Tumblr Icon RSS Icon

Island Wildlife Decline, Linked To Ocean Acidification, ‘Could Prove A Bellwether For Oceanic Change Globally’

By Joe Romm on October 15, 2012 at 4:30 pm

"Island Wildlife Decline, Linked To Ocean Acidification, ‘Could Prove A Bellwether For Oceanic Change Globally’"

Share:

google plus icon

The NY Times published a sobering piece recently about Tatoosh Island off the coast of Washington state. Tatoosh is a global “warming bellwether”:

But for over four decades, with the blessing of Makah leaders, Tatoosh has been the object of intense biological scrutiny, and scientists say they are seeing disturbing declines across species — changes that could prove a bellwether for oceanic change globally.

The Makah hold treaty rights to the island.

Among the declines the researchers are noticing: historically hardy populations of gulls and murres are only half what they were 10 years ago, and only a few chicks hatched this spring. Mussel shells are notably thinner, and recently the mussels seem to be detaching from rocks more easily and with greater frequency.

Goose barnacles are also suffering, and so are the hard, splotchy, wine-colored coralline algae, which appear like graffiti along rocky shorelines.

Media MattersThis particular whodunit appears to be largely solved: Humans in the Ecosystem with CO2. Global warming is “capable of wrecking the marine ecosystem and depriving future generations of the harvest of the seas” (see Ocean dead zones to expand, “remain for thousands of years”).

In this case, it’s ocean acidification, a subject we have covered extensively — see, for instance, Geological Society study finds acidifying oceans on track for marine biological meltdown “by end of century,” as co-author warns: “Unless we curb carbon emissions we risk mass extinctions, degrading coastal waters and encouraging outbreaks of toxic jellyfish and algae.”

The major media haven’t been so focused on this major threat to humanity (see ”Kardashians Get 40 Times More News Coverage Than Ocean Acidification“).

So it’s good to see the Times run with this story and explain the climate change angle so clearly:

Biologists suspect that the shifts are related to huge declines in the water’s pH, a shift attributed to the absorption of excess carbon dioxide being released into the atmosphere in ever-greater amounts by the burning of fossil fuels for energy.

As the carbon dioxide is absorbed, it alters the oceanic water chemistry, turning it increasingly acidic. Barnacles, oysters and mussels find it more difficult to survive, which can cause chain reactions among the animals that eat those species, like birds and people.

During a research trip in 2000, Dr. Pfister and Dr. Wootton first began testing the pH of water samples. They found the water around Tatoosh and along nearby coastlines to be 10 times as acidic as what accepted climate change models were predicting. Even after collecting seven years of data, when they published their findings in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in 2008, their data were met with skepticism.

“People think we just don’t know how to use the instrument — I still hear that,” Dr. Pfister said. “Luckily for our reputations, I guess, this has been corroborated by a lot of other people.”

Unluckily for humanity, a great many of the impacts of man-made greenhouse gas emissions are worse than what “accepted climate change models were predicting.”

It was on Tatoosh and the nearby shore (which you can see in the top photo) that Prof. Robert T. Paine, retired University of Washington zoologist, “developed his keystone species hypothesis, which describes how top predators dominate an ecosystem, often to the benefit of species diversity.” I guess that makes us the anti-keystone species, since humans dominate almost every ecosystem, but invariably to the detriment of species diversity (see Royal Society: “There are very strong indications that the current rate of species extinctions far exceeds anything in the fossil record”).

Indeed, we seem to be the species that is especially adept at wiping out keystone species and diversity (see “Global Warming May Cause Far Higher Extinction of Biodiversity Than Previously Thought“).

The final word goes to the too-appropriately named professor:

“You can predict change,” Dr. Paine said, “and most of the changes are going to be in a direction we don’t want.”

Related posts:

 

‹ PREVIOUS
Community Choice Aggregation: Giving Consumers Access To Clean Energy

NEXT ›
Ten Charts That Make Clear The Planet Just Keeps Warming

3 Responses to Island Wildlife Decline, Linked To Ocean Acidification, ‘Could Prove A Bellwether For Oceanic Change Globally’

  1. Solar Jim says:

    Some of us are aware that we are witness to an unbelievable existential tragedy as one species (us) converts prehistoric carbon, buried in the lithosphere, back into carbonic acid gas and subsequent carbonic acid. The sixth great geologic extinction event may also include us, especially if oxygen producing organisms can not sustain this onslaught of massive contamination.

  2. Climate Weary says:

    The most disturbing aspect of ocean acidification is the fact that it is irreversible in our life time. The oceans cover two thirds of the earth’s surface; they are sources of livelihoods to millions of people, sustain dynamic and diverse marine ecosystems and play a vital role in the global carbon cycle.
    If we do not reduce our CO2 emissions, the acidification of the oceans will disrupt the process of calcification in which molluscs and corals make their shells through calcium carbonate. Organisms such a phytoplankton and zooplankton will be affected and these organisms are major sources of food for many fish.
    The acidification of the ocean will not only affect marine life, but impact greatly on the carbon cycle. The oceans increasing acidity inhibits the oceans ability to absorb CO2 from the atmosphere, which contributes further to increased CO2 and global warming.
    Lastly the socio-economic impacts of ocean acidification are extensive. Destruction of coral reef ecosystems will leave fisheries and recreation industries at a huge economic and financial loss. The destruction of fisheries is especially of concern as poverty stricken and vulnerable coastal communities will lose their source if livelihoods.
    Some of these impacts of ocean acidification are already a reality! The reduction of our carbon emissions, especially CO2 is vital for the protection and safety of our oceans and the biodiversity they sustain!

    To receive a better understanding of ocean acidification this paper is very helpful and assisted me in my knowledge of the severe impacts: http://dge.stanford.edu/labs/caldeiralab/Caldeira%20downloads/RoyalSociety_OceanAcidification.pdf

  3. Nick B says:

    This is one of the most terrible affects and reinforces that we have to take more responsibility for a balanced Earth System. Here is an excerpt from an interview I gave with Jim Hansen on thi subject in Vienna in April: http://www.envisionation.co.uk/index.php/projects/jim-hansen-interviews