ThinkProgress Logo

Climate Progress

Energy and Global Warming News for October 22nd: Five renewable energy issues at stake in midterms; Arctic continues to warm at unprecedented rate; Plants play larger role than thought in cleaning up air pollution

5 Renewable Energy Issues at Stake in the Midterm Elections

Two weeks from now, voters will decide which federal and state politicians to keep and which to send packing. Polls, including the one from Wall Street Journal/NBC News released Wednesday, have shown that some voters are disenchanted with the Democrats and many voters remain undecided. Speaking at the Solar Power International (SPI) conference in Los Angeles last week, Democratic political strategist James Carville summed it up this way: “There is a hurricane coming, and it’s not changing course. It’ll be hitting the Democrats.”

The anticipated power shift could affect some of the policy decisions for which renewable energy industries have been lobbying in recent months, while other questions will go directly to voters in state elections. Here’s a list of hot issues and challenges facing cleantech advocates going into the midterm elections:

2. Premium for renewables. Setting solar electricity rates for long-term contracts, or feed-in tariffs, has been portrayed by many advocates as a must-have incentive to usher in a new era for renewable energy. The policy has worked to spur gigawatts of new solar energy projects per year in countries such as Germany.

Regardless of which party comes out on top after the November elections, it’s unlikely the next Congress will pass a national feed-in tariff, since the subsidy could raise utility bills for consumers and businesses in the near term. The fight for this type of incentive will remain concentrated at the state level. Hawaii, for example, just passed a feed-in tariff for installations up to 500 kilowatts in size. California is working on a program that is dubbed a feed-in tariff by some, even though it’s nothing like the policy that has made such a big impact in Europe. In any case, the state’s goal is to prompt its utilities to buy more renewable electricity through auctions….

5. Extending stimulus programs. At the federal level, renewable energy lobbying groups are busy working on extending an incentive program that is set to sunset at the end of this year. The program, created under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, gives owners of solar, wind and other clean power projects the cash equivalent of the 30-percent investment tax credit. California energy regulators and federal officials have accelerated the approval process for several large solar power plants so project developers can qualify for this incentive program.

Both the Solar Energy Industries Association and the American Wind Energy Association have been lobbying hard for prolonging this program. They are hoping Congress will extend it for at least two more years. Cash programs are popular particularly in economic downturn (i.e. Cash for Clunkers), but a spending program for businesses may not be as popular as one for consumers when it comes to winning voters’ hearts. Matalin, for one, has advised solar energy advocates to avoid using the term “recovery” or “stimulus” because Republicans are eager to change what Democrats and Obama have put in place in the last two years.

Arctic Report Card: Region Continues to Warm at Unprecedented Rate

The Arctic region, also called the “planet’s refrigerator,” continues to heat up, affecting local populations and ecosystems as well as weather patterns in the most populated parts of the Northern Hemisphere, according to a team of 69 international scientists.

The findings were released Oct. 21, 2010 in the Arctic Report Card, a yearly assessment of Arctic conditions.

Among the 2010 highlights:

Greenland is experiencing record-setting high temperatures, ice melt and glacier area loss; Summer sea ice continues to decline — the 2009-2010 summer sea ice cover extent was the third lowest since satellite monitoring began in 1979, and sea ice thickness continues to thin. The 2010 minimum is the third lowest recorded since 1979, surpassed only by 2008 and the record low of 2007; and

Arctic snow cover duration was at a record minimum since record-keeping began in 1966.

There is also evidence that the effect of higher air temperatures in the Arctic atmosphere in fall is contributing to changes in the atmospheric circulation in both the Arctic and northern mid-latitudes. Winter 2009-2010 showed a link between mid-latitude extreme cold and snowy weather events and changes in the wind patterns of the Arctic, related to a phase of the Arctic Oscillation.

Climate: Money Vs. Money in the Battle Over California’s Climate Law

Thanks in part to the Supreme Court’s decision to allow unlimited political spending by corporations and unions, money is flowing into this election like never before. A lot of that funding is coming from corporate sources, and conservatives are receiving the lion’s share of those funds””although because many of those donors are keeping their identities secret (thanks again to the Supreme Court), it’s not easy to trace that campaign cash. But what’s clear is that anyone with a rooting interest in the composition of the next Congress””and that definitely includes business””is apparently willing and able to spend millions to get their way.

For environmentalists, one of the big battlefields is California’s Proposition 23 initiative, which will be on the state ballot this November. If passed, Prop 23 would suspend California’s landmark climate-change law AB32“”which requires the state to reduce carbon emissions to 1990 levels by 2020″”until California’s unemployment rate’s dropped below 5.5% for four consecutive quarters. Given that California’s unemployment rate””which is currently hovering at around 12%””hasn’t fallen to those levels since 1980, Prop 23 would effectively kill the state’s pioneering climate law.

Unsurprisingly, fossil-fuel interests are channeling money into Yes on Prop 23 campaigns””including the much-maligned Koch Industries, which has spent $1 million on the campaign. Other out-of-state oil refining companies like Tesoro and Valero have spent millions more to support Prop 23. It’s not hard to see why””oil refiners, like other fossil-fuel companies, will be squeezed by Ab32, so they’re exercising their constitutional rights (and shareholder money).

But unlike many other races around the country, where conservative money is carrying the day (and likely the election), in California forces in favor of the climate change law (and against Prop 23) are winning the fundraising battle. As Darren Samuelsohn of Politico reported today, opponents of Prop 23 have amassed some $28 million. Some of that money has come from big-name environmentalists who are donating out of their political convictions. Filmmaker James Cameron””who has emerged as a major environmental figure post-Avatar””has given $1 million to the anti-Prop 23 movement, while California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger recently held an event at his home that raised $1 million for no on Prop 23.

Oil Sands Effort Turns on a Fight Over a Road

As U.S. Highway 12 hugs the serpentine banks of the Clearwater and Lochsa Rivers here, road signs bear the silhouettes of the 19th-century explorers Meriwether Lewis and William Clark, with Mr. Lewis pointing off into the distance.

He is not pointing the way for big oil companies, says Lin Laughy, whose gravel driveway abuts the road.

But to Mr. Laughy’s dismay, international oil companies see this meandering, backcountry route as a road to riches. They are angling to use U.S. 12 to ship gargantuan loads of equipment from Vancouver, Wash., to Montana and the tar sands of Alberta in Canada. The companies say the route would save time and money and provide a vital economic boost to Montana and Idaho.

The problem, said Mr. Laughy, is that the proposed loads are so large “” and would travel so slowly “” that they would literally block the highway as they rolled through. According to plans submitted to state regulators, some of the shipments would weigh more than 600,000 pounds, stand as tall as a three-story building, stretch nearly two-thirds the length of a football field and occupy 24 feet side-to-side “” the full width of U.S. 12′s two lanes for much of its course through Idaho.

‘UN should stop geo-engineering’

Environmental activists say the United Nations should impose a moratorium on ‘geo-engineering’ projects to stop the increasing loss of plant and animal species.

During a meeting in Japan, a number of green groups said projects such as artificial volcanoes and vast cloud-seeding schemes could harm both nature and mankind.

This is while some UN officials believe climate change is a major cause for the rapid losses in nature and geo-engineering projects can fight global warming and stop extreme droughts, floods and rising sea levels.

Representatives of nearly 200 countries are gathered in Nagoya to find ways to fight the destruction of forests, rivers and coral reefs which support life as well as economies across the world.

Some countries spend billions of dollars on geo-engineering projects to curb climate change by cutting the amount of sunlight hitting the earth or soaking up extra greenhouse gas emissions, particularly carbon dioxide.

Environmentalists, however, say the risks of such projects are too great because the impacts of manipulating nature on a vast scale are not fully known.

“It’s absolutely inappropriate for a handful of governments in industrialized countries to make a decision to try geo-engineering without the approval of all the world’s support,” Pat Mooney of the Canada-based ETC Group, told Reuters.

“They shouldn’t proceed with real-life, in-the-environment experimentation or the deployment of any geo-engineering until there is a consensus in the United Nations that this is okay.”

Chinese CDM Fund to Have $1.5 Billion for Clean-Energy Projects by 2012

China CDM Fund, the government body that invests money from carbon credits, will almost double its available cash for renewable energy projects to 10 billion yuan ($1.5 billion) in 2012, the vice director of the fund said.

The fund, which manages 6 billion yuan currently, will add as much as 3 billion yuan a year through 2012, Jiao Xiaoping, deputy director general of China CDM Fund, said in an interview in Shanghai yesterday. The money is mainly raised from the cash Chinese companies earn from selling certified emission reduction credits (CERs), Jiao said.

The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) under the 1997 Kyoto protocol allows companies in industrialized countries to buy carbon credits from developing nations in order to comply with requirements to reduce emissions. Chinese companies have sold 229 million metric tons of CERs under the UN-backed CDM mechanism since 2005, or half of the total, Jiao said.

The fund has been approved by the government to be used for low-carbon research and planning, equity investment, preferential loans to energy-saving and renewable projects, according to Jiao.

China has pledged to cut its output of carbon dioxide per unit of gross domestic product by 40 to 45 percent by 2020 from 2005 levels. It has reduced energy intensity by 15.6 percent since 2006 to 2009 and the government has said it may be difficult to meet the 20 percent reduction five-year target by the end of this year.

Plants Play Larger Role Than Thought in Cleaning Up Air Pollution, Research Shows

The research, led by scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) in Boulder, Colo., uses observations, gene expression studies, and computer modeling to show that deciduous plants absorb about a third more of a common class of air-polluting chemicals than previously thought.

The new study, results of which are being published in Science Express, was conducted with co-authors from the University of Northern Colorado and the University of Arizona. It was supported in part by the National Science Foundation (NSF), NCAR’s sponsor.

“Plants clean our air to a greater extent than we had realized,” says NCAR scientist Thomas Karl, the lead author. “They actively consume certain types of air pollution.”

The research team focused on a class of chemicals known as oxygenated volatile organic compounds (oVOCs), which can have long-term impacts on the environment and human health.

“The team has made significant progress in understanding the complex interactions between plants and the atmosphere,” says Anne-Marie Schmoltner of NSF’s Division of Atmospheric and Geospace Sciences, which funded the research.

The compounds form in abundance in the atmosphere from hydrocarbons and other chemicals that are emitted from both natural sources–including plants–and sources related to human activities, including vehicles and construction materials.

24 Responses to Energy and Global Warming News for October 22nd: Five renewable energy issues at stake in midterms; Arctic continues to warm at unprecedented rate; Plants play larger role than thought in cleaning up air pollution

  1. fj2 says:

    NickKristof
    Why journalism has a tough time dealing w/ climate change, by @Revkin – http://nyti.ms/9bfOUn

  2. Leland Palmer says:

    A scientific paper which reportedly has evidence that the huge, likely methane caused spike in temperatures during the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum was preceded by an earlier smaller warming period at one location:

    Continental warming preceding the Palaeocene–Eocene thermal maximum

    Marine and continental records1 show an abrupt negative shift in carbon isotope values at ~55.8 Myr ago. This carbon isotope excursion (CIE) is consistent with the release of a massive amount of isotopically light carbon into the atmosphere and was associated with a dramatic rise in global temperatures termed the Palaeocene–Eocene thermal maximum (PETM). Greenhouse gases released during the CIE, probably including methane, have often been considered the main cause of PETM warming. However, some evidence from the marine record suggests that warming directly preceded the CIE2, 3, 4, raising the possibility that the CIE and PETM may have been linked to earlier warming with different origins. Yet pre-CIE warming is still uncertain. Disentangling the sequence of events before and during the CIE and PETM is important for understanding the causes of, and Earth system responses to, abrupt climate change. Here we show that continental warming of about 5 °C preceded the CIE in the Bighorn Basin, Wyoming. Our evidence, based on oxygen isotopes in mammal teeth (which reflect temperature-sensitive fractionation processes) and other proxies, reveals a marked temperature increase directly below the CIE, and again in the CIE. Pre-CIE warming is also supported by a negative amplification of δ13C values in soil carbonates below the CIE. Our results suggest that at least two sources of warming—the earlier of which is unlikely to have been methane—contributed to the PETM.

    This suggests that earlier CO2 based warming may have set off dissociation of the methane hydrates, causing the Abrupt Climate Change (ACC) of the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum.

    If true, this appears to be very similar to our own situation. Continued CO2 increases may set off dissociation of methane hydrates, leading to a methane catastrophe.

  3. Michael T says:

    Arctic Report Card: Region Continues to Warm at Unprecedented Rate

    Record temperatures in Greenland, thinning sea ice, record snow cover decreases and links to some Northern Hemisphere weather are among dramatic changes

    October 21, 2010

    “The Arctic region, also called the “planet’s refrigerator,” continues to heat up, affecting local populations and ecosystems as well as weather patterns in the most populated parts of the Northern Hemisphere, according to a team of 69 international scientists. The findings were released today in the Arctic Report Card, a yearly assessment of Arctic conditions.”

    http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2010/20101021_arcticreportcard.html

  4. Michael T says:

    NOAA: Another Winter of Extremes in Store for U.S. as La Niña Strengthens

    October 21, 2010

    “The Pacific Northwest should brace for a colder and wetter than average winter, while most of the South and Southeast will be warmer and drier than average through February 2011, according to the annual Winter Outlook released today by NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center. A moderate to strong La Niña will be the dominant climate factor influencing weather across most of the U.S. this winter.”
    http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2010/20101021_winteroutlook.html

    U.S. Winter Storms & Arctic Oscillation:
    http://www.climatewatch.noaa.gov/2010/articles/can-record-snowstorms-global-warming-coexist

  5. J A Turner says:

    Joe, it looks like your lead entry is missing some text. Of the 5 items at risk, you have bullets only for numbers 2 and 5.

    [JR: By design.]

  6. fj2 says:

    On marine ecosystem collapse “to build a ship . . . teach them to long for the endless immensity of the sea.” Antoine de Saint-Exupery

  7. Colorado Bob says:

    Oil Sands Effort Turns on a Fight Over a Road

    I have driven this road several times in an 18 wheeler it’s called the Lolo Trail. One of the great highways in the world. The article seems to imply the oil sands people are saying they just want to “tweek” the road. Since Lewiston Id. is the most eastern port on the Pacific, I can see why they want to do this . But unless one actually drives the road you have no idea how small and snakey this thing is.

    These are the Bitteroots they kicked Lewis and Clark’s ass.

  8. MapleLeaf says:

    Michael @3 and Joe,

    Maybe this Arctic report card deserves its very own post? New record set for melt over Greenland this past summer. And more sobering highlights. Just don’t watch the YouTube video boring and they used “impact/impacted” incorrectly several times.

    Anyhow this is being covered at CBC and other media in Canada

    What about the BBC? Zero, zilch, nada…..at least nothing yet.

    [JR: It does. Just busy today.]

  9. paulm says:

    Scary stuff. Lets start putting pressure on our banks…

    Brazil will be burdened with a nuclear reactor using materials that are out-of-date and that will fail to deliver the safe, affordable, clean energy Brazil needs in a world faced with climate change.

    http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/campaigns/nuclear/stop-radioactive-investment/?utm_source=SilverpopMailing&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=GPI%20newsletter%20-%20October%202010%20(1)&utm_content=

  10. Sasparilla says:

    Court Victory helps push the tar sands pipeline from Alberta ahead – courtesy of the Obama administration which fought for this in court against groups wanting action on climate change :

    http://www.nationalpost.com/news/Analysis+Court+victory+helps+push+pipeline+ahead/3709439/story.html

    After looking at the offshore oil giveaway and then seeing this and the administration’s lack of attention (and in some ways subversion) of action on the climate bill, makes me think something along the following.

    Obama and company, shortly after getting into office were briefed about how bad and how close the effects of peak oil (or whatever term you want to use) will be and chose to make securing all local supplies a non-spoken, but priority issue – definitely over climate action as these proceedings and offshore give-away seem to demonstrate. Climate change isn’t an immediate emergency to them, but getting supplies of additional oil appears to be a very high priority. Or they are completely corrupt and we’re doing a George Bush on the CO2 thing, which I’m hoping they were not.

    Seems like we (humanity) are going to pull every stupid drop of oil out of every nook and cranny we can find before this is over-with. Even for something easy like this, our climate friendly President is fighting to make it happen. How are we going to win when this is the “best” we can get?

    Things would appear not to be on a path to change for the better as oil gets more expensive.

  11. Colorado Bob says:

    Warming ‘destabilises aquatic ecosystems’

    Future warming could have “profound implications” for the stability of freshwater ecosystems, a study warns.

    Researchers said warmer water affected the distribution and size of plankton – tiny organisms that form the basis of food chains in aquatic systems.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-11575415

  12. fj2 says:

    Is China falling out of love with cars? Editor of China Car Times gives up on driving to buy a bike!

    http://www.chinacartimes.com/2010/10/20/why-im-thinking-of-calling-throwing-in-the-driving-towel-here-in-china/

  13. It seems the Hawaii feed-in tariff didn’t come without a struggle: “Hawaii rejects proposed ban on solar energy”: http://bit.ly/HawSol

  14. Leland Palmer says:

    This is not a current news item, but it is a fairly recent paper dealing with modeling methane release from the methane hydrates.

    It is the shallow water hydrates in the Arctic and in locations such as the Gulf of Mexico which seem to pose the greatest risk of destabilization, with as little as a 1 degree C change in water temperatures. The authors modeled hydrates at different depths, and under temperature changes of 1 to 5 degrees C. Location (depth) seemed to have a much greater impact on stability than temperature increases.

    Estimates of the total amount of hydrates and associated methane gas vary widely.

    MODELING OF OCEANIC GAS HYDRATE INSTABILITY AND METHANE RELEASE IN RESPONSE TO CLIMATE CHANGE

    Two of the most recent studies, each accounting for the coupled contribution of organic matter decomposition and mass transport, have produced drastically different results. Klauda and Sandler [8] provide an upper estimate of 74,400 Gt of methane carbon in hydrate form (27,300 Gt along continental margins, while Buffett and Archer [9] used both compaction and advection in a 1-D methanogenesis/hydrate formation model to
    reach an estimate of 3,000 Gt of methane in hydrate and 2,000 Gt of gaseous methane existing in a stable state under current climate conditions.

    David Archer, by the way, hails from the Rockefeller founded and funded University of Chicago, and has published joint papers with ExxonMobil chief scientist Kheshgi:

    ExxonMobil papers on climate science

    17. Archer, D., Kheshgi, H., and Maier-Reimer, E. 1997. Multiple Timescales for the Neutralization of Fossil Fuel CO2, Geophysical Research Letters, 24: 405.

    19. Archer, D., Kheshgi, H., and Maier-Reimer, E., 1998. The dynamics of fossil fuel CO2 neutralization by marine CaCO3, Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 12:259-276.

    35. Kheshgi, H. S. and Archer, D. 2004. A non-linear convolution model for the evasion of CO2 injected into the deep ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research,109, C02007, doi:10.1029/2002JC001489.

    13. Kheshgi, H. S., and D. Archer, 1999: Modeling the Evasion of CO2 Injected into the Deep Ocean, in Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, edited by B. Eliasson, P. Riemer and A. Wokaun, pp. 287-292, Pergamon.

    Is this another example of ExxonMobil’s influence, impacting the estimates of the quantity of methane hydrates and therefore the risk from them?

  15. Dickensian American says:

    The current lead line for the NOAA Arctic Report Card on the CNN homepage is laughable at best and deliberately deceptive at worst.

    Though the article itself when you get there is titled “NOAA:Arctic Changes are Affecting Climate Elsewhere” (which is marginally accurate) the link from their mainpage simply states “NOAA: Climate Shifting Due To Arctic.” This is neither true and nor does the NOAA report state this in any way. Insidious misinformation.

  16. Raul M. says:

    Artic reports first year of shelled creature
    destabilization from acdic waters.

  17. US utilities may close 1 in 5 coal-fired power plants on tougher EPA air pollution rules in 2011: http://bit.ly/CoalCl

  18. Prokaryotes says:

    These Gadgets make a change

    Infinit Solar Charging Bag http://www.infinitsolarbags.com/ or http://solarbag.org/

    Apple germany offers the infinit solar charger bag for around 100€

  19. Sasparilla says:

    #17 Susatainable2050 nice article – good to have some hopeful news for a change. 20% closure of existing coal plants in the next 5 years or so as the effects of natural gas prices and EPA regulations bite in. Please let it happen.

    I wouldn’t discount the fact that our friends in Washington (both sides of the aisle) have been persuaded and are scheming to not let the EPA regulations take effect at all through legislation (without any climate legislation whatsoever) – I have no faith our President would Veto said legislation if it made it to his desk (that court case his admin recently won for a new tar sands pipeline from Canada really institutionalizes the expansion of that CO2 emissive process for the long term).

  20. Prokaryotes says:

    BIODEGRADABLE STYROFOAM MADE FROM MILK
    Scientists at Case Western Reserve University have whipped up an alternative to insidious petroleum-derived styrofoam packaging using a combination of clay and milk protein. http://news.discovery.com/tech/biodegradable-styrofoam-made-from-milk.html

  21. paulm says:

    Scientists have done a “crappy” job explaining the science behind global warming, said Scott Denning, an atmospheric science professor from the Colorado State University in a recent lecture to 100 people.

    http://www.accuweather.com/blogs/climatechange/story/40389/are-scientists-good-at-explain-1.asp

  22. Michael T says:

    New State-of-the-Art Recycled Fuel Facility in Mecklenburg County

    Published Friday, October 22, 2010 6:00 am

    “Forsite Development, lead developer for ReVenture Park, is teaming up with FCR Recycling on a new $30 million “Recycled Fuel” facility that will vastly improve Mecklenburg County’s recycling rates and transform non recycling recoverable waste into a fuel that can be utilized to create renewable electricity.

    The facility will be located at the former Statesville Avenue Landfill site located at I-85 and Statesville Road. It is estimated that the project will create 150 new green jobs and will be operational in April of 2012.”

    http://www.charlottechamber.com/index.php?src=news&refno=3011&category=Economic+Development+News&prid=3011

  23. Michael T says:

    NOAA State of Climate report 2010

    3 climate regions had their warmest April-September on record:
    (Southeast, Northeast & Central regions)
    http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/get-file.php?report=national&file=Regionaltrank&byear=2010&bmonth=4&year=2010&month=9&ext=gif

    19 states in the east also had their warmest April-September on record:
    http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/get-file.php?report=national&file=Statewidetrank&byear=2010&bmonth=4&year=2010&month=9&ext=gif

ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up