ThinkProgress Logo

Climate Progress

To Sell Green Products, Clorox Mocks ‘Green Housewives’ And Eco-Consciousness

I would not have thought that mocking a very large pool of your potential customers was a winning ad strategy. But Clorox seems to think it makes sense:

I haven’t found anybody yet who isn’t offended by that in some way, including, as it does, various offensive stereotypes of “housewives.”

And if that isn’t enough mockery for you, play the shorter videos below that one on Clorox’s “Green Works” website, where they make light of “conflict diamonds,” An Inconvenient Truth, “gluten-free” food and BPA.

Oh, and they never actually mention their products! I can’t say that I ever thought of Clorox as a producer of green products — and these videos make it rather unlikely I’ll be trying any of them any time soon.

Satire is a risky business, especially if you yourself don’t belong to the group being satirized and your satire can easily be taken instead as offensive. Seth MacFarlane found that out at the Academy’s awards with his tasteless “We Saw Your Boobs” musical number. As Andrew O’Hehir put it in his Salon piece, “I’ll tell you what’s funny“:

[MacFarlane] stumbled into a well-known problem with irony, which is inherently unstable. Anytime you say something you supposedly don’t mean, people are likely to take you at your word – and then you no longer control “what you meant” in the first place. Whether MacFarlane intended his shtick as absurdist or satirical humor is now irrelevant, because it came out as a more hurtful variety.

Health

Three Reasons Why Robot Doctors Aren’t Improving U.S. Health Care — Even Though They Should Be

On Monday, the New York Times reported on the controversy surrounding Intuitive Surgical Inc.’s “daVinci” robotic surgery system — a product that allows doctors to “conduct” surgeries remotely on a console while robotic arms scale and translate their movements onto the actual patient. While high-tech systems like this are supposed to make procedures safer and more efficient, the daVinci lawsuit — which centers on a patient who eventually died from complications arising from the system’s use — reveals that a combination of factors, such as inadequate product testing and aggressive marketing strategies driven by profits, often undermine that goal.

That’s a frustrating reality for health care reform advocates on the lookout for effective methods of cutting national health expenditures while improving patient care. Although innovation in health care technology had undoubtedly improved lives and made care more efficient in the aggregate, as demonstrated through breakthroughs like vaccines and birth control, it has also accounted for at least half of the increase in health care spending in the last 70 years. While that may sound counter-intuitive at first, a quick dive into America’s health care culture shows why it’s not — and why innovations like “robot doctors” aren’t actually lowering health care costs:

1. It’s almost impossible to tell how much various health care technologies actually cost.

One of the most persistent problems in the American medical industry is rampant health care price opacity. Time Magazine’s recent investigative look into Americans’ sky-high medical bills revealed what many already suspected — that the prices of various medical products and services are essentially arbitrary, fluctuating wildly from one hospital chain to another and even more wildly between different geographic regions.

Since there isn’t an easily-accessible national database of medical devices and their prices, manufacturers can pitch their products at varying rates to hospitals and jack up prices with relative impunity. Those inflated costs are then passed on to consumers by providers looking to recoup their money — and since patients tend to trust their doctors and not know much about the intricacies of health care device markets, they don’t ask too many questions when they’re left to pick up an enormous, generally non-itemized tab at the end of a hospital stay that gives them no information about why they’re being charged what they are. Thus, price gouging and a general lack of perfect information in health care allows expensive consumption to continue unchecked.

Read more

Economy

Republican Congressman Finally Realizes Budget Cuts Hurt The Economy

The Federal Aviation Administration last week announced that it was closing 149 air traffic control towers at small regional airports across the country due to automatic budget cuts that went into effect on March 1. The FAA took the brunt of 60 percent of the cuts from the Dept. of Transportation, and though it originally proposed 189 closures, it narrowed it down to avoid some pain from the lost funding.

Still, the closures have one Texas Republican congressman fuming. Rep. Blake Farenthold (R) wrote a letter to FAA head Michael Huerta this week saying he was “deeply troubled” by the closure of airports that help the Texas economy, the Houston Chronicle reports:

I am deeply troubled for your public statements and proposed actions regarding the effect of the sequester on smaller, local airports. These airports have long played a vital role in economies across the country,” Farenthold said.

There’s a small problem with Farenthold’s anger: he voted for the Budget Control Act of 2011, the law that instituted caps on federal spending and, eventually, the automatic budget cuts that caused the airport closures. Since then, he has repeatedly blamed Democrats for failing to replace it with smarter cuts, but House Republicans refused to negotiate with President Obama and Democrats over a replacement that included new revenues in addition to cuts.

What is more problematic, however, is that Farenthold has only now realized that budget cuts are harming programs that help the economy. In fact, Republican efforts to cut the budget have held back the country’s recovery from the Great Recession, and Republicans continue to demand more even though spending on domestic programs is now at lower levels than it was before the recession.

Justice

Episcopal Bishops March On Washington To Demand An End To Gun Violence

Episcopal bishops, priests, and lay people from across the country gathered in Washington, D.C., yesterday to demand federal legislation that would help end gun violence, urging lawmakers to take action on the issue while celebrating a special version of the Christian devotion known as the Stations of the Cross.

Hundreds of participants braved wintry conditions on Monday morning as they gathered in front of St. John’s Church for the event, with many attendees wrapping heavy scarves around their clerical collars and brandishing signs that read “Stop the killing of our children” and “Thou shall not allow murder.”

Participants then sang hymns as they processed down Pennsylvania Avenue from the White House to the U.S. Capitol, stopping at several locations along the way to recount the Biblical story of Jesus’ crucifixion and pray for those affected by gun violence.

“Today we walk in acknowledgement of the things done and left undone that have contributed to a culture of violence,” said Bishop Laura Ahrens, Suffragan Bishop of Connecticut, as she read from a statement written by another Connecticut priest. “We must acknowledge our sins, individually and collectively.”

Leaders of the event, which included more than 20 Episcopal bishops from all over the United States, met with White House officials before the march to discuss the need for legislation that would prevent gun violence. Speakers at the service praised elected officials working to end gun-related tragedies, noting how incidents such as the recent killing of elementary school students by a gunman in Newtown, Connecticut could be prevented with the help of new laws.

The victims of each of these shootings are members of our families, religious congregations, and communities, and we continue to grieve for the living as well as the dead,” said Mark Beckwith, Bishop of Newark, as he read a statement written by Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori. “I commend the resolve of lawmakers who believe the time has arrived when our nation must come together to ask the difficult questions, and to discern what may be equally challenging answers, about how we can begin to break the cycles of violence that lead to massacres in suburban schools and routine death on the streets of our cities.”

But while bishops were upbeat about positive developments on Capitol Hill, they also expressed impatience with Washington’s beleaguered attempts to push gun violence prevention legislation through Congress. They urged lawmakers to break partisan gridlock and take meaningful action, particularly in light of the string of high-profile mass shootings that rocked American communities and congregations this past year.

Leadership is sensitivity that identifies when an event has to have a response,” said Bishop Steve Miller of Milwaukee as he read a statement penned by Barbara A. Campbell.

Dozens of faith groups and religious leaders have spoken out against gun violence in recent weeks. Organizations such as PICO National Network and Faiths United to Prevent Gun Violence helped organize a “National Gun Violence Sabbath” earlier this month, where more than 1,000 congregations – including the National Cathedral in Washington, D.C. – held Sunday services and events that called for federal legislation that would end bloodshed caused by gun violence. In addition, Mayors Against Illegal Guns released a video in mid-March that showcased clergy members calling for sensible legislation on the issue, and PICO recently announced that clergy from Newtown, Connecticut have joined more than 4,000 other religious leaders from across the nation in signing a letter to the Senate demanding action on gun violence prevention.

Our guest blogger is Jack Jenkins, a Writer and Researcher with the Faith and Progressive Policy Initiative.

LGBT

Fox News Contributors Say Marriage Equality Would Criminalize Christianity

Fox News contributors Todd Starnes (L) and Erick Erickson (R)

As the Supreme Court weighs the merits of allowing gay and lesbian Americans the freedom to marry, right-wing anti-equality advocates are cranking the fearmongering up to 11, claiming that a world of marriage equality is one that would functionally ban Christians from practicing their religion.

Two Fox News contributors, independently and in other outlets, made dire predictions along these lines. Todd Starnes, speaking on American Family Radio, argued that “persecution [of Christians] like we have never seen it” had “already started” as a consequence of the marriage equality movement:

STARNES: You know, it’s as if we’re second-class citizens now because we support the traditional, Biblical definition of marriage, or perhaps we are pro-life, and that means we’re somehow second-class citizens who don’t deserve to be in the public marketplace of ideas.

RIOS (HOST): Absolutely. In fact, it’ll be worse than that. You know there’s going to be punishment. There will be tremendous punishment. If gay marriage is embraced by the country, if the Supreme Court goes south this week in its hearings, we are in for – of course, we’re not going to hear about it until June – but we are in for persecution like we have never seen it.

STARNES: Well, it’s already started.

In reality, every piece of marriage equality legislation that’s been passed around country has included legal exemptions preventing clergymembers and religious institutions from being forced to provide marriage-related services to LGBT Americans. Indeed, as a recent a CAP report shows, these exemptions have become increasingly broad as marriage equality advances, suggesting more, not less, sensitivity to the views of religious opponents of same-sex marriage.

Another Fox News contributor, Erick Erickson, went further. Writing on RedState, a conservative blog that’s commonly read by Republican legislators, Erickson fantasized about a world where the United States government — with a Congress that is roughly 80 percent Christian — began terrorizing Christian institutions, shuttering Christian businesses for opposing marriage equality, and labeling Christians themselves criminals:

Any Christian who refuses to recognize that man wants to upend God’s order will have to be driven from the national conversation. They will be labeled bigots and ultimately criminals…Once the world decides that real marriage is something other than natural or Godly, those who would point it out must be silenced and, if not, punished. The state must be used to do this. Consequently, the libertarian pipe dream of getting government out of marriage can never ever be possible.

Within a year or two we will see Christian schools attacked for refusing to admit students whose parents are gay. We will see churches suffer the loss of their tax exempt status for refusing to hold gay weddings. We will see private businesses shut down because they refuse to treat as legitimate that which perverts God’s own established plan. In some places this is already happening.

Erickson here is arguing for a broad-based license to discriminate against LGBT Americans. Other than the wedding case addressed above, Erickson’s examples aren’t situations where freedom of conscience or freedom to worship in the way your religion dictates are at stake. Rather, he’s asking that schools and businesses, two of society’s most basic institutions, be given carte blanche to discriminate against gay parents or patrons merely because they’re gay. It’s the difference between the freedom to be racist and the freedom to kick black people out of your store for being black — and there’s a reason why society protects the former but punishes the latter.

Alyssa

‘Veronica Mars’ Television Club: You Love Me, Don’t You

This post discusses plot points from the third and fourth episodes of the first season of Veronica Mars.

Noir is mannered, but I admit through the first several episodes of Veronica Mars, the show’s stylized nature was keeping me at a bit of a distance. That all changed with these two episodes of the show. It’s not so much that the cases got to me—I suspect that after the first two episodes, which used crimes to pull the basic cast of characters together, that Veronica’s clients will be a little more disposable. It’s that the, despite its use of private eye conventions, and in fact because of them, Veronica Mars became piercingly emotional in these two episodes, which focused substantially on the relationships between parents and children. In noir, everyone has secrets, but in Veronica Mars, the gap between public and private selves takes less time to unravel, or at least to become apparent. But that doesn’t mean that Veronica is free to send clients on her way faster than Sam Spade—instead, mysteries matter less than the consequences they open up.

In her first case, Veronica is employed by a boy named Justin to find his father—except that as far as Justin knows, his father is dead, and the gig is just an excuse for him to talk to Veronica and to give her mix CDs built around 311 releases. But instead of pulling off a successful ploy, Justin ends up discovering something that requires much more maturity from him than the quota that’s required to hit on a cool, older girl. His father’s transitioned and is living as a woman named Julia, played beautifully by Melissa Leo, who regularly patronizes the movie rental business where Justin works so she can have a chance to talk to him about film and take his recommendations. In one of the slyest, most impressive arguments for tolerance I’ve seen, she is clearly and deeply loved by the man she lived with. And Justin is in terrible pain not just because he’s discovered that his father abandoned him, but because his mother couldn’t trust him to react well to the truth.

“This is hard, I know. I wish I could have found a way to tell you,” Julia tells Justin. “This is something I had to do. This is who I am.” Justin is focused on the betrayal rather than the rare opportunity he has not just to be loved again, but to act like the kind of man Veronica would admire, until Veronica explains what it would mean to her to know that her mother wanted to visit her, even in disguise. “90 miles,” Veronica tells Justin. “That’s the distance your dad travels every week to see you for a few seconds. Look, my mom’s been missing, too, and I would give anything to feel that she cared enough about me to do that.” The case ends, and Justin’s resolution begins, with him tentatively calling his mother to tell her that the copy of Body Heat he recommended to her and special ordered for her has arrived—and giving her his regular schedule. The mystery matters far less than the emotional landscape that it opened up, noir’s secrets giving way to the complexities of contemporary life, which is difficult enough even before you introduce guns, gumshoes, and dames to die for into the mix.

As Julia’s taking the risk that Justin can love her as his mother, rather than his father, Keith Mars is confronting his daughter’s maturity, rather than his worries about her lack of it.
When he’s called into the principal’s office because she wants to tell him “We’ve noticed a dramatic change in [Veronica] over the last year. She’s late, a lot. She has attitude with certain teachers. She falls asleep in class. And socially she seems a bit isolated,” Keith downplays these changes. “I’d say Veronica is doing pretty well given the circumstances,” he tells the principal. “I can handle it, thank you.” But while he can manage Veronica’s behavior in limited ways, he can’t exactly arrest the forward march of time. When he asks Veronica about her first date with Troy, he’s rattled by her explanation that it was “Lousy conversation, but the sex was fantastic.” He gets territorial when the two keep seeing each other. “If he’s going to be kissing my daughter on my front porch for eight and a half minutes, I’m going to have to meet him,” Keith demands. “He’s taking up a lot of daddy-daughter time.” And Keith can even use his private-eye skills to put the kibosh on Veronica’s plans for homecoming. “You won’t mind, then, that I cancelled your reservation at the Four Seasons?” he tells Troy over Diet Cokes. But tracking down hotel registers one at time can only go so far—Keith’s business, in fact, depends on the idea that the world will stay richly supplied in venality. He can intimidate Troy out of sleeping with his daughter on one occasion, but he can’t predict her slipping out of her red dress and racing into the water in Lily Kane’s memory, can’t stop her from being exposed to hurt and seeking out new forms of joy.
Read more

Economy

Despite Education Funding Gap, Sacramento Wants To Spend $250 Million To Build An Arena

The National Basketball Association’s Sacramento Kings are contemplating leaving their home city for Seattle after a group of investors there crafted a proposal to buy the team from its current owners. But now Sacramento’s mayor, a former NBA All-Star himself, has countered that proposal with a plan that would finance more than half of a new $447 million arena for the team.

The desire for a new arena is why the Kings have considered moving to nearly every city in the United States that would give them money to build one, especially after Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson walked away from a deal last year because the team’s ownership was demanding too large a share from taxpayers. But with the Kings’ threats to leave now a real possibility, Johnson is back at the table and ready to hand over $258 million in tax dollars to keep the Kings in town. And he’s giving the city council very little time to consider a deal he promises will help the city’s finances, Yahoo reports:

City officials reached a preliminary agreement Saturday with the investment group that hopes to keep the Kings from moving, but the late negotiations leave little time for council members to study the proposal before the vote. [...]

Johnson, a former NBA all-star, said the deal would avoid new taxes and ensure a net impact to the city’s general fund.

That’s a bold promise considering the evidence that exists against public financing of sports stadiums. A 2012 study, for instance, found that taxpayer-financed arenas do not foster economic growth in the cities where they were built. Johnson’s proposal, meanwhile, hinges largely on future revenues generated by parking, and financing plans that depend on future revenues rarely, if ever, work out for cities.

The most likely outcome from Sacramento’s proposal is that projected revenues fall far short of projections, just as they have for a Louisville arena built in 2008 and a Minnesota football stadium that is already running behind projections even before it gets built. That, despite Johnson’s promises not to raise taxes, will leave taxpayers footing the bill, whether through higher taxes or through cuts to public services. And in a city that already has a $5.6 million funding gap for public schools, further cuts to services likely aren’t worth the cost of a new arena that does nothing but keep a bad NBA team in town.

Climate Progress

Denier Déjà Vu: Conspiracy Theories In The Blogosphere In Response To Research On Conspiracy Theories

The results of {the study “NASA faked the moon landing — Therefore (Climate) Science is a Hoax”} implied that conspiratorial thinking is linked to climate denial, and hence might emerge in turn to defend climate denial against cognitive analysis – and that’s what happened, as we document in “Recursive Fury.”

by John Cook and Stephan Lewandowsky via Skeptical Science

Our paper Recursive fury: conspiracist ideation in the blogosphere in response to research on conspiracist ideation has been published. The paper analyzed the public discourse in response to an earlier article by Lewandowsky, Oberauer, and Gignac (LOG12 for short from here on), which has led to some discussion on this blog earlier.

Refreshingly, the journal Frontiers makes all papers available for free with no paywall. Another unique feature of this journal is that readers can post comments directly beneath the abstract. Unfortunately this has led to the posting of a number of misrepresentations of the paper.

In this post, I’ll be addressing some of these misconceptions (but being careful to practise what I preach, will adopt the principles of the Debunking Handbook when I debunk the misconceptions). So here are some key facts about the Recursive Fury paper:

Conspiracy theorists are those who display the characteristics of conspiracy ideation

Yep, just stating the obvious, right? Recursive Fury establishes, from the peer-reviewed literature, the traits of conspiracist ideation, which is the technical term for a cognitive style commonly known as “conspiratorial thinking”. Our paper featured 6 criteria for conspiratorial thinking:

  1. Nefarious Intent: Assuming that the presumed conspirators have nefarious intentions. For example, if person X assumes that blogger Y colluded with the New York Times to publish a paper damaging to X, then X presumes nefarious intent on the part of Y.
  2. Persecuted Victim: Self-identifying as the victim of an organised persecution.
  3. Nihilistic Skepticism: Refusing to believe anything that doesn’t fit into the conspiracy theory. Note that “conspiracy theory” here is a fairly broad term and need not involve a global conspiracy (e.g., that NASA faked the moon landing) but can refer to small-scale events and hypotheses.
  4. Nothing occurs by Accident: Weaving any small random event into the conspiracy narrative.
  5. Something Must be Wrong: Switching liberally between different, even contradictory conspiracy theories that have in common only the presumption that there is something wrong in the official account by the alleged conspirators. Thus, people may simultaneously believe that Princess Diana faked her own death and that she was assassinated by MI5.
  6. Self-Sealing reasoning: Interpreting any evidence against the conspiracy as evidence for the conspiracy. For example, when climate scientists are exonerated of any wrong-doing 9 times over by different investigations, this is reinterpreted to imply that the climate-change conspiracy involves not just the world’s climate scientists but also the investigating bodies and associated governments.

We then went on to identify responses to LOG12 that exhibited these criteria. Our analysis was entirely based on whether or not public statements conformed to the criteria just listed—we made no comment on the merit of any criticism (except in cases where speculations were plain wrong).

A common misrepresentation of Recursive Fury is articulated by one commenter who says “conspiratorial ideation is defined in such a way that any criticism of LOG12, whether true or false, comes under that heading.” Actually, our criteria for conspiracist ideation come from a number of peer-reviewed examinations of conspiratorial thinking and have nothing to do with the substance of any criticism of LOG12. Our objective in Recursive Fury was to demonstrate that some of those criteria arguably applied to the public discourse surrounding LOG12. It does not follow that any criticism of LOG12 involves conspiratorial thinking. Of course not. But if some (not all) critics of a paper on the role of conspiratorial thinking in science denial engage in, well, conspiratorial thinking in response, that’s of scholarly interest.

The criteria for conspiracist ideation are applicable without regard to a statement’s truth or falsity. Recursive Fury is not about defending LOG12. On the contrary, this latest paper puts on the scholarly record many criticisms of LOG12 that had previously been limited to blogs, and it did so without evaluating or rebutting the substance of those criticisms. Some defence!

A few critics have complained that we didn’t include their methodological critiques of LOG12. Such critiques do not fit the conspiracist criteria, which is why they weren’t included. Those critics are welcome to submit rejoinders or comments on LOG12 to the journal in question.

A range of different conspiracy theories are posted in Recursive Fury

Recursive Fury reports and analyzes a number of conspiracy theories regarding LOG12. These range from “global climate activist operation” to “ringleader for conspiratorial activities by the green climate bloggers,” to Stephan Lewandowsky receiving millions of dollars to run The Conversation.

Read more

LGBT

VIDEO: Conservatives At Anti-Gay Marriage Rally Undercut One Of Their Primary Talking Points

WASHINGTON, DC — Nearly a decade ago, the recent debate over marriage equality entered the limelight when, in May 2004, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts ruled that the state’s prohibition on same-sex marriage was unconstitutional.

In the years since, conservatives have argued that marriage equality is a “threat” to marriage between straight couples.

ThinkProgress asked attendees an anti-equality rally in Washington DC today about what impact same-sex marriage has had on their own marriages over the last decade. Nearly everyone was flummoxed by the idea that someone else’s marriage would pose a threat to their own. One man even noted that gay marriage has strengthened his marriage by bringing him and his wife together over the shared belief that gays and lesbians should not be allowed to wed.

Watch the highlights:

During today’s Supreme Court case on marriage equality, the justices pressed Charles Cooper, the lawyer defending discrimination, on how exactly same-sex marriage somehow undermines marriage between straight people. He was unable to give a cogent response.

Justice

New Jersey Legislature Approves Early Voting Bill, Awaits Christie’s Signature

New Jersey is one of a dwindling number of states that doesn’t allow its residents to cast in-person votes prior to Election Day. That could change for the Garden State with a stroke of Gov. Chris Christie’s (R) pen.

Late last week, the State Assembly passed S 2364 by a 46-31 vote, following the Senate’s 24-16 approval. The bill would open polling places for 15 days before Election Day, giving residents flexibility to cast a ballot at their convenience. However, Christie has yet to take a position on the matter, and some prognosticators suspect he’ll veto the bill.

New Jersey currently allows citizens to mail in a ballot early, but there’s still a strong need for in-person early voting, as the New Jersey Star-Ledger explains:

The vote was mostly along party lines, which could indicate the governor is unlikely to sign the legislation.

Under the bill, polling places would be open all week, from 10 a.m. to 8 p.m. on Mondays through Saturdays, and from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. on Sundays. The cost of the program is estimated at $22 million, although sponsors said it could be done more cheaply without buying costly new equipment.

Democrats say voting complications caused by Hurricane Sandy demonstrate the need for the program.

Early voting is an important and popular voting reform that arose primarily after the 2000 presidential election debacle. Now, all but 16 states offer some form of early voting. Americans take advantage of the option, too; around one-third of all voters now cast their ballots before Election Day, including nearly 80 percent in some states like Colorado.

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up