent in our warming world — are incredible in scope, with over two million acres burned in 252 of the state’s 254 counties, only 900 buildings have been destroyed and the loss of life has been limited to that of two volunteer firefighters.

The nature of the tornado disaster is very different. Over 300 people were killed in Alabama and six other states in hours by some of the strongest storms this nation has ever seen, crippling communities and leaving hundreds of thousands of people without power. “Whole neighborhoods of brick homes were completely leveled,” and “bodies of the deceased were still lying in open view, with medical teams unable to reach them because of the staggering amount of debris.” The National Guard, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the Red Cross, and other service and disaster relief organizations (including for-profit disaster contractors) are engaged in the multi-billion-dollar recovery effort.

One would think that Perry would applaud the federal government for being responsible with our limited national budget, constrained by the Tea Party ideologues he supports, and using those precious resources for those Americans most in need of emergency assistance.

Politics

Donald Trump Demeans Gay Marriage By Comparing It To His Taste In Golf Putters

On the tails of being the brunt of many jokes at the White House Corresspondents’ Dinner, Donald Trump offers a new collection of jocular political positions in a New York Times profile. Among them is a new explanation for his opposition to marriage equality for same-sex couples. Declaring himself a “traditionalist,” Trump compares same-sex marriage to long golf putters:

TRUMP: It’s like in golf. A lot of people — I don’t want this to sound trivial — but a lot of people are switching to these really long putters, very unattractive. It’s weird. You see these great players with these really long putters, because they can’t sink three-footers anymore. And, I hate it. I am a traditionalist. I have so many fabulous friends who happen to be gay, but I am a traditionalist.

This is what he thinks makes for a “conservative with a big heart“? Generally, individuals who demonstrate that they have values — even billionaires — actually bother to consider the lives other people live. There are severe long-term consequences for same-sex couples deprived of the rights and protections of marriage equality, but Trump thinks a golf metaphor does justice to the issue despite the fact he took two mulligans on marriage himself.

Trump can only see things in the world as attractive or unattractive, and he has no time for anything he finds “very unattractive.” Just ask the many girls he objectifies and humiliates when they enter the Miss USA pageant. His taste is a minefield of sexism bunkers and LGBT sand traps that have little to do with improving other people’s lives. Trump’s campaign hasn’t even teed off yet, but he’s already shanking his approach.

If anything, Trump should see long putters as an enticing investment opportunity, considering a majority of the population now supports marriage equality. But then again, who is really praising Trump for his business sense anyway?

Cross-posted from The Wonk Room.

Yglesias

What Is The Alternative To American Decline?

The Weekly Standard’s cover package assailing Barack Obama’s weak foreign policy seems ill-timed. Still, Bill Kristol is raising important issues here:

Thanks for confirming that our current president believes his task is to accommodate American decline. Thanks for reminding us how high a priority he places on appeasing those who revile us. And thanks for explaining that our Leader from Behind sees his role as “shepherding us through this phase” of appeasement and decline.

That’s all very polemical, but Kristol is raising the right issues and revealing that Obama has them right. The United States currently accounts for about five percent of the world’s population. The only way for us to maintain enduring military hegemony over the planet under those circumstances would be for huge swathes of the planet to permanently consign themselves to poverty. Currently, however, the very large nation of China is following the trail of export-led growth already blazed by smaller countries like Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan and is growing quite rapidly. India, taking a different approach, is also growing very fast. And natural resource exporters such as Brazil and Nigeria are benefitting from this process and appear to be improving other aspects of their policy regime at the same time.

It might be politically convenient to just pretend this isn’t happening, but it doesn’t make a good deal of sense. Managing America’s relative decline while continuing to improve our absolute living standards is a completely appropriate mission for a 21st century statesman. What’s Kristol’s alternative? Launch wars with Iran, Syria, and North Korea while deepening our involvement in Libya and Afghanistan and watch the Chinese laugh?

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up