ThinkProgress Logo

Alyssa

Art And The Occupy Movement In 2012

Marissa Gluck has a cool piece up at Atlantic Cities about how Los Angeles, in the midst of dismantling its citiy’s Occupy encampment, took the time to preserve a mural created by people who were living there or passing through (the mural also had a functional purpose to protect a fountain):

The mural’s preservation is thanks to the efforts of Matthew Rudnick, a budget bureaucrat with no formal art education but with a keen sense of historical import. During the park clean up, Rudnick coordinated efforts between General Services, (which was responsible for cleaning the park), and the Department of Cultural Affairs. “It would be a tragedy to have it thrown away,” says Rudnick. “The work is dynamic.” [...]

The Department of Cultural Affairs is now beginning the process of finding a permanent home for the mural. Interested parties will soon be invited to submit offers to display the mural publicly.

It’s relatively new terrain but one the city viewed as necessary for an artwork that had become an emblem. “We felt giving it to a [caretaking] entity without a public process would come back to haunt us,” says Olga Garay-English, Executive Director of the Department of Cultural Affairs. “It’s more appropriate to have a transparent system in place.”

There’s a radical chic element to all of this, of course, and it’s worth keeping that in mind as Occupy-created and Occupy-inspired art is turned from political expression into commodities. But that doesn’t meant that the work isn’t worth making, or that Occupy-inspired art can’t provide a valuable public example of the connection between artistic expression, political argument, and change. Flavorwire, as one of their 2012 cultural resolutions, hopes the novelists, poets and playwrights who have signed up as part of Occupy Writers will start producing work inspired by their own commitments and in some cases reawakenings. It goes without saying that I agree. Yes, there’s a lag time between events and art inspired by them. But if the 99 percent movement’s going to continue, artists can play a role in sustaining it and looping more people into the conversation, and processing what is past, and passing, and yet to come.

Climate Progress

Breaking: Climate Science Denier Wins Iowa Caucuses

It was a battle down to the wire in Iowa with many unexpected twists and turns.  But in the end, Climate Science Denier (CSD) edged out Denier of Climate Science (DCS) and Science of Climate Denier (SCD) in the first GOP contest for the right to compete against Climate Science Ignorer (CSI) in the general election.

CSD told a small crowd at the airport, “The citizens of Iowa have spoken and decided that I am uniquely qualified to deny climate science.  They’ve sent a message to the president that simply ignoring climate change isn’t going to cut it with the  American people, especially the job creators.  We need somebody who can deny the problem entirely so the job creators can feel better about pocketing most of the wealth generated in this country while ruining a livable climate for everyone else.”

The real story of the caucuses may be SCD, who came from nowhere just a week ago to come within a few points votes of victory.  SCD told a smaller crowd at the airport, “I am the only true denier in the race.  CSD has flip-flopped on this issue, like so many others.  Just last spring he said he actually believed in the findings of the overwhelming majority of climate scientists, that the climate is changing, humans are the main cause, and failing to act threatens modern human civilization.  What poppy-cock!  There isn’t an inch of difference between CSD and CSI.”

Meanwhile, SCD told a massive crowd at the airport, “We really need to get rid of the Federal Reserve.  As for climate change, that’s best left to individuals to address, even it exists, which I doubt.”  SCD said he did not think he would win the nomination but refused to say whether he would mount a third-party run, which many fear would split the denial vote and allow CSI to capture a second term, thereby threatening 4 more years of left-wing, socialist inaction on the gravest threat to humanity.

One-time front runner, GWSOCWNPBRDCS (Guy who sat on couch with Nancy Pelosi but really denies climate science), finished far behind the 3 leaders, but vowed to press on saying, “CSD has been lying to you and getting his millionaire buddies to fund ads attacking me.  He’s really someone who used to believe in climate science, whereas I was just pretending to so I could be more credible as a critic of cap-and-tax.  I’m a genius, don’t you forget, and so even my mistakes are unintentional works of brilliance.  I’m going to win this thing just as soon as I come up with a shorter, catchier acronym.”

Jon Huntsman, speaking to his wife and family in New Hampshire, said something about how we must teach our children to respect science and scientists, since they are the engine of economic growth and the only hope for humanity, but no reporter was there to record it.

In unrelated news, greenhouse gas emissions and concentrations reached record levels in 2011, as did extreme weather disasters.

NOTE:  Watch this space for any late breaking updates.

Economy

Iowans Collected More Federal Benefits Than They Paid In Federal Taxes

The Iowa caucus officially takes place tonight, followed by the New Hampshire primary next week, the first two steps in the GOP’s selection of a presidential candidate. While the Republican candidates have been trying to outdo each other on the amount of government that they would cut — with several of them advocating the elimination of entire cabinet agencies — it’s worth noting how much government aid the citizens of those states receive, in everything from federal infrastructure money to Pell Grants. The National Priorities Project laid it out:

On average, every New Hampshire resident received $4,850 in direct assistance from federal programs in 2010 — that’s everything from the Medicare prescription drug benefit to Pell grants. According to a 2011 Census Bureau report, federal money also accounted for 30 cents of every dollar of New Hampshire state revenue in fiscal 2009, the most recent year for which comprehensive data are available. Federal money helps states pay for building roads and fixing bridges, among numerous other kinds of projects. [...]

Iowa received more federal money than New Hampshire in 2009. Thirty-three percent ($5.4 billion) of state revenue came from federal sources in that year…In addition to the billions of federal dollars that helped finance the state’s government, Iowa residents received substantial direct federal assistance. On average in 2010, residents of the state each received $5,400 from all federal programs. Iowans paid on average $5,175 in federal taxes that year — that includes income taxes as well as excise and other kinds of taxes, but excludes corporate incomes taxes. On balance, that means Iowans collected more federal benefits than they paid in federal taxes.

The slash and burn budgeting advocated by the GOP field would mean an end to many of the programs upon which Americans all across the country — including in Iowa and New Hampshire — depend. Of course, Iowa’s own budget priorities have been a bit out of whack recently, as they’ve cut business taxes while reducing pre-school funding and attempting to close unemployment offices.

Alyssa

Amy Waldman On Christmas In Afghanistan

I was substantially put off by the didactic tone of Amy Waldman’s The Submission, but I quite like her new short story, a sad Afghan Christmas tale, in the Financial Times. It centers around Aziz, a translator working for American forces trying to build a road that’s consistently thwarted or destroyed by the forces of a local warlord, who’s extorting the Americans for the resources he needs to build a private army in exchange for holding back attacks. What works about it, I think, is that unlike The Submission, where all the characters personalities and personal lives are bent to serve the cause of representing political positions, this is a story about how public events interact with private needs. Aziz finds the way he translates changing based on the personal goals that he brings to the project: making enough money to pay the bride price and for the wedding he hopes to have, and surviving working for the Americans long enough to do it:

Had the map documented the pace of work, its picture would have been less hopeful. The paving of the 80-kilometre road had started out well: 30 kilometres in the first three months. The pace had halved in the next three, and in the past two months, only seven kilometres had been completed. The insurgents weren’t just interfering with construction. They were blowing up “red” – sections of already-completed road – almost as fast as the contractors could build. Explosives erupted from new, ingenious hiding places: culverts and cliffsides, the asphalt barrels themselves. Assailants haunted the hills, hunted from them. A night raid on the road workers’ camp left 13 Afghans and four Nepalis dead. A sniper shot felled a respected Turkish engineer, and stopped work for two days while American and Afghan forces combed the rises.
Books podcast

The colonel tried to take more territory alongside the road just to get it built, but terrain cleared was soon lost: the heights couldn’t support a continued military presence. A war to win a battle, Aziz sometimes thought, but he held his tongue. Winter had arrived. Soon the snows would come, stopping work until the spring. Aziz was beginning to despair that he would be grey-bearded, and still a virgin, before the road was complete.

It’s also just worthwhile as a story about Christmas, and how it looks to people who don’t celebrate it, and the power the cultural practice exerts anyway. There’s a lot of good culture about Christmas, but not a lot about Christmas as part of a larger tapestry.

Security

The Candidate Who Cried Treason: Santorum Says Obama Consistently ‘Sided With Our Enemies’

In an attempt to pull off an upset in tonight’s Iowa caucus, GOP contender Rick Santorum is resorting to ever more vicious attacks on President Obama to prove his conservative bona fides.

On the campaign trail today he repeated his claim that Obama has consistently “sided with our enemies,” and refused to give the president credit for Osama bin Laden’s death:

Speaking on ABC’s “Good Morning America” on Tuesday, Santorum was asked by George Stephanopoulos to explain his comment at a rally in Iowa on Monday that in international conflicts, Obama has “sided with our enemies on almost every single one.”

Santorum doubled down on his comments, saying Obama has “appeased and pandered” on the international stage and that the killing of bin Laden in Pakistan, presented as a foreign-policy success by the White House, was set in motion by the Bush administration.

Santorum said that operations to kill bin Laden and other al Qaeda leaders were “missions that were defined” by the Bush administration.” Obama “simply went on and executed those decisions,” he said.

Santorum added, “This is a president who has gotten it wrong every time,” claiming that Obama has alienated allies from Britain to the Czech Republic.

As far as his bin Laden assertion goes, it’s been well documented that the Bush administration missed an opportunity to get bin Laden in Tora Bora in 2001. Bush himself stated publicly that he wasn’t spending much time thinking about finding the al Qaeda leader.

By contrast, Obama made getting bin Laden a priority as soon as he took office, and dedicated considerable time and manpower to the mission. He oversaw and approved the final successful plan to kill bin Laden, taking on the considerable risk if the mission failed.

NEWS FLASH

Hate Group Leader: Gays Should Pay A Fine For Having Unsafe Sex | The American Family Association’s Bryan Fischer regularly spouts some of the most hateful homophobic rhetoric in mainstream media, but today he found another way to outdo himself, calling for the criminalization of all homosexual activity as a “public health menace.” Fischer conflates calls to discipline the porn industry for promoting unsafe sex as an endorsement from LGBT activists to “impose fines on any homosexual who has unprotected sex with another homosexual,” suggesting that such laws would show “compassion” for the “fragile sexual health” of all gays and lesbians. Apparently, he cares more about condemning homosexuality than helping protect all people from the spread of HIV and other STIs.

NEWS FLASH

First Half Of Dream Act Goes Into Effect | AB 130, the first half of California’s Dream Act, which lets undocumented students receive private grants and scholarships, officially went into effect Jan. 1, which the California Department of Finance estimates will help 2,500 students. And a state law barring city and county governments from requiring private employers to use E-Verify to check an employee’s immigration status also went into effect. At the other end of the spectrum, Alabama, South Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana had immigration laws or provisions of laws go into effect on Jan. 1 to require wider use of E-Verify.

NEWS FLASH

Wall Street Journal Criticizes PolitiFact For Naming ‘End Medicare’ As 2011 ‘Lie Of The Year’ | The outrage over PolitiFact’s decision to declare the claim that Rep. Paul Ryan’s (R-WI) budget would end Medicare as the lie of 2011 has spread to the conservative Wall Street Journal, which explains in a Best-of-the Web feature today, the charge is “an assertion that combines elements of fact (Republicans did vote), interpretation (“end Medicare” means different things to different people) and prediction (about how the Ryan plan, if enacted, would work out in practice) That is to say, it is a statement of opinion.” The paper adds, “by practicing a style of journalism that centers on baselessly impugning the motives of others, it has managed to earn distrust across the political spectrum.”

Health

Conservatives Make Up Reasons For Why Some Of The ACA’s Pay-Fors Should Be Repealed

Ramesh Ponnuru has written the kind of column that really undermines the credibility of conservatives who thump their chests about reducing federal spending and insist that any new law must be paid for. Because it proves — yet again — that even if lawmakers jump through hoops and spend months agreeing to a combination of spending cuts and fees that result in deficit reduction, the GOP will either argue that the Democrats tricked the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) into producing a favorable score or just make up a lot of false arguments about the resulting pay-for provisions.

Ponnuru relies on the latter technique in this Bloomberg piece, in which he goes after the Affordable Care Act’s tax on medical devices, claiming that the fee would produce less jobs and undermine medical innovation:

A year from now, the federal government will start collecting a new tax on medical devices from tongue depressors to imaging machines, thanks to the sweeping health-care overhaul that Democrats enacted in the spring of 2010. People in the industry say it’s already having an effect. [...]

Device makers complain that the tax will lead not only to higher prices and layoffs but also to reduced research and development. They also say that when combined with high U.S. corporate-tax rates, the device levy makes relocation to other countries more appealing. Ireland, for one, is actively recruiting medical- device makers to move production there.

The main reason Congress included the tax in the health- care legislation was, of course, to raise money. Democrats wanted the Congressional Budget Office to certify that the bill would reduce the deficit overall. But why go after one industry in particular? The justification for this selectivity was that the legislation would be a boon for this sector. By expanding health coverage, the new law would increase demand for medical devices and thus, in effect, subsidize the industry. The tax was, therefore, a partial clawback of this subsidy.

Ponnuru must know that the fee was not intended to target the medical device industry specifically, but was just one of many provisions that sought to ask the sectors of health care — from hospitals to insurers to pharmaceuticals — that would benefit from reform to contribute towards expanding coverage to (almost) all Americans. In fact, these provisions came about after conservatives, Republicans, and moderate Democrats defeated a whole host other cost-cutting deficit-reducing mechanisms — from the public option to a national exchange — and for them to now present the resulting compromise as some kind of attack on medical devices is intellectually dishonest to say the least.

That being said, the specific charges in Ponnuru’s piece are highly misleading. First, the device tax excludes common consumer products like eye glasses, contact lenses, and “any other medical device determined by the Secretary to be of a type which is generally purchased by the general public at retail for individual use” — so as to minimize the cost-shift to consumers. Companies also cannot avoid the fee by moving manufacturing to Ireland, like Ponnuru suggests, since the fee applies to products produced in, or imported in the United States. Finally, it’s not clear that that tax would result in any significant hardship for the ever-profitable medical device industry. As Abbot Labs CEO Miles White explained during a conference call in June of 2010, “I’m not terribly optimistic that we’re going to pass along much at all to tell you the truth because it’s an extremely competitive market, and I haven’t seen for example in the vascular business that there is opportunity for price increase. You have to innovate. And you have to innovate with real value in order to maintain pricing or value.” “I tend to agree with Miles, but it’s not, and it doesn’t happen until 2013 and the amount of number is just not that large for us,” CFO Thomas Freyman added.

Economy

Contrary To GOP Candidates’ Claims, Obama And The Fed Aren’t Devaluing The Dollar

A favorite line of Republicans in the 2012 GOP presidential primary has been to claim that President Obama is devaluing the American dollar. The surging former Sen. Rick Santorum, for instance, ranted that Obama “has devalued our currency,” while Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) has said that, “in the last two years of the Obama administration, if you pull a dollar out of your pocket, you have lost 14 percent of the value of that dollar…A dollar in 2011 should be the same as a dollar in 1911. A dollar should be worth a dollar.”

Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R-TX) claimed in a debate that “it is a travesty that young people in America are seeing their dollars devalued.” Mitt Romney also chimed in to say that “people will not invest in this country and create jobs in this country for the American people if they don’t have belief in our currency.” But there’s one big problem with this storyline — it isn’t true:

Moves by the Federal Reserve to flood the world with dollars are doing little to dent the currency’s value, bolstering the appeal of U.S. assets at a time when the government needs the support of foreign investors the most.

The U.S. Dollar Index (DXY) has appreciated 13 percent from a record low in March 2008 even as the Fed kept interest rates at about zero and printed cash to buy $2.3 trillion (FARBAST) of Treasury and mortgage-related bonds, and is little changed since 1991. The International Monetary Fund said Dec. 30 that the greenback’s share of global foreign-exchange reserves rose in the third quarter by the most since 2008.

In fact, it was the George W. Bush administration that “was associated with a large and persistent fall in the value of the dollar.” As the Big Picture’s Barry Ritholz put it, “A fall [in the dollar index] from 121.02 in July 2001 to 70.69 in March 2008 — Now THATS a dollar collapse.” Of course, no Republicans were making headlines screaming about devaluing the currency then.

It’s not only those seeking the presidency that are using this line. As Bloomberg News noted, the dollar’s performance “counters officials in China, Germany and Brazil who said that the Fed’s policies were weakening the dollar. House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio and three other Republicans sent Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke a letter in 2010 expressing ‘deep concerns’ about the central bank’s plan to print money to buy bonds, saying it risked weakening the dollar.”

Claiming that he devalued the currency is just one more lie in a host of lies the candidates are propagating regarding Obama’s economic record. But it bears so little resemblance to reality that no candidate who uses it should be taken seriously when it comes to economic policy.

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up