JR: Cyberbullying of climate scientists is on the rise, thanks to the hard-core deniers (see “UK Guardian slams Morano for cyber-bullying and for urging violence against climate scientists“). MIT climatologist Kerry Emanuel, whose family is the target of the latest attacks, writes me, “I had heard about the hate mail and threats received by others, but am surprised at how little it takes these days to trigger hysterical and hateful responses from the ideologues out there.”
UPDATE: You can read below the comments of climate ethicist Donald Brown, who has been the focus of Morano’s “reprehensible” tactics four times. He calls it “sheer intimidation.”
Prominent MIT researcher Kerry Emanuel has been receiving an unprecedented “frenzy of hate” after a video featuring an interview with him was published recently by Climate Desk.
Emails contained “veiled threats against my wife,” and other “tangible threats,” Emanuel, a highly-regarded atmospheric scientist and director of MIT’s Atmospheres, Oceans, and Climate program, said in an interview. “They were vile, these emails. They were the kind of emails nobody would like to receive.”
“What was a little bit new about it was dragging family members into it and feeling that my family might be under threat, so naturally I didn’t feel very good about that at all,” Emanuel said. “I thought it was low to drag somebody’s spouse into arguments like this.”
Climate Desk has seen a sample of the emails and can confirm they are laced with menacing language and expletives, and contain personal threats of violence.
Emanuel began receiving emails “almost immediately” after the video was posted on Jan. 5, and the volume peaked at four or five emails a day. The threats have now petered off.
Threats are nothing new in the world of climate science.
But Emanuel was surprised by the viciousness of the emails. “I think most of my colleagues and I have received a fair bit of email here and there that you might classify as ‘hate mail,’ but nothing like what I’ve got in the last few days.”
“This was a little more orchestrated this time,” he said.
The video — “New Hampshire’s GOP Voters Speak Out About Climate Change” — documented a climate change conference run by a group of Republican voters upset by their party’s anti-science rhetoric. Emanuel was a keynote speaker, along with former Rep. Bob Inglis (R-S.C.), who, incidentally, has not received any threats since the video.
In one clip, Emanuel says, “It makes me feel to some extent disgusted with politics and to some extent ashamed to be an American.”
The comments were seized upon, Emanuel suspects, by “bloggers bent on distorting that message and amplifying it.” One website, Climate Depot, posted Emanuel’s email address.
Emanuel notes that in the full video, he went on to explain that the Republican candidates “have either been misled, in which case it’s not great to be part of the political system where candidates for the president of the United States could be so misled on such an important issue, or they were dishonest, which [is] equally bad in my view: How could we live in a country where candidates are being dishonest about an issue of such importance?”
Another website, Junk Science, raised questions about his wife’s anti-war feelings in the 1960s.
“Somebody came to the conclusion that back in the ’60s she was a Marxist — which she was back then,” Emanuel said. He notes that “conservative heroes of today like Norman Podhoretz [and] Jeane Kirkpatrick” were also socialists in the ’60s. “So I don’t quite know what the problem was there!”
In June 2011, top Australian climate scientists said they had been targeted by death threats and menacing phone calls, including threats of sexual attacks on family members. Australian National University in Canberra reacted by tightening security, and the police began investigating. U.S. researchers received a torrent of hate mail in the wake of “Climategate,” in which a trove of emails was stolen and released at the University of East Anglia in the U.K.
Emanuel decided not to alert police.
Emanuel says climate scientists are not used to the intensity of political debate around climate change: “We scientists are usually not in any kind of heated public debate, as is the case in climate; we’re not used to this, we’re not trained for it.”
“I’ve done a lot of public speaking, and I’ve spoken to many types of audiences, including audiences that are very conservative, and while I certainly have people push back — which is understandable and encouraged, and people debate; that’s all part of that, that’s fine — I’ve never ever encountered in direct contact with the public any behavior that I thought was bad or threatening or vile or anything like that. So I don’t have any trouble communicating directly with the public. I think it’s the distortions that occur sometimes in certain formats that are the root of the problem.”
Kerry asked me to publish the full audio of our interview, which you can listen to below.
– James West, The Climate Desk
Related Climate Progress Posts:
- The rise of anti-science cyber bullying: Morano says climate scientists “deserve to be publicly flogged.”
- Australian climate scientists face death threats, cyberbullying
- Anthony Watts urges WattsUpWithThat readers to disrupt Forbes blog: “shout them down in the comments section”
- Climate Crock video on Flogging the Scientists
- Even now, ClimateDepot’s Marc Morano reiterates his call for a “hostile reaction” to climate scientists