ThinkProgress Logo

Climate Progress

Triage: Record floods cause Army Corps to blow up levee, inundate 130,000 acres of farmland to save small town

Flood

Flooding on the Mississippi in Missouri at the end of April. Image credit: USACE

File this under Annals of Adaptation:

The Army Corps exploded the Birds Point levee near Wyatt, Mo., after nightfall Monday, potentially sacrificing 130,000 acres of rich farmland and about 100 homes in Missouri to spare the town of Cairo, Ill., with its 2,800 residents, located at the confluence of the Ohio and Mississippi rivers.

But even as the Corps carried out its bid to save the city, floodwaters were rising downriver, including in Memphis, Tenn. And the breach in the Birds Point levee wasn’t expected to ease those flooding concerns.

Army Corps of Engineers Maj. Gen. Michael Walsh, who made the decision to blast, said it was a heart-wrenching but necessary move.

As record-smashing deluges and floods become commonplace — along with Dust-Bowlification — so will a host of tragic triage decisions (discussed here).

Here is the video of the explosion, followed by meteorologist Dr. Jeff Masters discussing the record flooding that led to it:

Read more

Maryland To Sue Chesapeake Energy For PA Fracking Blowout

On April 19, a natural gas hydrofracturing well owned by Chesapeake Energy in Bradford County, PA suffered a blowout, spewing “thousands and thousands of gallons of frack fluid over containment walls, through fields, personal property and farms, even where cattle continue to graze.” The spill drained into the Susquehanna River watershed, which feeds Maryland’s Chesapeake Bay. Maryland’s Attorney General Douglas F. Gansler now “plans to sue the company for violating federal anti-pollution laws” including the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the Clean Water Act (CWA), as a press release issued yesterday explains:

On April 19, thousands of gallons of fracking fluids were released from a well owned and operated by Chesapeake Energy into Towanda Creek, a tributary of the Susquehanna River, which supplies 45% of the fresh water in the Chesapeake Bay. In his letter, Attorney General Gansler notified the company that at the close of the required 90-day notice period, the State intends to file a citizen suit and seek injunctive relief and civil penalties under RCRA for solid or hazardous waste contamination of soils and ground waters, and the surface waters and sediments of Towanda Creek and the Susquehanna River. The State also intends to seek injunctive relief and civil penalties under the CWA for violation of the CWA’s prohibition on unpermitted pollution to waters of the United States.

“Companies cannot expose citizens to dangerous chemicals that pose serious health risks to the environment and to public health,” said Gansler in the press release. “We are using all resources available to hold Chesapeake Energy accountable for its actions.”

Fox News Wants You To Believe Climate Pollution Can’t Influence Extreme Weather

NOAA Scientist Rejects Global Warming Link to Tornadoes,” blares Fox News. In a classic example of misreporting the threat that carbon pollution poses to the United States, Fox News reporter James Rosen asked climate experts the wrong questions and then confused the answers he received into a he-said, she-said faux controversy. Rosen claimed that a “top official at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)” — Greg Carbin, the warning coordination meteorologist at NOAA’s Storm Prediction Center — “rejected claims by environmental activists that the outbreak of tornadoes ravaging the American South is related to climate change brought on by global warming”:

Asked if climate change should be “acquitted” in a jury trial where it stood charged with responsibility for tornadoes, Carbin replied: “I would say that is the right verdict, yes.”

In fact, the “environmental activist” Rosen interviewed — Sarene Marshall, Managing Director for The Nature Conservancy’s Global Climate Change Team — did not accuse global warming of spawning the tornadoes. She said that greenhouse pollution is “connected to the increased intensity and severity of storms.”

In an interview with ThinkProgress, NOAA’s Greg Carbin said that it was a mistake to interpret his remarks as being in conflict with those of Sarene Marshall, Managing Director for The Nature Conservancy’s Global Climate Change Team. Like Marshall, he believes that global warming is real, is manmade, and is influencing extreme weather — but that scientists like himself do not have enough data to understand how a warming world affects tornadic storms. When it comes to warning people about deadly risks, he said, the “jury trial” standard is not appropriate.

“All the science points to warming being due to anthropogenic forcing,” he said. “We don’t know how that warming has an influence on the small scale.” There has been a clear increase in precipitation in the United States as the planet has warmed, he said, and the science of how greenhouse pollution influences large-scale events like droughts and floods is robust. However, the climatology of tornadoes is much more challenging, given sparse historical data and the complexity of super-cell thunderstorm physics. Although the number of recorded tornadoes has risen dramatically in the last few decades, that could simply be an artifact of improved record keeping. “We just don’t know with respect to tornadoes. We are continuing to do the research.”

It is important for people to understand that tornadoes are not the primary extreme weather risks that most people should worry about, Carbin said, despite the obvious and terrible destruction they can cause. Tornado outbreaks that cause mass casualties are extremely rare and localized, he said, in contrast to the heat waves, floods, and droughts that have strong links to global warming pollution.

Asked if he applies the “jury trial” standard to his own work of warning Americans about the threat of tornadoes and severe storms, Carbin replied, “Absolutely not.”

“We use probabilistic methods to predict the threat of severe weather,” because it would be foolhardy to require absolute certainty when dealing with matters of life and death. Their predictions are usually of the form of a 45 percent risk of a tornado appearing within a 25-mile region of a given point. However, the conditions that bred these deadly twisters were “unbelievable,” Carbin said. The modelling predicted that multiple tornadoes would form, hours in advance, with over 95 percent probability, and extreme tornadoes with over 90 percent probability.

Fox News wants to make off limits any discussion of any connection with climate change to extreme weather in the United States, precisely because they are the sorts of connections that real people might actually care about.

Update

Tornadogenesis is influenced by the jet stream and different air masses interacting, all of which are influenced by global warming. “Sea surface temperatures across the Gulf of Mexico have been warmer than normal for about a month and a half,” AccuWeather’s Heather Buchman explains. “Warm, humid air is a necessary ingredient for severe thunderstorm development, and the Gulf of Mexico is a major supplier of it. The warmer sea surface temperatures are across the Gulf of Mexico, the more warm and humid the air is above it. “

NBER: Air pollution lowers labor productivity

We find robust evidence that ozone levels well below federal air quality standards have a significant impact on productivity:  a 10 ppb decrease in ozone concentrations increases worker productivity by 4.2 percent….

Importantly, this environmental productivity effect suggests that common characterizations of environmental protection as purely a tax on producers and consumers to be weighed against the consumption benefits associated with improved environmental quality may be misguided. Environmental protection can also be viewed as an investment in human capital, and its contribution to firm productivity and economic growth should be incorporated in the calculus of policy makers.

That’s from an important new National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) study by Zivin and Neidell, “The Impact of Pollution on Worker Productivity.”

We’ve known for a long time that clean-air regulations are a boon to public health, with benefits far outweighing costs (see “Clean Air Act delivered $1.3 trillion in health and other benefits in 2010 alone at $53 billion cost“).

And there is a large literature on the boost in human performance and productivity from improving indoor environments on  — as documented at this Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory website.  But the NBER paper is, surprisingly, “the first to rigorously assess the less visible but likely more pervasive impacts on worker productivity.”

Here are some further excerpts from the conclusion:

Read more

Breaking: The earth is breaking … but how about that Royal Wedding?

One commenter pointed out that the (HuffPost) icon I used for the post on Bin Laden was actually a good symbol for the “Breaking Earth.”

Obviously, large parts of the Earth are breaking up at an unprecedented rate — with dire implications for humanity:

But that isn’t sexy enough to get the kind of round-the-clock media attention lavished on the royal couple.  Salon slammed the media obsession with William and Kate:

Read more

Cleaning up our air for World Asthma Day

Comment on EPA’s plans to cut air toxics from power plants

Submit a public comment to the EPA: Take action for clean air now!

By CAP’s Susan Lyon and Jorge Madrid

asthma_day_onpageThree hundred million people suffer from asthma worldwide, and its costs to our kids, families, and society are growing. Today, on World Asthma Day, the Global Initiative for Asthma is raising awareness about asthma by launching a campaign to reduce asthma-related hospitalizations by 50 percent in five years. But we also need to reduce exposure to conditions that aggravate asthma and trigger asthma attacks.

A big part of controlling asthma means cleaning up our air. High and growing asthma rates across the country, particularly among young children, the elderly, minority, and low-income populations, leave more people vulnerable to air pollution. Our air is much cleaner than it was 40 years ago, but it is still not clean. Approximately 159 million Americans live in areas that violate clean air health standards. Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, scientists and health experts must be allowed to establish and enforce safeguards to protect asthma sufferers and others from air pollution.

In this column we’ll look at asthma in the United States, the conditions that make it worse, and how the EPA’s proposed power plant air toxics standards will help those who suffer from asthma and protect other Americans from air toxics. You can help support the EPA’s proposed standards by clicking on the “take action” links and publicly commenting on the rules.

Read more

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up