Virginia Senator Tim Kaine: ‘We Have A Responsibility To Do Something’ About Climate

Posted on

"Virginia Senator Tim Kaine: ‘We Have A Responsibility To Do Something’ About Climate"

by Mike Casey, via Scaling Green

In our first post on the Clean Energy Forum we held recently at Tigercomm, we noted that there’s an aggressive, ongoing effort by the fossil fuel lobby to push clean energy policy into the culture wars (hat tip to J. Patrick Coolican of the Las Vegas Sun).  How to combat this assault is a pressing question not just for those of us in the clean economy, but also for politicians who get the urgent – even existential – need for our country to develop abundant energy that’s clean and cost-effective.

All too often, though, we have had to choose between one candidate who might support us and one who is cheering our demise (go figure!).  Former Virginia Governor  Tim Kaine recently ran for, and won, a U.S. Senate seat from Virginia. A few weeks earlier, Kaine was willing to sit with some of the sharpest minds and most dynamic companies in the mid-Atlantic region’s clean economy community (note: also see our first and second posts on the forum). He actually wanted to hear from us and had an understanding of what we’re doing.

During the roundtable, Kaine made a number of astute observations, but one particularly jumped out at us regarding the phony Solyndra “scandal.” According to Kaine, demonizing the entire solar industry over one particular company’s demise would be analogous to people arguing that the BP Gulf of Mexico oil spill should make us stop using oil completely.

More Kaine:

  • It’s time for opponents of clean energy to stop acting like the reign of fossil fuels as our dominant energy source constitutes some sort of inviolable theology.
  • Even for those who don’t “believe” in climate science, or who think clean energy is a science project, it’s still common sense to move ahead aggressively with energy efficiency and clean energy. Unless, of course, they want America assigned permanent international follower status on the technologies other counties want to lead.
  • If we find out in 50 years that the climate science was wrong, we’re still ahead by getting off the dirty stuff. If the 98% of practicing climate scientists were right and we let clean energy pass us by, we’ll deeply regret it.
  • Clean energy adoption is being slowed by an inherent, incumbent advantage that fossil fuels have and are using to block innovative new technologies.
  • We don’t have a level playing field for clean energy because even the way we currently price electric power provides little incentive for energy efficiency and conservation.
  • An important step is to “take all the  incentives that we currently put on heavy carbon and move them to mid-carbon, low-carbon and no carbon [energy sources]…we don’t need to subsidize mature industries and we shouldn’t be subsidizing the Big 5 oil companies.”

In sum, Senator-elect Tim Kaine understands that we can’t transition to a clean economy overnight. However, unlike many of the clean economy’s deniers, he also clearly understands that we need to be moving a lot faster for powerful economic, national security, and environmental reasons that aren’t going away.

Watch it:

Mike Casey is the President and Founder of Tigercomm, a leading clean energy communications firm. This piece was originally published at Tigercomm’s Scaling Green blog and was reprinted with permission.

« »

One Response to Virginia Senator Tim Kaine: ‘We Have A Responsibility To Do Something’ About Climate

  1. A Siegel says:

    During the roundtable, Kaine made a number of astute observations, but one particularly jumped out at us regarding the phony Solyndra “scandal.” According to Kaine, demonizing the entire solar industry over one particular company’s demise would be analogous to people arguing that the BP Gulf of Mexico oil spill should make us stop using oil completely.

    Have to say that this is actually a lousy analogy.

    Solyndra was a business failure — for a number of business decision, strategic environment, etc reasons — that was part of a larger strategic portfolio. The larger portfolio makes sense — and we want to continue. Solyndra didn’t shut down fisheries, kill wild animals, cause unknown havoc on a large eco-system, nor did it kill any one. And, solar electricity systems aren’t contributing to global warming, causing serious health problems, etc …

    What the Deepwater Horizon did was provide a very flagrant public example of the increasing risks associated with our fossil fuel dependencies, with the need to go after more dangerous and dirty oil to meet our addiction. Deepwater Horizon should be a nail in the coffin of our addiction — a tool to convince us to create a path so that we can “stop using oil completely”.