by Kelly Levin, World Resources Institute
This week WRI released Climate Science 2009-2010, the latest installment in our periodic review of the state of play of the science of climate change. Co-authors Kelly Levin and Dennis Tirpak describe some of the latest climate science developments.
What are the key findings of this scientific review?
We divide up the report according to changes to physical, hydrological, and ecological systems, as well as advances in technologies. As a whole, the literature paints a bleak picture. We are continuing to see accelerating change in many systems, with some changes happening much faster than initially envisioned.
Some of the key findings:
- 2000-2009 was the warmest decade on record since 1880 (NASA).
- The climate system has a number of different feedback mechanisms built into it, some of which are better known than others. New evidence suggests that as temperature rises, there may be positive feedbacks (processes that reinforce processes) through less cloud cover and in changes in aerosols, soils, peatlands, and Arctic ice cover, which can accelerate climate change impacts.
- Observations show that multi-year winter sea ice area decreased by 42 percent between 2005 and 2008 and that there was a thinning of ∼0.6 m in multi-year ice thickness over the same 4 years (average thickness of the seasonal ice in midwinter is ∼2 m) (Kwok et al.).
- Ocean acidification – caused by the buildup of carbon dioxide concentrations – was only recently recognized as a threat to coral in areas such as the Great Barrier Reef (and is happening much more quickly than anticipated (De’ath et al.)). It is now recognized as having implications for the entire ocean food web which is critical to whales, fish, and mollusks (snails and scallops) (Munday et al., Gooding et al. and Comeau et al.).
- The rate of mass loss in the East Antarctic Ice Sheet may be greater than previously estimated (Chen et al.).
- Based on physiological estimates, a global average temperature increase of 7° C, which is toward the extreme upper part of the range of current projections, would make large portions of the world uninhabitable to humans (Sherwood et al.).
What are some of the main areas in which scientists are making progress in advancing our understanding of climate change?
We found that there is new and abundant literature on four topics: climate feedbacks where the literature generally suggests positive feedbacks from many different processes, triggering an acceleration of climate impacts; sea level rise where the evidence indicates that previous estimates of sea level rise are likely to be revised upward; ocean acidification where new science is confirming the potential global implications of an ocean that is already 30 percent more acidic than about 100 years ago; and on climate impacts to ecological systems, where the literature base now provides more evidence of changes to a variety of species, including lizards, tigers, and butterflies.
Is there anything that surprised you about the research covered in this report?
In light of all the bad news about climate change, a surprise would have been to find out that we are much better off than we thought. But for the most part, we’ve seen impacts around the world in line with – and in many cases worse than – projections.
There are two stories that particularly stand out. First, recent literature (Yin et al.) suggests that sea level rise will likely not be even around the globe. In other words, sea level rise does not occur just like water being added to a bathtub. As a result, the northeast coast of the United States may be especially affected by changes in sea level due to changes in ocean circulation.
The latest research (Francis et al. and Petoukhov et al.) also suggests that recent “winter weather” experienced in temperate Northern Hemisphere could be connected to climate change. As winter sea ice cover in the Arctic Ocean disappears, it can create a pressure and temperature gradient that sucks heat out of Europe. Therefore, recent extreme winter weather is not inconsistent with increases in global average temperature.
What lessons will readers take away from this report?
There are two main lessons. First is the urgent need to proceed with mitigation – with rapid and deep cuts in greenhouse gas emissions. One of the papers we covered (Allen et al.) shows that models indicate that cumulative total anthropogenic (human-caused) carbon emissions need to be limited to one trillion tons if global average temperature rise is to remain below 2°C, the current long-term goal agreed to by the international community in the UNFCCC Cancun Agreements. And we have already emitted half of that amount (by 2060 we will have emitted the other half, and would need to immediately eliminate all carbon dioxide emissions after that date to limit warming to 2°C).
The other main lesson is that we need to enhance our capacity to adapt to climate change’s impacts. What we see already from the literature is a rapidly changing world, throughout physical, hydrological, and ecological systems. Even if we were to stabilize concentrations of greenhouse gases today, we’d still see warming, due to the heat trapping capacity of the oceans, and resultant impacts. We will need not only to be able to respond to extreme events but also proactively prepare for heightened variability and long-term change.
What’s next for climate science?
The next major milestone for climate change science is the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. This report, produced by the world’s leading scientists, will present the next “state of knowledge” of climate science since the Fourth Assessment Report was published in 2007. It will be a bit different from previous assessments, with greater emphasis on describing climate impacts to regions, communicating risks and uncertainties, and exploring socio-economic aspects of climate change and its impacts, among other changes. The reports will be published over the course of 2013-2014. In the meantime, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is also publishing a special report on “Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation” later this fall.
– Kelly Levin, Senior Associate, Climate & Energy Program, World Resources Institute
Related Posts:
- An Illustrated Guide to the Science of Global Warming Impacts: How We Know Inaction Is the Gravest Threat Humanity Faces
- Eight Must-Have Charts Summarize the Evidence for a “Human Fingerprint” on Recent Climate Change
Previous in TP Climate Progress
Language Intelligence: Lessons on persuasion from Jesus, Shakespeare, Lincoln, and Lady Gaga

Thanks for this summary – much of this we have seen mentioned here in the past.
A big missing gap in science concerns the puzzling psychology of denial.
Why do we let ourselves be fooled? Why do other work so hard to keep us fooled? Are humans that easy to control?
Why do we let ourselves be fooled?
- Because it’s the comforting path of least resistance, and delicate, fragile egos don’t like to admit mistakes
Why do other work so hard to keep us fooled?
- Money, money, money, power, power, power, and ego, ego, ego
Are humans that easy to control?
- Yes :( All you have to know are the right buttons to push.
“A big missing gap in science concerns the puzzling psychology of denial.”
I respectfully disagree. Denial and and how to overcome it are well understood.
How many people eat, exercise, etc., as they should to greatly reduce their odds of getting cancer and heart disease? In spite of tons of information telling them they should?
How many people drink Budweiser instead of some equally tasteless brand of beer?
Denial exists because advertising and peer pressure combine synergistically with our genetic legacy of responding only to imminent dangers.
I feel that I personally should have “my hair on fire” about climate change. If my grandson were drowning in front of me I’d risk my life to save him.
But what am I risking to save him from disastrous climate change? Not nearly enough. Why not? As much as I know about the coming catastrophe, it just doesn’t activate the fight or flight response in my reptilian brain.
I feel this is the root of our collective “denial”. It’s not a conscious thing, it’s a middle brain thing that ends up looking and acting as though we were consciously denying. Again, I recognize the Koch’s and their ilk fall into a small, special category going far beyond this – almost a psychosis that makes them incapable of any considerations other than profit. I’m talking instead about the great majority of the population.
What are you (anyone reading this) personally risking for the future any young person you care about? Ponder that.
That’s why, without a government wise enough to act in this country’s and the world’s best interest, we’re screwed. We need a massive propaganda campaign and pocket-book-hurting incentives to force changes required to fight Climate Change effectively.
As a hole, the future looks black. ~jwl
A very good article and the future not looking good at the moment.
It is important to point out, since the article mentions the report, that the next IPCC report (2013-2014) will still not include the expected impact of some of the most serious feedback mechanisms (permafrost melting, clathrates melting etc.) – i.e. when the next IPCC report comes out, it still won’t be showing the full picture – mind boggling except to Exxon and the Koch’s.
As a ¨where things are going from here¨ this probably needs a lot higher billing.
Excellent report from WRI. Yes. Global warming is a reality and all out efforts by all Nations are needed to mitigate it.
Dr.A.Jagadeesh Nellore(AP),India
E-mail: anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com
It is important to point out the next IPCC report (2013-2014) will still not include the expected impact of some of the most serious feedback mechanisms. Thanks for sharing with us.