Tumblr Icon RSS Icon

Twenty-two Democrats petition Reid for action on bipartisan climate and clean energy jobs bill

By Sean Pool on March 23, 2010 at 1:03 pm

"Twenty-two Democrats petition Reid for action on bipartisan climate and clean energy jobs bill"

Share:

google plus icon

Representing a diverse group of States and regions, we believe the United States should consider bipartisan and comprehensive clean energy and climate legislation this year with a renewed focus on jobs and reduced dependence on foreign oil.

So opens a letter sent yesterday from Tom Udall (D-NM) and 21 other moderate and progressive Democrats to Majority Leader Reid yesterday (full text reprinted at the end). The votes of these Dems are considered essential for passage of climate and clean energy legislation through the Senate this year:

Mark Begich of Alaska, Michael Bennet of Colorado, Sherrod Brown of Ohio, Roland Burris of Illinois, Maria Cantwell of Washington, Tom Carper of Delaware, Robert Casey of Pennsylvania, Al Franken of Minnesota, Kay Hagan of North Carolina, Tom Harkin of Iowa, Ted Kaufman of Delaware, Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, Jeff Merkley of Oregon, Patty Murray of Washington, Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, Debbie Stabenow of Michigan, Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, Jon Tester of Montana, Mark Udall of Colorado, Mark Warner of Virginia, Ron Wyden of Oregon.

The signatories include six Senators on E&E Daily’s (subs. req’d — see also here) list of 30 crucial fence sitters. Assuming that signatories of the letter have a good chance of voting for cloture on a final clean energy and climate package, we can move them from ‘fence sitters ‘ to ‘probably yes.’ That leaves Kerry, Lieberman, Graham, and possibly the future of a livable climate on planet earth in the hands of these 23 senators, of which at least 13 will have to vote yes:

Remaining Dem Fence Sitters

Max Baucus (Mont.)

Evan Bayh (Ind.)

Robert Byrd (W.Va.)

Kent Conrad (N.D.)

Byron Dorgan (N.D.)

Mary Landrieu (La.)

Carl Levin (Mich.)

Blanche Lincoln (Ark.)

Claire McCaskill (Mo.)

Ben Nelson (Neb.)

Mark Pryor (Ark.)

Jay Rockefeller (W.Va.)

Jim Webb (Va.)

Possibly Gettable Republicans

Scott Brown (Mass.)

Susan Collins (Maine)

Bob Corker (Tenn.)

Judd Gregg (N.H.)

George LeMieux (Fla.)

Richard Lugar (Ind.)

John McCain (Ariz.)

Lisa Murkowski (Alaska)

Olympia Snowe (Maine)

George Voinovich (Ohio)

(We’ve stricken out the few R’s that seem like pretty far-fetched gets despite E&E listing them as fence sitters)

There is still reluctance among some Democrats on this list to move forward on a comprehensive bill.  But the letter, along with Lindsay Graham’s indication (subs. req’d) that he will not abandon his spot as the sole GOP co-sponsor of the bipartisan clean energy agenda, indicates that there is still hope for bipartisan action in the senate this year.  And we have the positive momentum from the successful passage of a comprehensive health security bill.

The letter from Sen. Tom Udall and 21 moderate democrats is reprinted in its entirety here:

Representing a diverse group of States and regions, we believe the United States should consider bipartisan and comprehensive clean energy and climate legislation this year with a renewed focus on jobs and reduced dependance on foreign oil.

Our lack of a comprehensive clean energy policy hurts job creation and increases regulatory uncertainty throughout our economy. Businesses are waiting on clear signals from Congress before investing billions in energy, transportation, manufacturing, buildings, and other sectors. America’s competitiveness and export strength are also at stake. Asia and Europe are moving aggressively to take the lead in efficiency, renewables, clean coal, batteries, nuclear energy and other technologies. We need to take action in order to lead the emerging sectors that will drive our economic recovery.

While uncertainty hurts job creation, clean energy legislation can create jobs. Over the past decade, clean energy sectors have been creating jobs at over twice the rate of overall job growth. For established energy and manufacturing sectors, clean energy incentives will deploy the next generation of technologies that preserve and grow jobs in those sectors as well.

We recognize that achieving agreement in the senate will be a challenge, but across the country, Americans are coming together behind this effort. Recently, over 80 leading manufacturers, businesses, national security experts, veterans” groups, labor unions and faith-based groups called for “bi-partisan, national energy and climate legislation that increases our security and limits emissions, as it preserves and creates jobs.” The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has stats that “climate change is an important issue for this Congress to address.” By working together, we can meet the challenge.

We are also deeply concerned with spending hundreds of billions of dollars each year on imported oil from unstable regions. These billions spent overseas burden families’ budgets and threaten our national security. Gridlock will only continue more of the same, but a comprehensive energy strategy can break our addiction to foreign oil.

Thank you for your work to build consensus and facilitate bipartisan cooperation on these important economic and national security issues.

Sean Pool is Special Assistant for Energy Policy at the Center for American Progress.

‹ PREVIOUS
Energy and Global Warming News for March 23: Wind energy investments to hit $65 billion this year; World Bank helps Indonesia increase geothermal energy

NEXT ›
Farm, timber, and enviro groups demand forests and farms be part of climate bill, reject “energy-only” bill

4 Responses to Twenty-two Democrats petition Reid for action on bipartisan climate and clean energy jobs bill

  1. If Congress were truly serious they would establish or designate an climate information source… what is it? .. not the IPCC, I hope – because that is both outdated and a consensus report. By avoiding a serious definition of the problem, they can duck a good solution.

    I see code words of “reduced dependence on foreign oil.” to actually mean: “we believe in carbon fuel, just not foreign carbon fuel.”

    Until Congress examines both current and rapidly changing needs, with a ruthless eye on the science and data, then everything is political posturing with no connection to the real world.

  2. PurpleOzone says:

    I think the money presently going to coal subsidies (what a gross idea) should be put to job creation and training in the coal states, W. Va., N Dak., etc. West Virginia in particular is intensely coal and otherwise poor. It needs roads and economic development. Building prefab houses?

  3. Mike#22 says:

    This tally is something I have been looking for since Sunday’s vote. Thanks.

    On the Republican fence sitter side, consider first George LeMieux (Fla.). His home town is in Broward County, a region of this country which is particularly threatened by sea level rise and intensifying hurricanes. The South Florida Regional Planning Council has a nice map of Broward County showing areas impacted by a 5ft to 10ft sea level rise http://www.sfrpc.com/graphics/Qtrly_br.pdf Most of the county is below 10 ft.

    Republican Judd Gregg (N.H.) “Senator Gregg continues to support renewable technology and research that will help protect our environment and conserve our natural resources for generations to come, while also working to address the challenges of climate change” http://gregg.senate.gov/priorities/

  4. gary says:

    The real problem is Jon Tester.

    Jon Tester is killing our future and killing small business.

    How is he killing our future?

    THE JON TESTER HEALTHCARE PORTA-POTTY BILL, festering away with disease and stink and bile, Tester’s virulent IRS tax bacteria waiting to crawl out of his healthcare Porta-Potty sewer hole, up into our most vulnerable parts.

    JON TESTER is screwing the voters over with his healthcare fiasco, and now the voters are supposed to forget all about his healthcare vote against Montana kids and focus on other business, like we are too stupid to see Tester’s real agenda, like we will divert our attention from the real problem—Socialist Jon Tester—and this will save his sold-out soul from defeat in the next election.

    Socialist JON TESTER, you are stealing our money NOW to pay a debt for things you took away long ago. You want my kids’ money to fund a system that does not work. This is the old way of business in Washington, but when it comes to transforming our country into your socialist utopia, your old-way, corrupt porta-potty agenda does not work.

    You are reforming nothing with your “healthcare reform.” You are stealing our money to pay for your socialist legislation. You aren’t from Montana. You sold us out. Your legislation is from the sewer and it should go back.

    We are on to you and we will not forget.

    Here in Montana, we consider you Big Sky bile and in the next election, we will flush you back where you belong.