This is Part Three of a four-part Wonk Room series examining the implications for climate and clean energy policy of the 2010 gubernatorial races. Read Part One, on heartland states, Part Two, on Tea Party candidates, or view the full governor-race compilation.

The northeastern United States remains a bastion of the clean energy economy, though global warming deniers are vying to take over leadership of the state governments.

The Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) is the carbon trading program of Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island and Vermont, which went into effect in 2008. In 2006, Gov. Mitt Romney (R-MA) dropped his state out of the compact just before beginning his presidential campaign, but his Democratic successor Deval Patrick rejoined. There are governors’ races in all these states except New Jersey and Delaware.

The RGGI states “have seen tangible benefits from the program,” Stateline’s Rob Gurwitt reports. “Overall, there have been nine auctions held by RGGI since 2009, in which electric utilities and some investment firms have bought emissions allowances. And those auctions have raised some $729 million for a range of emissions-reduction and energy-efficiency programs — benefiting both homeowners and industrial users — as well as financing an occasional raid to balance a state’s general budget.”

Despite the strength of the clean-energy economy in these states, several Republican candidates are thinking of sabotaging it, driven by their ideological dislike of science, renewable energy, and the environment. In Maine, Massachusetts, and Maryland, Republican candidates have questioned their states’ renewable energy standards. Vermont stands alone, with both Democratic and Republican candidates who fully accept the scientific consensus on the threat of global warming pollution.

CONNECTICUT: Dan Malloy v. Tom Foley
MAINE: Libby Mitchell (D), Paul LePage (R), Eliot Cutler (I)
MARYLAND: Martin O’Malley v. Robert Ehrlich
MASSACHUSETTS: Deval Patrick (D), Charlie Baker (R), Tim Cahill (I)
NEW HAMPSHIRE: John Lynch v. John Stephen
NEW YORK: Andrew Cuomo v. Carl Paladino
RHODE ISLAND: Frank Caprio (D), Joseph Robitaille (R), Lincoln Chafee (I)
VERMONT: Peter Shumlin v. Brian Dubie

CONNECTICUT: Dan Malloy v. Tom Foley

538 forecast: 83 percent likelihood of Democratic pickup

Under Governor Jodi Rell (R-CT), Connecticut established a comprehensive plan for reducing greenhouse pollution in 2005. Connecticut’s renewable electricity standard was first established in 1998.

Republican candidate Tom Foley is in denial about the impacts of global warming:

Until you know what the problems are, and you’re in a reasonable time frame of their arrival, then there’s not much you could do. Until we actually experience the impact, then I’m sure there will be plenty of time to respond. [Connecticut Mirror, 10/13/10]

Foley also questioned whether Connecticut’s greenhouse gas reduction goals of 20 percent from 2005 levels by 2020 are “realistic,” though he “will certainly try to move us along a course that will get us to those goals.” Foley’s energy and environmental policy is a single paragraph of platitudes.

In contrast, Democratic Stamford mayor Dan Malloy has been a national leader in climate-friendly urban policy, and has a comprehensive environment, global warming, energy efficiency, and clean energy jobs agenda. “This is something I am ultimately committed to,” he told the Mirror.

Read more

A review and analysis of 10 research collaboration contracts between leading energy companies and major U.S. universities

The world’s largest oil companies are showing surprising interest in financing alternative energy research at U.S. universities. Over the past decade, five of the world’s top 10 oil companies””ExxonMobil Corp., Chevron Corp., BP PLC, Royal Dutch Shell Group, and ConocoPhillips Co.””and other large traditional energy companies with a direct commercial stake in future energy markets have forged dozens of multi-year, multi-million-dollar alliances with top U.S. universities and scientists to carry out energy-related research. Much of this funding by “Big Oil” is being used for research into new sources of alternative energy and renewable energy, mostly biofuels.

Why are highly profitable oil and other large corporations increasingly turning to U.S. universities to perform their commercial research and development instead of conducting this work in-house? Why, in turn, are U.S. universities opening their doors to Big Oil? And when they do, how well are U.S. universities balancing the needs of their commercial sponsors with their own academic missions and public-interest obligations, given their heavy reliance on government research funding and other forms of taxpayer support?

The answers to these three questions are critical to energy-related research and development in our country, given the current global-warming crisis and the role that academic experts have traditionally played in providing the public with impartial research, analysis, and advice. To unpack these questions and help find answers, this report provides a detailed examination of 10 university-industry agreements that together total $833 million in confirmed corporate funding (over 10 years) for energy research funding on campus.

Read more

52 Percent of Americans Flunk Climate 101

A new study by researchers at Yale University suggests that Americans’ knowledge of climate science is limited and scattershot, with some understanding of basic issues like the contribution of fossil fuels to global warming and some singular misconceptions as well.

Read more

Will electric cars one day become part of a network of rechargeable batteries that can help smooth out the intermittent nature of wind and solar power? Many experts believe so, pointing to programs in Europe and the U.S. that demonstrate the promise of vehicle-to-grid technology.

Journalist Dave Levitan has the story in this Yale e360 repost.

Read more

Karpinski: Prop 23 the “single most important race in the country”

Our guest blogger is CAP’s Ben Kaldunski of CAP’s Energy Opportunity team.

The League of Conservation Voters (LCV) named Proposition 23 one of its “2010 Dirty Dozen” list, marking the first time a ballot initiative was placed on the inglorious list that traditionally targets Congressional candidates who consistently vote against clean energy and environmental legislation.

Read more