But what would you expect from an oil company?
And I’m not just saying this because I only scored 10,156th out of 46,810 players on my third try.
On the postive side, the game seems to push energy efficiency and renewable energy.
On the minus side, Chrevon — and The Economist – seem unaware that hydrogen is not a primary energy source. Also, they include oil shale, which is an even less likely energy source than hydrogen, if that’s possible.
Edited by Joe Romm, we cover climate science, solutions and politics. Columnist Tom Friedman calls us "the indispensable blog" and Time magazine named us one of the 25 "Best Blogs of 2010." Newcomers, start here.
Language Intelligence: Lessons on persuasion from Jesus, Shakespeare, Lincoln, and Lady Gaga.
Joe Romm has pulled together the secrets of the greatest communicators in history to show how you can apply these tools to your writing, speaking, blogging — even your Tweeting.
Powered by NewsWhip
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.
About ThinkProgress | Contact Us | Donate
Previous in TP Climate Progress
After powering up Bishop, CA, with 75% hydro, the game would only offer biomass or fossil fuels as option for the remaining 25%. Nope, no windpower.
After adding 12.5% biomass, the game offers petroleum as sole option for last 12.5%.
What company did you say sponsors this game?
Rank = 1065/47009
Score = 692,893,291
50% Hydro
25% Solar
8.3% Petroleum
8.3% Biomass
8.3% Hydrogen
0% Fusion
0% MHD :)
I got 19547 the first time.