ThinkProgress Logo

Security

Months Before Total Confusion On Libya, Herman Cain Was Totally Sure Obama Was Wrong

Former pizza executive Herman Cain has struggled with foreign policy throughout his campaign to be commander in chief, but never more so than an in an interview with the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel today in which he muddled through a flailing, nonsensical answer on Libya for five excruciating minutes. Ultimately, Cain lands on being generally supportive of the intervention, but says he perhaps would have a bit more cautious at the outset.

But this seems to contradict with his longstanding strident opposition to the Libyan expedition. “I’ve said many times before that US intervention in Lybia [sic] is inappropriate and wrong. The US does not belong in this war,” he wrote in a Twitter debate in July. That same month, he appeared on John Stossel’s show on Fox Business, where he clearly stated his opposition:

CAIN: Should we be in Libya? The answer is no.

STOSSEL: That’s clear.

CAIN: That’s because U.S. interest was not clearly defined.

It’s worth noting that Cain’s foreign policy slogan is “peace through strength and clarity.”

Watch the flip flop, along with a compilation of Cain’s less-than-clear foreign policy vision, produced by ThinkProgress’ Jeff Spross:

Unlike Rick Perry’s infamous “oops” moment, Cain doesn’t appear to have a momentary brain lapse, but seems to be genuinely befuddled by the substance of the question. Last month, Cain said he had studied up on foreign policy and “challenge[d] anybody who says I wouldn’t know how to address foreign policy.”

While becoming the next commander in chief is looking increasingly unlikely for Cain, he has a backup plan. This weekend, he said he would like to be secretary of defense so he could “kick the you-know-what out of everyone in the world.”

Alyssa

‘Boardwalk Empire’ Open Thread: Family Matters

This post contains spoilers through the Nov. 13 episode of Boardwalk Empire.

In a decidedly dour season, Louise’s arrival, via an altercation with an Atlantic City matrons and a pack of “beach lizards,” is something of a delight. Angela’s been looking for an actual kindred spirit all season long, and while Richard’s too melancholic and too damaged to truly lift her up, Louise, who uses the fake names of one of the characters in her novels as an alias, and hollers, “Let ‘em gawk. They’re called knees, fellows!” at her pack of admirers on the beach, appears to be exactly who Angela is looking for. It’s nice to see Angela lit up a bit, galvanized both by overhearing Jimmy’s inept scheming, and by the kiss she shares with Louise at a joyfully bohemian party. And her conversation with Jimmy is bruising. When he asks her why she married him (after evading a question about whether he really loves her), she’s blunt: “Because we have a child together. It’s what society expected from me. Because you kept pushing it.”

And that’s sort of the key to Jimmy’s problems, isn’t it? He’s not a complicated man, and he’s not very good at seeing complexity in other people, or in assessing what people expect of him, particularly his mother. He’ll toss a fellow off a balcony for upsetting his party, incapable of thinking through what it might mean for a long game. In fact, Jimmy doesn’t particularly seem capable of seeing that there is a long game, that his moment of triumph is really Nucky’s victory. Inspired by a lecture from Arnold Rothstein, who tells him that “Some days I make 20 bets. Some days, I make none…so I wait, plan, marshal my resources. And when I finally see an opportunity and there is a bet to make, I bet it all,” Nucky rolls big. He quits his treasurer’s job, retires to private life, and prepares to unleash absolute hell on Atlantic City. “You sure this what you want?” Chalky asks when Nucky tells him to call a general strike and that Nucky will back him. “In about 30 minutes, it won’t be my problem,” Nucky says, relishing the thought of complicating everyone else’s life for a change — and planning a trip to Ireland to enlist Sinn Fein in his campaign.
Read more

NEWS FLASH

San Francisco Federal Reserve Finds Better Than 50 Percent Chance The U.S. Falls Into Recession Next Year | A new analysis from the San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank finds that there is a better than 50 percent chance that the U.S. will tip back into recession in 2012, mostly due to the ongoing fiscal crisis in Europe. “A European sovereign debt default may well sink the United States back into recession,” wrote researchers Travis Berge, Early Elias, and Oscar Jorda. “However, if we navigate the storm through the second half of 2012, it appears that danger will recede rapidly in 2013.

Yglesias

Immigrants Repopulating The Great Plains

A.G. Sulzberger has an awesome piece in the Times about Hispanic immigrants revitalizing dying small downs on the Great Plains:

In the sparsely populated western half of Kansas, every county but one experienced a decline in the non-Hispanic white population, two-thirds of them by more than 10 percent. At the same time, a vast majority experienced double-digit growth in Hispanic population, more than offsetting the declines in seven counties and many smaller cities and towns. Those places with the highest percentage of Hispanic residents tend to have the lowest average ages, the highest birth rates and the most stable school populations.

NEWS FLASH

Survey: Most Health Experts Believe Mandate Is Critical For Reducing Number Of Uninsured | A new Commonwealth Fund survey finds that 89 percent of health care leaders believe that “it is important for federal and state policymakers to continue to move forward in implementing the Affordable Care Act.” Significantly, 84 percent said “the mandate is an important strategy for reducing the number of uninsured, making coverage more available and affordable, and improving the health of the country overall.”

Climate Progress

Climate and Energy Ignorati at New York Times Run Yet Another Error-Riddled Story Attacking Clean Energy

On an average yearly basis, renewables represent a small fraction of the total government investments in the energy sector (O&G is Oil & Gas)

Can you write a 2300-word article trashing clean energy subsidies that is so utterly devoid of crucial context for the readers that it

  • Ignores the vast, documented benefits of clean energy
  • Never discusses the large cost of dirty energy to human health
  • Never compares clean energy subsidies to dirty energy ones
  • Never compares U.S. clean energy subsidies to those of China, Germany and other countries.
  • Ignores climate change (yet again)
  • Utterly misunderstands the difference between a loan guarantee and a direct subsidy, among myriad other basic blunders?

You can if you are Eric Lipton and Clifford Krauss of the New York Times.  Their Friday piece “A Gold Rush of Subsidies in Clean Energy Search” joins the pantheon of recent one-sided, error-riddled, climate-free NYT pieces attacking clean energy or promoting dirty energy — see The NY Times Abandons the Story of the Century and Joins the Energy and Climate Ignorati.

The story is truly context free.  Again, you’d never know that the top U.S. economists (center-right non-environmentalists, just like the NYT editors appear to be) have provided a strong justification for clean energy subsidies — see Economics Stunner: “Oil and Coal-Fired Power Plants Have Air Pollution Damages Larger Than Their Value Added”; Natural Gas Damage Larger Than Its Value Added For Even Low CO2 Prices.  So have public health experts (see Life-cycle study : Accounting for total harm from coal would add “close to 17.8¢/kWh of electricity generated”).

NOTE:  The lead author of that last study was Dr. Paul Epstein, associate director of the Center for Health and the Global Environment at Harvard Medical School.  My old friend Hunter Lovins just tweeted, “Very sad loss: my friend Paul Epstein has died. World’s foremost expert on health impacts of global warming. Damn…. The world needed him.”  Paul was a compassionate visionary.  The world did need him, since his message about the health impacts of climate change obviously has not reached all the people who need to hear it.

You’d never know that China provides vastly more subsidies for clean energy (see “Solar Trade War?“).  Again, in late October, the Times published an article titled, “China Takes a Loss to Get Ahead in the Business of Fresh Water.”  But apparently the editors seem to think that only China should invest in emerging industries that are going to be massive job creators in the coming years.  For New York Times editors, China’s short-term losses to achieve long-term gains are smart business but America’s are boondoggles.

Other than a couple of brief quotes by clean energy advocates, the only accurate part of the story is the analogy to gold rushClean energy is indeed gold.

Every NY Times reporter and editor should have this excerpt from the recent International Energy Agency report on their desk:

“… we are on an even more dangerous track to an increase of 6°C [11°F]….  Delaying action is a false economy: for every $1 of investment in cleaner technology that is avoided in the power sector before 2020, an additional $4.30 would need to be spent after 2020 to compensate for the increased emissions.”

Where on Earth can you get a return on investment like that?  Ideally we would have a price on global warming pollution, but failing that it’s obvious that our problem isn’t that subsidies for clean energy are too high, but that they are far, far too low.

As for debunking the myriad errors in this piece, NRG Energy, the major victim of the Times’ egregious reporting, has taken the unusual step of issuing a major rebuttal, which I repost below:

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE OR COMMENT

Read more

NEWS FLASH

Poll Shows Majority Support For Health Insurance Mandate | On the same day that the Supreme Court agreed to decide whether the Affordable Care Act’s requirement that most Americans carry insurance or play slightly more income taxes is constitutional, a new poll shows that this requirement has received a groundswell of support. According to the poll, “52% of Americans favor mandatory health insurance, up from 44% in June. . . . 47% oppose the health insurance mandate, down from 54% in early summer.”

Yglesias

Angela Merkel’s Prescription For Europe: Tighter Budget Discipline Across The Board

The fact that implementing a single currency could create a series of cascading continent-wide debt problems wasn’t exactly unknown to the Eurozone’s architects. They’re plan for dealing with it was something called the European Stability and Growth Pact which was support to limit budget deficits to 3 percent of GDP and keep the Italians in line. It didn’t work. Indeed, the Germans themselves were among the first to break the pact which swiftly came to look like a dead letter. Today in her speech (PDF) to the Christian Democrats’ party conference, German Chancellor Angela Merkel paired a stirring rhetorical defense of the European project to a strident call for a more robust version of the pact going forward.

“We want to have automatic sanctions,” she said calling on European states to establish a legal “right of action” against countries who violate the terms of the pact. Good idea?

Well, not really. The crux of the matter is that Ireland and Spain weren’t running large budget deficits before the crisis hit. What they were running was large current account deficits. Much as happened to Nevada and Florida, funds were pouring in from abroad to finance real estate loans. This influx of money pumped up wage and price levels. Then the flow of money halted, leaving unemployment high and then the high unemployment created budget crises. It’s true that Portugal and especially Greece also had unsound budget practices, but this wasn’t the real issue. The countries doing well in Europe today are the country that were running trade surpluses, and the countries that are doing poorly are the ones that were running trade deficits.

Security

Tennessee Gov. Bill Haslam Refuses to Denounce State Rep’s Anti-Muslim Remarks

Tennessee Gov. Bill Haslam (R)

Tennessee State Rep. Rick Womick (R-Murfreesboro) is facing growing criticism for his comments, first reported by ThinkProgress, calling for a purge of all Muslims from the U.S. military.

Tennessee Governor Bill Haslam (R) told The Nashville Scene, “I don’t think I would agree with Rick on that.” But when pressed to denounce Womick’s comments, as Muslim community groups have been urging, Haslam came up short, saying “I don’t know that’s my role. I would just say that on that issue I don’t agree with Rick.”

Haslam might be slow to denounce Womick’s comments that Muslims should be forced out of the military, but Womick is finding few defenders in his party.

The Murfreesboro Daily News Journal contacted Republican State Reps. Joe Carr, Pat Marsh, Bill Ketron, Jim Tracy and Mike Sparks for contact but none of them chose to comment on the controversy surrounding Womick.

While Republicans remain silent about Womick’s decision to denounce all Muslims in the U.S. military on Veterans Day, Muslim community groups are calling on Womick to issue an apology and for Tennessee politicians to publicly rebuke Womick’s anti-Muslim statements.

Islamic Center of Tennessee educator Abdul Rahman Chao told Nashville’s News Channel 5:

I think what he says has great implications, and I think he should not only retract what he said but also apologize to all people who are Muslims who are serving the military as well as all Muslims in the United States of America, because that bigotry only leads people to alienation and hate.

Watch it:

The Council on American Islamic-Relations (CAIR) issued a statement calling on the Tennessee General Assembly to formally rebuke Womick for “defaming all members of the military.”

Alyssa

Occupy Wall Street v. Frank Miller’s Spartans

David Brin takes on Frank Miller’s anti-Occupy Wall Street rant and 300, arguing that the Athenians — and by extension the Occupy movement Miller seems convince is going to undermine our fight against Islamic terrorism — are vastly more bad-ass and effective than Miller gives them credit for:

The first invasion by Persia, ten years earlier—under Xerxes’s father—had been defeated by just such a militia army… from Athens… made up of farmers, clerks, tradesmen, artists and mathematicians. A rabble of ill-disciplined “brawlers” who, after waiting in vain for promised help from Sparta, finally decided to handle the problem alone. On that fateful day that citizen militia leveled their spears and their thin blue line attacked a professional Persian force many times their number, slaughtering them to the last man on the legendary beach of Marathon…Think about that for a moment. Can you picture it? Damn. Please pause here and Wiki “Marathon.” Even better, watch it computer dramatized. Prepare to be amazed there were once such men. Go on… I’ll wait!…

That Athenian triumph deserves a movie! And believe me, it weighed heavily on the real life Leonidas, ten years later. “300″ author Frank Miller portrays the Spartans’ preening arrogance in the best possible light, as a kind of endearing tribal machismo. Miller never hints at the underlying reason for Leonidas’s rant, a deep current of smoldering shame over how Sparta sat out Marathon, leaving it to Athenian amateurs, like the playwright Aeschelus, to save all of Greece. The “shopkeepers” whom Leonidas outrageously and ungratefully despises in the film.

To a certain extent, it seems silly to keep pointing out how warped Miller’s world-view is. There are no questions that there are problems with safety at Occupy encampment, and I’ve been particularly troubled by the early trouble the movement seemed to have dealing with the risk of sexual assault and women’s concerns. But that’s not really what Miller’s screed is about. It’s just another way for him to assert that he’s doing more than anyone else is to combat terrorism inspired by extreme interpretations of Islam, to sneer “Wake up, pond scum. America is at war against a ruthless enemy. Maybe, between bouts of self-pity and all the other tasty tidbits of narcissism you’ve been served up in your sheltered, comfy little worlds, you’ve heard terms like al-Qaeda and Islamicism.”

And if Miller was an isolated crank with totally implausible beliefs, I’d probably just ignore him. But his conviction that the folks who don’t have jobs could have work if they wanted it in a time of persistently high unemployment is similar to the views University of Pennsylvania students who responded to Occupy protestors by telling them to join the same tax bracket those students expected to enter. The creepy idea that a New York mosque is a cover for a nest of terrorists, an animating fantasy of his execrable Holy Terror, is the one that’s entangled the development of a community center in the real world. Miller’s views are self-aggrandizing, uniformed junk, but it’s junk that has a foothold in American society.

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up