ThinkProgress Logo

NEWS FLASH

Indiana’s Planned Parenthood Law Could Cost Taxpayers A ‘Quarter Of A Million Dollars’ In Legal Fees | Indiana’s law banning Planned Parenthood from receiving Medicaid funds may cost the state $4 billion in federal Medicaid funds, but the state would also be responsible for paying the legal expenses for anyone who challenges the constitutionality of the measure. Sarah Seward of the Courier Press is reporting that the legal fees alone could “cost Indiana taxpayers a quarter of a million dollars” or more if the ruling is appealed. The state is “obligated to pay not just its own legal fees but the other side’s, too.”

Politics

Frank Gaffney For President?

At a panel on the threats facing Israel at the Faith and Freedom Conference in Washington Saturday, an attendee took the microphone to urge former Reagan defense official Frank Gaffney to run for president. Gaffney — who has made a career out of cooking up John Birch-like theories about Muslim infiltration — responded by saying that while has no plans to run, he wouldn’t rule out the possibility by making a “Shermanesque statement.” Watch it:

Gaffney’s thinly-veiled Islamophobia and penchant for accusing conservative bigwigs of being agents of the Muslim Brotherhood have earned him scorn from some fellow conservatives, including fellow members of the panels Gaffney sat on during the conference. At a panel Friday about Sharia law — Gaffney’s favorite topic — he faced off against Marshall Breger, a former Bush security official who has been publicly critical of Gaffney’s delusions, calling out the emptiness of the Sharia threat and warning that Gaffney’s brand of Islamoparanoid militarism would alienate American-Muslims. As Religion Dispatchs’ Sarah Posner reported, things got heated:

The moderator, neo-conservative conspiracy theorist Kenneth Timmerman, cut Breger off when he tried to defend himself against Gaffney. Gaffney, who insisted that even conservatives fail to understand the threat of a political, legal, and military takeover by shari’ah, at one point shouted “Rubbish!” in reaction to Breger. Gaffney’s fear-mongering knows no bounds, as he asserted that “if we don’t wake up, we will soon be like Britain . . . or even Saudi Arabia.” He had support on the panel, too, with the Christian Broadcasting Network’s Erik Stakelback calling him “the Paul Revere of calling out the Muslim Brotherhood.”

The crowd was clearly on Gaffney’s side, giving cheers and even a standing ovation when he would castigate Berger. Indeed, he seemed to be warmly welcomed at the event. As Gaffney wondered the halls of the conference area, he was often stopped by activists interested in taking a picture of getting an autograph, and he signed books for several minutes outside the Israel conference, staying longer to chat with admirers.

But his attacks, most notably on influential anti-tax activist Grover Norquist, got him barred from participating in any official capacity at the much bigger Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) two years ago. “[H]e has become personally and tiresomely obsessed with his weird belief that anyone who doesn’t agree with him on everything all the time or treat him with the respect and deference he believes is his due, must be either ignorant of the dangers we face or, in extreme case, dupes of the nation’s enemies,” then-CPAC Chairman David Keene told ThinkProgress earlier this year.

But apparently, for some religious conservatives at the Faith and Freedom Conference, Gaffney is a reasonable choice for president.

NEWS FLASH

Connecticut First State In The Nation To Mandate Paid Sick Days | Connecticut became the first state in the U.S. to mandate paid sick leave for workers today, with the state House approving a bill requiring service workers to earn one hour of paid sick leave for every forty hours worked. Gov. Dan Malloy (D-CT) intends to sign the bill, saying, “without paid sick leave, frontline service workers — people who serve us food, who care for our children, and who work in hospitals, for example — are forced to go to work sick to keep their jobs. That’s not a choice I’m comfortable having people make under my tenure.” Currently, only the cities of Washington D.C. and San Francisco require workers to receive paid sick leave. The U.S. loses $180 billion in productivity annually due to sick employees attending work and infecting others.

Yglesias

Protecting People Who Don’t Want Protection

I’m reading Robert Middlekauff’s The Glorious Cause: The American Revolution, 1763-1789 and one thing that comes through is the extent to which the British army faced what we’d now recognize as some of the classic problems of counterinsurgency. Particularly when they decide to shift action to the southern theater where they believe there to be strong loyalists sentiments, they face a classic dilemma. To make it safe for loyalists to show themselves, they need to suppress rebel military forces. This they can manage, since the rebels aren’t actually that formidable. But the means necessary for suppression—occupying army running hither and yon—tend to feed rebellion. What’s a commander to do?

I thought of that book when I read Michael Trevett’s piece on census operations in counterinsurgency:

Mao explained that the guerrilla or insurgent swims among the sea of people. Consequently, thoroughly knowing the population is the best method of identifying, finding, and fixing the insurgent. Only after identifying the insurgent, does it become possible to isolate and kill him and protect the population. From the perspective of the counterinsurgent, these are the fundamental purposes of census operations, a subset of populace and resources control (PRC) measures, which, when attained, significantly contribute to the elimination of an insurgency and the establishment of civil governing control.

This is, of course, applicable. The British spent a lot of time making strategic decisions that were based on a kind of guesswork about the disposition of the local population. Accurate, detailed knowledge of who lives where and what they think can be a huge asset.

But reading about George Washington, Father of His Country, First President of the United States of America, and posthumous six star general leading an insurgency makes a nice contrast with the bloodless and technocratic language used by his successors in the US military when discussing such matters. Should General Howe have listened to advice about the importance of “thoroughly knowing the population” as “the best method of identifying, finding, and fixing” American Patriots, so as to create the circumstances in which “it becomes[s] possible to isolate and kill [them] and protect the population”? Sounds odd, eh. Even though it’s quite true that Continental forces requisitioned supplies from local civilians and sometimes made themselves a nuisance, we’d generally say that the population hardly needed “protecting” from the insurgents. But maybe that’s wrong. Maybe if you went back in time with a bunch of copies of FM 3-24 and some better census it’d all have gone down differently.

Climate Progress

Australian climate scientists face death threats, cyberbullying

I hope readers will help draw attention to this stunning news in today’s Canberra Times:

Australia’s leading climate change scientists are being targeted by a vicious, unrelenting email campaign that has resulted in police investigations of death threats.

The Australian National University has confirmed it moved several high-profile climate scientists, economists and policy researchers into more secure buildings, following explicit threats to their personal safety….

More than 30 researchers across Australia ranging from ecologists and environmental policy experts to meteorologists and atmospheric physicists told The Canberra Times they are receiving a stream of abusive emails threatening violence, sexual assault, public smear campaigns and attacks on family members.

I hope you will also voice support in the comments section for the scientists and the important work they are doing to warn humanity of the gravest danger facing the planet.  I have many readers and colleagues in Australia and we will make sure that as many of the scientists see these comments as possible.

UPDATE:  See the featured comment below from Stephen Spencer, an Australian reader with insight into what’s happening down under.

Only in a very perverse world are such tireless, underpaid heroes the subject of relentless attacks to muzzle their vital message, as if they were the title character in Henrik Ibsen’s classic, An Enemy of the People.  Sadly, such cyber bullying and threats of violence are not exclusive to Australia (see “UK Guardian slams Morano for cyber-bullying and for urging violence against climate scientists“).

Here is more from this important Australia news story:

Read more

Climate Progress

GOP Rep. McClintock Predicts “We’re Going To See A Strong Movement” Among Republicans Towards Ending Oil Subsidies

ThinkProgress filed this report from the Faith and Freedom Conference in Washington, DC.

Three times this year, House Republicans voted unanimously to protect subsidies for oil companies.

But as the GOP faced a major voter backlash, especially during times of immense profits for oil companies, one conservative Republican spoke out in March against continuing oil subsidies: Rep. Tom McClintock (R-CA).

ThinkProgress spoke with McClintock after his speech today at the Faith and Freedom Conference to elaborate on his call to end oil subsidies. McClintock said such subsidies are “distorting” the price of oil and called for getting “rid of all the subsidies.” When asked why other fiscal conservatives weren’t standing with him in this cause, McClintock was optimistic, predicting that more Republicans would soon be joining him. “We have to reach out to folks from time to time, but when you do, they get it,” said McClintock. “I think we’re going to see a strong movement in that direction.”:

KEYES: Back in March, you came out in favor of ending oil subsidies. Can you just walk us through that decision a little bit.

McCLINTOCK: Sure. Prices include a tremendous volume of information. Oil prices include transportation costs, alternative fuel costs, bribery rates in Venezuela, demand in China. Whenever we subsidize any product, we are distorting that information which is absolutely critical for consumers to make rational decisions. So we ought to get rid of all the subsidies and allow those prices to convey accurate information to consumers so that they can make accurate decisions about where they are putting their dollars.

KEYES: Are you worries at all that there aren’t more fiscal conservatives on the right who are joining you in this?

McCLINTOCK: I’m not worried. They didn’t call them self-evident truths for nothing. We have to reach out to folks from time to time, but when you do, they get it. I think we’re going to see a strong movement in that direction.

KEYES: Do you think that more Republicans might be joining you soon on this?

McCLINTOCK: Yes, I do.

Watch it:

Still, despite McClintock’s harsh words, he was one of many Republican congressmen who criticized oil subsidies but then voted to protect them.

Check out ThinkProgress’s video compilation of GOP hypocrisy on oil subsidies.

Economy

Tables Turned: Bank Of America Pays Couple’s Legal Fees After Deputies Threaten It With Foreclosure

Across the country, the biggest banks have been responsible for abuses against homeowners, often foreclosing on them in abusive ways and disregarding the human casualties of their policies.

Yet in one case in Collier County, Florida, a pair of sheriff’s deputies turned the tables on the mega-bank and struck a blow for beleaguered homeowners everywhere.

A Bank of America branch there had improperly been involved in a foreclosure lawsuit against a local couple, yet the bank was refusing to pay the couple’s legal fees when it was found to be in the wrong.

So two sherrif’s deputies and an attorney showed up at a Bank of America branch with some help — a local William C. Hoff moving crew. The deputies and attorney offered Bank of America a choice: Either the mega-bank pay the couple’s $2,534 legal fees, or they would foreclose on the branch and and seize all of its assets. Bank of America decided to pay. Watch a local news station’s report on the incident:

It should be noted that not only has Bank of America been involved in abusive practices against homeowners, but that it also is a major tax dodger that actually got away with paying nothing in corporate income taxes in 2009.

NEWS FLASH

UPDATE: Judge reverses decision, allows O’Keefe to leave New Jersey | Controversial right-wing activist James O’Keefe is in Washington DC today attending the Faith and Freedom Conference. O’Keefe is currently on federal probation after being found guilty in a case where “he was accused of trying to tamper with the phones in Sen. Mary Landrieu’s office.” Days ago, the AP reported that a federal judge had denied his request for permission to leave New Jersey to attend the conference. You can read the order here. Although it’s possible the judge reconsidered his decision, there are no reports that occurred. Here’s a photo of O’Keefe at the event today in DC (via Dave Weigel):

Update

A federal magistrate judge issued a new order granting O’Keefe’s request to leave New Jersey

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up