Climate

Devoid of ideas on climate and clean energy, House GOP attacks big business, science, legislative process, and even Joe Barton!

Business is not always going to be a good friend of the Republicans, and that needs to be reflected in our strategy,” said MWR Strategies President Michael McKenna, a Republican energy lobbyist.

The GOP members of the House Energy and Commerce committee, led by Joe Barton of Texas, are, ironically, bereft of any ideas on energy and commerce — and climate.  That is clear if you are watching the (painful) mark up of the Waxman-Markey bill on C-SPAN3 — which resumes today at 10 am EST and will again go deep into the evening.

And when a party has no ideas, their message implodes and they start a circular firing squad — in this case, attacking Barton.  That has already begun, as two remarkable articles in the Politico make clear.

In the first, “Climate change: GOP turns on business to fight measure,” the Politico reporters can hardly contain their amazement that the GOP acknowledges their position on clean energy and climate is essentially anti-business:

Senate Republicans have come up with a novel way to fight the climate change bill working its way through the House: Tee off on Big Business, and tie it around the neck of the Democrats.

In a strategy memo obtained by POLITICO, Republican staffers for the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works say Republicans should argue that Democrats are embracing “Wall Street traders,” “polluters” and “others in corporate America” who are “guilty of manipulating national climate policy to increase profits on the backs of consumers.”

The Republican role-reversal may be counterintuitive “” GOP candidates routinely describe themselves as “pro-business” “” but Republicans say it reflects their party’s new reality.

“Business is not always going to be a good friend of the Republicans, and that needs to be reflected in our strategy,” said MWR Strategies President Michael McKenna, a Republican energy lobbyist. “The GOP business model is probably busted forever. It started to break apart on TARP, and it could permanently break apart on climate change.”

While the GOP tries to hold the line against a massive climate change bill, a number of major corporations “” including Duke Energy, Johnson & Johnson and Shell Corp. “” are backing cap-and-trade proposals by the United States Climate Action Partnership coalition, a group of environmental groups and businesses advocating legislation to reduce greenhouse gases.

Democrats could hardly contain themselves over the inanity of the GOP position:

I find it extremely amusing that suddenly the Democrats are being attacked as being too friendly to business creation. I don’t get it,” said Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), chairwoman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. “No one is going to believe that the Republicans are attacking us for creating jobs and new businesses. It doesn’t make sense.”

In fact, the GOP position is so inane that even the GOP has begun attacking it — the surest sign that the party has no ideas.  For instance, remember that Barton alternative energy plan (see “Contempt of Congress: House GOP reveals disdain for clean energy, livable climate with a more-of-the-same rehash of Cheney energy plan“)?  Well, it ain’t a GOP plan, as the Politico notes in a piece, “Leaders cool on warming skeptic“:

Republican leaders aren’t backing a Barton alternative to the Waxman-Markey bill that would gut the 1990 Clean Air Act to prevent the Environmental Protection Agency and other state agencies from regulating carbon emissions and other greenhouse gases as pollutants. Instead, they’re backing an alternative crafted by Indiana’s Pence “” who’s not even on the Energy and Commerce panel “” that seeks to expand nuclear energy production, improve clean coal technology and “drill, baby, drill” for oil and gas in this country.

The entire piece is a death by a thousand cuts attack on the eminently mockable Barton — see Barton says regulating CO2 could ‘close down the New York and Boston marathons’ and Barton: humans should just ‘get shade’ — but instead of the attacks coming from some progressive blog, it comes from his own party:

… his unpredictability worries Republicans….

Party leaders, who still believe Republicans have the advantage on energy issues,  … don’t want to get bogged down in … a debate over climate science “” or a litany of procedural arguments that make voters’ eyes glaze over.

“This is not a process fight,” said Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.), Barton’s No. 2 in the climate change debate, whose arguments Monday echoed those party leaders are set to make.

… More recently, Barton has given other Republicans heartburn by threatening to make Waxman read his nearly 1,000-page bill in its entirety, a stalling tactic meant to anger the party in power.

The Texan pulled a similar stunt two years ago during consideration of legislation to expand a popular children’s health care program. In the eyes of most Republicans, it backfired: Members of the minority had drafted more than 150 amendments, but they never got the chance to offer them because then-Chairman John Dingell (D-Mich.) pulled the bill in retribution for having it read.

When his staff floated the idea of forcing the reading of the climate change measure, other aides to committee Republicans warned against it, people present said, arguing the outcome last time didn’t bode well for a repeat performance. Leadership echoed those concerns through other members of the committee, aides said.

Leadership “believe[s] Barton’s dilatory tactics will cloud the message,” said a Republican lobbyist who works closely with party leaders on energy and climate issues.

In the end, Barton blinked.

He didn’t ask the majority to read the bill “” eliciting a sigh of relief from his GOP colleagues.

But Barton and his fellow committee Republicans have drafted more than 400 amendments to the bill, which could slow its consideration dramatically. He could also ask for his more-than-300-page alternative to be read as the committee tries to wrap up its work, making it even harder for Waxman to hit his self-imposed Memorial Day deadline.

“Bring a sleeping bag,” Barton said Monday.

“We’re trying to kill this bill or slow it way down,” he said Tuesday….

He has a master’s in engineering [Note to self:  Don’t drive over any bridges he’s built] but his folksy comments have created public perception problems, as he’s sometimes oversimplifed complicated climate issues to the most homespun extremes.

Barton has argued that regulating global warming would “close down the New York and Boston marathons” because “20,000 marathoners” in a confined space could be considered “a single source of pollution, and you could regulate it.”

He gloated about an exchange with Energy Secretary Steven Chu earlier this year in which he asked the Nobel Prize-winning physicist, “How did all the oil and gas get to Alaska and under the Arctic Ocean?”

During the exchange that followed, a chuckling Chu briefly explained the geology of plate tectonics before Barton asked, “So it just drifted up there?”

“That’s certainly what happened,” Chu said before Waxman cut them both off.

Needless to say, there was nothing to gloat about in that exchange — see Joe Barton thinks he stumped Nobelist Chu, but instead revealed his own ignorance “” or his plot to get his constituents beach front property.

Needless to say, the GOP, the “anti-business, anti-climate, anti-clean-energy party,” is devoid of ideas.

Related Posts:

9 Responses to Devoid of ideas on climate and clean energy, House GOP attacks big business, science, legislative process, and even Joe Barton!

  1. K L Reddington says:

    As the Obama administration considers further steps to fight air pollution, a recent report from a Washington think tank shows that air quality in the United States has improved significantly over the last decade.

    The American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research analyzed data collected by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and concluded that levels of numerous gases linked with air pollution have fallen off since 2001.

    Among the findings: Carbon monoxide decreased by 39 percent, ozone by 6 percent, and sulfur dioxide by 32 percent.

    “Pick any category you want and pollution levels are generally lower than they were seven years ago,” said Steven Hayward, the policy analyst who authored the report, titled “Index of Leading Environmental Indicators,” for the conservative think tank.

    Lets see if we can improve on cleaning the air even more.

  2. Joe says:

    Did the AEI mention that improvement was due to federal regulations?

  3. NFJM says:

    K.L. Reddington:

    It does not matter that your past situation is a higher level of pollution.
    As long as the global societal cost occured by pollution is higher than the abatement cost (both expressed per tonne of sulfur, Nox, etc…) then there is an economic gain in reducing pollution.

    Off course the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research wants to limit the cost on private companies. This is a typical problem of a split incentive where the cost is on specific US companies while the benefits of mitigating these emissions is for the whole country (and even neighboring countries).

    NOx allowances trade at roughly half their social cost.

  4. paulm says:

    Someone’s got to be the stooge.

  5. Dano says:

    Yes, I always try to point out that when AEI/CEI types say AQ is improving, it is because of th’ federal regalayshun. And that these regulations have a savings of 5-7x the cost.

    Best,

    D

  6. Rick Covert says:

    Why am I NOT surprised that Joe Barton doesn’t understand plate tectonics? I guess he chalks that up as just another “theory” like global warming, quantum theory, evolution or Newtonian physics. Though I would suggest that should he regard to Newtonian Physics to stand outside on New Years Eve during that lovely traditon in Texas called, “firing you guns in the air and what goes up doesn’t come down at the same veolcity it started at while going up.”

    On another topic, the movie website, HULU has the Spencer Tracy, Victor March, Gene Kelly movie classic “Inherit the Wind” about the Scopes Monkey trial on their website. I saw it for the first time and it was like in 84 years nothing has changed with respect to the public’s understanding of science. Watch for the scene where Spencer Tracy and Victor March square off in the panultimate exchange between science and reason vs. demagoguery and irrationality. The religious extremism is certainly reflective of some undercurrents in current events.

    http://www.hulu.com/watch/65442/inherit-the-wind

  7. Rick Covert says:

    Ooops! That was Frederic March. The film basically reenacts the standoff between two giants, Clarence Darrow and William Jennings Bryan after the end of the “Progressive Era,” in the infamous Scopes Monkey Trial though they are renamed as Henry Drumond and Mathew Harrison Brady respectively.

  8. Affordable electricity is an essential part of protecting consumers and American businesses. During the America’s Power Factuality Tour, our team traveled all over the country to document the places, people and technologies involved in producing cleaner electricity from domestic coal. Our travels brought us to Council Bluffs, Iowa, home of the Walter Scott Energy Center – one of the most efficient coal-based plants in America. This facility generates more than 1,600 megawatts of affordable electricity, which has a positive long-term economic impact on the region—one that includes a Google data facility.

    Take a look at the plant in action and meet the people who keep it running: http://sn.im/factuality

  9. Rosa says:

    more proof that the GOP is competely directionless they seem to be relying on the old Bush strategy of simply trying to change the terms of the debate rather than changing their actual policies. There hunt for leadership : http://www.newsy.com/videos/gop_soul_search doesn’t seem to be panning out.