Tumblr Icon RSS Icon

Top House races between climate heroes and deniers

Posted on  

"Top House races between climate heroes and deniers"

Share:

google plus icon

toles denial Yesterday, the Wonk Room identified six key U.S. Senate races in which a climate vote is threatened by a global warming denier (and one open race in New Hampshire that could add a new vote for climate). Today, we’re taking a look at the U.S. House of Representatives. We’ve identified eight top House races in which a strong supporter for action to reduce global warming pollution is being challenged by a global warming denier.

The Republicans in these races not only stand against comprehensive climate policy, like nearly all the rest of their party, they proudly proclaim that the overwhelming evidence of the threat of greenhouse gas pollution is a “hoax,” a “religion,” and “crap.” The sitting representatives are climate activists who voted in favor of the Waxman-Markey American Clean Energy and Security Act in 2009, recognizing that our economy and environment are mutually threatened by our dependence on fossil fuels. These eight races between climate heroes and anti-science deniers this November (with the Fivethirtyeight.com estimated likelihood of a Republican pickup) are:

76% NM-2 Rep. Harry Teague v Steve Pearce
63% IA-3 Rep. Leonard Boswell v Brad Zaun
63% IL-14 Rep. Bill Foster v Randy Hultgren
62% CA-11 Rep. Jerry McNerney v David Harmer
58% IN-9 Rep. Baron Hill v Todd Young
43% FL-22 Rep. Ron Klein v Allen West
26% NM-1 Rep. Martin Heinrich v Jon Barela
26% IL-17 Rep. Phil Hare v Bobby Schilling

RACE (% GOP pickup) CLIMATE HERO CLIMATE DENIER
NM-2 76% Rep. Harry Teague Steve Pearce
Crack down on global warming and protect the the environment that our children and their children will inherit.” “I think we ought to take a look at whatever the group is that measures all this, the IPCC, they don’t even believe the crap.”
IA-2 63% Rep. Leonard Boswell Brad Zaun
I believe the science is clear: carbon dioxide emissions are contributing to unprecedented climate changes. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has warned repeatedly that unless the industrial world acts soon, projected increases in emissions over the next fifty years will lead to drastic ecological changes, endangering countless species and human health.” I question global warming.”
IL-14 63% Rep. Bill Foster Randy Hultgren
“We must aggressively combat climate change, reduce our dependence on foreign oil and promote cleaner and more economical sources of energy.” I don’t believe we have a significant impact on climate change.”
CA-11 62% Rep. Jerry McNerney David Harmer
“Climate change is one of the most important issues facing our country. In fact, if left unchecked, climate change will seriously harm our environment, our economy, and our way of life, threatening our ecosystem and the availability of fresh water for drinking and agriculture.” Global warming is more a religion than a science.”
IN-9 58% Rep. Baron Hill Todd Young
“Ending our dependence on foreign oil and using renewable energy to help fight global warming will make our nation stronger.” “With the possible exception of Tiger Woods, nothing has had a worse year than global warming. We have discovered that a good portion of the science used to justify “climate change” was a hoax perpetrated by leftist ideologues with an agenda.”
FL-22 43% Rep. Ron Klein Allen West
“This bill will strengthen our national security, lower energy costs, create jobs, and reduce our impact on global warming.” “If we could just get President Obama and former Vice-President Al Gore to apologize to God reference “man-made global warming/climate change” perhaps we would not all be freezing, even in South Florida!”
NM-1 26% Rep. Martin Heinrich Jon Barela
“This bipartisan group of wildlife and conservation leaders share my strong belief that we must do more to fight climate change and protect our planet for generations to come.” “If you look at the recent snowfall in the East Coast and certainly our winter, you have the ebbs and flows of climate change, and that’s just simply how how things have worked for the millennia, and for the eons.”
IL-17 26% Phil Hare Bobby Schilling
The overwhelming scientific consensus is that global warming is real, it is a threat, and a failure to act soon will leave our children in a very dangerous world.” He doesn’t believe in global warming, putting him at odds with almost every major climate change expert in the world but in good standing with his base.”

Please note that this is not necessarily an exhaustive list of races in which a strong supporter of action to protect human civilization from climate catastrophe is running against a global warming denier. We certainly may have missed some “” please note any we’ve missed in the comments.

- Brad Johnson, via a Wonkroom cross-post.

Related Posts:

« »

4 Responses to Top House races between climate heroes and deniers

  1. Peter M says:

    The climate deniers- I just hope the reality of their rhetoric lives up to the reality.

    Co2 has risen to levels- that in Paleoclimate history are bordering on toxic.

    Short term gain-or long term misery for the deniers? They are taking a huge risk with their denier message-

  2. Who exactly is this Star Parker, whom exactly is she running against, and why is she apparently using the same publicist as Marc Morano?

    frank

  3. Dana says:

    Those Republican quotes made me want to upchuck.

  4. Gerald Einem says:

    Fellow the science not the self serving wingnuts.