ThinkProgress Logo

Climate Progress

George Will Believes In Recycling

George WillConservative leading light George F. Will recently penned a column claiming global warming is a “hypothetical” calamity. In “Dark Green Doomsayers,” Will attacked Secretary of Energy Steven Chu for discussing a worst-case scenario of California drought caused by the decimation of Sierra snowpack, falsely claiming Chu predicted this will come to pass “no later than 10 years away.” Will also incorrectly claimed that “global sea ice levels now equal those of 1979″ — based on a 45-day-old blog post by Daily Tech’s Michael Asher, one of Marc Morano’s climate denial jokers.

Will’s numerous distortions and outright falsehoods have been well documented by Joe Romm, Nate Silver, Zachary Roth, Brad Plumer, Erza Klein, David Roberts, James Hrynyshyn, Rick Piltz, Steve Benen, Mark Kleiman, and others. They recognized that George Will is recycling already rebutted claims from the lunatic fringe, and offer the excellent suggestion that Washington Post editors should require some minimum level of fact-checking.

But I haven’t seen anyone comment that Will is also recycling his own work, republishing an extended passage from a 2006 column — which Think Progress debunked — almost word for word. Take a look:

“Let Cooler Heads Prevail,” 4/2/2006:

While worrying about Montana’s receding glaciers, Schweitzer, who is 50, should also worry about the fact that when he was 20 he was told to be worried, very worried, about global cooling. Science magazine (Dec. 10, 1976) warned of “extensive Northern Hemisphere glaciation.” Science Digest (February 1973) reported that “the world’s climatologists are agreed” that we must “prepare for the next ice age.” The Christian Science Monitor (“Warning: Earth’s Climate is Changing Faster Than Even Experts Expect,” Aug. 27, 1974) reported that glaciers “have begun to advance,” “growing seasons in England and Scandinavia are getting shorter” and “the North Atlantic is cooling down about as fast as an ocean can cool.” Newsweek agreed (“The Cooling World,” April 28, 1975) that meteorologists “are almost unanimous” that catastrophic famines might result from the global cooling that the New York Times (Sept. 14, 1975) said “may mark the return to another ice age.” The Times (May 21, 1975) also said “a major cooling of the climate is widely considered inevitable” now that it is “well established” that the Northern Hemisphere’s climate “has been getting cooler since about 1950.”

“Dark Green Doomsayers,” 2/15/2009:

In the 1970s, “a major cooling of the planet” was “widely considered inevitable” because it was “well established” that the Northern Hemisphere’s climate “has been getting cooler since about 1950″ (New York Times, May 21, 1975). Although some disputed that the “cooling trend” could result in “a return to another ice age” (the Times, Sept. 14, 1975), others anticipated “a full-blown 10,000-year ice age” involving “extensive Northern Hemisphere glaciation” (Science News, March 1, 1975, and Science magazine, Dec. 10, 1976, respectively). The “continued rapid cooling of the Earth” (Global Ecology, 1971) meant that “a new ice age must now stand alongside nuclear war as a likely source of wholesale death and misery” (International Wildlife, July 1975). “The world’s climatologists are agreed” that we must “prepare for the next ice age” (Science Digest, February 1973). Because of “ominous signs” that “the Earth’s climate seems to be cooling down,” meteorologists were “almost unanimous” that “the trend will reduce agricultural productivity for the rest of the century,” perhaps triggering catastrophic famines (Newsweek cover story, “The Cooling World,” April 28, 1975). Armadillos were fleeing south from Nebraska, heat-seeking snails were retreating from Central European forests, the North Atlantic was “cooling down about as fast as an ocean can cool,” glaciers had “begun to advance” and “growing seasons in England and Scandinavia are getting shorter” (Christian Science Monitor, Aug. 27, 1974).

Will’s critics should recognize his recycling of old content is an admirable way to reduce waste and limit the production of hot air.

Update

Ezra Klein points out that George Will’s been recycling this content since 2004. From “Global Warming? Hot Air” (12/23/2004):

One of the good guys in “State of Fear” cites Montaigne’s axiom: “Nothing is so firmly believed as that which least is known.” Which is why 30 years ago the fashionable panic was about global cooling. The New York Times (Aug. 14, 1975) reported “many signs” that “Earth may be heading for another ice age.” Science magazine (Dec. 10, 1976) warned about “extensive Northern Hemisphere glaciation.” “Continued rapid cooling of the Earth” (Global Ecology, 1971) could herald “a full-blown 10,000-year ice age” (Science, March 1, 1975). The Christian Science Monitor reported (Aug. 27, 1974) that Nebraska’s armadillos were retreating south from the cooling.

So much for geoengineering, 2: Ocean dead zones to expand, “remain for thousands of years”

dead_zone.jpgClimateProgress doubts geo-engineering will ever be practical as a primary strategy for dealing with climate change (see “Part 1: Avoiding the Frankenplanet” and “Geoengineering remains a bad idea”). That said, I don’t consider most of the efforts to pull CO2 out of the air geo-engineering — that is ungeo-engineering our self-inflicted climate wound. And those efforts are only plausible with super-aggressive mitigation that keeps concentrations close to 450 ppm.

It’s strategies like injecting sulfur into the atmosphere that should worry people the most. Those strategies have many flaws, but among the worst is that they do nothing to stop humanity from turning the oceans into one giant acidic deadzone.

A new study in Nature Geoscience, “Long-term ocean oxygen depletion in response to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels,” (subs. req’d, abstract below) makes crystal clear why very serious mitigation must always be humanity’s primary strategy for averting climate catastrophe. As AFP reported on the study:

Global warming may create “dead zones” in the ocean that would be devoid of fish and seafood and endure for up to two millennia….

Its authors say deep cuts in the world’s carbon emissions are needed to brake a trend capable of wrecking the marine ecosystem and depriving future generations of the harvest of the seas.

Read more

How to be as persuasive as Abe Lincoln, Part 2: Use irony, the twist we can’t resist

Celebrating the 200th anniversary of Lincoln’s birth, Part 1 looked at how Lincoln taught himself the art of persuasion aka rhetoric. Lincoln was a master of three key figures — irony, metaphor, and extended metaphor, as I’ll discuss in Parts 2, 3, and 4.

Irony, derives from the Greek eironeia (“dissimulation”), the term given to the action and speech of the eiron, or “dissembler,” a stock character in Greek comedy. The first recorded use is the Republic by Plato where “Socrates himself takes on the role of the eiron” and feigns ignorance as he asks “seemingly innocuous and naive questions which gradually undermine his interlocutor’s case,” trapping him “into seeing the truth.” Many Greeks did not see the truth the way Socrates did-they put him to death-so eiron also carries the sense “sly deceiver” or “hypocritical rascal.”

Read more

REVEALED: Marc Morano’s Pack Of Climate Denial Jokers

JokersMarc Morano, Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-OK)’s environmental communications director, sits at the center of the right-wing global warming denier propaganda machine — of fifty-two people. Conservative columnist Fred Barnes recently refused to tell TPM Muckraker who’s informed him “the case for global warming” is falling apart, but all signs point to Marc Morano. Morano’s “entire job,” Gristmill’s David Roberts explains, “is to aggregate every misleading factoid, every attack on climate science or scientists, every crank skeptical statement from anyone in the world and send it all out periodically in email blasts” to the right-wing echo chamber. The Wonk Room has acquired Morano’s email list, and we can now reveal the pack of climate skeptics, conservative bloggers, and corporate hacks who feed the misinformation machine.

Promoted on the Drudge Report and Fox News, Morano’s moronic misinformation enters mainstream discourse through columns by Barnes, George Will, Robert Samuelson, and others. Many in the Morano gang are funded by right-wing think tanks, though a few are committed activists, conspiracy theorists who believe their homebrew interpretations of climate data. Others are aging scientists with strong conservative beliefs, motivating them to challenge action on global warming not because they disbelieve its existence, but because they are ideologically opposed to regulation of pollution:

Marc Morano’s Pack Of Climate Denial Jokers
Marc Morano, Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK), Committee on the Environment and Public Works
The Scientists
Name Website Affiliations
Bob Carter James Cook University, Queensland, Australia
John Christy University of Alabama at Huntsville
David Deming University of Oklahoma /
National Center for Policy Analysis
David Douglass University of Rochester
Don Easterbrook Western Washington University
Stanley Goldenberg NOAA
Vincent Gray New Zealand Climate Science Coalition /
Natural Resources Stewardship Project
William Gray Colorado State University (ret.)
Ben Herman University of Arizona
Craig Idso co2science.org Arizona State University /
Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change
Richard Lindzen Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Roger Pielke Colorado State University (ret.)
James A. Peden Extranuclear Laboratories (ret.)
Hans Schreuder ilovemycarbondioxide.com Rocky Mountain Research Station
Thomas P. Sheahen Western Technology, Inc.
Fred Singer University of Virginia (ret.) /
Science and Environmental Policy Project /
National Center for Policy Analysis
Roy Spencer drroyspencer.com University of Alabama at Huntsville /
Marshall Institute /
Interfaith Stewardship Alliance
Philip Stott University of London (ret.)
Willie Wei-Hock Soon Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics /
Marshall Institute /
Fraser Institute /
Science and Public Policy Institute
Brian Valentine Department of Energy
The Bloggers
Michael Asher dailytech.com
Joseph Bast globalwarmingheartland.org Heartland Institute
Edward John Craig planetgore.nationalreview.com National Review
Dan Gainor newsbusters.org Media Research Center
Barry Hearn junkscience.com
Steven Milloy junkscience.com Competitive Enterprise Institute
Tom Nelson tomnelson.blogspot.com
Lubos Motl motls.blogspot.com Harvard University (ret.)
Roger Pielke, Jr. sciencepolicy.colorado.edu University of Colorado
Jon Jay Ray jonjayray.blogspot.com
Gabriel Rychert co2sceptics.com
Marc Sheppard opinioneditorials.com Frontiers of Freedom
Noel Sheppard newsbusters.org Media Research Center
Matthew Sheffield newsbusters.org Media Research Center
Anthony Watts wattsupwiththat.com
surfacestations.org
The “Think Tankers”
Dennis Avery hudson.org Hudson Institute
Mike Burita accf.org American Council for Capital Formation
Terry Dunleavy climatescience.org.nz New Zealand Climate Science Coalition
Robert Ferguson scienceandpublicpolicy.org Science and Public Policy Institute
Tom Harris climatescienceinternational.org International Climate Science Coalition
Christopher Monckton scienceandpublicpolicy.org Science and Public Policy Institute
Craig Rucker cfact.org Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow
James Taylor heartland.org Heartland Institute
The Weathermen
William M. Briggs wmbriggs.com statistician
Richard S. Courtney CoalTrans International (ret.)
Joseph D’Aleo icecap.us Weather Channel (ret.)
Art Horn theartofweather.com weatherman (ret.)
Alan Siddons
George E. Smith Monsanto, Hewlett Packard (ret.)
James Spann jamesspann.com weatherman, ABC 33/40
Herb Stevens weatherman (ret.)

The Scientists: Ph.D.s, often with strong industry ties, who may or may not have experience in climate science, but are ready to denounce the scientific consensus

The Bloggers: They flood the Web with “news” and opinion, ready to be picked up by Drudge, Fox News, and the rest of the right-wing echo chamber

The “Think Tankers”: Ready spokesmen associated with impressive-sounding organizations, often founded by themselves

The Weathermen: Meteorologists, statisticians, and corporate scientists not associated with a think tank or university, but happy to give reporters their “expert” opinion

Update

Newsbusters‘ Noel Sheppard responds, “I’m sure I speak for all my fellow jokers when I say that I am honored to be mentioned with these highly-respected climate realists.”


Update

,George E. Smith (gsmith@avagotech.com) writes in to inform the Wonk Room that he is not the George E. Smith formerly of Bell Labs who invented the charged coupled device. In fact, this Smith is a different inventor with “no discernible experience in climate or earth sciences.” He writes: “I think you owe George E. Smith, Bell Labs (ret) an apology.” The Wonk Room agrees, and apologizes for sullying that George E. Smith’s reputation.


Update

,DeSmogBlog is “working to research the individuals on Morano’s list” and compiling this handy referral guide; we’re linking the names to their backgrounders as they’re added.


Update

,In an email interview spurred by John Tierney’s attack on Obama’s scientists that cites “Obamite” Roger Pielke Jr., Pielke compares me to Joe McCarthy.


Update

,Brian Valentine writes in to inform the Wonk Room that it is he, not Phil Valentine, who regularly corresponds with Marc Morano. Our apologies to Mr. Valentine, whose conservative radio show describes global warming as a swindle.

Phil Valentine is not an associate of Marc Morano.

I am an ethusiatic Morano supporter – as well as an absolute denialist.

Brad you are picking on the wrong people – and you’re making a MISTAKE.

You never know! You might be missing some really great material!

I might be a fraudulent PhD!

I might be a stooge for Exxon-Mobil!

I might be out ther helping to expose the fraud you are promulgating!

Brian G Valentine PhD PE
US Department of Energy
Washington, DC


[u

Front group for polluting billionaires wastes $140K on world’s dumbest global warming denier ads

Brad Johnson at WonkRoom has documented how Americans for Prosperity (AFP) is a front group for billionaire polluters. In this post, first published here, he dissects what is probably the most idiotic climate inactivist ad ever seen. Perhaps I should create a new category “unintentional humor.”

As Australia burns, animals are going extinct, and freak weather devastates our nation’s heartland, the propaganda arm of Koch Industries continues its bizarre denial of global warming. The multi-billion-dollar international polluter’s Americans for Prosperity “has launched a $140,000 advertising blitz in Virginia” telling the American public that corrupt environmentalists, not billionaire right-wing oil and coal men, are manipulating Congress and the media. According to AFP, these ads “expose the hypocrisy and outrageous economic costs of so-called global warming regulations, taxes, and green energy plans.” One of these ads portrays an “eco-hypocrite” with “three homes and five cars”:

Hey there, I’m Carlton, the wealthy eco-hypocrite. I inherited my money and attended fancy schools. I own three homes and five cars, but always talk with my rich friends about saving the planet. And I want Congress to spend billions on programs in the name of global warming and green energy. Even if it causes massive unemployment, higher energy bills, and digs people like you even deeper into the recession. Who knows, maybe I’ll even make money off of it!

Watch it:

In reality, it is the backers of Americans for Prosperity who are wine-sipping, ballet-loving trust-fund elites, a thousand times more wealthy than the likes of “eco-hypocrite” Al Gore. Charles and David Koch are the scions of Koch Industries, founded as an oil refining business by their father Fred Koch. Fred Koch also helped found the John Birch Society, an ultraconservative organization that believed the U.S. government was controlled by a traitorous cabal of Communist sympathizers.

Read more

L.A. Times: “Hydrogen fuel-cell technology won’t work in cars.” Duh. Time for Obama and Chu to kill the program.

Honda’s striking, amazing hydrogen fuel-cell vehicle may be the most expensive, advanced and impractical car ever built.

Honda FCX Clarity - front view

So writes Dan Neil, the L. A. Times car guy in “Honda FCX Clarity: Beauty for beauty’s sake,” (vehicle details here).

You will never buy a hydrogen car. And I say that mostly because I know that in the unlikely event a major car company actually ever tries to sell you one, you are just way too smart to bite or even nibble. And I say that not because you read ClimateProgress, but because you are breathing at all. Hydrogen cars are simply too impractical.

It is time for President Obama and Energy Secretary Chu to drastically scale back the federal hydrogen fuel cell vehicle program, to a small basic research program focused on long-term breakthroughs in hydrogen storage, fuel cells, and renewable hydrogen. This could free up some $1 billion in Obama’s first term alone for more important R&D and more urgent deployment efforts (see “An introduction to the core climate solutions“).

The hydrogen emperor has no clothes. This isn’t news overseas (see “The car of the perpetual future” — The Economist agrees with Climate Progress on hydrogen). Nor is it news that the Honda FCX is a lemon, tangible proof of the futility of pursuing the commercialization of hydrogen cars (see “The Last Car You Would Ever Buy — Literally“).

But it is a big deal to see the car guy of the L.A. Times — in the home state of many of the last remaining hydrogen diehards, the state that had until recently seriously entertained building a “hydrogen highway” — dismantle the vehicle in his review, so I’ll reprint it below:

Read more

New hit show “Law & Order: Coal Plants.” The victims and suspects vary, but not the verdict: Innocent by reason of sanity

[Sean's post-mortems on coal plants would almost make for a new "Law & Order" series. Every week, another victim bites the dust and another suspect is uncovered, but the motive is always the same -- self-defense. See also the NYT story, "Is America Ready to Quit Coal?"]

http://www.nbcuniversalstore.com/img/product/cat07/00006342-047201.jpg

I’ve been following coal plant cancellations for the past couple weeks (see my previous two posts on the topic to get caught up), but it has been hard to keep up with the dizzying pace with which municipalities, states, and universities are nixing plans to build new conventional generating capacity.

Now, three more coal plants are on the chopping block in Nevada, Ohio and Wisconsin.

Read more

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up