"Plug-in Hybrids Beat Coal-to-Liquids (Duh!)"
Carnegie Mellon researchers state the obvious in a new report:
A major program to subsidize coal-to-liquids [CTL] makes no sense, since the goals of energy independence and reducing greenhouse gas emissions can be achieved at lower cost through plug-in hybrid vehicles charged with electricity from reduced carbon sources.
The report’s main, if obvious, conclusions are:
Generating electricity from coal with carbon capture and sequestration and replacing the fleet with plug-in hybrid vehicles could enhance energy security by reducing 85% of motor vehicle gasoline use and reduce greenhouse gas emissions from vehicle travel by 70%.
Even the most carbon-intensive scenario using plug-in hybrids has substantially less greenhouse gas emissions than the best possible coal-to-liquids case.
Nearly three-fourths of the existing light-duty vehicle fleet could be accommodated as plug-ins without requiring additional power plants through off-peak charging.
For press contacts with the Carnegie Mellon researchers, go here.