Bush team, humiliated by Papua New Guinea (!), blinks in Bali, sort of

London — At least that’s how they’re covering it outside the United States. Similar to how it was reported on British TV last night, The Toronto Star, in an article titled “U.S. backs down after needling” reports the game-changer at the UN climate conference was the remarks of the delegate from Papua New Guinea, Kevin Conrad:

“We seek your leadership. But if for some reason you are not willing to lead, leave it to the rest of us. Please get out of the way.”

Oh, snap! as Jon Stewart would put it were he not silenced by the writer’s strike. What happened next?

The conference exploded with applause, the U.S. delegation backed down, and the way was cleared yesterday for adoption of the “Bali road map” after a dramatic half-hour that set the stage for a grinding two years of climate talks to come.

Since no hard, near-term targets were agreed to, I’d still call the conference an utter failure, by any reasonable standard, given how urgent the climate problem is. But compared to expectations — and the painful reality of the richest, most polluting nation on the world working full-time to block everyone else from moving forward — it was a partial success. The world will continue to work together to develop a roadmap to a post-Kyoto agreement.

The utter disdain that the rest of the world holds our President, if not clear from the ovation for tiny Papua New Guinea’s smackdown, drips from the lead editorial in today’s The Independent, titled “The world gets the better of Bush,” which drops any pretense of British stiff upper lip:

Last week was the week, and yesterday was the day, when the world finally showed that it was terminally fed up with the simple-minded, short-sighted and self-serving outlook of George Bush. The moment came not, as it well might have done, amid the dust and bloody debris of Iraq or the torture and state terrorism of Guantanamo Bay, but in Indonesia’s lush and lovely Island of the Gods. And, appropriately, it came over climate change — the issue on which the “toxic Texan” first showed that he was going to put his ideological instincts and oil-soaked obstinacy over the interests of the rest of the world and of future generations.

Double snap! The rest of the editorial is worth reprinting, because it puts what Papua New Guinea did in diplomatic context, it has insight into Tony Blair’s failure, and it has implications for our Presidential election:

The mood had been building all week at the negotiations in Bali on a replacement to the present arrangements under the Kyoto Protocol which run out in 2012. For months the United States, and President Bush himself, had been insisting that it would not block progress. Spin-doctors were dispatched to assert, ludicrously, not only that the President was as committed as anyone to avoiding catastrophic global warming, but that the man who had spent years trying to destroy any attempt to tackle it had always really been on the side of the environmental angels. But once his hard-faced negotiators took their seats in the steamy conference centre at the Nusa Dua resort the pretence slipped away. They blocked virtually every constructive proposal put on the table, refusing any suggestion of concrete action by the US, while insisting that other countries do more and more. Ever since Bush first rejected — and set out to kill — the Kyoto Protocol, he had cited as his main objection its exclusion of big developing nations such as China and India. More recently he has indicated that the US would move if they took the first step. Sure enough, they came to Bali ready to take action on their own emissions — and still the US refused to budge.

It is simply not done in international negotiations for one country to single out another for criticism; it’s the equivalent of calling someone a liar in the House of Commons. But from early last week other delegations were publicly, unprecedentedly and explicitly blaming the US for the lack of progress. Worse, they were beginning to point the finger at President Bush himself, suggesting that things would improve once he was gone. That is the kind of humiliation reserved for such international pariahs as Robert Mugabe and Saddam Hussein. But even they were never subjected to the treatment that America received yesterday morning. When it tried, yet again, to sabotage agreement the representatives of the other 187 governments broke into boos and hisses. When Papua New Guinea told the US to “get out of the way”, they cheered.

The US buckled, as it has always done in international negotiations when it has been isolated. The same thing happened at the G8 summit in Heiligendamm, Germany, last summer, and two years ago in Montreal, when holding the Bali negotiations was unexpectedly agreed. That is why Tony Blair’s fatal flaw of constantly trying to let President Bush off the hook — while doing so much to raise the profile of climate change internationally — was so destructive. That is also why it is so deeply disturbing that an EU source told The Independent on Sunday that Britain had helped the US water down the Bali agreement after a phone call from the White House to Downing Street. We must hope, as Hilary Benn insists, that this is wrong. The last thing the country wants, or the world needs, is for us to have replaced the poodle with a Pekinese….

The full scale of the White House’s isolation and humiliation, and its consequences for the fading superpower’s standing around the world, needs to be understood by the presidential candidates of both parties.

Cool Britannia!

Global warming is now the defining issue of our times, and it will determinie almost exclusively how future generations judge us.

Why am I in London? Every year or two, I like to spend some time trying to buy stuff with our worthless dollar and apologizing to foreigners for our president — and seeing how lamely our traditional media treat issues like climate compared to the rest of the civilized world. Seriously, though, I am attending a small workshop on clean energy and climate solutions, one of a few I hope to attend over the next few weeks, which I will report back on.

7 Responses to Bush team, humiliated by Papua New Guinea (!), blinks in Bali, sort of

  1. David B. Benson says:

    Never was a smack-down more deserved.

  2. Ronald says:

    Replace the poodle with a Pekinese. . . How true.

  3. Jim Prall says:

    I was just relieved that the U.S. actually gave in rather than just play the spoiler and walk away to pursue that parallel regime Bush wanted…

    One can only try to imagine how this overwhelming international backlash will be spun by the neocon machine. Can Fox news make a palatable “red fact” out of this, or not? We’ll see…

    I take your point about the writer’s strike: the sharp sarcasm of The Daily Show is sorely missed. We all just have to think: “what would John Stewart say about this if he were back on?”

  4. An eyewitness to the final hours of negotiations described the turning point this way, which came after the US delegation initially rejected compromise language:

    “Then occurred one of the most remarkable sounds that has perhaps ever been heard in the annals of international diplomacy–like a collective global groan–descending then to a murmur, then increasing in volume to a full-throated expression of rage and anger and booing and jeering, lasting for a full minute, so that finally the Minister had to call the meeting back to order.”

    The full, riveting account is here:

  5. Keith Fischer says:

    Ridiculous caving in to this Third World extortion….Pay us or we’ll destroy our forrests. No one is standing in anyone’s way. If they want to cut emmisions they are free to do so. They shouldn’t have to be bribed to do what is right. Kyoto was a joke. Most of the countries who signed on are over the agreed limits or they don’t have any industry to begin with. China and India are still free to polute as they see fit. This was nothing but an Anti-American bash fest, which begs the question – why do we even support this ridiculous organization. It’s time to send the U.N. packing.

  6. Peter Morain says:

    Hey Keith, what’s it like working for the Heritage Foundation?

  7. Miz says:


    “They shouldn’t have to be bribed to do what is right. ” – I’d hardly call it bribing, the Third World can’t afford to stop cutting down its forests, it’s how it keeps their economy going. The Third World, Keith, aren’t ever really “free” to cut their emissions, and if they are going to do so, they need help. They need help from the nations primarily responsible for human-induced climate change, responsible for the huge burden on developing nations. And as for China and India being free to pollute, there’s a good reason for it – how about you look at PER CAPITA emissions in their countries, compared to the US. Another thing is that China and India are both developing nations, and are in a period of transition to development, meaning that if assisted, they’ll soon enough become an Annex I country and then believe it or not will have limits put upon them. The US isn’t cooperating with a global effort because it won’t face up to the fact that there are basic ethical responsibilities that it’s ignoring, that it will be responsible for the deaths of millions of people by hindering this effort. So if you think that this was an “Anti-American bash fest”, you’re probably right, the rest of the world is, quite frankly, sick of it.