ThinkProgress Logo

Climate Progress

NBC: “The Dust Storm that Swallowed Up an American City”

A massive dust storm has swept into the Phoenix area and drastically reduced visibility across the valley.

The wall of dust moved across the desert from the south on Tuesday and descended on the valley by nightfall. KSAZ-TV reported the storm appeared to be roughly 50 miles wide.

A 2-mile high, 50-mile wide Dust Storm enveloped Phoenix yesterday.  Tonight, on NBC (video here), Brian Williams called it “The Dust Storm that Swallowed Up an American City.”

Back in April, the USGS released a report on Dust-Bowlification that concluded drier conditions were projected to accelerate dust storms in the U.S. Southwest.  In large parts of Texas and Oklahoma now,  the drought is more intense than it was during the Dust Bowl of the 1930s.

In 2007, Science (subs. req’d) published research that “predicted a permanent drought by 2050 throughout the Southwest” — levels of aridity comparable to the 1930s Dust Bowl would stretch from Kansas to California.  Last year, a comprehensive literature review, “Drought under global warming: a review,” by NCAR found that we risk multiple, devastating global droughts worse than the Dust Bowl even on moderate emissions path.  Another study found the U.S. southwest could see a 60-year drought this century.

So the monster dust storm — a haboob — that hit Phoenix is just the shape of things to come for the entire Southwest.

Here are more videos, via the Atlantic Wire:

Read more

Economy

Rick Perry Doubled Texas’ Debt, Then Balanced Budget Through Accounting Gimmicks

Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R) and Republican lawmakers completely failed to keep their promise not to “kick the can” down the road when it came to solving the largest budget shortfall in the state’s history. That’s according to a new Associated Press report, which concludes that Perry and the GOP legislature largely balanced the state’s budget through flimsy accounting gimmicks that do nothing to secure Texas’ financial footing.

The self-professed fiscal conservatives resorted to tactics like delaying a $2.3 billion payment to schools by one day to technically push it into the next fiscal year and keep it off the books of this budget. They also “found” $800 million by ordering the state’s accountants to forecast a faster increase in land values to show more property tax income:

Gov. Rick Perry signed a budget that was balanced only through accounting maneuvers, rewriting school funding laws, ignoring a growing population and delaying payments on bills coming due in 2013.

It accomplishes, however, what the Republican majority wanted most: It did not raise taxes, took little from the Rainy Day Fund and shifted any future deficits onto the next Legislature.

The new budget also preposterously assumes there will be no growth in the number of school children in Texas, even though it is one of the fastest-growing states in the nation. Experts predict this trick alone will shortchange school districts by $2 billion.

Texas lawmakers had to close an enormous $27 billion budget deficit this year. Amazingly, only about a third of it was caused by the economic downturn. The state has had a chronic shortage of revenue after years of slashing property and business taxes and creating numerous tax breaks and exemptions. Conservative governors have slashed state services to the bone, so there was no more fat to cut from the budget.

As governor for over a decade, Perry’s “fiscal conservatism” has doubled the state’s debt from $13.7 billion in 2001 to $34.08 billion in 2009. He’s refused to raise taxes on the wealthy and brags about not dipping into the state’s substantial Rainy Day Fund. (However, Perry’s fellow Texas Republicans claim Perry has appropriated nearly all the money in the Rainy Day Fund, and have asked him to stop claiming that he preserved it.)

Democrats have fought back against the GOP claim that it was truly a balanced budget. “It’s all smoke and mirrors and misdirection,” said state Rep. Garnett Coleman (D).

Alyssa

Did A Court Just Accidentally Outlaw Remakes?

You know, I understand that overly restrictive copyright laws are a bad thing that stymie innovation and empower corporations. But if they’ll save me from having to see a remake of The Wizard of Oz, that’s a powerful argument in their favor. As the Hollywood Reporter’s Eriq Gardner reports, Warner Brothers yesterday won a court decision in an unrelated merchandising case that says the characters in movies that are adaptations of other works can be copyrighted independent of the copyrights on those individual works:

There are nine Wizard of Oz projects currently in development, by one count, including a big-budget 3D film by Disney directed by Sam Raimi and starring James Franco that’s meant to be a prequel to the classic film. Might these films have to be very, very careful going forward? One lawyer believes so.

“The court’s statement that the film copyrights cover ‘all visual depictions’ of the characters recognizes that there is often a quintessential version of a literary character that exists in the public’s mind as a result of a popular film adaption,” says Aaron Moss, the chair of litigation at Greenberg Glusker. ” Any filmmaker that wants to create a new version of a literary work—even one in the public domain—needs to be careful not to use copyrightable elements of characters that first appear in protected motion picture versions of the works. Of course, when it comes to characters depicted by live actors, this may be easier said than done.”

Obviously, I don’t actually believe there should be a law against making crappy, derivative knockoffs and revisitations of classic movies (and even non-classic movies) even as I wish there were a lot fewer of them. In any case, I tend to think that there are some works so powerful that there will never be a straight remake of them — variants on Oz projects probably wouldn’t want to ape the original too closely in any case, and I don’t think we’ll ever see another attempt to make Gone With the Wind. And if this decision stands and becomes an anti-competitive tool, it’s more likely to have studios seeing how close they can get to the line where they’d trigger a copyright violation (are we ripping off Lara Croft if we take her down a cup size?) rather than embracing originality as a way to stay lawsuit-free. But man are there times — a moment when we have NINE Oz projects going at once, not to mention the millions of Snow White projects that are underway — when I despair for original content.

Economy

Parroting Palin: Inhofe Falsely Claims Obama Grew Debt More ‘Than All Presidents Throughout The History Of America’

Today on the Senate floor, Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-OK) broke out the familiar GOP talking points to argue against raising taxes on millionaires as a means of deficit reduction, declaring it tantamount to “rais[ing] taxes on America’s job creators to prevent the economy from recovering from this recession.” But instead of sticking to the same-old song, Inhofe decided to throw in a eye-raising factoid. According to him, President Obama has increased the debt more “than all presidents throughout the history of America”:

INHOFE: President Obama has managed to increase spending by 30 percent — 30 percent. He incurred trillion dollar deficits each year and pushed our national debt up by 35 percent. The statistics that no one seems to care about, and we say it over and over again, that this president has increased the debt more in his two and a half years than all presidents throughout the history of America, from George Washington to George W. Bush.

Watch it:

It’d be a powerful charge — if it were true. Despite the fact that Sarah Palin often repeats the charge, the statement is entirely false. Obama inherited a $10.6 trillion debt in 2009, along with two wars and the worst economy since the Great Depression. Since then, the debt rose by $3.4 trillion which, as Politifact noted, is “far less than what was accumulated by Obama’s 43 predecessors.”

Even assuming Inhofe did not mean the debt from all presidents combined, he’s still wrong. As ThinkProgress’s Judd Legum pointed out, Bush started with a $236 billion budget surplus, yet still managed to add $4.4 trillion to the nation debt.

LGBT

Bishop Gene Robinson Calls For Federal LGBT Employment Protections

Episcopal Bishop Gene Robinson today called upon Congress to pass the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, which would ensure that no one can be fired based on sexual orientation or gender identity. Nine out of 10 voters already believe such a federal law exists, but only a handful of states actually offer the LGBT community protections, and in eight states, only sexual orientation is protected. Unlike Catholic Bishops in New York, Rhode Island, and Illinois, Bishop Robinson sees supporting LGBT equality as a matter of Christian principle:

The scriptures of the Old and New Testaments are filled with admonitions that we will be judged by the way we treat our most vulnerable members. For Christians and Jews, God is described as having a special concern for the poor, the marginalized, and the vulnerable. We are morally bound to take special care to protect those who are so marginalized. I believe that in our time, it is gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people who are the marginalized deserving of civil protections. Surely, in this great nation, we can at least do that much.

Though protections are inconsistent from state to state, progress is being made in the absence of a federal ENDA. The map below was current just four months ago, but since then there have been victories for transgender protections in Hawaii, Nevada, and today Connecticut. (Those states should appear as red now.) Still, the map has a bit too much orange, representing the 29 states that have no employment protections for LGBT people whatsoever:

Climate Progress

Proposed Keystone XL Pipeline Is 20 Times Bigger Than Faulty Exxon Pipeline

An Exxon Mobil pipeline buried under the Yellowstone River in Montana burst with terrible effect last week, poisoning the river that Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT) has called “a cornerstone of Montana’s economy and our outdoor heritage.” The hour-long spill — which lasted twice as long as Exxon initially admitted — released about 42,000 gallons of toxic oil, to current knowledge.

The Obama administration is now considering whether to approve the construction of a vastly larger pipeline, the Keystone XL project, which would deliver tar sands crude from Canada to Texas refineries, crossing the Yellowstone River, 1,903 other key waterways, and major aquifers along the way. The Keystone pipeline would deliver 830,000 barrels per day, over 20 times the 40,000-barrel Silvertip pipeline that failed last week.

As NRDC’S Anthony Swift relates, the government’s approach to pipeline safety does not lead to confidence regarding Keystone XL:

Several days after the Yellowstone spill, pipeline safety regulators at the Department of Transportation reacted by issuing Exxon-Mobil’s Silvertip pipeline a Corrective Action Order (CAO) which requires the company to make safety improvements to the pipeline before it can restart. In issuing the order, Secretary LaHood said “when companies are not living up to our safety standards, we will take action.”

Here’s the problem — Exxon was living up to the Department of Transportation’s (DOT) safety standards. True, Exxon’s decision to build an unprotected crude pipeline only 5 to 8 feet below a flood prone river appears to have been imprudent. Exxon’s decision to restart the pipeline in May despite heavy flooding was foolish. However, the real story is that this string of reckless decisions was permitted by both our pipeline safety regulations and the regulators who enforce them.

This reactive approach to pipeline safety regulation is evidenced by the Department of Transportation’s approach to Keystone XL and other pipelines carrying raw tar sands crude. In her recent testimony to Congress on pipeline safety, Cynthia Quarterman, the Administrator of DOT’s Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), conceded that her agency did not have a handle on the safety risks that raw tar sands pipelines pose. Specifically, she said that the U.S. pipeline system was not designed with the risks of raw tar sands crude in mind, her agency had not evaluated those risks, and she did not know whether current safety regulations were sufficient to address them. Despite these serious unknowns, her agency has not actively engaged in the consideration of the Keystone XL.

Transcanada’s “first tar sands pipeline, Keystone I, has had thirty three leaks in the U.S. and Canada in less than one year of operation,” Swift writes, “and is the youngest pipelines in the U.S. to be deemed by regulators a threat to life, property and the environment. ”

Activists are mobilizing against the Keystone XL project with the StopTar.org and Tar Sands Action projects.

Security

A Unified Security Budget: Shifting DOD Spending To Non-Military Security, Green Jobs & Deficit Reduction

Our guest bloggers are Center for American Progress Senior Fellow Larry Korb and CAP national security intern Sam Klug.

Cost overruns caused by management failures on Department of Defense contracts in the last two years exceeded the entire annual budget of the State Department. And not by a little bit, either — the cost overruns came to $70 billion, while the U.S. spends only $47 billion on the State Department every year. Facts like this one indicate the need to rethink the way we budget for national security issues.

As talks on deficit reduction heat up, lawmakers have begun to suggest — finally — that cuts to the Pentagon budget must be “on the table.” Yet just weeks ago, the Senate Armed Services Committee approved a massive $682.5 billion budget for the Defense Department. The Center for American Progress has for years supported and contributed to the Task Force on a Unified Security Budget, which last week released its 2012 proposal to rebalance national security spending. The Unified Security Budget (USB) offers a comprehensive look at our national security needs and the military and non-military tools we use to address them, identifying areas where unnecessary military spending (like those cost overruns we mentioned earlier) could REALLY be cut — as opposed to just reducing current estimates of spending growth.

Looking at security holistically, the Task Force finds that the FY2012 budget the House approved allocates 87 percent of security money for “offense” (military forces), only 7 percent for “defense” (homeland security), and only 6 percent for “prevention” (all non-military tools, such as diplomacy, foreign aid, and non-proliferation). The Task Force’s main goal is to place these figures more in balance. In order to do so, it identifies $77.1 billion in Pentagon savings, and it recommends reinvesting $28.1 billion of those savings in non-military, security-related accounts. Of the remainder of the savings, the Task Force suggests allocating half to deficit reduction and half to domestic job creation. While members of Congress only seem to want to discuss the budget, the Task Force understands that the United States faces not only a budget deficit, but an investment deficit, a diplomacy deficit, and a development deficit as well.

Sustainability is a major focus of the USB. In its review of America’s roles and missions abroad, the Task Force promotes “an effective and sustainable balance among available instruments of power,” arguing that the recent approach to security, through boots-on-the-ground-heavy nation-building and counterinsurgency, has cost too much in blood and treasure to be continued for much longer. This recommendation sounds surprisingly similar to former Secretary of Defense (and Presidential Medal of Freedom recipient) Robert Gates’ comment that “any future defense secretary who advises the President to again send a big American land army into Asia or into the Middle East or Africa should have his head examined.”

Sustainability in our budget, our economy, and, importantly, our environment rank high among the USB’s goals as well. Of the $28.1 billion it recommends reinvesting within our national security apparatus, by far the largest share — $22.4 billion — is designated for alternative energy. In addition to helping DOD combat the security threat of climate change, this money “will do the double duty of paying dividends in job creation.”

Almost nothing illustrates the imbalance in our national priorities better than the way we allocate money for national security. Adopting a unified security budget would represent a step toward the recognition that not every problem this country faces requires a deployment of military power — and that we can be safer and more prosperous if we budget accordingly.

Yglesias

Nobody Cares About The Press Corps’ Process Questions

The Boston Globe has an interesting info-graphic comparing the past two weeks’ worth of White House press corps briefing questions to #AskObama Twitter requests. It quantifies precisely the phenomenon James Fallows noted a long time ago — professional political reporters ask a lot of political process questions. Fully 24 percent of questions at briefings were about congressional negotiations as opposed to just two percent of the questions from Twitter.

This continued to reflect, in my view, the leading failure of the press. It’s not exactly that the man on the street is more substance-oriented than your average political journalist. It’s more that insofar as the man on the street wants to see some diverting entertainment, he’s probably watching a football game or The Real Housewives Of Atlanta. Ordinary people don’t care about politics all that much. But when they do decide to pay attention to politics, it’s because they’re worried about jobs or the environment or energy prices or taxes or something. It’s never because they’re wondering how the president reacted to Steny Hoyer’s remarks about Eric Cantor’s characterization of the Treasury secretary’s statement about the debt ceiling.

Alyssa

Gods That Look Like Men

Nelsan Ellis is signed up to play a god in his next movie.

I’ve complained in the past that nobody knows how to do the divine in movies and television any more. And Gods Behaving Badly, which involves a bunch of Greek deities hanging out in a Manhattan brownstone may not exactly inspire a sense of awe and wonder. But the casting sounds straight-up awesome, and for once, decently representational: Phylicia Rashad as Demeter is nice, as is Rosie Perez as Persephone. And Nelsan Ellis, who is far and away my favorite part of True Blood, as Dionysus is just genius. (Ditto for picking World’s Twitchiest Catholic John Turturro as Hades, and Christopher Walken, who will be the most dour Zeus ever.) It’s not perfectly proportional representation, but having three out of ten gods be played by people of color is a step up from pure tokenism.

I can’t quite make up my mind if I think the quest to make Hollywood’s outputs look more like America is better served by a focus on original content, remakes that racebend in the opposite direction (something I’m working on a separate piece about), adaptations, or historical dramas and biopics that shade in the country’s history so it’s not all white. The obvious answer is a combination of all of these categories, though I wonder if original content has an advantage because folks can’t have preconceptions about the race or ethnicity of characters they’re not already familiar with.

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up