Sen. Boxer on “Telling the Whole Story on Global Warming” plus the witness list for her marathon hearings this week on the clean energy bill

Posted on

"Sen. Boxer on “Telling the Whole Story on Global Warming” plus the witness list for her marathon hearings this week on the clean energy bill"

The Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works launches a full week of hearings this week on the climate and clean energy bill.  You’ll certainly want to tune in (at the EPW website) for first hearing Tuesday, 9:30 ET to hear:

  • Energy Secretary Steven Chu;
  • Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood;
  • Interior Secretary Ken Salazar;
  • U.S. EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson; and
  • Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Chairman Jon Wellinghoff.

Wellinghoff in particular may be the best Obama appointment you never heard of, who said in April of new nuclear and coal plants:  “We may not need any, ever.” I’ll repost the full witness list for Wednesday and Thursday at the end.

First, however, Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA), EPW chair, has a great piece on HuffPost on “Telling the Whole Story on Global Warming” — on making sure that we don’t just talk about the cost of action but also talk about the cost of inaction:

Global warming is one of the greatest challenges of our generation. Addressing this challenge also represents enormous opportunities for economic recovery and long term prosperity.

But sometimes the big picture is lost when just a part of the story is told.

That’s just what happened when Douglas Elmendorf, the head of the Congressional Budget Office, testified recently before the Senate Energy Committee about the economic impact of clean energy legislation recently passed by the House of Representatives.

Afterward, a few headlines gave a misleading impression about the implications of addressing the challenge of global warming.

But those reports largely missed what CBO left out of its analysis.

The CBO Director said it himself: “These measures of potential costs do not include any benefits from averting climate change.”

Global warming is happening now. Ignoring the long-term costs of doing nothing to avert the most dangerous impacts of a changing climate results in a profoundly incomplete and distorted economic picture.

The U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change warns that more frequent and intense storms, wildfires in the West, heat waves across the nation, increased droughts and flooding, global instability and conflict, food shortages and more are all among the likely impacts of continued global warming.

Whether or not it was caused or worsened by climate change, the devastating effects of Hurricane Katrina provide a window into the kind of world we can expect if global warming continues unabated.

Earlier this month, President Obama visited New Orleans. In 2005, Hurricane Katrina took an estimated 1,700 lives and displaced 1 million people. The total cost of the storm is estimated at well over $100 billion, with some estimates much higher. Four years later, the people of the region are still suffering, and it will take billions more to rebuild the Gulf Coast and protect coastal communities from future storms.

And that’s just what one storm cost us. How many of these disasters can we withstand? We must take action to address these real and costly threats.

A closer look at CBO’s testimony, and analyses by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Energy Information Administration (EIA), shows that the cost of action is dwarfed by steady growth in the economy.

CBO estimated an average monthly cost of about $13.00 per family in 2020. An EPA analysis estimated a price tag even smaller — less than a postage stamp per day.

The CBO has also estimated U.S. gross domestic product may be just slightly lower in 2050 (one to three percent) than it would be without comprehensive clean energy legislation, but they didn’t put that in context.

Let’s think about what that really means. Over the next four decades, our economy is projected more than double in size. According to CBO’s estimate, if we act now to address global warming and invest in clean energy, the economy 40 years from now may be about 249 percent bigger, instead of 250 percent bigger. And we’ll still get to 250 percent – in May instead of January 2050.

And a recent study from the University of California at Berkeley reports that comprehensive clean energy legislation, coupled with gains in energy efficiency, could produce nearly 2 million new American jobs by 2020.

The CBO director noted, “The uncertainties around the damage of climate change are also great … many economists believe that the right response to that kind of uncertainty is to take out some insurance … against some of the worst outcomes.”

We are at a crossroads. We can choose a future in which we face the ravages — and the costs — of unchecked global warming, while other nations gain the jobs and the economic benefits of investing in clean energy technologies. Or we can act now to transform our economy, create millions of new American jobs, and lead the world in developing and exporting in clean energy technologies while protecting our children from dangerous pollution.

Comprehensive clean energy legislation like the Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act that Senator Kerry and I have introduced in the Senate is not only the right choice to transform our economy, create jobs, and make America more secure. It is also our most effective insurance policy against a dangerous future.

For a more detailed analysis of the cost of stopping catastrophic climate change, see “Waxman-Markey clean air, clean water, clean energy jobs bill creates $1.5 trillion in benefits.”
The witness list for the rest of this week’s hearings, from E&E News (subs. req’d):

Witnesses for Wednesday’s hearing: Panel I, Jobs and Economic Opportunities: Peter Brehm, vice president of business development & government relations, Infinia Corp.; Dan Reicher, director, climate and energy initiatives, Google Inc.; Dave Foster, executive director, Blue Green Alliance; Michael Nutter, mayor of Philadelphia; Kate Gordon, senior policy adviser, Apollo Alliance; Bill Klesse, chairman and CEO, Valero Energy Corp.; and Brett Vassey, president and CEO, Virginia Manufacturers Association.

Panel II, National Security: Former Sen. John Warner (R-Va.); Kathleen Hicks, deputy undersecretary for strategy, plans and forces, Defense Department; Retired Vice Adm. Dennis McGinn, U.S. Navy, member, Center for Naval Analysis Advisory Board; retired Maj. Gen. Robert Scales; Drew Sloan, fellow, Truman National Security Project; and retired Lt. Col. James Jay Carafano, deputy director, Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for International Studies and Director, Douglas and Sarah Allison Center for Foreign Policy Studies, Heritage Foundation.

Panel III, Utilities: David Crane, president and CEO, NRG Energy Inc.; Ralph Izzo, chairman, CEO and president, Public Service Enterprise Group Inc.; Kevin Law, president and CEO, Long Island Power Authority; Nathaniel Keohane, director of economic policy and analysis, Environmental Defense Fund; Joel Bluestein, president, Energy and Environmental Analysis Inc., ICF International; Barry Hart, CEO, Association of Missouri Electric Cooperatives; and Dustin Johnson, commissioner, South Dakota Public Utilities Commission.

Panel IV, Adaptation: Shari Wilson, secretary, Maryland Department of the Environment; Ronald Young, president, California Association of Sanitation Agencies; Peter Frumhoff, chief scientist, Union of Concerned Scientists; Larry Schweiger, president and CEO, National Wildlife Federation; Fawn Sharp, president, Quinault Indian Nation; Jim Sims, president and CEO, Western Business Roundtable; and Kenneth Green, resident scholar, American Enterprise Institute.

Witnesses for Thursday’s hearing: Panel I, Moving to a Clean Energy Economy: Preston Chiaro, CEO, Energy Product Group, Rio Tinto; John Rowe, chairman, president and CEO, Exelon Corp.; Willett Kempton, professor, marine policy, University of Delaware; Bob Winger, president, International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Local 11; Fred Krupp, president, Environmental Defense Fund; Mike Carey, president, Ohio Coal Association; and Bob Stallman, president, American Farm Bureau Federation.

Panel II, Transportation: Former Rep. Sherwood Boehlert (R-N.Y.), co-chair, Bipartisan Policy Center’s National Transportation Policy Project; William Millar, president, American Public Transportation Association; Mike McKeever, executive director, Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG); and Barbara Windsor, president & CEO, Hahn Transportation Inc.

Panel III, Actions in Other Countries: John Podesta, president and CEO, Center for American Progress; Ned Helme, president, Center for Clean Air Policy; Jonathan Lash, president, World Resources Institute; Iain Murray, vice-president for strategy, Competitive Enterprise Institute.

Panel IV, Moving to a Clean Energy Economy: Linda Adams, secretary, California Environmental Protection Agency; Dave Johnson, organizing director, Laborers’ Union Eastern Region, Laborers’ International Union of North America (LIUNA); J. Stephan Dolezalek, managing director, VantagePoint Venture Partners; David Hawkins, director, Climate Center, Natural Resources Defense Council; Eugene Trisko, attorney for the United Mine Workers of America; Charlie Smith, president & CEO, CountryMark; and Paul Cicio, president, Industrial Energy Consumers of America.

« »

3 Responses to Sen. Boxer on “Telling the Whole Story on Global Warming” plus the witness list for her marathon hearings this week on the clean energy bill

  1. Jeff Huggins says:

    Just One Suggestion

    Even as there is, and should be, talk about the economic benefits of addressing the problem, as well as the costs (in a more narrow sense, given that the benefits will greatly outweigh the costs), and of the economic aspects from all angles, we must also realize and repeat, over and over again, that there are immensely important benefits OTHER THAN the economic ones.

    Clearly — and needless to say here, I hope — much of what is most important, i.e., most valuable, cannot be measured in dollars and cents.

    Too often, this point is acknowledged (who would disagree with it?) and yet ignored as being “theoretical”, too obvious to be of any use, or not as important as the economic stuff.

    “That’s all well and good, but it doesn’t fit into my economic model, so let’s just set it aside.”

    That view and dismissal must be challenged at its roots. I’m not suggesting that we ignore the economic analyses or that we think that they aren’t part of the picture. They are important to understand and consider. They are PART of the picture. BUT, they are far from all of the picture, and indeed they aren’t even the most important part. So, at the start of any discussion of the economic costs and benefits, somebody should remind the group of that context. Other sorts of value are real, vital, and important. Indeed, on a daily basis, and especially when it comes to the largest life decisions, most of us place more emphasis, ultimately, on some rather basic non-economic values. They are real.

    Be Well (which, of course, is largely a sentiment having to do with things that can’t be measured monetarily),

    Jeff

  2. There is one book that does a particularly good job of “telling the whole story.” Called simply “Climate Wars” by Gwynne Dyer. It focus on what is most likely to happen when the competition for food and water starts getting really intense on an international level. It is available in Canada and will soon be available in the United States.

  3. Anonymous says:

    The witness list is very heavy on CEOs and very light on scientists. What would be the economic cost of the extinction of Homo Sapiens?