ThinkProgress Logo

NEWS FLASH

Pew Center For Climate Changes Name, Now Sponsored By Energy Companies | The Pew Center on Global Climate Change is now the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions (C2ES), an explicitly corporate-managed organization. “Royal Dutch Shell, Hewlett-Packard Co. and Entergy Corp. will be the principal founding sponsors for the new C2ES,” E&E News reports. The move comes after the Pew Charitable Trusts ended its relationship with the centrist think tank founded in 1998. “The group does receive some funding from independent and foundation sponsors,” center president Eileen Claussen told reporters. The three companies, which she called “strategic partners,” will have seats on the C2ES board. Other contributors include Bank of America, Duke Energy, and General Electric Co. Claussen says the Shell-sponsored organization will retain its independence.

NEWS FLASH

Panetta: Attacking Iran Only Briefly Delays Nuclear Program | Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta said today at a press briefing that striking Iran’s nuclear program would only delay it two to three years. Asked if he agreed with his predecessor’s evaluation that “bombing would at most delay that program or derail it up to two or three years at most,” Panetta responded: “I see no change in the assessments.” The former Central Intelligence Agency chief said that among the “consequences” of attacking Iran could be “not really deterring Iran from what they want to do, but more importantly, it could have a serious impact in the region and it could have a serious impact on U.S. forces in the region.” He said strikes “ought to be a last resort” and a nuclear-capable Iran was “unacceptable.”

Climate Progress

Stunning Triumph for 99%: Obama Sends Keystone XL Back to State for Review, McKibben Calls This “A Very Important Day”

Big news: We won. You won.

That’s Bill McKibben’s headline at Tar Sands Action (full statement below).

In a stunning reversal of a “done deal,” the Obama administration has sent the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline back to review at the State Department:

… the Department has determined it is necessary to examine in-depth alternative routes that would avoid the Sand Hills in Nebraska in order to move forward with a National Interest Determination for the Presidential Permit.

There will be a “supplemental” environmental impact statement — presumably one that isn’t rigged (see “Bombshell: State Department Outsourced Tar Sands Pipeline Environmental Impact Study to ‘Major’ TransCanada Contractor.”  It “could be completed as early as the first quarter of 2013.”

Yes, Obama has punted this until after the election, but don’t undersell what just happened.  Bill McKibben is the man most responsible for leading the charge to kill the pipeline, and as he wrote me, “a done deal has come spectacularly undone.”  He added:

The people spoke very loudly, and thankfully the president appears to have heard them. We have had few enough even partial victories on climate change in Washington. That makes this a very important day.

In his statement at Tar Sands Action, McKibben writes, “most analysts are saying [the delay] will effectively kill the project.“  While we must continue to hold Obama’s feet to the fire burning planet, I agree with that assessment.

The people, the 99%, have won a victory over the 1% — the only group that would have profited from this pipeline.

Here is the McKibben’s eloquent, must-read statement (followed by the State Department’s and Obama’s):

Read more

Economy

More Than A Quarter Of Americans Would Have Lived In Poverty Last Year Without The Social Safety Net

Republicans in Congress and on the presidential campaign trail have spent much of the year trying to gut social safety net programs vital to the livelihood of America’s poor and elderly citizens. From House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan’s (R-WI) Medicare-ending budget plan to multiple proposals from the GOP’s presidential candidates, conservatives have sought to extract massive cuts from important programs, even while supplying the wealthiest Americans with massive tax cuts.

But Americans continue to rely heavily on safety net programs to stay afloat, according to a new report from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). Without the permanent safety net programs (including Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and various assistance programs) and temporary programs included in the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (which Republicans have falsely claimed didn’t work), more than a quarter of the country’s population would have fallen beneath the poverty line in 2010, CBPP says:

Our report also shows that if the government safety net as a whole — these temporary initiatives (all were featured in the 2009 Recovery Act) plus safety-net policies already in place when the recession hit — hadn’t existed in 2010, the poverty rate would have been 28.6 percent, nearly twice the actual 15.5 percent.

CBPP’s report comes on the heels of newly-refined poverty measures from the Census Bureau that painted an even bleaker picture of American poverty. According to the new measure, 16 percent of the population, or approximately 49.1 million Americans, lived in poverty in 2010, up from 46.2 million found in the official report released in September. The bulk of that difference comes from seniors, the very people who rely most on social safety net programs. Because the alternative measure takes out-of-pocket medical expenses into account, it found that nearly 16 percent of those over age 65 lived in poverty in 2010, up from 9 percent in the September report.

NEWS FLASH

Oklahoma Police Pension Fund Sues U.S. Bancorp Over Losses | Bloomberg reports that U.S. Bancorp is being sued “by an Oklahoma police pension fund over allegations investors in mortgage bonds were hurt by the bank failing to ensure that securities were backed by loans.” The Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement System is alleging that U.S. Bancorp “knew mortgage loans underlying the bonds weren’t properly transferred to trusts and caused investors to suffer millions of dollars in losses.” (HT: @matthewstoller)

NEWS FLASH

New Oscar Producer Has Own Anti-Gay Controversy | After Brett Ratner stepped down from producing the Oscars after making homophobic comments, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences announced that Brian Grazer would replace him. Unfortunately, Grazer has his own baggage of promoting anti-gay language. He produced this year’s Vince Vaughn/Kevin James comedy, The Dilemma, which featured a joke using “gay” as a pejorative. GLAAD spoke out about how insensitive (and unnecessary) the joke was when it appeared in the film’s trailer, but it was not cut from the film.

Yglesias

The Union Vote In 2012

What does the aftermath of Ohio’s referendum to overturn the anti-union SB 5 tell us about 2012? Most likely, not a great deal. But if it does prove to be a harbinger, I suspect the mechanism will be by costing the GOP votes from union households that it’s counting on to win. Everyone knows that labor unions, in their institutional forms, are big supporters of Democratic candidates. But GOP-voting by union members or members of union households is hardly unheard of. Gov. John Kasich, for example, got the vote of 35 percent of Ohioans who say someone in their house is in a union. In 2004, George W. Bush got re-elected in part thanks to the backing of 40 percent of voters who said someone in their household was a union member. Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker got 37 percent of the vote of members of union households to win in 2010.

These aren’t huge numbers, of course, but they’re way better than Republicans normally do with African-American voters. I generally emphasize the role of macroeconomic conditions in driving swing voters’ behavior and thus election outcomes. But it’s obvious that there’s also a deep demographic structure to the American electoral landscape. It’s at least conceivable that the newly vigorous anti-union sentiments in the Republican Party would drive a structural shift in this regard and push down the number of “winnable” union members who are willing to consider GOP candidates.

Alyssa

A Good New Project From Tina Fey

I feel like I’ve been kind of hard on Tina Fey when I’ve written about her recently, mostly motivated by the fact that I don’t think 30 Rock is particularly funny any more. I haven’t missed it at all this fall, and I think I might be done with Liz Lemon’s stale eccentricities and lack of growth. I do think it’s important for women to be able to have a diversity of interests, and to diverge from socially acceptable norms of femininity if they want, and to tell a wide array of women’s stories, though, so I was happy to see that Fey hosted a couple of NPR specials called “The Hidden World of Girls.” The project started by letting people call in and spend four minutes telling stories about the things about them that no one knows, about their rituals, about their daughter who became a radical mechanic in Vermont, and then they picked some folks for longer interviews. I particularly liked the segment on Irish Travelers in the first episode — I know I’ve heard of Irish Travelers before, but I knew precisely nothing about them, and coming of age rituals were a particularly interesting way to approach the culture as a whole:

Anyway, it’s a nice reminder that there are different kinds of stories to about women (and about men, and everyone else) than the conventional scripts that get followed a lot of the time. The world is big, and strange, and fascinating, and marvelous. And this is the kind of week where that sort of reminder is particularly valuable.

NEWS FLASH

Federal Judge Slams SEC’s Fraud Settlement With Citigroup: ‘It’s Just For Show’ | Last month, Citigroup announced that it had settled with the Securities and Exchange Commission over charges that the bank misled investors in a derivatives deal and then bet against them. Under the terms of the settlement, Citi agreed to pay $285 million and made a promise to never again break anti-fraud laws. The SEC accepted that pledge, even though banks have repeatedly made and broken such promises in recent years. Yesterday, U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff slammed the settlement, questioning why the SEC “didn’t force Citigroup Inc. to admit to ‘what the facts are’ before the agency agreed to settle.” “Why does that make any sense in this context?” the judge asked. “It’s just for show.”

NEWS FLASH

Michele Bachmann: Obamacare Will ‘Endanger The National Security Of Our Nation’ | In a sure sign that she’s gearing up to talk about her number one priority — “repealing Obamacare” — during Saturday’s national security debate, Michele Bachmann argued that the Affordable Care Act would undermine American’s “strong national defense” during a foreign policy address in Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina this afternoon. “Admiral Mike Mullen warned us, the greatest enemy of our national security was not a foreign one, but it was our own national debt,” she said. “And Obamacare only threatens to exacerbate this problem. Because President Obama’s plan for socialized medicine will threaten the very heart of the U.S. economy and endanger the national security of our nation as it drains valuable resources away from a strong national defense.” Someone should tell her the law is fully paid for and actually reduces the national deficit. Watch it:

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up