by Whitney Allen
One of the biggest barriers to entry for renewables is dealing with utilities working to maintain control over energy distribution in their given region. These companies often feel threatened by emerging “green” utilities that produce and distribute energy that comes exclusively from renewable sources.
Enter Georgia Solar Utilities Inc, or GaSU. It has just presented a proposal to the Georgia Public Service Commission to begin a utility scale solar project that will allow it to sell clean, renewable energy directly to customers. The kicker? The company says it can deliver the electricity at a lower cost to customers than their would-be competitors.
The claim comes from the company’s energy deployment strategy. The plan is for GaSU to produce electricity from large-scale solar PV farms and then sell that to Georgia Power. The company would then use some of those profits to pay Georgia Power for access to the grid. Any additional profits left over would be offered as rebates to customers. GaSU plans on taking advantage of the Investment Tax Credit to be able to quickly and efficiently establish these large solar projects.
The supply for GaSU’s power will come from a proposed 90 MW facility, which would be three times as large as the Simon Solar Program, the state’s largest approved solar farm. The projected cost of the new farm is $320 million and is said to open up opportunity for “hundreds of jobs” during its construction.
But all this assumes it can get approval from the state to operate as a utility. But a major barrier is the 1973 Georgia Territorial Electric Service Act, which effectively gives the state’s largest utility, Georgia Power, a monopoly on utility services. Previous attempts at changing utility legislation have met strong opposition.
If the law was amended and GaSU was allowed to operate in Georgia, it could open up the state’s tremendous green energy potential. Georgia Power only just brought its first large solar farm online this July with a capacity of 1 MW, enough power for about 300 homes. Georgia Power has bought into three more large solar projects that promise to provide the company with 50 MW by 2015. While this would be a significant step up from the state’s current level of 18MW of solar production, it is still a tremendous under-utilization of a resource that could meet 31% of the state’s energy needs from rooftop solar alone. Currently, about 5% of Georgia’s total energy production comes from renewables.
If allowed to go forward, GaSU’s long term plans are to expand from 90 MW to over 2 GW, enough to provide power to between 330,000 and 670,000 American homes. In its proposal, GaSU stressed that it wanted the PSC to “recognize the value to ratepayers from their supplying solar power under an innovative business structure and to grant GaSU the right to undertake utility scale solar development in Georgia.”
Interestingly, GaSU’s motion may have already had an impact on Georgia Power’s policies. Last Wednesday, just days after GaSU’s proposal, Georgia Power announced that it would be taking steps to increase the state’s solar use. The Georgia Power Advanced Solar Initiative would be one of the largest voluntary steps to increase solar production by any independent utility. The plan is to expand Georgia Power’s current solar generation by 210 MW in three years. It’s an admirable step, but one that SEIA, the national solar trade association, says doesn’t go quite far enough. SEIA praised Georgia Power’s decision, but said that the state could do more to encourage solar growth across the state, including adding more support for small-scale distributed generation projects and, importantly, including policies that “allow for other solar providers to participate in the market.”
Previous in TP Climate Progress
Language Intelligence: Lessons on persuasion from Jesus, Shakespeare, Lincoln, and Lady Gaga

Some good news:
Georgia politicians jump on ‘solar’ bandwagon(both parties)
Regarding your last paragraph- GaSU’s proposal suggests only industrial sized projects. According to this story,
Georgia Power to add solar
Georgia Power proposes a mix of project sizes.
And although they’re criticized as including enough distributed generation, their plan seems to include more distributed power than that of GaSU.
But the GaSU proposal has the promise of allowing customers share in some of the savings.
drats, should be:
…not including enough distributed generation, their
Thanks for pciking up this story. GA Solar has asked for the right to sell power at retail rates over the grid direct to the end user. We pay GA Power the profits on the lost revenues via grid access charges. That way only the 1603 ITC’s are needed for success. No other subsidy is required. We want to go head to head with GA Power. Please download my petition from the GA PSC web site. Docket number 36286. You will see the value of a new approach to solar, a mutual company. It rewards ‘all’ ratepayers for underwriting the credit to build the solar farms through a dividend from the solar profits. With Georgia’s solar resources. 210 MW’s is not meaningful. 2 GW’s is. Our new corporate structure makes a big difference in what can be financed.
I suspect that the levelized cost of solar/clean energy, including end-use efficiency upgrading, is much more economical in Georgia than the atomic fission reactors under construction. Good luck with breaking the stranglehold of entrenched interests. That new nuclear plant could be instantaneously obsolete, and yet another multi-billion dollar “mis-allocation of resources.”
I’ve culled together from different sources, including GaSU’s principal Robert Green, some more details and questions about GaSU here:
https://sites.google.com/site/freemarketsolarpower/home/georgia-watch