Goodbye, GM … by Michael Moore

Yesterday, long-time GM critic Michael Moore offered his take on the auto giant’s demise (here).  He calls for a radical change in GM’s mission — a WWII-style rapid reengineering of the company to address the planet’s environmental crisis.  Terrific idea (see “Advice to a young climate blogger: Always use WWII metaphors“).  He deserves to be heard because he warned us all two decades ago what was ahead for GM in his career-making first film.

I write this on the morning of the end of the once-mighty General Motors. By high noon, the President of the United States will have made it official: General Motors, as we know it, has been totaled.

As I sit here in GM’s birthplace, Flint, Michigan, I am surrounded by friends and family who are filled with anxiety about what will happen to them and to the town. Forty percent of the homes and businesses in the city have been abandoned. Imagine what it would be like if you lived in a city where almost every other house is empty. What would be your state of mind?

It is with sad irony that the company which invented “planned obsolescence” — the decision to build cars that would fall apart after a few years so that the customer would then have to buy a new one — has now made itself obsolete. It refused to build automobiles that the public wanted, cars that got great gas mileage, were as safe as they could be, and were exceedingly comfortable to drive. Oh — and that wouldn’t start falling apart after two years. GM stubbornly fought environmental and safety regulations. Its executives arrogantly ignored the “inferior” Japanese and German cars, cars which would become the gold standard for automobile buyers. And it was hell-bent on punishing its unionized workforce, lopping off thousands of workers for no good reason other than to “improve” the short-term bottom line of the corporation. Beginning in the 1980s, when GM was posting record profits, it moved countless jobs to Mexico and elsewhere, thus destroying the lives of tens of thousands of hard-working Americans. The glaring stupidity of this policy was that, when they eliminated the income of so many middle class families, who did they think was going to be able to afford to buy their cars? History will record this blunder in the same way it now writes about the French building the Maginot Line or how the Romans cluelessly poisoned their own water system with lethal lead in its pipes.

So here we are at the deathbed of General Motors. The company’s body not yet cold, and I find myself filled with — dare I say it — joy. It is not the joy of revenge against a corporation that ruined my hometown and brought misery, divorce, alcoholism, homelessness, physical and mental debilitation, and drug addiction to the people I grew up with. Nor do I, obviously, claim any joy in knowing that 21,000 more GM workers will be told that they, too, are without a job.

But you and I and the rest of America now own a car company! I know, I know — who on earth wants to run a car company? Who among us wants $50 billion of our tax dollars thrown down the rat hole of still trying to save GM? Let’s be clear about this: The only way to save GM is to kill GM. Saving our precious industrial infrastructure, though, is another matter and must be a top priority. If we allow the shutting down and tearing down of our auto plants, we will sorely wish we still had them when we realize that those factories could have built the alternative energy systems we now desperately need. And when we realize that the best way to transport ourselves is on light rail and bullet trains and cleaner buses, how will we do this if we’ve allowed our industrial capacity and its skilled workforce to disappear?

Thus, as GM is “reorganized” by the federal government and the bankruptcy court, here is the plan I am asking President Obama to implement for the good of the workers, the GM communities, and the nation as a whole. Twenty years ago when I made “Roger & Me,” I tried to warn people about what was ahead for General Motors. Had the power structure and the punditocracy listened, maybe much of this could have been avoided. Based on my track record, I request an honest and sincere consideration of the following suggestions:

1. Just as President Roosevelt did after the attack on Pearl Harbor, the President must tell the nation that we are at war and we must immediately convert our auto factories to factories that build mass transit vehicles and alternative energy devices. Within months in Flint in 1942, GM halted all car production and immediately used the assembly lines to build planes, tanks and machine guns. The conversion took no time at all. Everyone pitched in. The fascists were defeated.

We are now in a different kind of war — a war that we have conducted against the ecosystem and has been conducted by our very own corporate leaders. This current war has two fronts. One is headquartered in Detroit. The products built in the factories of GM, Ford and Chrysler are some of the greatest weapons of mass destruction responsible for global warming and the melting of our polar icecaps. The things we call “cars” may have been fun to drive, but they are like a million daggers into the heart of Mother Nature. To continue to build them would only lead to the ruin of our species and much of the planet.

The other front in this war is being waged by the oil companies against you and me. They are committed to fleecing us whenever they can, and they have been reckless stewards of the finite amount of oil that is located under the surface of the earth. They know they are sucking it bone dry. And like the lumber tycoons of the early 20th century who didn’t give a damn about future generations as they tore down every forest they could get their hands on, these oil barons are not telling the public what they know to be true — that there are only a few more decades of useable oil on this planet. And as the end days of oil approach us, get ready for some very desperate people willing to kill and be killed just to get their hands on a gallon can of gasoline.

President Obama, now that he has taken control of GM, needs to convert the factories to new and needed uses immediately.

2. Don’t put another $30 billion into the coffers of GM to build cars. Instead, use that money to keep the current workforce — and most of those who have been laid off — employed so that they can build the new modes of 21st century transportation. Let them start the conversion work now.

3. Announce that we will have bullet trains criss-crossing this country in the next five years. Japan is celebrating the 45th anniversary of its first bullet train this year. Now they have dozens of them. Average speed: 165 mph. Average time a train is late: under 30 seconds. They have had these high speed trains for nearly five decades — and we don’t even have one! The fact that the technology already exists for us to go from New York to L.A. in 17 hours by train, and that we haven’t used it, is criminal. Let’s hire the unemployed to build the new high speed lines all over the country. Chicago to Detroit in less than two hours. Miami to DC in under 7 hours. Denver to Dallas in five and a half. This can be done and done now.

4. Initiate a program to put light rail mass transit lines in all our large and medium-sized cities. Build those trains in the GM factories. And hire local people everywhere to install and run this system.

5. For people in rural areas not served by the train lines, have the GM plants produce energy efficient clean buses.

6. For the time being, have some factories build hybrid or all-electric cars (and batteries). It will take a few years for people to get used to the new ways to transport ourselves, so if we’re going to have automobiles, let’s have kinder, gentler ones. We can be building these next month (do not believe anyone who tells you it will take years to retool the factories — that simply isn’t true).

7. Transform some of the empty GM factories to facilities that build windmills, solar panels and other means of alternate forms of energy. We need tens of millions of solar panels right now. And there is an eager and skilled workforce who can build them.

8. Provide tax incentives for those who travel by hybrid car or bus or train. Also, credits for those who convert their home to alternative energy.

9. To help pay for this, impose a two-dollar tax on every gallon of gasoline. This will get people to switch to more energy saving cars or to use the new rail lines and rail cars the former autoworkers have built for them.

Well, that’s a start. Please, please, please don’t save GM so that a smaller version of it will simply do nothing more than build Chevys or Cadillacs. This is not a long-term solution. Don’t throw bad money into a company whose tailpipe is malfunctioning, causing a strange odor to fill the car.

100 years ago this year, the founders of General Motors convinced the world to give up their horses and saddles and buggy whips to try a new form of transportation. Now it is time for us to say goodbye to the internal combustion engine. It seemed to serve us well for so long. We enjoyed the car hops at the A&W. We made out in the front — and the back — seat. We watched movies on large outdoor screens, went to the races at NASCAR tracks across the country, and saw the Pacific Ocean for the first time through the window down Hwy. 1. And now it’s over. It’s a new day and a new century. The President — and the UAW — must seize this moment and create a big batch of lemonade from this very sour and sad lemon.

Yesterday, the last surviving person from the Titanic disaster passed away. She escaped certain death that night and went on to live another 97 years.

So can we survive our own Titanic in all the Flint Michigans of this country. 60% of GM is ours. I think we can do a better job.

Michael Moore

16 Responses to Goodbye, GM … by Michael Moore

  1. paulm says:

    Now lets get on with nationalizing the coal utilities and neutralizing them.

  2. David says:

    “Announce that we will have bullet trains criss-crossing this country in the next five years.”

    Yeah, right. It would be impossible to have bullet train running between Dallas and Ft.Worth in five years and he thinks it’s possible to criss-cross the nation with them in the same amount if time?

    [JR: WWII-scale effort.]

  3. K L Reddington says:

    If we can have the government takeover of GM handled by central planning, then we can easily get the right of way to build railway. At 5-10 million dollars per mile, we can have a start for several hundred billion. Amtrak tell us it should be very lucrative. Running it with an Enron business model of secrecy and non disclosure will help.
    Liberal Harry Reid wants 10 billion to connect Vegas where Obama says we have no business going with LA.
    If Obama says we don’t need to go to Vegas, whty build a high speed rail connection? Why build a high speed rail for people to leave Detroit?
    Most of these projects are under the umbrella of social engineering.

  4. Sasparilla says:

    Its an interesting read and if we were a command economy we might even be able to do some of this stuff (high speed rail is much more efficient than aircraft and cars for shorter stuff Chicago to St. Louis/Cleveland or LA to San Fran distances etc.).

    But, since this isn’t a U.S. where we can get a climate change bill that will keep us below 2.0C/450ppm initially (to save civilization and billions of people as we know it), it certainly isn’t a country where its politically possible to do what Mr. Moore is suggesting. That type of control and the political tolerance for it do not exist in the US.

    Thanks for putting it up Joe, its good to ponder.

  5. Lou Grinzo says:

    Sasparilla: Sad, but true.

    All you have to do is start with item 9 (the $2/gallon gasoline tax) and ponder the political and economic chaos that would trigger. If nothing else, the current Blue majorities and president would be replaced by the drill, baby, drill team at the earliest elections, and we’d kill everything else Moore proposes and actually regress from where we are today.

    I hate the political hurdles we face in doing the right thing, but that doesn’t mean I (or anyone else) can choose to ignore them. As the saying goes, reality is that which, even when you cease to believe in it, still exists.

    I have a great deal of respect for Moore and his work, but I think he and others making these absurd and totally unworkable suggestions don’t do anyone any good, including themselves.

  6. pstoneki says:

    Why is that the Japanese, Germans, Swiss, Dutch, even the French! can run high speed trains reliably, on time, at a reasonable cost? Who cares if the government supports them if they work well. The government in the US supports our transportation infrastructure was well. Unfortunately, we seem incapable of managing anything correctly which is why we have crumbling roads, bridges, and airports.

    How did the foreigners get so much better than us?

  7. Jon Z says:

    Dear M&M,

    Yours sounds to me like a great plan. Let me know when Obama decides to take it up.

  8. Rick Covert says:


    Mike is right about the cost of the Volt. He was on Keith Olberman’s program and asked who can afford a $40,000 car in reference to the Volt? I like the Volt and would love to own one but unless my finances improve by 2011 I’m going to convert if I can find the time.

  9. Pat Richards says:

    Retooling GM to be the company to make the cars the world really needs in the future would be great… except that yesterday Obama stood up on national television and stated:

    “Let me make it very clear: The government is not interested in running General Motors.”

    So, don’t look for even a Vietnam-scale retooling of GM, much less WWII-scale.

  10. David B. Benson says:

    pstoneki — They didn’t fall for the foolishness of reaganonomics. :|

  11. Mike D says:

    Ford is releasing an all-electric Focus in 2011, engineered by Magna (which just bought Opel). Supposedly it will go 100 miles on a charge, and recharge in 6-12 hours. It uses the same platform as the European Focus (#1 selling car in the world) which will replace the American version. It can be made in the same factories as the regular Focus so they are looking at a price point of around $25k.

  12. Neil Howes says:

    6.For the time being, have some factories build hybrid or all-electric cars (and batteries).

    This has to be the most sensible suggestion why not have ALL GM production exclusively hybrid (PHEV) or EV, could be producing 3-4Million a year by 2015. There is no future in building ICE only vehicles, any more than building horse drawn buggies was in 1910.

  13. K L Reddington says:

    According to the Financial times, Obama blew up GM to protect the UAW. They were given preferred stock which pays a 500 million dollar dividend whether they make money or not.

    Vesta systems in england laid off 600 people. No more subsidies and a slow market in wind turbines apparently.

  14. hapa says:

    lou grinzo, tell me you’re not calling carbon pricing absurd and unworkable. are you thinking mike moore, of all people, is advocating sticking it to the little guy? gas taxes can be neutralized in household finances. the point is to push heavier on the lever.

  15. David C says:

    I’m surprised you would post somebody as incendiary as Michael Moore on your blog, particularly without any kind of disagreement.

    “And as the end days of oil approach us, get ready for some very desperate people willing to kill and be killed just to get their hands on a gallon can of gasoline.”

    Sentences like these are just plain unnecessary.

    [JR: He is over the top, true. Although what he is saying is not that much different from what Kuntsler and others say. I don’t agree 100% with every word of people I reprint. But Moore has been right for so long on General Motors he deserves to be heard.]

  16. lennyd says:

    who are you and your soapbox to tell people what to drive, if I can afford it its my businness, I drive a Durango, and was broadsided, and walked away, if is was a toy car I would have been dead airbags and seatbelts included,