ThinkProgress Logo

Yglesias

“The Gated City”

I read Ryan Avent’s ebook, The Gated City on the plane yesterday and recommend that you download it too.

The basic themes are similar to my own real estate obsessions, but I was pleased to see that the text is actually quite different from what I’m working on for THE RENT IS TOO DAMN HIGH. There’s even some stuff I disagree with, though of course my bottom line that we should have more density is similar. Overall, I like to think that there’s space for multiple publications in this general topic area. The United States of America is a very large country, so it’s sensible and appropriate that we have a fairly decentralized system of government. One result of that, however, is that oftentimes too much of our national political conversation focuses on the things that the federal government does. Local government, in the aggregate, makes an enormous amount of the public policy in the this country and attention must be paid.

Security

WikiLeaks – Israeli Official On Non-Violent Demonstrations In West Bank: ‘We Don’t Do Gandhi Very Well’

A new U.S. diplomatic cable out of the American embassy in Tel Aviv from February 2010 reveals that Israelis at that time were becoming increasingly frustrated with non-violent demonstrations by Palestinians in the West Bank. The cable — released recently by WikiLeaks — notes that one Israeli military official “warned that the IDF will start to be more assertive in how it deals with these demonstrations, even demonstrations that appear peaceful.” Later, the cable includes a striking quote from an Israeli defense official:

Less violent demonstrations are likely to stymie the IDF. As MOD Pol-Mil chief Amos Gilad told USG interlocutors recently, “we don’t do Gandhi very well.” The IDF impatience with these demonstrations may also be connected to the recent arrests of foreign NGO workers with expired or solely tourist visas who have been attending, and often organizing, the protests.

Indeed, this is exactly what has been taking place, for example, in the small Palestinian village of Nabi Saleh. In 2008, religious Israelis from the nearby settlement of Halamish claimed a fresh water spring belonging to a Palestinian family and every Friday since, Nabi Saleh residents and sometimes other activists gather to march peacefully toward the spring. Except, they never make it. Most times without provocation, IDF forces greet the demonstrators with tear gas, rubber bullets and “skunk water.” Activist Jenny Levin witnessed one such protest and described what she saw last June over at Mondoweiss:

I can confirm that there was absolutely no provocation on the part of the demonstrators. We’d hardly taken our first steps through this sleepy village when tear gas canisters started falling all around us, the air became filled with the acrid smoke, and our eyes, mouths and skin took the impact of the tear gas. [...]

Aside from the tear gas and rubber bullets, there’s also – by way of a grande finale – the notorious ‘skunk’, which is driven through the village spraying homes and people with a putrid, sticky chemical concoction, the ingredients of which are a mystery.

Watch the video Levin included in her post:

“The confrontations in Nabi Saleh over the past year are considered the most violent in the West Bank,” wrote Idan Landau at the blog +972 in April, “In spite of the fact that the Palestinian side is adhering to the nonviolent popular protest, with women and children participating, Israel’s army has broken several records in brutality at Nabi Saleh.” (HT: Didi Remez)

NEWS FLASH

CIA Rendered Rebel Commander To Libya At Qaddafi Request | Apparent Central Intelligence Agency communiques to now-deposed Libyan dictator Col. Muammar Qaddafi obtained by the New York Times and Human Rights Watch (HRW) indicate that the CIA rendered Abdelhakim Belhadj to Libya at the request of Qaddafi’s intelligence agency in 2004. Belhadj, who has a militant extremist past but is now the rebel commander in charge of Tripoli, says he was tortured while in CIA and Libyan custody. Asked for Belhaj, an apparent CIA caseworker wrote the CIA was “committed to developing this relationship” with Libyan intelligence. Two days later, an officer wrote the CIA was “planning to take control of [Belhadj and his pregnant wife] in Bangkok and place them on our aircraft for a flight to your country.” The Times couldn’t verify the documents, which were found by journalists and HRW in a binder marked CIA at Qaddafi’s intelligence headquarters.

Yglesias

Drug Treatment In Russia

Not surprisingly it’s harsh:

The treatment center does not handcuff addicts to their beds anymore. But caged together on double-decker bunks with no way out, they have no choice but to endure the agonies of withdrawal, the first step in a harsh, coercive approach to drug treatment that has gained wide support in Russia. [...]

Most experts in drug treatment condemn this approach as a primitive, brutal and ineffective way to address the problem, saying that addiction is a much more complex and intractable challenge and that simply drying out cannot bring a lasting cure.

“What they present as drug treatment has absolutely no basis in evidence,” said Diederik Lohman, a senior researcher at the monitoring group Human Rights Watch who took part in a recent study of narcotics use and treatment in Russia.

Russia bans the use of methadone.

What I’ve learned from Mark Kleiman is that the role for coercion probably comes later in the process. Hard as it is to “go clean” from any addictive substance, what’s even harder is to stay clean. If somebody needs to get himself tested regularly, with a sure shot of punishment if he flunks, then the actual punishment can be quite mild and you can do a great deal of good keeping the patient on track.

Media

Fox News Calls Exclusion Of Candidates From Debate A ‘Scandal,’ Will Fox’s Debate Next Month Be Different?

Fox News denied former Gov. Buddy Roemer (R-LA) from its GOP debate earlier this year. Now, Fox News says excluding candidates based on polling is the "real scandal"

On Wednesday, Fox News’ Neil Cavuto hosted a segment on his Fox Business show slamming the NBC/Politico debate next week for refusing to include GOP presidential candidates like Rep. Thad McCotter (R-MI) and former Gov. Gary Johnson (R-NM). Cavuto called the exclusion “the real scandal,” and made a refreshing and legitimate observation: “How can groundbreaking ideas ever get through if we don’t let the guys offering them break them?”

His demand that networks “invite all” candidates was joined by McCotter as a guest to the program:

CAVUTO: Alright forget the controversy over when the president’s big speech on jobs will take place and if it conflicts with next week’s GOP debate. I think the real scandal is who won’t be in that particular debate like last night’s guest on this very show, Gary Johnson. He’s a guy with a real resume, two-term very successful governor of New Mexico. Real ideas, dramatic ideas, on how to fix this financial mess. The debate organizers are saying Johnson and others don’t track well enough on polls to be included. They say eight is enough for the event and that young man is not going to be at the event.

So I’m calling this podium-gate. Why not just add more podiums for legit candidates? [...] Surely the TV networks — I don’t care how dire and poorly off they are — can figure out how to shoot a slightly more crowded stage. How can groundbreaking ideas ever get through if we don’t let the guys offering them break them? [...] My point is, invite all.

Watch it:

Cavuto and McCotter are right. The polling criteria used by most major networks to select debate participants is a catch-22 because polling generally reflects name identification, which depends largely on media coverage and debate inclusion. In addition to generally expanding the number of debate participants, a different way to choose would be to poll using political positions, policies, and biographies — without the name of the candidate — to gauge the American people.

However, Cavuto’s righteous rant isn’t without incredible hypocrisy. Earlier this year, Fox News hosted a Republican debate and used nearly the same criteria as Politico/NBC. Fox News refused to allow GOP presidential candidates former Louisiana Gov. Buddy Roemer and former political consultant Fred Karger into their debate. Many have alleged bias, especially since Roemer has unorthodox conservative ideas, and is running on a platform of cleaning up corruption and corporate influence in government, while Karger is a pro-gay rights Republican.

Later this month, Google and Fox News are teaming up to host a Republican debate on September 22. Few details have been released. Given Cavuto’s demand for more inclusion, the question viewers should ask is, “Will Fred Karger, Thad McCotter, Buddy Roemer, Gary Johnson and other candidates be included in the debate?” As Cavuto noted, giving candidates like these a platform is the only way to infuse “real ideas” into the discussion.

Yglesias

Man Dies Of Toothache

There’s a lot of waste in our health care system, but providing basic coverage and basic services to people who don’t have it adds a lot of value:

A 24-year-old Cincinnati father died from a tooth infection this week because he couldn’t afford his medication, offering a sobering reminder of the importance of oral health and the number of people without access to dental or health care.

According to NBC affiliate WLWT, Kyle Willis’ wisdom tooth started hurting two weeks ago. When dentists told him it needed to be pulled, he decided to forgo the procedure, because he was unemployed and had no health insurance.

When his face started swelling and his head began to ache, Willis went to the emergency room, where he received prescriptions for antibiotics and pain medications. Willis couldn’t afford both, so he chose the pain medications.

The tooth infection spread, causing his brain to swell. He died Tuesday.

Now, clearly, this man made some sub-optimal choices here he’s not purely a victim of lack of health insurance. At the same time you have right before you a no-longer-living, no-longer-breathing example of the “push the patient to the edge of financial desperation” theory of health care cost controls. It turns out that the quality of a frightened, pain-wracked young man asked to make technical medical decisions under severe financial constraints is not very high. The social cost of 24 year-old fathers dying of eminently treatable tooth infections, by contrast, is gigantic.

Climate Progress

Is President Obama a Lost Cause Environmentally — and What Should Progressives Do?

This weekend’s question is inspired by the Obama administration’s dreadful decision to do nothing on ozone pollution.

This decision is indicative of what we can expect from the president for the foreseeable future for a few reasons:

  1. The decision was Obama’s alone —  Like the upcoming Keystone XL tar sands pipeline decision, Congressional approval isn’t needed for the President on EPA rules.
  2. Unlike the pipeline, whose biggest impacts (on climate) would be decades from now and spread over the entire human race, the decision to do nothing on ozone pollution means millions of Americans — including kids, elderly, and the infirm —  will suffer needlessly in the near future.
  3. Relatedly, if your administration can’t figure out how to do messaging to defend clean air for kids, reduced deaths and hospital visits and asthma attacks from air pollution — stuff that is wildly popular  with Americans, especially independents — how precisely are you ever going to do messaging on global warming? Oh wait, I know, you aren’t.

Those who believe there is some underlying political brilliance in this administration — some clever strategy about to emerge that embraces and defend progressivism, particularly on the environment — no longer have a case.  [After the 2012 election, yeah, that's the ticket.]  Aaugh!

On the other hand, before progressives bail entirely on our feckless president, consider that the Intrade prediction (i.e. betting) market has Texas Gov. Rick Perry with a 38% chance of being the Republican nominee (ahead of Romney with 30%) — and Obama with whopping 50.3% chance of getting reelected.

And consider what Michael Gerson (Bush’s former speechwriter) points out in the WashPost of “Perry’s campaign against the New Deal“:

Read more

Economy

GOP ‘Jobs Agenda’ Revives Ineffective Business Tax Giveaway

This week, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) released a memo outlining the House GOP’s supposed “jobs agenda.” In addition to being an assault on organized labor and recommending the elimination of environmental regulations that save tens of thousands of lives every year, the document proposes reviving some of the GOP’s favorite tax cuts, including the so-called “20% Small Business Tax Deduction.”

This particular idea made an appearance in both an “economic plan” that Cantor and House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) presented to President Obama in 2009 and the GOP’s 2010 Pledge to America. The policy would allow businesses to deduct 20 percent of their income from their taxes, and in Cantor’s words, “immediately free up funds for small business people to retain and hire new employees, and reinvest in and grow their businesses.”

However, as Citizens for Tax Justice pointed out in 2009, there is little reason to think this tax break would be anything but a boondoggle:

The Republican plan proposes to allow a “small business” to take a tax deduction of 20 percent of its pretax income, whether the small business is a corporation or a sole proprietor. The plan defines a “small business” as one with 500 or fewer employees. It makes no distinction based on income. A “small business” making $100 million would get to deduct $20 million of its income right off the top. (Apparently, a company with slightly more than 500 employees would have an incentive to lay off staff to qualify for the tax break!) [...]

A business tax cut is just about the least effective stimulus measure Congress could possibly enact. The tax cuts put more money in the hands of business. But there is very little correlation between a corporation’s cash position and its plans for investment—whether expanding capacity or hiring new employees. Businesses invest in expansion when they believe there will be an increase in the demand for the goods and services they provide. If they don’t anticipate a sales increase, they won’t expand no matter how many tax breaks the federal government gives them.

And the Center for American Progress’ Christian Weller noted in 2010 that, while the credit is restricted to business with fewer than 500 employees, it’s still “an ‘upside-down’ tax break that gives the largest benefits to those who already have the highest incomes” because the amount of the deduction is contingent on which tax bracket a business files in (the higher the tax bracket, the more the deduction is worth):

A deduction reduces the taxable income and thus the taxes that somebody has to pay. A business owner with lots of business and other income will thus get a government subsidy of 35 cents for each dollar in deduction, while a small business owner in the 15 percent tax bracket will get 15 cents for each dollar in deductions…Larger businesses could easily use this windfall to outcompete smaller businesses. A larger business owner with a 35 percent marginal tax rate will get a benefit that is 133 percent greater than the benefit that a smaller business owner with a 15 percent marginal tax rate gets for each dollar in tax deduction.

But for the GOP, this idea is so good that it’s worth bringing up over and over again.

Climate Progress

A Climate Movement Is Born: Ozone Decision Spikes Total Arrests to 1,252 at White House Pipeline Protest

by Jamie Henn, TarSandsAction.org

WASHINGTON– The largest environmental civil disobedience in decades concluded at the White House this morning with organizers pledging to escalate a nationwide campaign to push President Obama to deny the permit for a new tar sands oil pipeline.

“Given yesterday’s baffling cave on ozone standards, the need for a fighting environmental movement has never been more clear,” said Bill McKibben, who spearheaded the protest. “That movement is being born right here in front of the White House and reverberating around the country.”

The proposed Keystone XL pipeline has become the most important environmental decision facing President Obama before the 2012 election and sparked nationwide opposition, from Nebraska ranchers to former Obama campaigners. A petition with 617,428 names opposing the pipeline will be delivered to the White House today.

Over the course of the two-week sit-in 1,252 people were arrested, including top climate scientists, landowners from Texas and Nebraska, former Obama for America staffers, First Nations leaders from Canada, and notable individuals including Bill McKibben, former White House official Gus Speth, NASA scientist Dr. James Hansen, actor Daryl Hannah, filmmaker Josh Fox, and author Naomi Klein.

“Back home we are fighting to protect our land and water. This week, we decided to bring that fight to the President’s doorstep,” said Jane Kleeb, Director of BOLD Nebraska, who led a delegation of Nebraskans who were arrested this morning. “We are acting on our values and expect our President to act as well.”

McKibben also announced at the protest that the movement will continue organizing, with a Phase Two announcement within 48 hours. Click here to be the first to know details when they’re announced: www.tarsandsaction.org/next-steps.

Read more

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up