Score Another Victory for Scientists, Michael Mann and the Freedom of Inquiry

Posted on  

"Score Another Victory for Scientists, Michael Mann and the Freedom of Inquiry"

http://thinkprogress.org/romm/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Mann11.gif

Reconstruction of Northern Hemisphere temperatures, Mann et al, 2008.  Multiple, independent analyses confirm recent warming is unprecedented in magnitude and speed and cause (so the temperature history looks like a Hockey Stick).

by Chris Mooney, in a DeSmogBlog cross-post

Yesterday in a Virginia courtroom, Michael Mann—who is quickly becoming the Galileo of climate science—triumphed over the conservative American Tradition Institute, and ongoing attempts at scientist-harassment.

More specifically, Prince William County Circuit Court Judge Gaylord Finch both allowed Mann to join the case that ATI is pursuing against the University of Virginia to get Mann’s emails, and allowed UVA to back out of an agreement with ATI to let it review some of Mann’s emails that the university is nevertheless claiming are exempt from disclosure.

This is a bit technical, as is often the case in ongoing court proceedings, but let’s remember why it matters.

The ATI lawsuit is a follow-on to Virginia attorney general Ken Cuccinelli’s outrageous harassment of Mann. And protecting Mann’s emails from disclosure is critical for ensuring that ideological fishing expeditions that attack and harass scientists aren’t permitted. The contrary result, as many scientific groups have asserted, could have a chilling effect on academic research and freedom of inquiry in controversial areas.

Mann has been greatly supported by the Union of Concerned Scientists, the American Geophysical Union, and other organizations, and by grassroots fundraising efforts to support his legal expenses. To contribute see here.

 

Let us also add that there is no reason to think Mann has done anything wrong, scientifically or otherwise, or that his emails will reveal some malfeasance. To the contrary, Mann and other scientists involved in the pseudo-scandal of “ClimateGate” have been repeatedly vindicated by independent investigations.

Meanwhile, the connections between ATI and various other conservative and industry groups and funders have now been extensively documented.

I called Mann the “Galileo of climate science,” and increasingly, I think this is not mere hyperbole.

I’ve been following climate science, and political attacks on it, for nearly a decade. Throughout that period, conservatives have been relentlessly attacking Mann because of the hockey stick graph. And starting in 2005, there have been attempts—first in Congress, then using the legal process—to wrest information from Mann, information whose disclosure would simply allow conservative motivated reasoners to come up with new reasons to criticize and attack him.

This is a beast that, at all costs, must not be fed.

At the same time, all of this has surely exacted a serious toll on Mann himself in the form of personal stresses and, perhaps, legal expenses.

Mann has risen to the occasion, however, and fought back admirably and courageously.

In the process, he has become a hero and a role model for standing up against the forces of ideology and unreason.

And in turn, as this long and completely unnecessary legal process continues, we must continue to give him our full and absolutely unwavering support.

Chris Mooney is Washington correspondent for Seed magazine, senior correspondent for The American Prospect, and author of the bestselling book The Republican War on Science. This piece was originally published at DeSmogBlog.

JR:  The figure at the top and the caption is not from Mooney.  I just like to lead with the science and end with it too.

Recent Studies Vindicating the Hockey Stick:

  1. Temperatures of North Atlantic “are unprecedented over the past 2000 years and are presumably linked to the Arctic amplification of global warming” — Science (2011)
  2. GRL (2010):  “We conclude that the 20th century warming of the incoming intermediate North Atlantic water has had no equivalent during the last thousand years.“
  3. JGR (2010):  “The last decades of the past millennium are characterized again by warm temperatures that seem to be unprecedented in the context of the last 1600 years.”
  4. Human-caused Arctic warming overtakes 2,000 years of natural cooling, “seminal” study finds (2009)
  5. Unprecedented warming in Lake Tanganyika and its impact on humanity (2010)
« »

11 Responses to Score Another Victory for Scientists, Michael Mann and the Freedom of Inquiry

  1. Jeanne Clark says:

    Given that much of this harrassment is based on stolen electronic communications, and that they were stolen from a UK university, I find it curious that no enterprising reporter has investigated to see if there is a connection to Rupert Murdock/News of the World. He/they seem to have taken hacking to a high art.

  2. Scientific process converts another scientist who was once a denier. Now Mann beats ATI back with his hockey stick ;). It’s a good week for science. Let’s hope this keeps up!

  3. Merrelyn Emery says:

    Looks like it’s all starting to happen over there. Good work folks, ME

  4. Mark Shapiro says:

    Edit: the last sentence is incomplete. Perhaps he meant to add “unqualified support.”

    And yes, Mann deserves our support. It is good to see at least a partial victory here, but the ATI suit, the ATI harassment of Mann continues. And note that the suit is based largely on faulty, biased premises.

    • Mark Shapiro says:

      Wow. It looks like David Schnare, ATI’s lead attorney, actually lied to UVA’s attorney, and to the court.

      Worse, the documents show that he two-timed the US taxpayers — working on this ATI case for months while he was employed full-time by the US EPA. THat’s right, the EPA. With anti-environment moles like Schnare in the EPA, there’s little wonder that we have a tough time getting government to work properly.

    • Mark Shapiro says:

      Don’t people get disbarred for behavior like this?

  5. Joe Bftsplk says:

    The “hockey stick” is an older indicator. As Trenberth has been saying, ( http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/cas/Trenberth/trenberth.papers/NatureNV10.pdf )there has been a “revolutionary” change in the ability of scientists to get their hands on better data, specifically, about heat in the oceans.

    Hansen’s recent “Earth’s Energy Imbalance” paper (available from his website: http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2011/20110415_EnergyImbalancePaper.pdf ) makes the claim we have a new “fundamental verification that human-made climate forcing is the dominant forcing driving climate change”, i.e. the increasingly precise analyses of Argo float data. Hansen points to the 2011 study by von Schuckmann and Le Traon ( http://www.ocean-sci-discuss.net/8/999/2011/osd-8-999-2011-print.pdf ) and calls the consistency of this analysis, coupled with the expectations if climate scientists have been correct all long “a smoking gun”. It sounds like a claim this is better than “hockey stick” interpretations of the global average surface temperature over time, because the oceans are where the accumulating heat really is. The only caveat all three scientists use in their papers is unless: “systematic errors remain in the observing system”

    Perhaps von Schuckmann, Le Traon, and Hansen can now expect to come under increasing and more personal attack like Mann.