ThinkProgress Logo

Climate Progress

Iowa Scientists Urge Candidates to Acknowledge Climate Science, Warn of Threat to “National and Global Food Security”

Iowa Scientists:  “Over the last 40 years intense rainfall has occurred about five times more often than in our previous history. As a result our communities have faced enormous expense to recover from repeated “500-year” floods. Cedar Rapids, Des Moines, Iowa City, and Ames all have suffered multi-million dollar losses from floods since 1993. In 2008 alone, 85 of Iowa’s 99 counties were declared federal disaster areas.”

A sign is completely submerged along a road north of Vinton, Iowa, as water from the Cedar River continues to rise Wednesday June 11, 2008…. Flood waters have inundated the electric plant in Vinton and the entire city is now without power. Officials are preparing for the Cedar River to crest at record levels all across the state. (AP Photo)

JR:  Here is a news release and statement by three dozen Iowa scientists.

SCIENTISTS ACROSS IOWA SAY THAT CLIMATE CHANGE IS AFFECTING IOWA, URGE CANDIDATES TO ACKNOWLEDGE CLIMATE SCIENCE

DES MOINES - Scientists from across Iowa issued a statement today re-affirming that climate change is real and urging candidates to acknowledge the science of climate change and present “appropriate” policy responses.  The statement, signed by 31 scientists from 22 different colleges and universities in Iowa, is being delivered to Governor Terry Branstad’s office today and will be available for participants in the Iowa Energy Forum sponsored by Politico in Des Moines on Wednesday.

In the statement, the scientists point out that Iowa is already experiencing the effects of climate change, such as increased precipitation, and that those changes have “clear connections to changes in global climate.”

All major scientific societies and the US National Academy of Science have affirmed that the recent rise in greenhouse gases in the global atmosphere has contributed to changes in our climate,” the scientists say.  Additional climate changes will challenge farmers and planners “to maintain the prosperity of our state and its role in national and global food security.”

“I believe it is important for Iowans to know that scientists who live and work in communities across our state understand that climate change is real and has serious implications for our future,” said David Courard-Hauri, assistant professor of environmental science and policy at Drake University.  “This is an issue that all candidates for elected office, from city council to President of the United States, should acknowledge and address through public policy.”

The statement was drafted by four climate science researchers at Iowa State University, including Prof. Gene Takle, Director, Climate Science Program, Iowa State University.  Prof. Courard-Hauri organized the scientists from other colleges and universities who signed on to the statement.

The full text of the statement and the signatories to the statement are provided below.

Climate Science and Public Policy in Iowa

November, 2011

The productive soils and favorable climate of Iowa underpin the economy of our State. Over the last half-century our farmers have adapted to changing conditions to keep Iowa ranked as one of the leading agriculture states in the US. We take well-earned pride in our contributions to national and global food security.

Changes in rainfall patterns and other climate indicators have emerged as the latest and potentially the most serious challenge to Iowans’ lives and livelihoods. Subtle changes in climate can have large effects on agriculture, making it a sensitive indicator of climate change. Statewide data show changes in temperature, precipitation, and humidity over the last forty years affecting Iowa’s producers. In recent decades a longer growing season, more precipitation, and lack of extreme high daytime temperatures have contributed to improved crop yields in our State. But the accompanying increase in extreme rainfall events, higher humidity, and higher nighttime temperatures have required costly adaptations.

Like its farmers, Iowa’s cities and rural communities, which provide our infrastructure, educational opportunities, and cultural amenities, also have felt the effects of a changing climate. Over the last 40 years intense rainfall has occurred about five times more often than in our previous history. As a result our communities have faced enormous expense to recover from repeated “500-year” floods. Cedar Rapids, Des Moines, Iowa City, and Ames all have suffered multi-million dollar losses from floods since 1993. In 2008 alone, 85 of Iowa’s 99 counties were declared federal disaster areas.

These changes in Iowa’s climate have clear connections to changes in global climate and to changes in how we use the land. As the global climate continues to evolve, our farmers and city planners will face new challenges to maintain the prosperity of our state and its role in national and global food security. All major scientific societies and the US National Academy of Science have affirmed that the recent rise in greenhouse gases in the global atmosphere has contributed to changes in our climate. We urge all candidates for public office at national, state, and local levels to acknowledge the overwhelming balance of evidence for the underpinning causes of climate change, to develop appropriate policy responses, and to develop local and statewide strategies to adapt to near-term changes in climate.

Signed,*

Chris Anderson, Climate Science Program, Iowa State University

Ray Arritt, Climate Science Program, Iowa State University

Bill Gutowski, Climate Science Program, Iowa State University

Gene Takle, Climate Science Program, Iowa State University

Mark Aronson, Department of Biology, Scott Community College

Neil Bernstein, Chair, Department of Natural and Applied Sciences, Mount Mercy University

Aaron Bunker, Department of Biology, Morningside College

David Campbell, Henry R. Luce Professor in Nations & the Global Environment and Professor of Biology, Grinnell College

David Courard-Hauri, Environmental Science and Policy Program, Drake University

Richard Cruse, Director, Iowa Water Center, Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University

Gary Donnermeyer, Math/Science Department, Kirkwood Community College

Robert de Haan, Environmental Studies Department, Dordt College

Rhawn Denniston, Chair, Department of Geology, Cornell College

Jack Gittinger, Science Education, Simpson College

Brian Hazlett, Director, Environmental Science Program, Briar Cliff University

Laura Jackson, Professor of Biology, University of Northern Iowa

M. Patrick McAdams, Division of Health and Life Science, William Penn University

David McCullough, Professor of Biology, Coordinator, Environmental Studies, Wartburg College

Gilbert Nebgen, Associate Professor of Science and Math, Indian Hills Community College

Laura Peterson, Department of Chemistry, Environmental Studies Program, Luther College

Gary Phillips, Environmental Studies Department, Iowa Lakes Community College

Thomas Rosburg, Professor of Biology, Drake University

Melanie Hansen Sadeghpour, Chair, Environmental Science Program, Des Moines Area Community College

Paula Sanchini, Professor of Biology, Coe College

Jerald Schnoor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Co-Director, Center for Global and Regional Environmental Research, University of Iowa

Keith Summerville, Environmental Science and Policy, Drake University

Kathryn Szramek, Environmental Science and Policy, Drake University

Martin St. Clair, Professor of Chemistry, Coe College

Tracy Todd, Associate Professor of Biology, Northwestern College

Paul Weihe, Biology & Environmental Science, Central College

Danielle Wirth, Environmental Science Department, Des Moines Area Community College

*The views expressed herein are those of the individual signatories, and do not necessarily represent the views of the institutions with which they are affiliated.

11 Responses to Iowa Scientists Urge Candidates to Acknowledge Climate Science, Warn of Threat to “National and Global Food Security”

  1. Paul Magnus says:

    Climate Chaos shared a link.

    Bangkok Post : PT MPs propose new capital city
    http://www.bangkokpost.com
    Twenty MPs of the ruling Pheu Thai Party have signed a motion for an urgent debate on a proposal that the House of Representatives to set up a committee to study the possible relocation of the capital to another province less prone to flooding.
    https://www.facebook.com/pages/Climate-Chaos/187700434593711

  2. Ken says:

    November 15, 2011 at 1:33 pm
    I was just at the American Spectator commenting on an article “Paul Krugman Flunks Moore’s Law” By William Tucker
    http://spectator.org/archives/2011/11/15/paul-krugman-flunks-moores-law#comment_677671
    Not a bad article really, but flawed, i was more curious in engaging with the Fossil Fuel supporters.
    Check it out, see what the otherside is saying; a lot of anger on the other side. I tried to inject some apoliticial factual statements to no effect. Got exhausted and left to comeback home.

  3. Ken says:

    I live in South Eastern NY and have lived here in the same town for 35 years.This August we had almost 20 inches of rain, nearly twice the record in a location where 40 inches in an entire year would be normal, an astounding development. In addition we had a hurricane in August and a record smashing 12 inch October snowstorm 8 weeks later which brought down trees which still had green leaves on them causing widespread damage (more than the hurricane).

    Was the snowstorm due to an early arctic oscillation from melting ice in the arctic? I shudder to think what the next 30 years will bring.

  4. Gail Zawacki says:

    As usual, the climate scientists ignore the critical contribution that the “other” greenhouse gases from fuel emissions make to both crop reduction in yield and quality from ozone, and the role played by aerosol pollution in extreme precipitation and drought.

    It’s important to make the distinction because aerosol and ozone are not going to be reduced one iota by geoengineering schemes, which is what some technograts think will save us from catastrophic food shortages.

    Links:

    1. crop reduction from ozone:

    http://witsendnj.blogspot.com/p/basic-premise.html

    2. precipitation extremes from aerosols:

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/11/111113141304.htm#.TsFqHQd6YKA.email

  5. M Tucker says:

    “As the global climate continues to evolve, our farmers and city planners will face new challenges to maintain the prosperity of our state and its role in national and global food security.”

    Food security, climate change and the prosperity of Iowa are in a three way tug-of-war. Iowa produces more corn than any other state. About a quarter of that corn is burned! Iowa also produces more corn ethanol than any other state: making enormous taxpayer subsidized profits for the farmers, keeping corn prices for those same taxpayers higher than ever, and keeping Iowa farmland some of the most expensive in the nation.

    You can’t win Iowa if you don’t support government subsidized corn ethanol. I’m not sure how important global climate is to the Iowa farmer but those government subsidies are very, very important. I would have really liked to see a similar letter from a large consortium of Iowa farmers (they also grow the most soybeans), or from the Iowa Farm Bureau, or from the Iowa Corn Promotion Board, or from the Iowa Corn Growers Association. But that ain’t gonna happen until drought or flood takes out several seasons worth of corn crops. 2008 is old news and this year the corn was as high as a Republican elephant’s eye.

    I do thank the Iowa scientists for trying but you will have absolutely no impact on this presidential election cycle.

  6. Chris says:

    Not to be a nitpicker here, but the caption “A sign is completely submerged…” is wrong. If the sign was completely submerged we wouldn’t see it.

  7. SecularAnimist says:

    When these scientists are in a position to offer as much money to the Republican candidates as the Koch Brothers can offer, the candidates will consider their views.

  8. NJP1 says:

    Climate change isn’t the problem.
    We are the problem.
    Every species is evolved to eat and procreate, and humanity has been good at it.
    We are burning 150 million years of stored sunshine, and deluding ourselves it is profit and prosperity, and that it is infinite. We must have ‘growth’ because growth pays our wages.
    It is in our short term interests to deny that global warming matches population rise exactly, because our ‘economy’ can only function on fuel burning. Our collective genius has turned oil into food, so that 99% of the world food supply is now totally dependent of continually increasing oil supplies
    There are now 7 billion of us, 80 million show up every year and add to the 1 billion who are starving because the cost of oil/food is rising beyond the means to pay for it. Food poverty is climbing the ladder of prosperity as the cost of oil goes up.
    We are ripping the planet apart in our scramble for energy, and our numbers have reached plague species. The Earth is a living organism and will return to its normal temperature just as soon as it gets rid of the bugs that are causing its illness. Climate change is just a global sneeze to get rid of a fever.
    Us!

  9. Roger says:

    These scientists are right, the GOP candidates should be addressing climate change, just as Jill Stein, the new Green Party candidate, is already doing.

    Most of all, the candidate-in-chief, President Obama, should be addressing climate change. It has gotten to the point that Obama’s relative silence on the issue is enabling the ongoing denial of climate change as a serious issue by tens of millions of Americans.

    More’s the pity because addressing climate change could create tens of millions of well-paying American jobs, as we make the needed transition to renewable energy.

    CP readers can support the concept of Obama being a leader in responding to the climate challenge in many, mostly obvious, ways: Call the White House comment line, M-F, 9 to 5PM at 202-456-1111, to suggest he lead US.
    Alternatively, go to the president’s home page at http://www.whitehouse.gov, then click on the “Contact Us” button in the upper right corner, then write a comment, day or night.

    Finally, and in addition, you and your friends can go to a website supporting this bold idea: http://www.facebook.com/climateaddress.

    • Roger says:

      Well, usually one can make a comment at the White House web page, but I just double checked and found only a big picture of Barack, and an invitation to sign up for his emails.

      One can still write a letter (hand written is best) to the president at the White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, DC 20500, United (in climate denial) States of America.

      Easiest is to call the White House comment line at 202-456-1111. If the line is busy, you can try later. Most of the volunteers who handle these calls are quite friendly.
      Suggest that the president lead on climate.

  10. Where are all the University of Iowa scientists; notably absent.

ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up