Bishop Gene Robinson in a CAP repost.
Earth Day 2011 is also Good Friday. In the midst of budget cut proposals, compromises on services to the poor and needy, and a rush to preserve the wealth of America’s top-earning 1 percent, it is not surprising that the environment is all but forgotten.
Ignoring environmental issues will cost us, too, however.
Current efforts to rein in spending and reduce the federal deficit are all done in the name of future generations who, the thinking goes, should not have to shoulder the burden of massive federal debt perpetrated by previous generations. This sounds reasonable. But at the same time we are neglecting climate change and other environmental problems that will affect not just our children and grandchildren but every living thing on earth. What good will a manageable debt be if we can’t breathe the air, drink the water, or withstand the sun’s harmful rays?
The little attention that is paid to the environment in the current budget debate is troubling. For instance, there have been recent attempts to strip the Environmental Protection Agency of its newly won authority to control polluting emissions into the air. Yet this aspect of the budget fight has not been able to break through the larger narrative about deficits, taxes, and government spending.
We see the trickle-down theory actually working on efforts to reverse the progress we’ve made on the environment. Just last week, The New York Times reported on efforts underway in state legislatures to gut environmental progress: Gov. Paul LePage of Maine has announced a 63-point plan to eviscerate environmental regulations in that state; Gov. Rick Scott of Florida is proposing drastic cuts in outlays for land conservation and the allocated budget for restoration of the Everglades; and North Carolina’s Republican-led legislature is proposing a 22 percent cut to their Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
These attacks at the federal and state level are made under the assumption that environmental regulation is the enemy of job creation and hurts economic growth. Recent studies suggest otherwise, though.
A new report by Ceres and the PERI Institute at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, finds vast economic benefits from two Clean Air Act rules expected to be finalized in 2011: the Clean Air Transport Rule and the Utility Maximum Achievable Control Technology.
The report outlines the jobs impact of “investments in pollution controls, new plant construction, and the retirement of older, less efficient coal plants as the country transitions to a cleaner, modernized generation fleet under new EPA clean air standards.” Perhaps it is more than serendipitous that Earth Day 2011 will fall on a religious holiday since the challenges faced by the environment are religious and moral. Both sides of the climate change debate appeal to Genesis 1:28, in which newly created humankind is told by God, “Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it; and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the air and over every living thing that moves upon the earth.”
One side argues that “having dominion over” the created order means using it for our own betterment and treating it as a financial asset to be plundered in the service of humankind’s comfort””a decidedly self-absorbed attitude.
The actual meaning of the Hebrew word used for “dominion” in Genesis has to do with responsible stewardship of creation, not its subjugation. Human dominion should correspond to the kind of dominion exercised by God, which is benevolent and peaceful.
I am old enough to remember the first Earth Day in 1970. I can remember the excitement of that day, the feeling of oneness with the Earth and with one another. It has been over 40 since that first Earth Day. And what do we have to show for our efforts?
Yes, we have made some legislative progress””major amendments to the Clear Air and Water Acts””and some individual progress as even the most remote places find people recycling and turning off lights. But some””many of them in Congress, funded by anti-environmental lobbyists””still argue that global warming is a fiction created by granola-eating liberals.
If, among other things, the crucifixion remembered by Christians on Good Friday is an example of humankind’s blindness and cruelty, then certainly our lack of action on environmental issues is another example of our penchant for blindness to reality and cruelty to future generations.
Maybe what we need to be praying for on Earth Day 2011 is an Easter of sorts, when our nation wakes up to the pressing””even desperate””needs of the Earth and commits itself to passing along to future generations a clean and viable planet.
Without that the national debt will be the least of our worries.
Bishop Gene Robinson is a Senior Fellow at American Progress.
Related Post:
Previous in TP Climate Progress
Language Intelligence: Lessons on persuasion from Jesus, Shakespeare, Lincoln, and Lady Gaga

I Was just sayin the very same thing. SAFER Earth Please .
I’ve been singing this song for about a year. When I heard conservatives complain about their grandchildren’s’ inherited debt, and in the same breath spew vitriol over anything remotely related to environmental protection, it was not logical to me.
The Right’s ‘concern’ for future generations in regard to government debt is entirely fraudulent abd cynically opportunistic. The whole process of wealth redistribution to the rich, creating huge inequality, followed by elite financial speculation and malfeasance (in search of the highest possible return on investment)followed by financial implosion, that led to government bailouts of the kleptocrats, was no mistake. As long ago as the Reagan maladministration, as was admitted by Stockman at the time, the building up of huge deficits through tax cuts to the rich and gargantuan military expenditure was designed to produce just such deficits. And they were intended to be paid off not by taxing the hyper-avaricious elites (who have gained at least 100% of the economic growth of the last ten years in the US-maybe more as their predation on the rest has led to a falling share of GNP for workers over decades)but by expenditure cuts ie screwing the poor, the middle, minorities and welfare recipients and by privatising anything that has not yet been looted by the elites.
None of this was in any manner ‘accidental’. I do not know if it was actively planned, or the same results achieved by following a steady ideological path as events played out, but the creation of a global empire of tremendous inequality, headed by Western elites and poor world compradores, has been the goal of the rulers of the West for centuries, and it is being pursued as ruthlessly today, in Libya, Syria, Latvia, Greece, Iceland and Ireland as in Wisconsin, Maine or Florida as it was hundreds of years ago.
The Onion hits it on the head again:
http://www.theonion.com/articles/mitt-romney-haunted-by-past-of-trying-to-help-unin,20097/
Over the centuries famine has brought down many empires. It will bring down our latest version of empire.
Famine is often the result of a lack of respect for the Earth’s life support systems.
Famine rules over Empire.
“At any time we’re only six meals away from anarchy.”
I am so glad to read the Bishop’s views. I hope the voices of all religious sectors will concentrate on the is critical issue to human survival. Burt as Jew I am disappointed to see the lack of serious involvement of the Jewish leadership of the US in this issue, as I expressed below:
Liberal Judaism lost its compass
For many decades modern liberal Judaism in the US has focused its main attention on Tikkun Olam, making this world a better place for all humanity. The idea was to make the outstanding Jewish Mitzvot [commandments] relevant to today’s world by minimizing human suffering. Kashrut [Kosher] laws were changed, for example, to be concerned about animal welfare. Our Mitzvot that focused on Jewish welfare were broadened to care for people suffering every where, such as Darfur.
Tikkun Olam is not about trivia, about doing what is relatively easy and may be popular. It is extending yourself beyond your comfort zone. It is breaking barriers, fighting seriously for an important human cause. About making real impact on the world…….
To read the rest:
Judaism and global warming
at http://www.ginosaronglobalwarming.org
Matania Ginosaur, it is indeed good to see your ‘Mitzvot’ extend to the Darfurese, whose travails are basically a fight between pastoralists and farmers, exacerbated by climate change. Does your concern extend as far as the long-suffering Gazans, as well?
Mulga, This blog is for environmental issues, not private political views.