Now that our New Year’s Eve party hats are put away, its time to look to the next year in the battle against global warming. In the year 2007, some good things did indeed happen on this front. Measures significantly improving car mileage standards and promoting the growth of renewable fuels were signed into law. But if 2007 was a year that could be considered in some ways good, then 2008 needs to be a year that will be great.
Nothing else will do. The cataclysms of one million square miles of ice melting in the
Second, George W. Bush will have to have an epiphany.
His veto threats against everything from a renewable portfolio standard, to replacing tax breaks for oil companies with ones for clean energy companies, evinces a total failure to recognize his responsibility to lead a national effort against global warming. Much more, his refusal to assist these relatively modest efforts is an ominous indicator that he will continue to “stand in the school house door” against the passage of a cap and trade system, the granddaddy of global warming measures.
It is true that nobody has gotten rich betting that this President will embrace science when it comes into conflict with his old political cronies. But we do not have the luxury of indulging in the comfort of low expectations, even for a President who has so often not just ignored science, but has actively suppressed it. We are duty bound to soldier on, and pass the most aggressive cap and trade system possible, and again pass the Renewable Portfolio Standard and tax measures we previously passed in the House, all in the hope that a combination of pressure from major progressive corporations, the public, and a dose of divine intervention can bring the light of understanding into the White House.
This is “no regrets’ strategy. In the best case scenario, the Presidential epiphany arrives, In the worst case, we have plowed the ground in preparation for the next President to get the job done. Either way, we will have done what we should do — everything we can.
Third, we need the spirit of Teddy Roosevelt to arise in the breasts of just few more Republican Senators, so that we can break a filibuster of these vital provisions. We fell just one vote short on the RPS last year, for example. With the ghost of the Old Rough Rider leading the charge, the Grand Old Party could again regain the legacy that gave us our national park system and the Environmental Protection Agency, two things that occurred under Republican Presidents. If not, the American people in 2008 will have to put a few new leaders into the Senate, leaders who understand that eight years of inaction on global warming during the Bush Administration were eight years too many.
One thing we know will happen in 2008 as a lead pipe cinch — while these policy battles are going on, the brilliant Americans who have been inventing the new revolutionary clean energy technologies will be busy. We can assuredly look forward to advances in solar thermal power at Ausra Energy, advances in wave power at Finavera, advances in lithium battery technology at A123 Battery, and advances in cellulosic ethanol at Range and Iogen Companies. The shifting of economic tectonic plates will continue at a rapid pace because of the genius of inventors and the courage of entrepreneurs. We just need to create the conditions where their work can blossom. After co-authoring the book Apollo’s Fire:Igniting America’s Clean Energy Economy, I can warrant that if the policies finally level the playing field, so that fossil fuels do not enjoy such an outrageous advantage in subsidies, both direct and indirect, over renewable, we will see an explosion in clean technologies that could rival the growth in the internet.
This is why global warming is as much an economic opportunity for the nation as an environmental challenge. It is our destiny to provide the world with the clean energy technologies it will need to tame the beast of global warming. We should be selling to
It’s a great planet. It deserves a great year. Let’s make it great in ’08.
– J. Inslee: www.apollosfire.net
Related Post:
Previous in TP Climate Progress

I’m going to boldly attempt to create a link to
http://onthecommons.org/node/1239
Cap and Dividend
in the hope that Rep. Jay Inslee reads the article and then begins implementing the creative idea.
David B.,
That’s a good link. It looks like the may have been omitted. The cost to the average American figures in the article are sobering. The cap and dividend idea to rebate auction fees to the people to offset higher costs merits discussion. How much in revenue are CO2 auctions expected to raise? A dividend of $10 per month would cost $30 billion a year, $25/month = $75B. Is there really that much money in these auctions? I’d be happy to learn that the answer is yes.
p.s.
It should have read the tag for close /a may have been omitted.
If you want to hope that Jay Inslee reads something maybe you should email him at his own website – info@apollosfire.net.
That would be 1MM square kilometers of ice. Same basic idea though.