Tumblr Icon RSS Icon

Rep. Rob Bishop falsely claims there is no western support for wild lands policy

By Climate Guest Contributor on March 8, 2011 at 9:53 am

"Rep. Rob Bishop falsely claims there is no western support for wild lands policy"

Share:

google plus icon

Guest blogger Christy Goldfuss, CAPAF’s Public Lands Project Director, in a Wonk Room cross-post.

In a hearing on Thursday, Rep. Rob Bishop (R-UT) claimed that the overwhelming majority of westerners oppose the administration’s recent work to protect wild lands, a responsibility illegally ignored by the Bush administration. As he was questioning Interior Secretary Ken Salazar at a budget hearing before the House Natural Resources Committee, Bishop held up a pile of letters and claimed that the people directly impacted by Secretarial Order 3310 are the ones complaining “time and time again”:

Why are the people directly impacted by these decisions are the ones who are complaining time and time again about these decisions?

Watch it:

The Wild Lands policy introduced by the administration last December fulfills the government’s responsibility under the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) to “prepare and maintain” an inventory of public lands for all uses, including wilderness. Under the Bush administration, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) had ignored that responsibility.

As Rep. Ed Markey (D-MA) said during an oversight hearing last week, “the Bush administration did not want Congress to preserve wilderness so they volunteered to stop looking for it.” In a settlement with the State of Utah, then Secretary of the Interior Gale Norton abandoned BLM’s responsibility to designate new wilderness study areas beyond those identified by recommendations made to Congress in 1993. In the last five years, BLM found more than 18,000 new sites for oil and gas wells but not a single new site for potential wilderness.

When Bishop took the opportunity to support Big Oil, he snubbed the other western elected officials and business owners that support the Wild Lands policy, including those from his own district and state. A letter thanking Secretary Salazar for the Wild Lands policy was signed by 67 elected officials from around the West. People in Colorado were so supportive of the policy that 73 elected officials signed their own letter, and seven businesses from Congressman Bishop’s own district asked him to stop his attack of the Wild Lands policy. That’s 147 businesses and elected officials from around the West that aren’t complaining. They’re saying thanks.

Christy Goldfuss, Public Lands Project Director at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.

‹ PREVIOUS
A science-free Congress?

NEXT ›
House climate science hearing webcast now

4 Responses to Rep. Rob Bishop falsely claims there is no western support for wild lands policy

  1. Mike Roddy says:

    Republicans made this claim during the timber wars in Oregon, too. Actually, even in timber dependent Douglas and Jackson counties the polls demonstrated that the people there wanted more forest protection, not less. They were heartsick about seeing their spectacular forest turned into a sea of clearcuts.

    It’s probably the same even in Utah. Right wingers pretend that bluster from them and their allies equals public support for public lands pillage, or that a stack of letters prove they have a majority. Their real strategy in politics is to fight the culture wars by painting their opponents as free spending heathens, while they wave flags and rave about God and guns. This provides cover for the rape and pillage that the mining, oil, and timber companies are paying them for. Sold out Blue Dog Democrats such as Montana’s Tester use the same strategy, in his case via the flattop and Jesus card. Even most Republicans are troubled by what we have been doing to the land, but the party has been so bought off at the national level that our health and future have been sacrificed.

    I don’t know if we can stop them, but we have to try.

  2. Bill W says:

    Pretty much the same thing as John Boehner’s incessant “the American people [don't] want”. Apparently only a very small minority of us are actually “American people”.

  3. Mulga Mumblebrain says:

    These people are ‘mad, bad and dangerous to know’, and I doubt that they can write poetry as a compensation.

  4. David B. Benson says:

    I’m a westerner born and bred.

    I’ve always supported protection for the wilder portions.