I’m not seeing the usefulness of these calculators. Maybe you should have posted this under ‘humor’.
I tried several and got a range of 2.82 to 10.6!
One put me over the national average and one put me at ‘very low’. Some don’t ask what kind of car you drive. Some give ranges to choose from, such as electricity bill amounts and mileage, that don’t seem specific enough. None that I saw asked about recycling. Also, it seems to me, purchasing and eating habits should be taken into account, etc.
Speaking of carbon footprints, I saw this in a Smithsonian article from February of this year. I thought it was ironic.
“[Susan Solomon] a no-nonsense 51-year-old atmospheric chemist, …. a co-leader of the massive new study, along with Qin Dahe, a climatologist from the China Meteorological Administration in Beijing. Solomon will become the public face of the U.N. report, in charge of presenting the best scientific thinking on the subject of global warming and the evidence that it is caused by the burning of fossil fuels. “The science is strong,” she says, “and we’ll be presenting a consensus view.”
Here comes the funny part:
“To reach that consensus, Solomon logged more than 400,000 air miles over the past four years ….”
Edited by Joe Romm, we cover climate science, solutions and politics. Columnist Tom Friedman calls us "the indispensable blog" and Time magazine named us one of the 25 "Best Blogs of 2010." Newcomers, start here.
Joe Romm has pulled together the secrets of the greatest communicators in history to show how you can apply these tools to your writing, speaking, blogging — even your Tweeting.
I’m not seeing the usefulness of these calculators. Maybe you should have posted this under ‘humor’.
I tried several and got a range of 2.82 to 10.6!
One put me over the national average and one put me at ‘very low’. Some don’t ask what kind of car you drive. Some give ranges to choose from, such as electricity bill amounts and mileage, that don’t seem specific enough. None that I saw asked about recycling. Also, it seems to me, purchasing and eating habits should be taken into account, etc.
Which one do you think is most accurate?
I’d go with LBNL’s — it seems the most comprehensive.
Speaking of carbon footprints, I saw this in a Smithsonian article from February of this year. I thought it was ironic.
“[Susan Solomon] a no-nonsense 51-year-old atmospheric chemist, …. a co-leader of the massive new study, along with Qin Dahe, a climatologist from the China Meteorological Administration in Beijing. Solomon will become the public face of the U.N. report, in charge of presenting the best scientific thinking on the subject of global warming and the evidence that it is caused by the burning of fossil fuels. “The science is strong,” she says, “and we’ll be presenting a consensus view.”
Here comes the funny part:
“To reach that consensus, Solomon logged more than 400,000 air miles over the past four years ….”
I bet her footprint would scare Sasquatch!