ThinkProgress Logo

Politics

Huntsman Drops Out: Is Set To Endorse Romney, Whom He Called ‘Unelectable’

Former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman (R) informed his advisers today that he is dropping out of the presidential race. After his third place finish in New Hampshire’s primary, Huntsman declared that he had a “ticket to ride” but it appears the be on a bus owned by GOP front-runner Mitt Romney, whom Huntsman is now expected to endorse. “The governor and his family, at this point in the race, decided it was time for Republicans to rally around a candidate who could beat Barack Obama and turn around the economy,” Huntsman adviser Matt David said in a statement. “That candidate is Gov. Mitt Romney.

While the statement was not an official endorsement, CBS reports “Huntsman is expected to throw his endorsement to current front-runner Mitt Romney.”

Last week, Huntsman told CNBC that Romney was making himself “completely unelectable.”

Huntsman’s decision may have been influenced by the fact that a powerful group of social conservatives called on conservative to coalesce around Rick Santorum as the anti-Romney candidate this weekend.

Justice

Republican Sponsor Of Bill To Require Drug Testing For Georgia Welfare Recipients Arrested For DUI

A Georgia Republican who wants all welfare reciepients subject to drug tests failed one himself after he ran a red light on Friday morning. The Atlanta Journal Constiution has the story on State Rep. Kip Smith (R):

Smith, whose given name is John Andrew Smith, first told the officer he had not consumed any alcoholic beverages.

“I asked him again, and he stated he had consumed a single beer at Hal’s. I noticed also that Mr. Smith’s eyes were watery, and I asked him to exit the vehicle, which he did,” Kramer said in the report.

Smith told the officer he’d had the beer 45 minutes earlier, and the officer asked him to blow into a hand-held “intoximeter”. The officer said the lawmaker refused, stating he would prefer to go to a clinic or the hospital to get tested.

The officer said Smith finally agreed to blow into the device. The report stated that Smith blew a .091., which is above the legal limit of .08.

Smith is a sponsor of Georgia House Bill 464, which would “require random drug testing” for citizens on public assistance. In response to Smith’s legislation, State Rep. Scott Holcomb introduced a bill last month that would require all state lawmakers to be subject to random drug testing.

Random drug tests for recipients of public assistance are very likely to be found unconsitutional.

Alyssa

Kevin Smith Talks Getting Women In Comic Book Stores—And Comics

Kevin Smith is launching Comic Book Men, a show based on Jay and Silent Bob’s Secret Stash in Red Bank, New Jersey, on AMC on February 12. And of all the people I’ve seen in a week and a half at Television Critics Association press tour, he’s the biggest comic book nerd, the only person who would dream of saying something like comics are “one of the only pure american art forms. We invented the comic book. It’s one of the things that like jazz we can claim for our own. It didn’t come from any other place.” So of course I had to ask him what he thinks about the state of women in comics, and how to get more women into comic shops.

His answer was half flip: “I’ve seen Catwoman in her bra far too often. Now I just want to see her panties,” he joked, after I referenced the New 52. “All I hear single women talking about is how to find a good man. You will never find a better man than in a comic book store. Comic book dudes are all oral. My wife dropped her standards this much and she got me for life.”

But he was also very clear on the dynamics of the industry, and in thinking there should be more women represented both in the creative staffs making the books and in the stores selling them.

“It’s male-dominated media, and the readers are mostly dudes,” he acknowledged. “The growth of independent comics has been great for people who don’t want to tell stories about anyone in tights…more of that is what’s going to bring in more women.” And he praised Womanthology, the anthology collection of comics by women funded by Kickstarter and sold for charity. “It’s such a great idea…You could go page by page and say this person should be working in the industry. This is a show about these four dudes who work in this store. There are no women [in the store] yet…There should be a Comic Book Women, and good willing, there’ll be a spinoff Comic Book Women, and I’ll make shit ton of money.”

And really, that’s the way in. I wonder if Womanthology might be the key wedge here (I will admit to being impressed Smith had read it). I’d love to see spinoffs of the stories there, or by the artists who contributed. And whether those books are supported by sales or donations, they could be a means of demonstrating a market for something different. I doubt they’d reach the same scale as a mass-distributed book: it’s almost impossible to do that without marketing, distribution, and pure history and devotion. But if money is what matters, we need to find alternative ways to buying the same old stuff to demonstrate our market power. And we have to be very clear about communicating what makes us buy things (as well as what makes us not buy them).

NEWS FLASH

Former Top Arab Officials Bolster Qatar Call for Arab League Force In Syria | After the Emir of Qatar called for an Arab League military intervention in Syria, he was bolstered by two former top Arab officials — Amr Moussa, the Egyptian former Arab League secretary-general, and Saad Hariri, the former Lebanese prime minister. “The Arab League council will meet very soon to study the issue of replacing the monitoring mission with an Arab military force to separate between the army and civilians,” Moussa told the Lebanese Daily Star newspaper on the sidelines of a conference. “We should not rule out any proposal from the head of an Arab state.” Hariri, in response to a question about the Qatari Emir’s call, tweeted: “I am all for it.” (HT: Adam Makary)

NEWS FLASH

Stephen Colbert: “Corporations are people” | It was not until after Stephen Colbert handed the reins of the Super PAC he founded over to Jon Stewart — and the PAC was re-dubbed The Definitely Not Coordinated With Stephen Colbert Super PAC — that it released its ad accusing Mitt Romney of being a “serial killer” of corporations, based on the assertion that corporations are people and that Romney, as head of Bain Capital, oversaw the dismantling of numerous such “people.” But on ABC’s This Week this morning, Colbert himself came out decisively in favor of corporate personhood. During a back-and-forth over the role of money in politics, Colbert pointedly asked host George Stephanopoulos if he thought corporations were people. When Stephanopoulos deferred “weighing in” on the question, Colbert responded, “Corporations are people. You won’t ‘weigh in’ on whether some people are people? That seems kind of racist, George.”

Climate Progress

MIT Climate Scientist’s Wife Threatened in a “Frenzy of Hate” and Cyberbullying Fomented by Deniers

JR:  Cyberbullying of climate scientists is on the rise, thanks to the hard-core deniers (see “UK Guardian slams Morano for cyber-bullying and for urging violence against climate scientists“).  MIT climatologist Kerry Emanuel, whose family is the target of the latest attacks, writes me, “I had heard about the hate mail and threats received by others, but am surprised at how little it takes these days to trigger hysterical and hateful responses from the ideologues out there.”

UPDATE:  You can read below the comments of climate ethicist Donald Brown, who has been the focus of Morano’s “reprehensible” tactics four times.  He calls it “sheer intimidation.”

By James West at The Climate Desk via Grist

Prominent MIT researcher Kerry Emanuel has been receiving an unprecedented “frenzy of hate” after a video featuring an interview with him was published recently by Climate Desk.

Emails contained “veiled threats against my wife,” and other “tangible threats,” Emanuel, a highly-regarded atmospheric scientist and director of MIT’s Atmospheres, Oceans, and Climate program, said in an interview. “They were vile, these emails. They were the kind of emails nobody would like to receive.”

“What was a little bit new about it was dragging family members into it and feeling that my family might be under threat, so naturally I didn’t feel very good about that at all,” Emanuel said. “I thought it was low to drag somebody’s spouse into arguments like this.”

Climate Desk has seen a sample of the emails and can confirm they are laced with menacing language and expletives, and contain personal threats of violence.

Emanuel began receiving emails “almost immediately” after the video was posted on Jan. 5, and the volume peaked at four or five emails a day. The threats have now petered off.

Threats are nothing new in the world of climate science.

Read more

Security

Amid Rapid Reforms, Rep. Ros-Lehtinen Calls For U.S. To ‘Immediately Cease Talks’ With Myanmar

Secretary Clinton visiting Myanmar dissident Aung San Suu Kyi in December

Since 1962, a repressive military junta ruled the Southeast Asian nation of Myanmar. But, since 2010, an initial bubbling of hope emerged in the isolated and impoverished nation that the system would begin to open up. In the past several months, reforms came a lightening-quick pace. The West, including most notably the U.S., ramped up engagement to meet Myanmar’s positive steps forward.

Neither process is complete. While the U.S. pledged to restore diplomatic ties with Myanmar, sometimes known as Burma, appointing an ambassador will take time, and most of the sanctions against the country remain in place. Nor have Myanmar’s reforms yet been solidified into sustainable, concrete accomplishments. The two tracks, however, are not mutually exclusive: “[T]he United States will meet action with action,” said Secretary of State Hilary Clinton, announcing the new ambassadorship. “Based on the steps taken so far, we will now begin.”

Now a right-wing Member of Congress wants to bring it all to a screeching halt. In a statement released Friday, House Foreign Affairs Committee chair Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL) called on the administration to end all talks with Myanmar. She said:

I am distressed that the Administration is prematurely and publicly discussing any major concessions to the Burmese regime, such as nominating an Ambassador. Any concession to the dictatorship would be grossly premature. The world needs to see that the upcoming April elections are not the same kind of sham that we saw in 2010. [...]

I call on the Administration to immediately cease talks with the ruthless tyrants in Burma until the junta has been replaced with a duly elected, democratic government that respects human rights and civil liberties.

While, in the statement, Ros-Lehtinen raises legitimate concerns — for example that the ceasefire with one of the ethnic insurgencies is not nationwide and might not hold — her prescription doesn’t reflect the direct connections between the gains toward reform that have so far occurred and the Obama administration’s engagement.

While the reform project in Myanmar kicked off in 2010, the flood of actions undertaken by the government in the past several months have followed rigorous U.S. engagement that began in early Autumn. In October, the U.S. special envoy to Myanmar Derek Mitchell, who was only appointed in August, made his second visit to the country in less than two months. Foreign Policy’s Josh Rogin reported in October that the administration’s policy was one of cautious engagement and waiting for concrete steps from the Junta before concessions are made. That process has yielded at least a few advancements such as prisoner releases.

Yesterday, Rogin reported that appointing an actual ambassador will take time. That gives the U.S. wiggle room to ensure further reforms are made and that those already gained are implemented and not walked back.

And while the caution is well advised, the gains do seem to have some legitimacy. One previously repressed dissident and Nobel Laureate is expected to run for a parliamentary seat. And the Daily Beast’s Ron Gluckman, who’s been travelling to Myanmar for nearly two decades, reported in December that “most here believe the reforms are genuine.

The reforms in Myranmar are connected directly to continued and vigorous U.S. engagement — a term that appears again and again in the “guiding principles” of the administration’s foreign policy. But Ros-Lehtinen, with her ideological opposition to the policy and the administration, seems to want to throw it all away in favor of waiting until all the reforms are carried out and a “duly elected, democratic government that respects human rights and civil liberties” is in place — a process that could take years. Her stance epitomizes Voltaire’s famous phrase that the “perfect is the enemy of the good.”

Health

After Supporting Health Care Mandate In 1994, Santorum Now Says He Never Supported Mandates

Former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum (R) stepped up his criticism of GOP presidential primary front-runner Mitt Romney on CBS’ Face The Nation this morning, slamming Romney for providing “the basis” for the Affordable Care Act when he signed a comprehensive health reform law while he was governor of Massachusetts.

In addition to providing a model for national health care reform, RomneyCare is to blame for raising taxes, rising health care costs, and, worst of all, Santorum said, an individual mandate requiring people to buy health insurance. That, Santorum said, represented a government intrusion into health care that he never has and never could support:

SANTORUM: Gov. Romney’s plan, as much as he’d like to say it’s not, was the basis of Obamacare. He was for an individual mandate, he was for government top-down control of the health care system in Massachusetts. And it’s led to the highest cost health care in the nation in Massachusetts, it’s led to higher taxes. … It is an absolute disaster. [...]

He would not have the clear record that I have…of being for government out of the health care business, being for a plan that is bottom-up, private sector health care reform. Unlike other folks in this race, I’ve had a consistent record over that time of not being for individual mandates. … He has been for individual mandates, I have not.

Watch it:

As Igor Volsky reported last week, however, Santorum supported an individual health insurance mandate during his 1994 Senate campaign, shortly after a host of Senate Republicans had offered the mandate as an alternative to President Clinton’s health reform plan.

And aside from the fact that RomneyCare did lay the groundwork for the Affordable Care Act — Romney repeatedly touted his plan as a national model before the ACA passed — Santorum’s criticisms are largely off-base. Massachusetts’ health costs are rising, but at rates comparable to the national average, and the cost of some premiums has fallen dramatically. Meanwhile, the state has the lowest uninsured rate in the nation, with just 4.7 percent of Bay Staters lacking health insurance.

Alyssa

Ricky Gervais, Rob Schneider, and Keegan-Michael Key and Jordan Peele on Mocking Prejudices

All eyes will be on Ricky Gervais at the Golden Globes tonight given his celebrity-skewering last year. But in his appearance at the Television Critics Association Press tour on Friday, I was most struck by how he discussed a theme that came up again and again across panels and networks; the challenges of targeting your jokes so you lampoon people’s prejudices and assumptions rather than the people themselves.

“I think some people confuse the target of a joke with the subject of a joke. You can have jokes about race without being racist,” he said at the panel for Life’s Too Short, the HBO show he’s doing with Warwick Davis. “And I think sometimes people flinch too soon. And very often the target is people’s prejudices or stupidity…We’re not trying to be outrageous for outrageousness’s sake. It’s churlish…I think the job of a comedian isn’t just to make you laugh, it’s to make you think as well. I have to be able to justify myself.”

The question of whether you can justify yourself is hard. I thought Gervais was funny but not always a particularly profound truth-teller in last year’s Globes—making fun of the Hollywood Foreign Press Association’s pandering is a worthwhile thing to say in public, while suggesting that Tom Cruise is gay is less so. We’ll see how he does tonight.

Rob Schneider, in however limited a fashion, did pull off his promise on the first episode of Rob. At the CBS session on Wednesday, he told the audience “There are still race problems in America…If anything bad happens, it’s mostly to my character.” And at least in the scene between Rob and his new father-in-law, that’s true. I don’t necessarily trust Rob to do this, but I think it’s critical for somebody to be pointing out that our race problems in the United States are problems caused by folks who are unfamiliar with or hateful of people of different races, ethnicities, and cultures, not by members of minority groups.

And finally, Keegan-Michael Key and Jordan Peele in a wonderful session promoting their very promising new Comedy Central sketch-and-standup show, Key & Peele (which premieres on January 31 at 10:30PM) said that they thought if people were merely offended, they weren’t doing their jobs. And they suggested it was important to trust the audience to see what they were doing.

“Why be offensive for no reason? And I never got a comedian who went ‘well, if you didn’t get it, whatever’ Maybe you weren’t funny,” Key said. “We’ll try to make a grand, thematic point in a scene, a social point. But our hope is that the audience is astute enough to say ‘this scene is about this even though it’s in this frame.’ And I’m sure sometimes people are going to be offended by the frame and not get what we’re going for in the scene.” Peele added “If we feel we have to go somewhere extreme, we will force ourselves to bakc it up with the comedy.”

The sketches they showed us, including one with Key out on a date who wants him to act blacker (both comedians are biracial) and be more aggressive with a rude waiter, and Peele doing his (very good) Obama impression with Key acting as “his anger translator, Luther,” demonstrate the challenge of what they’re trying to do. There’s no point in creating a space that’s safe for frank conversation if you’re not going to do it. And as Don Cheadle suggested on Friday, sometimes you can achieve more in opening up conversations about race by coming at them sideways with comedy. Even if the quality varies, it’s nice to see so many comics trying to come at the problem of how to create those spaces and what to say once you’re there from so many different perspectives.

Climate Progress

James Bond Villains Harm Nuclear Power’s Public Image, Top UK Scientist Tells BBC. I say No, Dr. No.

dr no nuclear power, dr no nuclear energy, james bond nuclear energy, nuclear power, nuclear energy, nuclear fukushima, nuclear disasters, james bond, james bond dr no

James Bond villains blamed for nuclear’s bad image

The evil villains in James Bond movies are being blamed for casting a long-lasting shadow over the image of nuclear power, says the president of the Royal Society of Chemistry.

Prof David Phillips says that Dr No, with his personal nuclear reactor, helped to create a “remorselessly grim” reputation for atomic energy.

Prof Phillips was speaking ahead of the 50th anniversary of the movie.

The chemistry organisation says it wants a “renaissance” in nuclear power.

Prof Phillips says the popularity of the Dr No movie from 1962 created an enduringly negative image of nuclear power – as something dangerous that could be wielded by megalomaniacs with aspirations to world domination.

The villain of the movie, planning mass destruction from his secret Caribbean hideout, eventually dies in the cooling pool of his nuclear reactor, having been foiled by James Bond, played by Sean Connery.

No, this isn’t a story in The Onion.  It’s actually from the BBC.  You can listen to the interview here.

Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, Fukushima — these aren’t to blame for nuclear’s bad image.  It’s Ian Fleming and Hollywood.  Well, actually not Ian Fleming, since the original book didn’t have the nuclear power stuff.  In the book, Dr. No is buried under a chute of guano.  Darn you, anti-nuke screenwriters!

To paraphrase the other interviewee, Prof. Tom Burke, blaming Bond villains for creating a bad image for nuclear power is like blaming the enduringly negative image of the Mafia on the Godfather movies and the Sopranos.  And no, I’m not comparing power of the atom to the power of the mob, although they do have one thing in common — they  charge more and more over time (see “Does nuclear power have a negative learning curve?“):

Read more

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up