ThinkProgress Logo

Politics

VIDEO: Corporate Lobbyist Concedes He Does Not Always Register As A Lobbyist For ALEC Bills He Helps Write

The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) is a nonprofit that touts itself as a “Jeffersonian” limited government organization for state lawmakers. In reality, the group is little more than a sophisticated front group that allows corporate lobbyists — from companies like Peabody Coal, McDonalds, AT&T, and others — to literally write big business-friendly legislation and pass it off to state-level legislators to be eventually introduced and passed into law. As we have reported, health insurance lobbyists drafted ALEC’s anti-health reform legislation, private prison lobbyists drafted ALEC’s harsh immigrant detention policies, and as the NRDC has documented, multitudes of other corporate giveaways have been drafted as ALEC reform legislation.

Some have challenged the very model of ALEC, claiming that it is designed to skirt state disclosure laws requiring corporate lobbyists to register. A corporate lobbyist can avoid disclosure by simply writing bills via ALEC, at conventions or other meetings with legislators, so when the bill is introduced it no longer has the fingerprints of whatever corporation is employing the lobbyist who wrote the law.

At ALEC conference in New Orleans earlier this month, we ran into Victor Schwartz, an attorney with the firm Shook Hardy and chair of an ALEC task force (the committees charged with writing draft legislation). Schwartz runs what he calls “the iron triangle” at Shook Hardy, a business practice comprised of litigation, lobbying, and public relations to limit liability for corporations. We asked Schwartz, who has helped pass tort reform laws across the country, at times using the support of ALEC, about the ethics of the ALEC strategy for passing laws without lobbying disclosure:

FANG: If Representative Joe Schmoe from Nevada meets with you here in New Orleans, gets a great idea from you, you helped him write this law, he goes to his state and introduces it; you’ve never been to Nevada, let’s say, and he introduces that law, the citizens of Nevada don’t know Victor Schwartz helped write that law.

SCHWARTZ: Well people don’t know who—I’ve worked with Congress every day. No one knows who writes all the laws in Congress.

FANG: Isn’t that problematic? For the critics of ALEC, that kind of validates their criticism. […] You understand the criticism that ALEC is just a proxy to get around all the disclosure, the transparency that many states require.

SCHWARTZ: No. Because people, every Dick, Moe, and Joe knows just the way you found me. I co-chair the civil justice task force.

FANG: Not every Dick and Joe understands ALEC. […]

SCHWARTZ: If you all think the laws should be changed, then go and change them. I don’t see any hidden thing. […]

FANG: But ALEC is a very convenient identity. The person could say ‘I’m a Jeffersonian individual liberty, you know conservative, I’m not here representing Phillip Morris or whatever.’ It’s a front, that’s the accusation and you haven’t really deflected that.

SCHWARTZ: Well all the people, all the people who sponsor ALEC on the webs and everything say these are the people who sponsor and if in my experience when I’ve testified – I don’t do it too much – if someone is there, they will say well Victor is representing ALEC. And everyone knows who sponsors ALEC, General Motors and everything, and they list them.

Watch it:

Victor Schwartz insisted to us that ALEC is an open organization with nothing to hide. But it’s not clear who exactly is paying Victor Schwartz (or his law firm) to write tort reform laws, or which legislators around the country are busy passing laws written by Schwartz and his committee. Moreover, there is no information about which corporations pay Schwartz or some the other private sector lobbyists helping him craft model legislation.

According to the Minnesota Independent, ALEC appears to have broken state lobbying laws in Minnesota. The group hosted an event with lobbyists and state GOP lawmakers without registering its agents as lobbyists.

Although ALEC has been around since the late 70s, only recently has the group gained national attention for its powerful role in setting public policy at the state level. When we tried to attend the ALEC conference, ThinkProgress reporters were violently attacked by security guards who said they were acting on ALEC’s behalf.

Economy

Confronted At Town Hall, Romney Falsely Claims Raising Payroll Tax Cap Wouldn’t Strengthen Social Security

ThinkProgress filed this report from Berlin, New Hampshire.

Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney (R) was confronted at the Iowa State Fair last week for indicating that, as president, he would not support lifting the income cap on taxes used to finance Social Security (currently, income above $106,800 is exempt).

Romney was again asked about his plans today in New Hampshire, where a questioner asked him why he supported raising the retirement age instead of raising the payroll tax cap. Romney reiterated that raising the cap amounted to a tax increase he would not support, and falsely claimed that it wouldn’t “begin the solve the problem” facing Social Security’s long-term viability:

ROMNEY: What I want to do is make sure Social Security is there for your generation.

ATTENDEE: By raising the retirement age, though?

ROMNEY: There are two ways we could go, you can tell me your choice. One is we can keep Social Security –

ATTENDEE: Raise the cap.

ROMNEY: That doesn’t begin to solve the problem. [...] My guess is [people] are going to say, give me lower benefit growth but don’t raise my taxes.

Watch it:

Upon Romney’s proclamation that raising the cap on income taxed for Social Security purposes would not “begin to solve the problem,” the woman presented evidence backing up her claim, telling him that raising the cap would ensure the program’s solvency for at least 75 years. Romney responded, “I don’t agree with your numbers.” He then guessed that Americans would rather face benefit cuts than an increase in the amount of income taxed, despite poll numbers showing that an overwhelming majority of Americans are opposed to benefit cuts.

But whether Romney agrees with the numbers is moot because the questioner’s evidence is correct. According to a report by the Congressional Research Service, fully eliminating the cap without increasing benefits would create a long-term surplus for Social Security and would indeed ensure its solvency for at least 75 years. None of the other “solutions” Romney proposed — means testing benefits, changing the way benefits are calculated, or raising the retirement age — would strengthen the program so substantially without drastically cutting benefits.

Romney is, however, correct in one way: raising the cap on the amount of income taxed for Social Security purposes does not begin to solve the problem. Instead, it solves the problem altogether.

Alyssa

High Art Tyranny

I’m not an opera buff, but as a nerdy arts blogger, the New York Metropolitan Opera should be ashamed of bullying an opera blogger who reported on possible upcoming productions into shutting down his site and giving him some CDs in return. Per the New York Observer:

Since 1996 Brad Wilber, a reference librarian and crossword puzzle enthusiast, has published Met Futures, an online list of repertory and casting for upcoming seasons at the Metropolitan Opera. Drawing on information in the public domain and tips from sources, it’s a valuable, dependable, much-loved resource, providing a wide-angle view of the Met’s artistic direction and singers’ choices. [...] He received a phone call from Sharon Grubin, the company’s general counsel, who asked Mr. Wilber to take down Met Futures. [...] “She said their uppermost reason was that the site contains errors,” he said in a phone interview last week from his office at Houghton College, a small liberal arts school about 60 miles southeast of Buffalo, “and those errors, whatever percentage, create mistaken expectations on the part of the public, even with my disclaimer. And that it also sometimes muddied negotiations with artists. They said that that created difficulty for them.”

Others would disagree with the Met’s assessment of the list’s accuracy. “The accuracy of Brad’s site was quite spectacular one to two seasons in advance,” said James Jorden, the publisher of the opera gossip and discussion blog Parterre.com. “For example, six months before the Met announced their 2011-12 season in February 2011, Brad had the entire repertory and all major casting in place and, as it turned out, it was 100% correct.”

There is no legal justification for this: folks publish casting and production rumors based on reporting all the time and there’s nothing libelous or deceptive about it. And no artistic institution has a right not to be blogged about. This is exactly the kind of thing that makes opera and other high art forms seem elitist and distant from the people who love the work, much less the people who are trying to find their way in. Brad Wilber was just trying to get other people excited about opera, and says he plans to keep going to show his support for the institution that’s bullying him. The Met should be apologize to him — and maybe offer him free season tickets as thanks for his work promoting their art and bringing it to new audiences.

Security

Military Invests Heavily In Clean Energy As Study Finds It Saves Lives

U.S. fuel convey under attack in Iraq.

Renewable energy reduces military casualties and leads to a more effective fighting force. Those findings from an Army study are a big part of the reason the U.S. military is increasingly moving away from oil and investing heavily in clean energy. From 2003 to 2007, an astounding one out of eight U.S. Army casualties in Iraq was the result of protecting fuel convoys. That’s a total of 3,000 troops who died trying to transport oil:

From experimental solar-powered desert bases for the Marines to Navy robots that run on wave energy, the military is quickly becoming a leading buyer of cutting-edge renewable energy technology.

For the armed services, the benefits extend beyond reducing fuel convoy casualties. A fighting force that isn’t restricted by the reach of a tanker truck or weighted down by heavy batteries is more nimble and, as a result, more lethal.

For renewable energy companies, the military is proving to be a vital customer, buying the latest in clean energy gadgets and encouraging private investment. The hope is the armed services can shepherd this technology to the point where it becomes commercially viable, much like it did a generation ago for GPS systems or the Internet.

Being energy independent isn’t just a feel-good environmental issue for troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. There are huge risks and logistical challenges involved in transporting oil around war zones. Fuel in Iraq generally arrives through tanker ships, while fuel in Afghanistan is delivered via truck convoy from Pakistan to distribution centers. Truck conveys then have to redistribute the oil to other bases, and sometimes fuel must be helicoptered in.

Not only are these conveys “big, slow-moving, explosive targets,” they are expensive. The military says it can cost up to $40-a-gallon to get fuel to some locations.

Bases that can use diesel or other fuels to run their everyday needs are safer and in a better tactical position. Several bases currently use clean energy for generators that power everything from air conditioning in tents, to computers running battlefield management software. Indeed, the U.S. Army is forming a task force to work with developers to spend as much as $7.1 billion over the next decade to build renewable power plants at U.S. military sites.

Yglesias

The Arc Of Population Growth

Perhaps the best take on how extremely rapidly Texas’ population is growing comes from this chart I did back in March when the Census released numbers on county-level population growth:

Four out of the top 10 is a lot! But this list should also call into question how special Texas is. The odd man out on this list, in some ways, is really Wake County in North Carolina. Otherwise, if you ask yourself what do Los Angeles and the Inland Empire and Phoenix and Houston and Dallas-Fort Worth and Las Vegas all have in common, you’re not going to come up with a policy variable. This is roughly speaking the “Close to Mexico” portion of the United States.

NEWS FLASH

Report: Writing Down Underwater Mortgages Could Create 1 Million Jobs | A report from the The New Bottom Line — a coalition of community, faith-based and labor groups — finds that “if banks wrote down all underwater mortgages to market value and refinanced the homeowners into 30-year, fixed-rate loans at current market interest rates, that would pump $71 billion into the national economy.” “That would amount to $6 billion every month that is currently going towards mortgage payments that could instead go towards buying groceries, school supplies, and other household necessities,” the report notes. “As consumer demand picked up, businesses would start hiring again, creating new jobs. Putting $71 billion into American consumers’ pockets would create 1.05 million jobs.” Banks have been extremely opposed to writing down principal for troubled borrowers.

NEWS FLASH

Bachmann Promises $2 Gas Like We Had During Global Recession | “The day that the president became president, gasoline was $1.79 a gallon. Look at what it is today,” Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) said at a campaign event in Greenville, South Carolina. “Under President Bachmann, you will see gasoline come down below $2 a gallon again. That will happen.” The global price of oil, which determines the price of gasoline, had crashed as the global economy collapsed at the end of 2008.

Climate Progress

Denier Rick Perry Takes $11 Million from Big Oil, Then Claims Climate Scientists ‘Manipulated Data’ For Money

If you look up chutzpah in the dictionary, there is a picture of Rick Perry.  Perry has received millions of dollars from Big Oil to push its pro-pollution, anti-science agenda:

So what does Perry do when a questioner points out that the National Academy of Sciences and observed data utterly disagree with his disinformation on climate change?   He simply asserts with no evidence that a “substantial number” of climate scientists have “manipulated data” for money, as TP Green reports.  Here’s the background and the video:

Read more

NEWS FLASH

TSA Security ‘Chat-Downs’ Could Disparately Impact Transgender People | The Transportation Security Authority is piloting “chat-downs,” short conversations with every traveler coming through Boston’s Logan Airport designed to detect “behaviors that are out of the norm.” The National Center for Transgender Equality is worried these mandatory interviews will disparately affect transgender people, who are unfairly depicted as being “deceptive,” and could result in harassment or unwarranted invasive screenings. A recent study of transgender people found that almost a third have experienced disrespect or discrimination in airports.

Yglesias

A Modest Proposal On Ratings Agencies

If you were considering lending money to a friend of mine and were asking me for some advice and I thought there was an 95 percent chance that the friend in question would pay you back, I would say, “I’d say there’s about an 95 percent chance he’ll pay you back.” Something like that. What I definitely wouldn’t do is say, “oh, yeah, my friend’s got an AA+ rating.” And if my friend did something new to make me think the odds might be more like 90 percent, I’d say, “he just did this thing that makes me think the odds are more like 90 percent.” Similarly, if I realized that I’d neglected something earlier, I’d say, “sorry, man, I screwed up — odds are more like 90 percent.” But, again, what I definitely wouldn’t do is say “he’s downgraded from AA+ to AA.”

The reason, of course, is that you don’t convey information about probabilities via arbitrary alphanumeric strings. You use arbitrary alphanumeric strings because you’re trying to be deliberately vague about what you’re saying in order to evade accountability.

Something you think about as you ponder Fitch’s downgrade of New Jersey’s bonds from AA to AA-. What does that mean? What’s the difference between America’s former AAA status in the eyes of S&P and our current AA+ status?

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up