Tumblr Icon RSS Icon

Down But Not Out: Interior Department Scales Back Its Dirty Energy Plan In The American West

Posted on  

"Down But Not Out: Interior Department Scales Back Its Dirty Energy Plan In The American West"

Share:

google plus icon

by Tom Kenworthy

The Department of Interior’s Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has completed its final environmental review of the amount of federal land designated for research and development of oil shale and tar sands in Colorado, Wyoming and Utah.

The final programmatic environmental impact statement (PEIS) published late last week would make almost 700,000 acres in the three states available for research and development of oil shale, and another 130,000 acres in Utah available for potential leasing and development of tar sands.

That is a significant reduction from actions taken in the final days of the Bush administration that would have expedited commercial development for oil shale on nearly 2 million acres in the three states. But it is more expansive than the Obama administration’s draft environmental review completed last February, which allocated about 462,000 acres for oil shale and 91,000 acres for tar sands.

Sometimes confused with shale oil – actual crude oil trapped in sedimentary rock – oil shale is a rock that contains kerogen, an organic material produces hydrocarbons when heated at high temperatures. Tar sands are sedimentary deposits that contain bitumen, a hydrocarbon that can be refined into oil. They are one of the dirtiest and most environmentally destructive fossil fuels.

The BLM’s plan, which Sen. Mark Udall (D-CO) said was a more “measured” approach to providing land for these resources, excludes environmentally sensitive areas, including those with wilderness characteristics and habitat for sage grouse.

The BLM directive would first open lands for what are known as research, demonstration and development leases and set certain requirements before they could become full commercial development leases.

David Abelson, who works on oil shale issues for Western Resource Advocates, told E&E the decision is “mixed” – requiring research before commercial development, but still opening vast tracts of federal lands for potential development.

And if one takes the International Energy Agency’s new World Energy Outlook seriously, developing these extremely dirty resources at all is a poor use of land. According to the IEA, we need to keep two thirds of fossil fuel resources in the ground in order to keep global temperature rise below 2 degrees C.

The local environmental impact is also substantial. Oil shale is a longstanding pipe dream of western energy developers, who despite considerable effort, have yet to prove it is commercially viable. According to a Government Accounting Office study and other reports, production could severely stress western water supplies already strained by population growth and climate change. In addition, a recent report by Western Resource Advocates predicts that development of oil shale would exacerbate air pollution problems in the West.

Tom Kenworthy is a Senior Fellow with the Center for American Progress Action Fund

« »

3 Responses to Down But Not Out: Interior Department Scales Back Its Dirty Energy Plan In The American West

  1. Mike Roddy says:

    McEnaney of NRDC says that opening up a few hundred thousand acres of public land for drilling is “responsible”? That organization sold out to donors a long time ago. This is an example of why big green organizations and politicians such as Salazar are worse than useless.

    They need to read this:

    http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/global-warmings-terrifying-new-math-20120719

    Kenworthy and the CAP team obviously don’t get it either. We have to leave all dirty oil and frackable gas in the ground. Joe and Stephen know this, and should draw a line against timid, sold out Democrats here.

    • John McCormick says:

      Mike, the big green are trying to make it up as they go along. No coordinated and comprehensive strategy. Still big dogs do the talking. Follow the money, as they say.

  2. Zimzone says:

    How about forcing dirty coal & oil to actually USE the leased lands they now have in possession first?
    This idea that corporations can buy leases on areas they’ll never use is as preposterous as thinking dirty coal is the answer to our energy needs.