Like a bad horror movie, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce just can’t stop shrinking — and like the incredibly shrinking man, it is becoming increasingly desperate in its efforts to save itself.
After a third company, Exelon, the nation’s largest utility, pulled the plug on the U.S. Chamber of Commerce over climate denial, Chamber spokesman Eric Wohlschlegel desperately — and falsely — claimed “We’ve never questioned the science behind global warming.”
In fact, as NRDC’s Pete Altman (with some help from National Wildlife Federation) reports:
In a petition to EPA this summer, posted on the U.S. Chamber’s website and part of the public record on important global warming proceedings under the Clean Air Act, the Chamber argued that a “warming of even 3ºC in the next 100 years would, on balance, be beneficial to humans” because of fewer cold-related deaths in winter months. (p. 38) The petition is available at: http://www.uschamber.com/co2/default
This is but one part of an elaborate U.S. Chamber effort to prove that climate change is not a threat. As part of its comments to EPA, the U.S. Chamber submitted a 57 page document that would make even he hardiest climate denier blush (See “Detailed Review of EPA’s Health and Welfare Scientific Evidence” on the above-referenced site).
Here are some excerpts:
- “The increased use of air conditioning will mitigate many of the effects cited by EPA….” (p.1)
- “Overall, there is strong evidence that populations can acclimatize to warmer climates via a range of behavioral, physiological, and technological adaptations” (p. 4)
- “The evidence when considered together suggests potential increases in temperature as the result of climate change will not pose an endangerment to public health… ” (p. 14)
- “The U.S. health care system has effectively dealt with many of the reported climate sensitive diseases for a long time, and will continue to respond effectively.” (p. 39)
Wonk Room further notes:
This is a blatant falsehood, by any definition. The Chamber has a long history of questioning the science of climate change. The Chamber’s present campaign against regulation of greenhouse gases by the Environmental Protection Agency questions the existence of global warming as well as the scientific evidence of its impacts on the public health and welfare. The Chamber promotes global warming denier books “to advance our thinking about issues of significance,” and has promoted the work of global warming denier Pat Michaels since at least 1992:
2009: Chamber SVP Kovacs Calls For ‘Scopes Monkey Trial’ On The ‘Science Of Climate Change.’ “It would be evolution versus creationism. It would be the science of climate change on trial.” Chamber of Commerce Senior Vice President William Kovacs explained that the Chamber was seeking a “Scopes monkey trial of the 21st century” on global warming to prevent the EPA from declaring greenhouse gases a threat to the public welfare. [Los Angeles Times, 8/25/09]
2009: Chamber Claims No ‘Plausible Theory’ To Link ‘Climate Change With Extreme Weather Events And Disease In The United States,’ Disputes ‘Claims Of Ocean Acidification.’ In an official filing prepared by the law firm of Kirkland & Ellis for the comments on the EPA’s proposed endangerment finding for greenhouse gases, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce cited blog posts by global warming deniers such as Pat Michaels and Chip Knappenberger to challenge a broad range of climate change science, including sea level rise and the “UN/IPCC forecasted temperature increases.” [U.S. Chamber of Commerce, 8/25/09]
2009: National Chamber Foundation Promotes Global Warming Denier Book As ‘#1″² Top Book Of The Year. Promoting “Climate of Extremes: Global Warming Science They Don’t Want You to Know,” the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s National Chamber Foundation writes: “Climatologists Patrick J. Michaels and Robert Balling Jr. explain that climate science is hardly unbiased,” and that the “pop-culture icons of climate change turns out to be short on facts and long on exaggeration.” On Twitter, the National Chamber Foundation ranked the book “#1″³ in its “Top Books of ’09.” [National Chamber Foundation, 8/20/09]
2008: National Chamber Foundation Promotes Global Warming ‘Deniers’ Book Against ‘Global Warming Hysteria.’ The National Chamber Foundation selected “The Deniers: The World Renowned Scientists Who Stood Up Against Global Warming Hysteria, Political Persecution and Fraud; And those who are too fearful to do so” by Lawrence Solomon to “help shape the debate on issues important to the business community.” [National Chamber Foundation, 2008]
2008: Chamber President Tom Donohue Says ‘Scientific Inquiry’ Into Climate Change ‘Should Continue’ Because Of ‘Cooling Trend.’ On March 4, 2008, U.S. Chamber of Commerce President Tom Donohue revealed his true thoughts to the Chamber’s board, questioning the science of global warming: “As the scientific inquiry continues (and given the recent reports indicating a cooling trend over the last year, such inquiry should continue) the Chamber supports public and private sector action to control the greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to climate change.” [U.S. Chamber of Commerce, 3/4/08]
2003: Chamber Says ‘We Need To Have Better Science’ To Justify Climate Action. Following the defeat of the McCain-Lieberman cap-and-trade climate legislation in 2003, William Kovacs, the Chamber’s vice president for environment, technology, and regulatory affairs, told the Heartland Institute, “We need to have better science to support any efforts to restrict energy use before Americans can justify sacrificing their jobs, quality of life, and paying almost double for their utility bills.” [Heartland Institute, 11/21/03]
2003: Chamber Claims ‘Every Aspect Of The Environment’ Is ‘Getting Cleaner.’ Praising George W. Bush’s environmental record, William Kovacs dismissed the concept of global warming pollution. “The air, along with every other aspect of the environment, is getting cleaner. I think that has been a true statement for the last 30 years, and it will continue to be. I think Bush has been continuing along that path.” [New York Times, 2/23/2003]
2001: Chamber Claims Global Warming ‘About One Percent From Human Activity,’ Says ‘Things Just Change.’ Appearing on CNNFN, William Kovacs challenged the “link” between human activity and global warming and called for more research. “Let me address two issues. One is, the link. You know, let’s be realistic, 95 percent of all greenhouse gases, you know, really come from water vapor; and another 3 or 4 percent from natural causes, and we’re down to about one percent from human activity. So the Bush plan is really twofold. One is, we’re going to spend another 120-$130 million to see if we can get some of the tough issues, and make the links. Even EPA agrees. You know, yes, there is global warming, but you know, 20 years ago, we were worried about global cooling. Things just change, and before we sink the economy, we need to make sure we’ve got the right research done.” [CNNFN, 7/16/2001]
1992: Chamber Sponsors Global Warming Denier Pat Michaels To ‘Refute The Global Warming Warnings.’ “Bankrolled partly by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Global Climate Coalition, a group of manufacturers fearful of new environmental regulations, Patrick Michaels and Washington, D.C., attorney Eugene M. Trisko have been traveling cross-country to refute the global warming warnings from environmentalists.” [Chicago Sun-Times, 5/13/1992]
Can someone please put an end to this horrible, horror movie? I fear the Chamber won’t shrink to oblivion fast enough.

2008: National Chamber Foundation Promotes Global Warming ‘Deniers’ Book Against ‘Global Warming Hysteria.’ The National Chamber Foundation selected “The Deniers: The World Renowned Scientists Who Stood Up Against Global Warming Hysteria, Political Persecution and Fraud; And those who are too fearful to do so” by Lawrence Solomon to “help shape the debate on issues important to the business community.” [National Chamber Foundation,
Previous in TP Climate Progress
Language Intelligence: Lessons on persuasion from Jesus, Shakespeare, Lincoln, and Lady Gaga

Industry trade groups are always kind of a joke, run by mediocrities, but 3C is just peachy? Reminds me of Lomborg’s appearance on the Colbert Report a couple of years ago. Colbert summarized Lomborg’s argument thusly: “The world is getting hotter. So?” Even Steven Colbert had trouble keeping a straight face as he delivered that line.
This is among several things that we can expect:
Deniers will deny that they ever denied.
Extreme hesitaters will (after hesitating) rush in to claim that they were timely, after all.
And many of the people who block(ed) progress will be retired and, in many cases, passed away, never to feel or even see one consequence of their irresponsible behavior.
So, what does this mean? Among other things (and especially given the science of the matter and the lead-times involved in solving it), we really can’t sit around and accept slowness, watered-down non-solutions, unscientific bunk, and irresponsible behaviors.
For example, the time for ExxonMobil to change its tune completely is NOW and in the coming few months.
As another example, the time for The New York Times to get its act together is NOW or, at least, in the coming two or three weeks, in time for the public to be much better informed before the Senate deliberations and before Copenhagen.
The time for The New York Times to get its act together on all this is NOT six months from now or even three months from now. It is NOW. Or else, “off with their credibility!”
That’s the reality of the situation, if you believe what science has been telling us all for some time now.
Be Well (and Good Luck!),
Jeff
I agree with Jeff. As soon as everyone sees that drilling holes in our ship’s hull is causing some sort of sinking problem, all of the drillers will be saying, “Who, me drilling holes? No way!”
It’s also time for our government, starting with President Obama, to step up to the plate and provide citizens with the protection from harm that motivates us to pay taxes and etc. for the common good.
Can anyone reading this remember when, during the Cold War of the last century, the sirens would blare when the government tested our civil defense systems? We young school children would be told to crawl under our desks–offering us great protection form the (possible) nuclear warheads that might be headed our way. (Of course we, like GWB, couldn’t even say nu-cle-ar back then!)
Well, can anyone slow the ‘threat clock’ down by a few orders of magnitude and see the similar need for our government to send out a warning about a threat that ordinary citizens can’t see.
Isn’t this true, especially when the climate change threat could ultimately be much worse than a 1950s bomber, or ICBM, heading for a single American city? Isn’t this especially true when there is a hidden “point of no return” that all of our best scientists know about, but that the lay person can’t see? (It’s sort of like substituting a 2009 scientist’s ability to build and interpret a climate model, for a 1949 scientist’s ability to build and interpret a radar machine, or an accurate anti-aircraft gun, or a Geiger counter.)
A slow threat doesn’t equate to no threat!
So, IMHO, it’s well beyond the time when our government/Obama, like Joe Romm, should speak out and tell it like it is to Joe Sixpack. No one is doing our uninformed citizen-neighbors any favors by letting them continue to be ignorant of the consequences of unbridled climate change.
If folks think spending a few percent of our GDP on mitigation is too much, well, it’s because no one has told them, bluntly, what it will cost if we do nothing. According to my quick calculations, the cost of INACTION could be roughly 100% of our GDP by the year 2050–if we even have a GDP at that point!
It’s like they say, “You think education is expensive; try ignorance!”
P.S. My nomination for best theme song for “The Age of Stupid” is…
“Those Were The Days My Friend, We Thought They’d Never End”
by Mary Hopkins.
There is IFR nuclear left. Comment something on IFR, Joe!