- One more Hansen (et al.) must read — What is “dangerous” human interference with climate?
- The growth rate of carbon emissions has TRIPLED
- U.S. Media Duped by Bush, Foreign Media not Fooled
- 2006: Second Most Extreme Weather Ever
- GM Volts to the Lead
- Congress should say NO to coal-to-diesel
- AP & MSNBC: Climate Progress Knows its Crap
- Don’t Discount the Stern Review
- 26 Climate Myths Debunked
He may be a “venture-capital star” who is now putting a lot of money into biofuels — but he is no clean tech expert, as he proved during a keynote address at ThinkEquity Partners’ ThinkGreen conference in San Francisco. In remarks that should worry anybody relying on his judgment, Khosla said:
Very, very wrong. Plug ins are likely to be a central strategy for dealing with climate change, as readers of Climate Progress know (see below). I hope cellulosic ethanol will be, but that still remains to be seen.
Contrary to what Khosla says, affordable cellulosic ethanol probably requires a major breakthrough — and to play a major role in climate change, it needs a major new infrastructure investment. I recently test-drove a prototype plug in that avoids the need for a battery breakthrough (more on that after the Detroit auto show). And plug ins don’t need a major new infrastructure investment. They are not toys.
Khosla should stick with what he knows.
- The Car of the Future: Plug-in Hybrids
- Plug in Hybrids are Green (Duh!)
- Iacocca: Plug-in hybrids, not hydrogen “the wave of the future”
- Why I don’t agree with James Kunstler about peak oil and the “end of suburbia”
- The Book to Read on “Freedom from Oil”
- A New Fleet of Plug-in Hybrid books
- GM may make 60,000 plug-in hybrids in 2010
- Google Jump-Starts Plug-In Hybrids