ThinkProgress Logo

Justice

The Most Compelling Case For Gun Violence Prevention In 2 Minutes: ‘They Deserve A Vote’

Concluding his State of the Union address Tuesday night, President Obama invoked the families of recent gun violence victims, who attended the speech to represent the need for gun violence prevention measures. House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) stood in respect.

Obama talked with emotion about 15-year-old Hadiya Pendleton, who was gunned down shortly after performing in Obama’s inaugural parade. He then recognized the victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre, the Aurora theater shooting, the Sikh temple shooting, the Tucson shopping center shooting and the Virginia Tech shooting:

Hadiya’s parents, Nate and Cleo, are in this chamber tonight, along with more than two dozen Americans whose lives have been torn apart by gun violence. They deserve a vote. Gabby Giffords deserves a vote. The families of Newtown deserve a vote. The families of Aurora deserve a vote. The families of Oak Creek, and Tucson, and Blacksburg, and the countless other communities ripped open by gun violence – they deserve a simple vote.

Watch it:

The NRA recently dismissed the grief of these families as “the Connecticut effect,” which would subside in time for the lobbying group to continue to push a radical gun agenda.

Obama’s gun regulation plan calls for universal background checks, expanded mental health care services, improving gun ownership databases and a ban on high capacity magazines.

Climate Progress

Climate Hawk Obama: ‘If Congress Won’t Act Soon To Protect Future Generations, I Will’

President Says Warming-Driven Extreme Weather Demands We “Act Before It’s Too Late,” While GOP’s Rubio Pushes Climate Denial, Attacks Solyndra!

Below are Obama’s extensive remarks on energy and climate in his State of the Union address. The President has expanded on his strong remarks in his Second Inaugural, asserting “if Congress won’t act soon to protect future generations, I will.”

Below the jump is the energy portion of his just-released “Plan for A Strong Middle Class & A Strong America.”  There’s a call for doubling renewable electricity (yet again!) by 2020 — and for doubling energy productivity by 2030 (“a new Energy Efficiency Race to the Top for states”). But who knew he’d call for Congress to pass cap-and-trade?

Here is the key part of the speech (as delivered):

Now is the time to reach a level of research and development not seen since the height of the Space Race. And today, no area holds more promise than our investments in American energy.

After years of talking about it, we are finally poised to control our own energy future. We produce more oil at home than we have in 15 years. We have doubled the distance our cars will go on a gallon of gas, and the amount of renewable energy we generate from sources like wind and solar – with tens of thousands of good, American jobs to show for it. We produce more natural gas than ever before – and nearly everyone’s energy bill is lower because of it. And over the last four years, our emissions of the dangerous carbon pollution that threatens our planet have actually fallen.

But for the sake of our children and our future, we must do more to combat climate change. Yes, it’s true that no single event makes a trend. But the fact is, the 12 hottest years on record have all come in the last 15. Heat waves, droughts, wildfires, floods – all are now more frequent and more intense. We can choose to believe that Superstorm Sandy, and the most severe drought in decades, and the worst wildfires some states have ever seen were all just a freak coincidence. Or we can choose to believe in the overwhelming judgment of science – and act before it’s too late.

Now the good news is, we can make meaningful progress on this issue while driving strong economic growth. I urge this Congress to get together, pursue a bipartisan, market-based solution to climate change, like the one John McCain and Joe Lieberman worked on together a few years ago. But if Congress won’t act soon to protect future generations, I will. I will direct my Cabinet to come up with executive actions we can take, now and in the future, to reduce pollution, prepare our communities for the consequences of climate change, and speed the transition to more sustainable sources of energy.

Four years ago, other countries dominated the clean energy market and the jobs that came with it. We’ve begun to change that. Last year, wind energy added nearly half of all new power capacity in America. So let’s generate even more. Solar energy gets cheaper by the year – let’s drive costs down even further. As long as countries like China keep going all-in on clean energy, so must we.

In the meantime, the natural gas boom has led to cleaner power and greater energy independence. We need to encourage that. That’s why my Administration will keep cutting red tape and speeding up new oil and gas permits. That’s got to be a part of an all-of-the-above plan. But I also want to work with this Congress to encourage the research and technology that helps natural gas burn even cleaner and protects our air and water.

In fact, much of our new-found energy is drawn from lands and waters that we, the public, own together. So tonight, I propose we use some of our oil and gas revenues to fund an Energy Security Trust that will drive new research and technology to shift our cars and trucks off oil for good. If a non-partisan coalition of CEOs and retired generals and admirals can get behind this idea, then so can we. Let’s take their advice and free our families and businesses from the painful spikes in gas prices we’ve put up with for far too long. I’m also issuing a new goal for America: let’s cut in half the energy wasted by our homes and businesses over the next twenty years. The states with the best ideas to create jobs and lower energy bills by constructing more efficient buildings will receive federal support to help make that happen.

Wow! Looks like I’ll be needing a stomach pump — after drinking all this beer, Hurricanes, Damn-The-Weather cocktails, espressos, energy drinks, and, I’m afraid, fracking fluid from Haliburton.

His remarks on climate are very strong. So is his plan for action. Yes, both are four years late, but still….

UPDATE: Carol M. Browner, CAP Distinguished Senior Fellow and former Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, said:

“Tonight’s speech is a big win for those who want action on climate change and believe now is the time to act.  The president was clear about the magnitude of the challenge and resolute in his determination to use his executive authority to take action, especially if Congress won’t.  He pledged to build on the achievements of his first term, including historic standards for clean cars and energy efficiency, and he laid down a strong marker that he intends to continue investments in clean energy technology as part of our economic recovery.”

Comparing the texts with the actual speech, Obama ad-libbed “That’s got to be a part of an all-of-the-above plan.” Sad. “All of the above” is not a plan. It is more of the same — literally.

UPDATE2: In the GOP response, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) goes full climate denier, anti-clean energy:

When we point out that no matter how many job-killing laws we pass, our government can’t control the weather – he accuses us of wanting dirty water and dirty air….

Instead of wasting more taxpayer money on so-called “clean energy” companies like Solyndra, let’s open up more federal lands for safe and responsible exploration.

Rubio is the GOP’s savior? This is Stone Age stuff.

Here is the energy portion of “The President’s Plan for A Strong Middle Class & A Strong America”:

Read more

Economy

Obama Calls For Raising Minimum Wage To $9 Per Hour In State Of The Union

In his State of the Union address tonight, President Obama calls for raising the minimum wage to $9 per hour, up from its current $7.25. He also called for raising the tipped minimum wage — made by tipped employees, such as waitresses — and for indexing the minimum wage to inflation so that it grows along with the economy:

We know our economy is stronger when we reward an honest day’s work with honest wages. But today, a full-time worker making the minimum wage earns $14,500 a year. Even with the tax relief we’ve put in place, a family with two kids that earns the minimum wage still lives below the poverty line. That’s wrong. That’s why, since the last time this Congress raised the minimum wage, nineteen states have chosen to bump theirs even higher.

Tonight, let’s declare that in the wealthiest nation on Earth, no one who works full-time should have to live in poverty, and raise the federal minimum wage to $9.00 an hour. This single step would raise the incomes of millions of working families. It could mean the difference between groceries or the food bank; rent or eviction; scraping by or finally getting ahead. For businesses across the country, it would mean customers with more money in their pockets.

In fact, working folks shouldn’t have to wait year after year for the minimum wage to go up while CEO pay has never been higher. So here’s an idea that Governor Romney and I actually agreed on last year: let’s tie the minimum wage to the cost of living, so that it finally becomes a wage you can live on.

According to a fact sheet released by the administration, “Raising the minimum wage to $9 restores the inflation-adjusted value of the minimum wage back to where it was in 1981.” If the minimum wage had simply kept up with inflation since the 1960s, it would be over $10 per hour today.

Currently, the minimum wage does not lift a family of three out of poverty and its covering a much smaller percentage of health care and education costs than it used to. Raising the minimum wage also disproportionately helps women and minorities, since they make up a majority of low-wage workers.

Conservatives usually oppose minimum wage increases on the grounds that they will hurt small businesses and job growth. However, study after study has shown that raising the minimum wage does not have a negative effect on employment. In fact, an analysis of state minimum wage increases showed that those state boosting their wage “had job growth slightly above the national average.” This holds true even when the economy is weak.

Update

During an interview on CNN, Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) said he is opposed to the minimum wage increase, parroting the false claim that it will hurt job creation.

Politics

ThinkProgress Live-Blogs The State Of The Union

Welcome to ThinkProgress’ live-blog of President Obama’s fifth State of the Union address. We’ll be providing real-time commentary and analysis of Obama’s speech and the official responses from Sens. Marco Rubio (R-FL) and Rand Paul (R-KY).

LATEST UPDATE
11:12 pm

That's a wrap!

Surely pundits will have more to say on the speech — and the two rebuttals — tomorrow, but that wraps up the ThinkProgress live blog. Thanks for joining!

11:11 pm

Rubio tweets his water bottle

Heading off the nearly-immediate Twitter mockery over Rubio reaching for a bottle of water in the middle of his rebuttal, the Senator (or one of his staff) tweeted this just after his speech:

11:03 pm

Rand Paul cites Adam Smith, a major proponent of banking regulations

Paul said that Obama should have learned from 18th century philosopher Adam Smith, author of The Wealth Of Nations. Though conservatives like Paul frequently cite Smith to justify their opposition to new regulations, Smith actually said that regulations on banks were as important as fire codes and other safety regulations. As Paul Krugman notes, he even supported banning high-risk, high-interest loans, similar to today’s subprime lending.

11:01 pm

Rand Paul perpetuates the 'free Obama phone' myth

Rand Paul says the Republican Party won’t “give you a free phone,” referring to a myth that Obama was giving out free cell phones to poor people as incentive to vote for him. In fact, former president and Republican icon Ronald Reagan was the first to propose the program, and former president George W. Bush (R) expanded the program to include cell phones.

10:55 pm

Oil industry think tank blasts Obama's climate change remarks

Immediately after Obama’s address, an oil-funded group, Institute for Energy Research, attacked the president’s strong remarks on climate change.

“It is telling that President Obama seemed more concerned about climate change than job creation, clearly following a well-worn path for this administration where no crisis goes to waste in pursuit of the President’s progressive agenda,” IER President Thomas Pyle said. “For this administration, a deadly hurricane means a chance for carbon taxes. A crop-killing heat wave means another opportunity to attack the coal industry. Virtually any nightly weather report can be exploited to justify the empowerment of Washington regulators and more hurdles for affordable energy. In fact, the only jobs the president seems to be worried about are at the Environmental Protection Agency.”

Climate-change fueled extreme weather cost up to $188 billion since 2011, a deadly reminder that action is needed.

Read the full live blog

Climate Progress

Three Decades Of SOTU Climate Remarks Plus A Brand New Drinking Game

UPDATE: Obama’s extensive remarks on energy and climate — and his new plan for action — is here.

First the bad news, via a tweet from CNN White House Correspondent Brianna Keilar:

Pres. Obama will NOT announce regs on carbon emissions for existing power plants in the SOTU, per sr. admin official.

The good news is I have a brand new drinking game. And the “ugly” news is below the jump: All the climate mentions from State of the Union addresses (SOTUs) and joint Congressional addresses from 1992 through 2012, showing that talk has been cheap for a long, long time….

I needed a new drinking game after that whole Second Inaugural business, which led to a full week in Las Vegas with Charlie Sheen and Chelsea Handler (and then a month in rehab with Lindsay Lohan). So here it is:

  1. Each time the President uses the phrase “climate change” or “global warming,” down one beer.
  2. Each extreme weather event the President links to climate change, down a Hurricane or a Damn-The-Weather Cocktail
  3. Every time Obama talks up domestic oil production, drink an espresso.
  4. If Obama mentions clean coal, drink a cup of coffee.
  5. If Obama pushes his “all of the above” energy strategy, down an energy drink.
  6. Finally, the Gov. John Hickenlooper special: Every time Obama talks up domestic natural gas production, drink “a glass of fracking fluid produced by oilfield services giant Halliburton.”

And don’t worry about the fracking fluid, since the company asserts it is made entirely “of ingredients sourced from the food industry” — and who has more credibility than a firm once run by Dick Cheney or one that “intentionally destroyed evidence” of its culpability in the Gulf Oil disaster? (As an aside, there is plenty of stuff “sourced from the food industry” that no one should drink.)

Read more

Economy

New Democratic Budget Committee Chair Has Harsh Words For Austerity

Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA)

Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) chaired her first hearing as head of the Senate Budget Committee today. In her opening statement, she had strong words for the sort of short-term austerity in which Republicans (and too many Democrats) want to engage:

Experts and economists across the political spectrum agree it makes sense to invest in job-creation in the short term, while putting ourselves on a strong path to responsible and sustainable deficit and debt reduction over the medium and long-term. And poll after poll shows that’s what the American people support too.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke put this idea well in a speech he gave in August of 2011. He said: ‘Although the issue of fiscal sustainability must urgently be addressed, fiscal policymakers should not, as a consequence, disregard the fragility of the current economic recovery.’ [...] I think that’s exactly right. I will work with anyone to tackle our debt and deficit responsibly, but as I’ve told Senator Sessions and others — I feel very strongly that it just doesn’t make sense to replace our budget deficit with deficits in education, infrastructure and research and development.

With the deficit shrinking and the national debt stabilizing while unemployment stays stubbornly high, focusing on deficit reduction instead of jobs and economic growth is utter folly. Federal Reserve Vice Chair Janet Yellen yesterday rightly blasted Congress for allowing fiscal policy to be a “headwind for the recovery.”

Despite the experience of Europe, where austerity has ushered in recession, joblessness, and more debt, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle want to bring those same policies here. But spending is not the problem in the U.S.: the problem is a consistent output gap that has left the country a long way from full employment.

Justice

U.S. Drug Czar: Federal Prosecutors Will Go After Washington And Colorado Marijuana Distributors

Federal prosecutors will crack down on recreational marijuana dispensaries and growers even in states where they are legal, U.S. drug czar Gil Kerlikowske told a Canadian news magazine this week. The statement appears to be the first from a federal official to state explicitly that the federal government will prosecute dispensaries and producers once they are licensed in Washington and Colorado. During an interview on 20/20, President Obama told Barbara Walters only that the federal government has “bigger fish to fry” than going after recreational users, but did not address those who produce or distribute marijuana. MacLean’s reports:

Q: In the November elections, two states—Washington and Colorado—voted to legalize marijuana for recreational use. President Obama has said that the U.S. government has “bigger fish to fry” than to go after recreational users in states where it is legal. Where do things stand with regard to producers and distributors of marijuana, which is still illegal under federal law?

A: You’ll continue to see enforcement against distributors and large-scale growers as the Justice Department has outlined. They will use their limited resources on those groups and not on going after individual users.

While the questioner rightly points out that distribution and production of marijuana are illegal under federal law (as is possession), Washington and Colorado’s laws do explicitly make both production and distribution of marijuana legal under state law if the entities are licensed and follow regulations.

In states where medical marijuana is legal, federal prosecutors and Drug Enforcement Administration agents have ratcheted up crackdowns of those distributing medical marijuana in seeming compliance with state laws. And Kerlikowske’s statement suggests the federal government will take the same approach to the recreational marijuana laws, in spite of growing public support for state marijuana legalization in the wake of the November election.

Neither Attorney General Eric Holder, nor other representatives from the DOJ or DEA have spoken publicly about their planned approach, other than to issue a statement immediately following the ballot initiatives’ passage saying that enforcement of federal law “remains unchanged.”

The threat of not only shutdown, but harsh federal mandatory minimum jail sentences of ten years just for marijuana distribution — and as high as 85 years if other associated charges are lobbed on – would no doubt have a chilling effect on the recreational marijuana industry, and thwart state efforts to experiment with new approaches to achieving public health and safety goals in the wake of the failed War on Drugs. It remains to be seen, however, whether federal agents would make significant use of their prosecutorial discretion, or merely retain the right to prosecute in very limited circumstances.

The best way to eliminate this threat would be to amend the federal Controlled Substances Act, which the executive branch remains responsible for enforcing. Members of Congress proposed bills last week to regulate and tax marijuana like alcohol in those states where it is legal. Last session, other bills proposed simply exempting those states with marijuana laws from the Controlled Substances Act, and Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) said he was open to decriminalizing marijuana. But given congressional inaction on absolutely everything, it will likely fall to prosecutors to decide how the law gets applied.

Update

Dominic Holden of the Stranger claims that Kerlikowske’s comments do not indicate that the administration will crack down on recreational marijuana dispensaries, but rather that the DOJ will continue its current policy to “prioritize charging people breaking state marijuana laws.” This, however, is not an accurate reflection of Obama Administration policy, nor of their past actions with regard to medical marijuana dispensaries. In the 2011 “Cole Memorandum” the Department of Justice stated that “commercial operations cultivating, selling or distributing marijuana” will remain subject to prosecution — even though individuals users would not be if they comply with state law. Kerlikowske’s statement that DOJ would “use their limited resources on those groups and not on going after individual users” is a restatement of the Cole Memo’s position, and suggests that the Cole framework will be applied to recreational users as it has been applied to medical marijuana users. It remains to be seen whether Kerlikowske is speaking for the DOJ and/or the administration.

LGBT

Texas YMCA Ends Discriminatory Membership Policy After Lesbian Couple Complains

Last month, the YMCA in Tyler, Texas refused to offer a family membership to a lesbian couple, demanding they produce a marriage certificate if they expected to receive the discount. This was in spite of the fact that they actually had a family membership at the same YMCA 10 years prior. Suzy Sheridan created a Change.org petition on behalf of her family that received 8,00 signatures, and the YMCA has now adjusted its policies to be more inclusive.

The new policy is unfortunately now known as a “household membership,” implying that not all households are families, but it is at least fully inclusive:

Household Membership are 2 adults and children under 21 [24 if enrolled in college (full-time)-must submit proof of registration annually] Additional adults can be added for an additional monthly fee of $15.00 per month. Required documentation will be ID and proof of residency such as driver’s license with current address or bill showing name and matching address. This membership includes facility usage, fitness group classes and discounted programs.

The change represents a small but important victory in the struggle for same-sex families’ full inclusion in communities and society.

Health

New Zealand Woman’s Coca-Cola Addiction Contributed To Her Death

Natash Harris, the New Zealand mother whose Coca-Cola addiction allegedly contributed to her death.

Thirty-year-old New Zealand mother of eight Natasha Harris was not a casual Coca-Cola drinker: She drank more than two gallons of the soda per day, taking in more than 11 times the recommended daily sugar consumption and twice the recommended amount of caffeine in what her family calls an addiction, complete with withdrawal symptoms. And according to the coroner investigating her death by cardiac arrest, that addiction contributed to her death:

“I find that, when all of the available evidence is considered, were it not for the consumption of very large quantities of Coke by Natasha Harris, it is unlikely that she would have died when she died and how she died.”

The coroner’s report revealed Harris suffered from a variety of health problems possibly connected to her Coke problem, including a racing heart and “absent teeth.” Coca-Cola Oceania issued a statement condemning the report yesterday:

“The Coroner acknowledged that he could not be certain what caused Ms Harris’ heart attack. Therefore we are disappointed that the Coroner has chosen to focus on the combination of Ms Harris’ excessive consumption of Coca-Cola, together with other health and lifestyle factors, as the probable cause of her death. This is contrary to the evidence that showed the experts could not agree on the most likely cause.”

While Harris’s soda consumption was clearly well outside the norm, research has connected the consumption of sugary drinks like soda to health concerns, particularly obesity. Children in the U.S. consume 7 trillion calories of these drinks per year, and studies show that the least healthy of those products are aggressively marketed to children of color who have been hit hardest by the obesity epidemic.

That marketing works so well that Coca-Cola has launched PR campaigns to divert attention from its role in that epidemic. The food and beverage industry touts “personal responsibility” messaging to emphasize that it’s simply up to people to make healthy choices and consume their products in moderation, as opposed to Harris. But health experts warn that those industries’ misleading marketing tactics mimic Big Tobacco’s.

Security

Senate Committee Approves Chuck Hagel’s Nomination As Defense Secretary


The Senate Armed Services Committee today voted to move Chuck Hagel’s nomination to become Secretary of Defense to the full Senate on Tuesday afternoon with a vote of 14 to 11, with Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) yet to vote, split down party lines.

“Senator Hagel has received broad support from an array of senior statesmen and foreign policy dignitaries,” Chairman Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI) said before the vote. Levin continued to list the impressive array of endorsements that Hagel has received, noting the long-list of positions Hagel holds that stand firmly in the mainstream.

A vote on the floor of the Senate could come as soon as tomorrow, according to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV). Reid today announced that he would not honor holds — informal filibuster threats placed by individual Senators — from the GOP, forcing them to actually filibuster the nomination to prevent it from coming to a vote.

Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-OK) has already pledged to lead the charge in a filibuster, the first against a Defense Secretary nominee, once the nomination hits the Senate floor. Inhofe, during the discussion before the vote, cited how pleased he was that Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) displayed his misleading evidence during Hagel’s testimony. Cruz and Inhofe also implied during the hearing that Hagel has taken money from Saudi and possibly other foreign governments, an argument without proof that found itself harshly challenged.

Inhofe’s plan is unlikely to succeed, though. Several GOP members have already pledged to either vote for Hagel — such as Sen. Thad Chochran (R-MS) — or oppose a filibuster — like Hagel opponent Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) — making the odds of Republicans mustering the 41 votes necessary to prevent cloture on the debate unlikely. While a movement is growing to have a sixty vote threshold for Hagel that is somehow not a filibuster, Hagel has more than enough votes on his side to easily clear the majority required for final confirmation.

Neocons and their allies have been attacking Hagel since weeks before its official announcement. In their desperation in recent weeks, Republicans are throwing everything they can at the nominee, in hopes of derailing him. Instead, their efforts are proving ineffective at best, damaging to their own party at worst.

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up