ThinkProgress Logo

NEWS FLASH

Obama Administration: GOP Keystone XL Poison Pill Would Force A Permit Denial | If Rep. Lee Terry’s (R-NE) legislation to expedite the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline review process is attached to the payroll tax cut bill, as Republicans and polluter lobbyists intend, the administration would be forced to deny the necessary permits, a State Department spokesman said today. “Should Congress impose an arbitrary deadline for the permit decision, its actions would not only compromise the process, it would prohibit the Department from acting consistently with National Environmental Policy Act requirements by not allowing sufficient time for the development of this information. In the absence of properly completing the process, the Department would be unable to make a determination to issue a permit for this project.”

Climate Progress

Keystone Cops: State Department Says if Congress Forces a Rapid Decision, It Will Be Forced to Reject Pipeline Permit

The House GOP has said it will pass a bill holding the payroll tax cut extension hostage to accelerating the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline decision.  House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) predicted Monday that measure would pass the House.

At the State Department’s daily briefing, a reporter asked about this and the answer was a firm, “go ahead, make my day”:

QUESTION: Do you have any comment on the proposed Congressional action requiring the State Department to make a determination on the Keystone pipeline within 60 days of enactment of the House version of the payroll tax cut bill?

ANSWER: It is the President’s prerogative to lead and manage the foreign policy of the United States, and in the case of the proposed Keystone XL pipeline project, our relations with Canada. This historical prerogative encompasses the President’s long-established authority to supervise the permitting process for transboundary pipelines.

The President has delegated his authority to supervise this permitting process, by executive order, to the Department of the State. This process for determining whether to issue permits for transborder pipelines has been in place for more than 40 years.

In determining whether a permit is in the national interest, this process requires consideration of a myriad of factors, including environmental and safety issues, energy security, economic impact, and foreign policy, as well as consultation with at least 8 federal agencies and inputs from the public and stakeholders – including Congress.

The State Department has led a rigorous, thorough, and transparent process that must run its course to obtain the necessary information to make an informed decision on behalf of the national interest. Should Congress impose an arbitrary deadline for the permit decision, its actions would not only compromise the process, it would prohibit the Department from acting consistently with National Environmental Policy Act requirements by not allowing sufficient time for the development of this information. In the absence of properly completing the process, the Department would be unable to make a determination to issue a permit for this project.

The State Department is currently in the process of obtaining additional information regarding alternate routes that avoid the Sand Hills in Nebraska. Based on preliminary consultations with the State of Nebraska and the permit applicant, the Department believes the review process could be completed in time for a decision to be made in first quarter 2013.

Bang. Bang.

It’s worth noting that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said last week: “If the House sends us their bill with Keystone in it, they are just wasting valuable time because it will not pass the Senate.” And President Obama said: “Any Effort to Tie Keystone to the Payroll Tax Cut, I Will Reject.”

Good to see the State Department switch from Kops to Cops.

Politics

Moon Bases And Beyond: Newt Gingrich’s Top 5 Sci-Fi Policy Proposals

Gingrich tests virtual reality goggles in 1996

It’s not often that moon bases play a key role in presidential politics, but when Mitt Romney sought to draw a contrast with front-runner Newt Gingrich during Saturday’s ABC debate, he explained: “We could start with his idea to have a lunar colony that would mine minerals from the moon.” The comment drew laughter from the audience, but Gingrich is serious. “I’m proud” of the idea, Gingrich said. “I grew up in a generation where the space program was real, where it was important.”

Indeed, Gingrich has had a long fascination with ideas that most Americans would probably consider science fiction. Gingrich’s top five science fiction ideas, beyond moon bases:

1. EMP attack: As the New York Times notes today, Gingrich has a unusual phobia for outlandish doomsday scenarios like an electromagnetic pulse attack, even though most nuclear experts dismiss the threat. He even wrote the foreword to a 2009 sci-fi thriller based on an EMP attack.

2. Space mirrors: Gingrich has proposed a “a mirror system in space [that] could provide the light equivalent of many full moons so that there would be no need for nighttime lighting of the highways.”

3. Space lasers: Gingrich has flirted with several variations of orbiting death rays. For example, in 2002 he called for “directed energy weapons and laser pulsing systems that could actually [shoot down missiles] from space.” “If you go to a space-based system, we can almost certainly build a workable system,” he said in 2009.

4. Geo-engineering: Gingrich has suggested that instead of actually stopping global warming from happening (this was when he believed in global warming), we should use geoengineering to ameliorate its impact. “Geo-engineering holds forth the promise of addressing global warming concerns for just a few billion dollars a year,” Gingrich said in 2008. Geo-engineering is the process of artificially altering the climate in fundamental ways and is considered so dangerous that it faced a ban from the U.N.

5. A better life through video games: Gingrich made a political speech to Second Life in 2007 in which he said that the “3-D Internet in all of its various forms” will help create a better “parallel country.” “It’s a parallel that enables us to do things that would be much more difficult to do in the real world.. [It's a] world that works.” Second Life has basically failed.

Gingrich’s “futuristic proselytizing” even earned him the nickname “Newt Skywalker” among the local press in his home state of Georgia in the 1980s and ’90s, Politico notes today.

But Gingrich’s fascination with science fiction goes far deeper than gadgets and to his core motivations as a politician. Ray Smock was the historian of the U. S. House of Representatives from 1983 to 1995 until Gingrich fired him as one of Gingrich’s first acts as Speaker. As Smock wrote last week for the History News Network, Gingrich’s “hero and role model” was the protagonist of Isaac Asimov’s Foundation series, who invents a new field of history — Gingrich is himself a historian — and fundamentally changes the course of history for thousands of planets in the process. A tagline of the series is, “In a future century the Galactic Empire dies and one man creates a new force for civilized life.” As Smock writes, “Newt liked the idea of one man shaping the destiny of entire civilizations.”

Indeed, Gingrich has spoken often about his galatic inspiration. For example, as he wrote in his 1996 memoir, To Renew America:

Isaac Asimov was shaping my view of the future in equally profound ways. …For a high school student who loved history, Asimov’s most exhilarating invention was the ‘psychohistorian’ Hari Seldon. The term does not refer to Freudian analysis but to a kind of probabilistic forecasting of the future of whole civilizations. The premise was that, while you cannot predict individual behavior, you can develop a pretty accurate sense of mass behavior.

Gingrich’s sense of grandiosity is by now famous, but his reverence for Seldon underscores the planet-sized ambitions Gingrich held, as helps elucidate his fascination with grand, futuristic projects. In a doodle of Gingrich’s recently published in Slate, the then-Speaker wrote that his two primary missions were to be an “Advocate of civilization” and “definer of civilization.” Another doodle “shows Gingrich (the “system designer”) at the hub of concentric circles featuring his staff, key supporters, the media, constituents, and the public.”

NEWS FLASH

Just 22 Percent Of The Long-Term Unemployed Are Collecting Unemployment Insurance | According to a recent Kaiser Family Foundation/NPR poll, just 22 percent of those Americans who have been out of work for a year or more say that they are collecting unemployment insurance. Among those who are collecting benefits, “a full 94 percent think it is at least somewhat likely that their benefits will run out before they are able to find a new job.” As Center for American Progress Policy Analyst Sarah Jane Glynn wrote, “these findings echo what economists have been saying for some time now. The long-term unemployed are desperate to find work, their benefits are running out, and something needs to be done to assist them in this tough economy.” Instead, House Republicans have proposed cutting their benefits.

Alyssa

The Epic Fail Trailer For ‘What To Expect When You’re Expecting’

Well, this looks even more rancid than I expected:

Ladies! Always with the demands for homeownership! And wanting to punch their husbands in the face! Hatin’ on other ladies! And hipster dads! Using their babies for accessories, laughing about their incompetence, and complaining about their women! And of course, we couldn’t possibly have a gay couple in a movie that’s about the creation of modern families and parenting.

This is particularly embarrassing in the wake of Up All Night, which moved past its irritating-hipster-parenting stage fairly quickly, and has become a gratifyingly tender and perceptive look at what it means for a man to give up a career that he’s wonderful at to redefine himself as a stay-at-home parent. Sometimes it’s OK not to distance yourself from everything with a heavy layer of irony and artifice.

NEWS FLASH

200 Leaders Embrace New Hampshire’s Marriage Equality Law | More than 200 state and local leaders have joined a bipartisan group working to preserve New Hampshire’s 2-year-old gay marriage law” called Standing up for New Hampshire Families, the Boston Globe reported on Saturday. The organization has also attracted Christine Barrata — who until recently served as the GOP’s communications director — who will now work as a high-level field organizer. The House Judiciary Committee advanced the repeal measure in October and the full House is expected to take it up in January. Significantly, the repeal bill — which most residents oppose — would allow anyone to refuse to recognize the civil unions and discriminate against such couples in employment, housing, and public accommodations.

NEWS FLASH

Wisconsin To Spend Nearly $500,000 Educating Citizens About New Voter ID Law | Next month, Wisconsin will launch an ad campaign to educate residents about the state’s new voter ID law. The estimated price tag for 28 weeks of these public service announcements? $436,000. Wisconsin should be commended for undertaking such an ambitious campaign to educate the public (including a website, print ads, billboards, brochures, a toll-free hotline, and television and radio spots). Of course, they could have spared taxpayers the considerable expense and completely unnecessary and damaging voting restrictions by simply not passing the voter ID law in the first place.

Security

Palestinian Activist Dies After Israeli Soldier Shoots Tear Gas Canister At Point Blank Range

A U.S. diplomatic cable from February, 2010 released back in September by WikiLeaks revealed that the Israelis had said that at the time that they were having trouble dealing with unarmed demonstrations in the West Bank against the Israeli occupation. According to the cable, one Israeli military official warned that the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) “will start to be more assertive in how it deals with these demonstrations.” The February, 2010 cable also said that “[l]ess violent demonstrations are likely to stymie the IDF,” and included a quote from Defense Ministry Director of Policy and Political-Military Affairs Amos Gilad: “We don’t do Gandhi very well.”

That sentiment was on full display last Friday in the small Palestinian village of Nabi Saleh. Every Friday for nearly three years, village residents and other activists demonstrate against nearby religious Israeli settlers who claimed a fresh water spring belonging to a Palestinian family.

During Friday’s demonstration, an IDF solider shot a tear gas canister from close range that hit 28 year-old Palestinian Mustafa Tamimi. He died Saturday morning of the wounds suffered from the incident. Video was captured of the protest and the incident’s aftermath. Tamini’s run in with IDF soldiers occurs at around the 6 minute mark. Warning, images are graphic:

IDF officials called the event “exceptional” (+972′s Noam Sheizaf notes that this kind of thing has happened before) and the Israeli military has launched an investigation into Tamini’s death. Army officials seemed to try to justify the incident by tweeting photos of a slingshot (the implication being that Tamini threw stones at the Israeli soldiers). The New York Times reports that those present “did not dispute that Mr. Tamimi had thrown rocks at the armored vehicle before the shooting, but witnesses claimed that the Israeli officer had fired the shell directly at him in violation of Israel Defense Forces regulations.” Sheizaf circles in red the weapon and the tear gas canister. Tamini is on the left in white:

Haaretz reports that the Israeli army said the soldier “didn’t see” Tamimi. But Haim Schwarczenberg, the photographer of the above photo, said, “From what I saw, there is no chance that the soldier had not seen him.”

Economy

Romney Admitted Stat About Obama Regulations Was A Lie, Keeps Using It Anyway

One of the favorite conservative myths of the moment involves the supposed “job-killing” effects of regulations coming out of the Obama administration. Today, it was evidently 2012 GOP presidential hopeful Mitt Romney’s turn to take this tall tale out for a spin. During an event in New Hampshire, Romney claimed that the rate of new regulations under Obama has “increased four-fold,” resulting in businesses being buried under a pile of red tape:

The level of regulation in America, every the regulators, the government, come up with new regulations. And they send them out. The rate of regulatory burden has increased four-fold since Obama has become president. Four times the amount of regulation coming out per year as in the past. And so businesses say, ‘gosh, I’m not sure I want to invest in America.’

Watch it:

This statistic has absolutely no basis in reality. In fact, it isn’t true according to the Romney campaign. When Romney made the same claim during an interview with NPR in September, NPR asked the Romney campaign for verification, at which point the campaign was forced to admit that “the Governor misspoke.”

Instead, the Romney camp told NPR that new regulations under Obama are twice what they were under President George W. Bush. Trouble is, that’s not true either, as Bloomberg News pointed out:

Obama’s White House approved 613 federal rules during the first 33 months of his term, 4.7 percent fewer than the 643 cleared by President George W. Bush’s administration in the same time frame, according to an Office of Management and Budget statistical database reviewed by Bloomberg.

Later on during the event, Romney claimed that, according to an official government report, regulations costs the U.S. economy $1.7 trillion annually. That number, according to economists, also isn’t true. In fact, John Irons of the Economic Policy Institute found that the study Romney cited “contains basic conceptual mistakes and relies on extraordinarily poor data.” “Its results should neither be used as a valid measure of the economic costs of regulation nor as a guide for policy,” he said.

For Romney, using these outright falsehoods helps him paint the Obama administration as some sort of regulatory behemoth, smooshing small businesses beneath its heels. However, when actual small businesses are asked whether regulations are killing jobs, the answer is always a resounding no.

NEWS FLASH

Orlando Unanimously Approves Domestic Partnership Registry | The Orlando City Council has voted unanimously to enact a domestic partnership registry, becoming the first city in Central Florida “to grant gay couples some of the rights that come with marriage.” In 30 days, unmarried couples “will be able to record their relationship in a government database for a $30 fee” and will be able to visit each other in hospitals, make health care decisions and funeral arrangements.

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up