Our guest blogger today is Van Jones.
New polls are showing that the majority of Californians reject Proposition 23, a November ballot initiative — funded by Texas oil companies — that would effectively repeal the state’s landmark clean energy and environmental protection laws.
What the polls do not show and what few news outlets are covering, is the striking diversity of voices that are demanding clean energy, and rejecting the false notion that protecting the planet and our public health will hurt the economy.
Last week, the No on Prop 23 campaign experienced a surge of support from groups that included a council of inter-faith leaders, university academics, the wealthiest man in the country (Bill Gates), an award-winning Hollywood director (James Cameron), and even President Obama and former Vice President Al Gore.
They join the rank and file of a coalition that is rarely witnessed in our modern age of ultra-polarizing politics.
This coalition includes social justice organizations of all creeds and colors, whose missions are to empower the voices of the working class and communities of color — including immigrants. These groups understand that less smog means less asthma, fewer trips to the emergency room, and healthier neighborhoods for their children.
The coalition also includes a group of investors who represent more than $421 billion in assets, much of it in the clean tech sector. They make the case that clean energy technology is the next wave of the industrial revolution, and California is poised to become a leader in innovation, job creation, and commercialization of these technologies. However, they also warn that reversing course on policy — precisely what Prop 23 aims to achieve — will cause investment to flow elsewhere (mainly to places like China and parts of Europe), and doom California and the rest of the nation to be left behind during the biggest revolution of the new global economy.
These groups represent just the tip of iceberg in a movement that includes environmentalists, politicians from both parties, students, public health organizations, big and small businesses, labor groups, consumer groups, senior citizens, and public safety organizations.
A vision for the future of green growth
What’s happening in California is truly amazing. Hundreds of thousands, if not millions of voices, from literally every political, ethnic, faith, and socio-economic spectrum, all pulling for the same cause. This beautiful coalition gives us a glimpse of the green path forward toward clean energy, a prosperous sustainable economy, and a healthier planet.
In 2008, I wrote a book called The Green Collar Economy, and in it I outlined a vision for a “Green Growth Alliance.” This coalition, I argued, should include labor, social justice activists, environmentalists, students, and faith organizations — along with green business interests. Such an alliance could, in my opinion, “change the face of politics in this country.”
A lot has happened since early 2008 — and the face of politics has begun to change, slowly.
The green movement has suffered setbacks, most notably the failure of comprehensive climate and clean energy legislation in Congress. The deep pockets of the dirty energy lobby, which spent more than $500 million to buy influence among (mostly Republican) lawmakers, along with the rise of Tea Partiers, climate deniers, and conservative TV and radio pundits, turned the protection and preservation of the planet and public health into a political malaise.
But what we see happening in California gives the green movement a reason for continued optimism. This time we are on the defensive, protecting our climate laws already on the books. The fight has unmasked the opponents of clean energy, as well as vetted their arguments — the same tired talking points they have been using for the last four decades.
But more importantly than unmasking our enemies, this fight has revealed our friends and allies. It turns out that given the opportunity, huge swaths of Californians, from all walks of life, can find common value in supporting cleaner air and a commitment to growing the clean technology sector.
The fight is far from over, and with Election Day approaching in less than a week, the stakes are higher than ever. But victory in California can give us a model for the coalition that is needed to achieve a green growth victory in Washington, D.C. and the rest of the nation.
- Van Jones is a Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress and is a co-founder the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights, Color of Change, and Green For All.
Previous in TP Climate Progress

Very well said, Van Jones.
Climate change is by far the most powerful political issue.
Everything else pales in comparison.
http://www.treehugger.com/files/2010/10/climate-change-like-slavery-needs-cultural-shift-to-stop.php
Climate Change, Like Slavery, Needs a True Cultural Shift to Stop It
“The human force is the engine . . .
“It’s very clear that we have enough human resources, enough capital, enough possibility to make a good world,” he says. “Let’s do it.”
“The Future of Humanity, as Explained with Legos,” April 6, 2010
Hans Rosling, the charming Swedish professor behind the knowledge onslaught called Gapminder, explains where we’re all going with a few Lego blocks. Video below.
http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/2R6P8N/www.good.is/post/the-future-of-humanity-as-explained-with-legos/
A vote against Prop 23 is probably the most important vote in 2010. This issue may very well determine the course of the US over the next 20 years. Its heartening to see the citizens of CA rise to the challenge.
Hello Joe Romm,
Could you consider a copyright form for Climate Progress such as Creative Commons provides? one that permits reprinting with attribution? I believe that Climate Progress could provide & specify the exact attribution text.
Such a Creative Commons copyright form would let people like me republish blog posts such as this one in local/regional online news media such as http://www.sunvalleyonline.com, or SVO. Your choice of attribution could attract more people to read more of http://www.climateprogress.org.
SVO would provide appropriate outreach leverage for CP. They are online from Sun Valley, Idaho, the year-around resort area located in Blaine County, in the middle of Idaho. Blaine County’s population spans interests from rural agriculture to global business. 60% of SVO’s measured audience are 2nd home owners from around the world.
Please let us know your thoughts on this suggestion, whatever they may be. Thank you.
[JR: TOS: "You may copy reprint, publish, reproduce, or otherwise display materials created by CAPAF and made available through Climate Progress (collectively, the “Climate Progress Works”) on the condition that you attribute those materials to CAPAF or Climate Progress, as applicable, and provide a link to the CAPAF website (www.americanprogressaction.org) or the Climate Progress site (climateprogress.org), as applicable."]
Thank you for the clarification. I was unsure as to whether the familiar c & the following phrase precluded SVO, which may have affiliates that make it a nominal “network” — “…Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, you may not distribute any material produced by CAPAF over any network, including a local area network …”