Tumblr Icon RSS Icon

Fossil fuels: A legacy of disaster

By Climate Guest Contributor  

"Fossil fuels: A legacy of disaster"

Share:

google plus icon
Daniel J. Weiss and Valeri Vasquez provide more data on why we need to move to safer energy sources in this CAP repost.

fossil fuel disasters in the united states

On the one-year anniversary of the BP Deepwater Horizon oil disaster and the Massey coal mine explosion in West Virginia, we are reminded how dangerous our dependence on fossil fuels can be. A large cost of our reliance on these energy sources is the death or injury of workers in these industries. Transitioning to cleaner energy technologies such as solar and wind is safer for workers as well as better for public health, economic competitiveness, and the environment. We can take steps to make fossil fuel industries less dangerous while we transition to cleaner energy.

The toll of fossil fuels on human health and the environment is well documented. But our dependence on fossil fuels exacts a very high price on the people who extract or process these fuels. Every year, some men and women who toil in our nation’s coal mines, natural gas fields, and oil rigs and refineries lose their lives or suffer from major injuries to provide the fossil fuels that drive our economy.

Take April 2010, for example, which proved to be a cruel month for workers in the fossil fuel industry. Twenty-nine coal miners lost their lives at the tragic Massey mine explosion in West Virginia, two miners perished at a western Kentucky mine accident, and 11 workers lost their lives from the BP Deepwater Horizon disaster.

Coal mining is a dangerous profession. Explosions, fires, and collapsed mine shafts have killed at least 3,827 miners since 1968″”not to mention thousands of others who have suffered from pulmonary diseases and other work-related injuries.

To be sure, automated mining equipment and improved safety measures make mining considerably safer than it once was. The mining fatality rate has fallen 75 percent since 1970, while the injury rate is down by two-thirds since 1973. But it still remains one of America’s most dangerous professions, as the Massey explosion shows.

Oil workers also pay a huge price for our oil use. There have been 77 fatalities and 7,550 injuries at onshore and offshore oil production facilities since 1968 according to our review of Department of Labor data.

Spills related to these accidents totaled 7.5 million barrels of oil and caused billions of dollars of economic and environmental damage. This includes the BP disaster, which spewed 4.2 million barrels into the Gulf of Mexico and according to BP’s own estimate had cost $8 billion in damages by September 2010.

Natural gas, touted as a cleaner and safer alternative to coal and oil, has its perils, too. Natural gas pipeline accidents have resulted in 892 deaths and 6,258 injuries since 1970. According to the Detroit Free Press, there have been 2,554 significant oil and gas pipeline accidents nationwide that caused 161 deaths and 576 injuries in the past decade alone. The 110,700 miles of interstate and intrastate pipelines snaking across the United States makes “accelerating the rehabilitation, repair, and replacement of critical pipeline infrastructure with known integrity risks” crucial to citizen and worker safety.

Many fossil fuel work environments remain unsafe despite thousands of deaths and injuries. An explosion at the BP refinery in Texas City, Texas, in 2005 killed 15 workers and injured 180 others. Since 2003, there have been 20 deaths and 7,400 injuries at oil refineries. BLS records before that time are relatively inaccessible.

In the wake of the BP refinery tragedy, the Tony Mazzocchi Center for Health, Safety and Environmental Education, or TMC, conducted a worker safety survey of United Steelworkers-represented oil refineries. The findings were in a 2007 report on the “State of Process Safety in the Unionized U.S. Oil Refining Industry.”

The report found that nearly all of the surveyed facilities were vulnerable to similar disasters: “Ninety percent of the 51 refineries reported the presence of at least one of the three targeted highly hazardous conditions.” The three targeted conditions used in the survey were the “use of atmospheric vents on process units, the siting of trailers and unprotected buildings near high risk process facilities, and the allowance of non-essential personnel in high risk areas.”

But oil refineries, coal mines, and other fossil fuel industries that are chronically out of compliance with health and safety standards cannot be held properly accountable without consistent, up-to-date information about employee fatality, injury, and illness rates. After passage of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, or BLS, became responsible for collecting data on occupational injuries and illnesses.

Nonetheless, our attempt to gather and compile complete, accurate information for this assessment was difficult because BLS and other agency records were incomplete. This is not an isolated experience, either. A 2006 study by Michigan State University found that the BLS and the OSHA Integrated Management Information System, a national “consolidated database system for collecting, manipulating, maintaining and retrieving” employment-related data, “did not include 61%–and with capture-recapture analysis up to 68 percent of the work-related injuries and illnesses that occurred annually in Michigan [alone].”

We therefore recommend that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, or OSHA, review its Health and Safety Statistics program to establish best practices for record keeping, determine areas for improvement, and consequently update its database.

OSHA can look to “Governing by the Numbers,” a 2007 CAP report that assesses the promise and challenges of “data-driven policy making in the information age,” to increase the comprehensiveness and accessibility of its information about fossil fuel industry fatalities and injuries. The report makes three critical recommendations that OSHA and other agencies should adopt:

  • Close gaps in knowledge by harnessing new technologies to collect, analyze and disseminate key data.
  • Focus on results by setting quantitative, outcome-focused goals, measuring policy performance, and comparing results among peers.
  • Develop systems to ensure data are used to guide policy priorities and solutions.

Accurate data and thorough analysis is impossible, however, without sufficient funding. OSHA received $35 million in the fiscal year 2010 enacted budget to collect and evaluate workplace Safety and Health Statistics. In the newly enacted FY 2011 continuing resolution, $34.9 million was cut, deleting funds for the rest of the fiscal year. Overall, the CR reduced OSHA’s total budget by $99 million, an 18 percent cut. This includes cuts in federal and state enforcement of workplace safety standards.

To protect fossil fuel and other workers from death and injury, OSHA must have the resources it needs to set and enforce standards and provide compliance assistance and training to aid risky workplaces. More funds for more frequent inspections of fossil fuel and other very hazardous workplaces are also essential. This would increase protection for the men and women in these dangerous fossil fuel industries.

Labor unions also played an essential role to ensure worker safety beginning with the horrible Triangle Shirtwaist Fire in 1911. But successful business efforts to shrink or neuter unions over the past 30 years leave employees more vulnerable to a dangerous workplace.

The Center for Progressive Reform noted last year that “the decreasing power of unions to organize and press employers to implement strong health and safety programs” puts oil, refinery, coal, and natural gas employees at risk. With fewer or weaker union officials, workers in these industries must rely more on an underfunded OSHA to set and enforce protection standards that dramatically reduce the occupational hazards they encounter in their daily work.

Finally, the United States must make significant investments in energy efficiency and clean, noncombustible renewable energy sources. These decentralized, less-complex power producers, such as solar panels and wind farms, are much less susceptible to large, catastrophic disasters such as the Massey and BP Deepwater Horizon tragedies. Many of the professions in fossil fuel industries””including manufacturing, plumbing, electrician, and construction””are easily transferable to the clean-tech sector.

No workplace can ever be risk free. But efficiency and renewable energy technologies promise fewer worker injuries, illnesses, and deaths while generating power more cleanly and protecting public health. Let the transition begin. In the meantime we should adequately fund OSHA, push for comprehensive, centralized data collection and analysis to hold fossil fuel industries accountable, and strengthen unions. All these steps would go a long way toward protecting fossil fuel workers.

See also: Interactive Map: Fossil Fuel Accidents in the United States

Daniel J. Weiss is a Senior Fellow and Director of Climate Strategy and Valeri Vasquez is a Special Assistant at American Progress. Thanks to CAP Director of Government Reform Reece Rushing and former CAP intern Ben Kaldunksi. Special thanks to CAP energy intern Emily Bischof.

Methodology

The lack of consistent reporting and record keeping was a severe impediment to the compilation of data on fossil fuel disasters.

Our original intent was to calculate fossil fuel workplace fatalities, injuries, spills, and costs back to 1968. Reliable government data on the economic damages and amounts of environmental pollution resulting from accidents in the oil, oil refinery, coal, and natural gas industries were virtually nonexistent, however.

Likewise, the information on employee fatality and injury rates was not readily available across these four industries. Information about the natural gas industry, for instance, is from 1970 onwards. Data on oil refinery accidents were only readily accessible from 2003 to 2009. Data on Hazmat incidents involving crude oil were available from 1998.

No single government entity compiles information on worker safety in the petroleum industry. Cost, spill, fatality, and injury figures for oil production and refining were compiled through data from the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation, and Enforcement; the Department of Transportation, or DOT’s Distribution, Transmission, and Liquid Accident and Incident Data as well as the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration‘s incident reports; and the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Fatalities and injuries resulting from natural gas transmission and distribution were found through DOT’s Distribution, Transmission, and Liquid Accident and Incident Data. All numbers for coal-mining accidents were derived from the Mine Safety Health Administration’s national and state figures as well as the Center for Disease Control’s National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Mining Safety and Health.

‹ One year later BP still not “making it right” in Gulf restoration funding

One Year After BP Disaster, Congress Has Passed Zero Oil Spill Bills ›

8 Responses to Fossil fuels: A legacy of disaster

  1. Kojiro Vance says:

    Total and utter rubbish! The fossil fuel industry is one of the safest and best careers. Commercial fishing, construction, farming/ranching, even refuse/recycling (25 fatalities per 100,000) are many times more dangerous than working in a refinery.

    Don’t take my word for it, read the NY Times:

    http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/20/the-most-dangerous-jobs-in-america/

    By Weiss & Vasquez’s tortured logic, we shouldn’t recycle because it causes deaths from workers falling off the back of the recycle trucks!
    You won’t even find coal miner on the list of most dangerous.

  2. Mark says:

    It appears these numbers are only at US domestic facilities, and do not include numbers from foreign facilities from which we import energy.

    And, of course, they don’t include numbers of military injuries and deaths in countries we would not be operating in if it weren’t for oil.

  3. Dr.A.Jagadeesh says:

    While I appreciate your plea for more and more Clean Energy Technologies like Renewables,fossil fuels are the mainstay and Renewables can only play supplementary role.

    Dr.A.Jagadeesh Nellore(AP),India

  4. Bob Lang says:

    It strikes me as somewhat hypocritical to be using fossil fuels to support our extravagant lifestyles and then blame the industry for all this mess.

    [JR: They fight and block regulations that would have avoided most/all of these disasters.]

  5. Mark Shapiro says:

    Clean energy: efficiency, renewables, and conservation.

    Clean energy will make us — and workers — and our children — healthier, wealthier, safer, and more secure.

  6. madcitysmitty says:

    As a worker’s compensation judge my expertise is in the law, not the insurance side. Still, I strongly agree that we need better data on workplace injuries. Definitions of “injury” and “reportable injuries” (not every paper cut gets reported) vary among the 50 states, and among various federal agencies that regulate certain industries.

    But, #1 above certainly raises the right question with his NYTimes article–how does the fossil-fuel industry compare to other industries? This kind of data about one industry in isolation has very little persuasive power.

    Further, as a general rule, within any industry (from banking to nuclear power plants) each business is “experience rated.” Generally, those with the best safety records pay the lowest rates. While I’m not an expert in this area, I recall that, typically, the safest companies will pay 1/10 the insurance rates that the worst companies within that industry pay. So, rather than looking at BLS data, why not look at insurance industry data. Most businesses in most states are required to insure for worker’s comp.

    Finally, I’d suggest you contact the Worker’s Compensation Research Institute (WCRI) in Cambridge, Mass. They have some amazing policy experts who could steer you or CAP toward data comparisons that might be more meaningful than what’s presented here.

  7. Charliesnorkel says:

    Most coal is delivered by trains. Has anyone tallied up the fatalities from train accidents?

  8. Anne van der Bom says:

    Jagadeesh,

    Uuhh, that’s why Joe and others are pushing for consitent policieis to increase the use of renewable energy. What exactly is the point you are trying to make?