Tumblr Icon RSS Icon

What Obama’s Re-Election Means For Coal, Climate Change, And America’s Energy Future

Posted on  

"What Obama’s Re-Election Means For Coal, Climate Change, And America’s Energy Future"

Share:

google plus icon

by Mary Anne Hitt, via the Sierra Club

President Obama’s victory yesterday was a victory for clean energy, one that gives us a fighting chance to slash coal pollution and turn the corner on climate change, in the wake of a devastating hurricane that brought global warming into sharp, painful focus for millions of Americans.

As the Sierra Club’s Michael Brune said on election night, “We did it.” Fossil fuel billionaires had spent at record levels to defeat Obama in this election, and Romney had returned the favor, promising to open the floodgates on more mining and drilling if elected. But then Hurricane Sandy hit the Eastern Seaboard, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg endorsed President Obama as the candidate most likely to lead on climate change, and Romney’s dismissal of rising oceans as a laugh line in his GOP Convention speech became an especially chilling out-of-touch episode, in a Republican Presidential campaign that had no shortage of such moments.

Ironically, the coal industry had pinned its hopes on Romney — the consummate businessman — to protect the industry from the harsh realities of the free market. Now, the coal industry will have to stop hiding behind inflammatory slogans like “the war on coal,” and will have to grapple with a marketplace and an American public that are turning away from coal in favor of cleaner, cheaper sources of energy. Coal will only produce 37% of America’s electricity this year, down from 50% just five years ago, and those trends show no signs of reversing.

In reality, the decline of coal and the rise of clean energy have more to do with Main Street and Wall Street than with Pennsylvania Avenue. Over the past four years, in almost every state in the nation, hundreds of thousands of people have worked together to retire polluting local coal plants, get more wind and solar power on the grid, and use energy more efficiently. Today, 125 coal plants — out of over 500 nationwide — are now slated for retirement. As a result, U.S. carbon emissions are at their lowest level in two decades, clean energy is coming on line at record levels, and tens of thousands of Americans now have clean energy jobs.

The marketplace and the American people have spoken, and there is no amount of grandstanding by coal barons that will turn this tide. By the end of Obama’s second term, the Beyond Coal Campaign plans to:

  • Secure the retirement of one-third of the nation’s coal plants.
  • Power the nation with record amounts of clean energy and energy efficiency.
  • End mountaintop removal once and for all.
  • Close additional coal pollution loopholes, including long-overdue protections for carbon, soot, smog, coal ash, and water pollution.
  • Prevent increased coal exports overseas to places where it will be burned with fewer pollution controls and no climate safeguards.

Making this happen will require the continued energy and dedication of our Beyond Coal grassroots movement. While the coal industry did its best to paint President Obama as their sworn enemy during the election, in fact, in Obama’s first term, he was a centrist when it came to energy. On one hand, his Administration took historic measures to clean up some of the most dangerous pollution from coal — mercury, arsenic, lead, and other toxins — while also putting a carbon standard in place for new power plants. The Obama White House also helped jumpstart clean energy, creating tens of thousands of new wind and solar jobs and helping to ensure that America will be a lead innovator in the clean energy revolution that will power the nations and economies of the twenty-first century.

On the other hand, some of the worst abuses of the coal industry continued. Mountaintop removal mining operations are still blowing up mountains, burying streams, and causing serious health problems across Appalachia. We don’t yet have carbon standards for existing power plants, which are our single biggest source of greenhouse gases. There are still no national protections for the dumping of toxic coal ash. And when it comes to clean energy and energy efficiency, this country is still far behind much of the rest of the developed world.

No, coal’s decline has less to do with President Obama and more to do with the fact that, after 100 years of heedlessly dumping air and water pollution onto the American people, the day of reckoning has come. Investors know that our fleet of coal plants is outdated, and they are putting their money into cleaner twenty-first century energy technologies like wind and solar — not into propping up coal plants that are reaching the end of their lifespan. Meanwhile, town by town, city by city, and state by state, local leaders are making the decision to retire aging coal plants, get rid of the pollution and health problems, and ensure their communities aren’t left behind in the clean energy revolution.

I live in West Virginia, so I’m not surprised that coal mining areas of the U.S. voted overwhelmingly for Romney in this election. As coal is eclipsed by other forms of energy, people in coal country are justifiably concerned about their livelihoods and their future. Perhaps the results of this election will finally push some of our leaders to start talking honestly about the challenges we face and the need to diversify coal state economies — in short, to provide some leadership. Our region’s decision-makers would be doing a far greater service to their constituents by using their political clout to bring federal resources that will help Appalachia and other mining regions make a transition, rather than digging in their heels and refusing to acknowledge that the world is changing.

In Appalachia and beyond, one thing is certain — President Obama’s re-election means that for four more years, the marketplace and the American people will continue to move away from coal, and the coal barons won’t have a crony in the White House to try and stop that inevitable shift.

From the streets of New York ravaged by Hurricane Sandy to the mountains of Appalachia ravaged by mountaintop removal, and from the mother watching her son struggle to breathe to the grandfather watching his granddaughter sleep and worrying he is leaving her a dangerous, unstable planet, Americans are ready to move beyond coal.

President Obama can only help lead the nation there. We are going to have to do the hard work ourselves. But his re-election means we have a fighting chance.

Mary Anne Hitt is Director of the Beyond Coal Campaign. This piece was originally published at the Sierra Club and was reprinted with permission.

Tags:

« »

9 Responses to What Obama’s Re-Election Means For Coal, Climate Change, And America’s Energy Future

  1. Rabid Doomsayer says:

    We have put various dollar values on the value and cost of carbon capture. At the very least companies should be paying more in royalties than the value of the captured carbon.

    Companies are supposed to make good the damage done by coal extraction. Time for them to start rebuilding mountains and clearing rivers and restore the original contour lines. Until the water is clear that job is not done.

    • Judy Fleming says:

      I HOPE THEY RESPECT YOUR TERRITORIES AND FINISH THE JOB RIGHT. TREAT OTHERS LIKE THEY WANT TO BE TREATED

    • Mulga Mumblebrain says:

      The problem with ‘carbon capture’ is that it will leak, either rapidly or more slowly. The cost is pretty choice also, as the infrastructure required to capture, compress and inject the CO2 into the ground is gigantic. I’d bet that it will have unforeseen effects as well, say causing earthquakes for starters. A sudden, catastrophic release, will kill a lot of creatures too, as at Lake Nyos.

  2. Cowcharge says:

    Morons. This just accelerates the slide into bankruptcy.

  3. Mike Roddy says:

    The Sierra Club has done great work with the Beyond Coal campaign, much of it under the radar. Thanks, Mary Anne, and hello to Brune, too.

    Of course, this is no time to declare victory due to the election results. We celebrated in 2008, too. The current pace of reducing emissions is nowhere near what is needed. Obama, Chu, and Holdren know what needs to happen. Let’s see if they are up to it.

    • Lionel A says:

      Aye Mike, will they be up to it?

      This reality check suggests that there is much to do still.

    • Jan says:

      This is beyond Whack-A-Mole. Our coal exports are at an all time high, are they not? To render moot the decrease here.

      We must push policies that make coal pay a price for polluting our atmosphere whether it is burned here or abroad, by
      a. putting an “export fee” on it
      b. tariff on Chinese/Indian goods based on their national emissions
      c. charge coal companies more for our permission to gouge our lands.

  4. Mulga Mumblebrain says:

    The election seems to have been a real watershed in that the weight of money did not overwhelm the sane fraction of the electorate. And the lunatic, obscurantist, extremism of the Tea Party Mad Hatters appears to have turned out negative for its creators and sponsors. Optimism is called for. Now all you need are genuine candidates, really determined to turn things around, and perhaps, as Gore Vidal hoped, you might get your Republic back.

  5. Dennis Tomlinson says:

    I’d like to be on the public record regarding “carbon capture and sequestration”: Coal IS sequestered carbon!