ThinkProgress Logo

Security

Perry Says Aid To Israel ‘Would Start At Zero’ In His Administration: ‘Make Your Case’ For U.S. Assistance

Tonight during the CBS/National Journal GOP presidential foreign policy debate, Gov. Rick Perry (R-TX) said that if he were president, “every country is going to start at zero dollars” in American foreign aid. “We need a president of the United States working with a Congress that sends a clear message to every country. It doesn’t make any difference whether it’s Pakistan, Afghanistan or whether it’s India,” he said.

Later in the debate, debate co-moderater Scott Pelley read a question from Twitter that asked, “Does governor Perry’s foreign aid starts at zero include Israel?” “Absolutely,” Perry said:

PELLEY: Does governor Perry’s foreign aid starts at zero include Israel?

PERRY: Well @GovernorPerry would tweet back at her that absolutely, every country would start at zero. Obviously Israel is a special ally and my bet is we would be funding them at some substantial level. But it makes sense for everyone to come in at zero and make your case.

Watch it:

The U.S. has committed to a 10-year agreement to provide Israel with security assistance with approximately $30 billion in aid. President Obama has upheld this agreement, but Perry’s stance would cancel that U.S. commitment.

The Republican Jewish Council tweeted that it hopes Perry gets briefed “on 10-year Memorandum of Understanding that governs US- Israel funding levels.”

“My faith requires me to support Israel,” Perry said in 2009. Apparently that faith only goes so far.

Update

“I agree with Governor Perry. Start everything at zero,” Mitt Romney chimed in. A Romney spokesperson later told Politico’s Ben Smith that Mitt was only talking about Pakistan, not Israel.

Transcript: Read more

Security

Bachmann: Obama Favors American Protesters Over Israel

During tonight’s national security and foreign policy GOP presidential debate on CBS, Rep. Michele Bachmann (MN) said that President Obama favors Americans protesting against income inequality over Israel, the U.S.’s chief ally in the Middle East. Bachmann said:

President Obama has been more than willing to stand with Occupy Wall Street, but he hasn’t been willing to stand with Israel. Israel looks at President Obama, and they do not see a friend.

Watch the video:

After the Israeli embassy in Cairo was stormed this past September and Obama stepped in, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netnyahu said, “We owe [Obama] a special measure of gratitude. This attests to the strong alliance between Israel and the United States.” In May, at AIPAC’s annual conference, Netanyahu said U.S.-Israel “security cooperation is unprecedented.”

Climate Progress

Conservatives Attack and Misunderstand a Book They Haven’t Read — A Book About Flawed Conservative Reasoning

by Chris Mooney, in a DeSmogBlog cross-post

This would be sad, if it weren’t also so telling.

On Monday I announced my new book The Republican Brain, which will be due out next spring. And I provided a brief description, as well as layering on plenty of nuance, like a good liberal, to make sure it wouldn’t be misinterpreted.

So much for that!

Beginning with Roger Pielke, Jr. (not technically a conservative, but, well…), and then spreading to climate “skeptic” blogs like Watts Up With That and Marc Morano’s Climate Depot, conservatives are claiming that the book is a form of “new eugenics” and that it describes them as “genetically/mentally/psychologically inferior,” and so on.

All of this is completely without foundation, and in fact, contradicted by my own book announcement, which discusses the many strengths (as well as weaknesses) of the conservative psychology, and describes the left-right difference as a kind of necessary yin and yang.

And none of the people saying these things (including over 100 commenters at Watts’ site) have read the book because it isn’t out yet, and won’t be for 6 months. In fact, it is still being edited.

Chalk up yet another example of conservative factual wrongness! Perhaps I can even fit it into the text.

But that’s not all. These conservatives have somehow gotten the idea that Pielke, Jr., “reviewed” the book, although he did nothing of the kind. Here’s Anthony Watts:

Read more

Alyssa

‘Community’ Open Thread: Growing Up

This post contains spoilers through the November 10 episode of Community.

It’s been interesting for me how Community, a show that started with Jeff Winger as its main character, and began the formation of the study group when he met Britta, has evolved to a show that’s much more interesting about its three actual college-aged characters and much less interesting about its adults. To a certain extent I’m sorry about that: there’s a really interesting story to be told about adults who need to reset their lives, and how hard it is to do that. But I also really love Troy, Abed, and Annie, and think they’re the linchpin to the show’s best episodes, its explorations of the ritual stops on the pilgrimage to adulthood, run through a very Greendale lens.

That said, I totally appreciate the fact that this episode moved the ball forward on Shirley, at least a tiny bit, addressing the sort of aggressive resurgence of her religiosity we’ve seen this season. “I’ve seen enough episodes of Friends to know that cohabitation leads to sex, drugs, and something Parade Magazine calls Schwimmer Fatigue,” Shirley complains to Britta about Annie’s move, prompting Britta to try to prove that secular morality can go toe-to-toe with Christianity. Shirley’s dismay when she discovers that their hitchhiker believes himself to be Jesus, and when he declares, in response to Britta’s question, that marijuana “was given to us by God. It should be legal,” is pretty priceless. But it’s nice that they end up reaching a common consensus that their passenger is nuts after he says that “And now, with your permission, I’d like to sing a little song about race mixing called ‘Don’t Do It.’” The show doesn’t have to have them talk about it, but they’ve found the thing that’s just too much for both of them.

I’m less fond of the Dean’s role in this episode. His deal with Jeff has always been a little creepy, but he’s crossed the line here from slightly off to outright predator. If he’d spied on the email of a female student, using that to force her into a date, people would—rightly—be horrified. If the Dean was a woman, this would be some Fatal Attraction territory. Instead, because Jeff is a guy who is more physically imposing than the Dean and who we assume couldn’t be physically coerced by him, the show treats the Dean’s emotional coercion of him as if it’s sort of adorable. There’s no question that their “Kiss From a Rose” duet was fun (and two of the best recent moments in the series have come from study group sing-a-longs), but I’ll be pretty uncomfortable if the show treats this as if it’s no big deal. This is Quinn-tries-to-get-Shelby-declared-unfit on Glee territory: it’s just not okay to behave this way, and narratively to treat it as if this is behavior that carries no major implication for the characters.

It was counterbalanced by the fact that this was a very good episode for Troy, Abed, and Annie. I thought it was a usefully forceful reminder that there are things that are objectively desirable about being a grown-up, and that wanting them doesn’t make you dull. “”Living here’s going to be fun all the time!” Annie tells herself—as much as Troy and Abed—after the puppet show, momentarily forgetting that when things are fun all the time, they’re not necessarily that fun after a while. And Troy and Abed confess that they could really use Annie’s expertise: “There’s a couple of things that you’d help us with,” Abed tells her. “Like where does the water go in the iron?” Troy explains. “And what is the iron for?” Abed chimes in. And while I do think there’s something weird about the fact that none of these attractive young people are dating, keeping them the children in a chosen family rather than actual adults, there’s something really nice about the fact that Annie and Troy have moved past their high school dynamic, her crush on him and his total ignorance of her, to become just good, solid friends.

Yglesias

The Deadliest Jobs

I tweeted earlier that the world would be a better place if more people had a more consistent view of the armed and un-armed forms of public sector workers. That prompted a rejoinder from at least some fans of the armed public sector that cops are running more risks than, say, librarians. This is true, but it’s worth keeping in mind that in the scheme of things (PDF) lots of jobs are more dangerous than being a policeman:

In terms of non-fatal injuries (PDF), police work is actually less dangerous than nursing:

Obviously, cops are doing a dangerous job. But it’s not the most dangerous job at there. So I think the point stands. Conservatives would do well to be a bit more skeptical of the activities of police, correctional, military, and intelligence bureaucracies and most liberals would do well to be a bit more skeptical of the activities of education and social service bureaucracies.

Alyssa

‘Parks And Recreation’ Open Thread: To High School And Back Again

This post contains spoilers through the November 10 episode of Parks and Recreation.

One thing that’s struck me about Parks and Recreation as its come into its own as one of the best comedies on network television is the way it uses its supporting characters. While 30 Rock‘s essentially abandoned its supporting cast to the point of making jokes about it, and Community‘s core cast is so big that the supporting cast is mostly there for very minor moments or one-offs like the Dungeons and Dragons episode, Parks and Recreation‘s supporting characters, even if they don’t get full episodes of their own, are reasonably well-developed and used for perfect inflection points. There’s something very funny and tender about Jerry as the minor bureaucrat with the soul of an artist, the kind of guy who recommends Italian Renaissance poetry for a horse funeral and paints pictures of Leslie as a Greek goddess, who’s too nice not to help April and Andy fulfill Andy’s bucket list even though he just wants to go home to his wife’s roast, who can’t tell Chris to leave him alone even as Chris is driving him insane by pulling Jerry into Chris’s relationship with Millicent. Similarly, I love Donna as the small-town hedonist, she of the Mercedes, and the treating yourself, and in this episode, lying back, eating popcorn, and getting Chris and Anne to relive their tantric sex workshops. They reinforce the main storylines perfectly without needing to be something they’re not for the situation. It’s a very nice bit of work.

I say all this as a preface to saying that I thought this was a particularly good episode for April, one of the characters who consistently frustrates me the most on Parks and Rec but has, this season, shown real signs of promise for the future. April’s clearly very smart, but she mostly acts willfully difficult or ignorant. Because she tamps down her own capabilities and Andy’s so perpetually enthusiastic, they mostly end up averaging out and ending up in the same place, but she’s clearly smarter than he is, and I’m always curious as to what might happen to their fledgling marriage if they got out of synch. You can see flashes of that in their participation in the Model UN tournament. When Andy tells April that “I just traded Finland’s military to Kenya for 50 lions,” her momentary practicality shows through when she reminds him that “Militaries are pretty good at protecting stuff.” And she also has a really good moment with Leslie, who has regressed to high school ridiculousness with Ben. “I just wanted to say it was cool how everything fell apart in there,” April says as she and Leslie slump by the lockers, before shifting into a slightly more mature gear. “And maybe you should talk to Ben…he takes really long sadness baths and makes me late for stuff.” I think it’s a really smart move to give April and Andy a spin-off web series: I’m sort of excited to see what they’re going to grow up into.

I have to admit, I’m less compelled by the core problems in this episode than the good stuff happening at the periphery. I worry that the show’s going to spend too much time with Leslie and Ben just being stuck in romantic limbo. Leslie’s lament-disguised-as-pep-talk “Friends help you move. They drive you to the airport. Boyfriends just love you and marry you,” is a very funny line, especially signaling the high school regression of the episode. But we know she feels this way. The show is wallowing a bit. Similarly, Chris’s decision to launch a ” full-scale investigation into my relationship with your daughter, Millicent Gergich,” as he puts it to Jerry, is very funny, and in character. But it also mostly serves to resolve a position that I’ve been basically talked around to, that Chris and Anne shouldn’t actually be together and will be better off as friends. And I’m glad that Tom is back, if only for Entertainment 720 to be definitively over. But I think it’s the least interesting choice the show could have made with him: it doesn’t really expand our vision of Pawnee, something that’s going to have to happen in Leslie’s campaign anyway and could have set the stage for the very different show it’ll be if she ends up on City Council.

Special Topic

Democratic Party Of Georgia Treasurer Destroys Bank Of America Card At Occupy Athens

Georgia Democratic Party Treasurer Russell Edwards

Georgia Politico’s Dustin Baker writes of a high-ranking Georgia Democratic Party official lending his support to the 99 Percent Movement.

Yesterday, Russell Edwards, the Georgia Democratic Party’s Treasurer and co-host of True South Radio, attended a meeting of Occupy Athens in the town where the University of Georgia, the state’s largest university, is based. Edwards, an attorney, offered to defend anyone who was arrested pro bono and encouraged everyone there to move their money from big banks to local community banks or credit unions. He also destroyed his Bank of America card in front of the audience:

EDWARDS: My name is Russell Edwards. I am a practicing attorney. My office is right between Taco Stand and 5 Star Day. If anyone in Occupy Athens gets arrested, I will provide my services and glad and proudly represent them pro bono. This is the last thing I will say before I leave and the last act I have in my hand a [expletive] Bank of America card. And I will now destroy it. I am sorry of my obscene language. I apologize to the children present. My choice word reflects my severe frustration with the big banks in this country, with the serves they DO NOT provide the people and the utter greed that they have shown again and again. It is time for all of us to our money away form them. Take your money out of the big banks, give it to the small community banks – or better yet, the credit unions.

Watch Edward’s appearance in the following recording (it appears at the end):


Edwards is one of the highest-ranking Democratic Party officials to appear at one of the occupations and declare his support for the 99 Percent by disavowing a big bank.

Climate Progress

What Should McKibben and the Climate Movement Do Next?

Climate hawks won a (relatively) big and “unlikely” victory this week.  Thanks to the leadership of Bill McKibben — with the help of countless others,  including many people who read Climate Progress — we stopped the Obama administration from its original plan to mindlessly permit the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline.

IF Obama is reelected — which is no more than about 50-50 at this point — then I agree with McKibben that the Keystone pipeline is probably dead.  But even setting aside the climate benefit of slowing the exploitation of the tar sands, the pipeline victory is far more than symbolic.

The key point is it absolutely would not have happened without the  emergence of an organized protest movement (see “A Climate Movement Is Born“).

So the victory hints at the possibility of even greater victories to come.  And so that leads to the weekend question:  What Should McKibben and the Climate Movement Do Next?  Bill will, I’m quite sure, read your comments.

Yglesias

The Rent Is Too Damn High

My least favorite argument:

The wealthy have been the subject of much discussion lately, from the protesters on Wall Street to lawmakers in Washington. President Obama has even provided a definition of who’s wealthy in arguing that taxes should be raised for those households with incomes of at least $250,000 a year. But is that really the marker of wealth? After all, earning $250,000 a year in New York does not buy as much as it does in, say, Iowa or Alabama.

This always strikes me as deeply confused. If you want to pay your daughter’s tuition at CalTech it doesn’t matter if you live in Manhattan or Mobile. If you want to book a 10 night stay in a hotel in Paris, it doesn’t matter if you live in Manhattan or Mobile. If you want to order an iPhone 4S, it doesn’t matter if you live in Manhattan or Mobile. It’s true that Per Se probably costs a lot more than any restaurant in Mobile, but that’s because the best chefs in America want to open the best restaurants in New York. The most important thing that you can buy more of in Mobile than in Manhattan is square feet of real estate. But that’s not because the same real estate is somehow cheaper in Mobile than it is in Manhattan, it’s because Manhattan real estate is exclusively available in Manhattan. But this is a bit like saying that someone who owns a Bentley isn’t really as rich as someone driving a Camry. Manhattan real estate is expensive because the supply is constrained and the demand is high. If you don’t want to pay Manhattan rents, you can move to Mobile. If you don’t want to switch jobs, you can try Mott Haven.

Now as it happens, I think the fact that real estate in coastal urban cores is expensive is a huge social problem. The rent, to coin a phrase, is too damn high and we need to change regulation to reduce the scarcity. But giving a tax break to people with expensive houses doesn’t solve anything.

Climate Progress

Climate Change Starts to F#*& With Cocktail Hour: Cue the Revolution

by Auden Schendler, in a Grist cross-post

Come Friday, I’m usually pretty torched after a typical week of being attacked as a hypocrite for working on climate change in the ski industry, failing to get any attention from corporate funded politicians, or torquing on the status quo and getting nowhere because of rule No. 1 of climate activism: Given the choice between saving the world and having an awkward encounter in the supermarket because someone doesn’t agree with you, most humans will opt to avoid the awkwardness, despite the obvious imbalance in the equation.

So, often, I’ll join our company CFO for a cocktail. He will have, himself, spent the week trying to wrest chunks of money for efficiency retrofits out of tight budgets; or beating up sketchy financial models from clean energy projects. Our favorite cocktail is a Manhattan, which I mix up with some Gentleman Jack if possible, because I like owner Brown-Forman’s work on climate change. And, in theory, I escape. Or so I thought.

A terror-inducing study for the Commonwealth of Kentucky that just came across my radar has warned that global warming may affect weather patterns crucial to the Bourbon aging process.

Hey, now. Come on. Things are getting a little personal now.

For years we’ve been hearing that climate change will lead to increased drought, fire, super storms, floods, threats to oceans and fisheries, disruptions to food and water supply. But that’s just standard apocalypse. Now climate change is jacking with cocktail hour, and that’s no bueno. Maybe this will be the final straw that galvanizes people into action. Just this Wednesday alone there were two posts on the booze-climate connection. They were, not surprisingly given my worldview, both by friends who have been known to enjoy the occasional highball. Snowboarder Jeremy Jones talks about his climate nonprofit Protect Our Winters’ new collaboration with Alamos vineyards in the Huffington Post. Of course this makes sense: Alamos depends on Andes snowmelt to irrigate their vineyards.

Read more

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up