ThinkProgress Logo

Climate Progress

Politics

Asked About Being Viewed As A Pawn Of Koch Industries, Rep. Mike Pompeo Replies: Koch Is ‘Amazing’

Rep. Mike Pomepo (R-KS)

Last September, ThinkProgress posted an investigative piece about Mike Pompeo, the Republican nominee running for Congress in an open seat near Wichita, Kansas. Our post revealed that Pompeo, a businessman with little political experience, had been groomed and selected for office by the petrochemical conglomerate Koch Industries. Not only was Koch Pompeo’s largest contributor, but Pompeo had gained a public profile using two local Koch front groups, had been personally endorsed by Charles Koch, and Pompeo’s oil business has a partnership with Koch’s subsidiaries operating in Brazil.

Pompeo worked hard to qualify our research. Shortly after being sworn in, Pompeo sponsored amendments to cut the EPA’s ability to regulate pollution — a top priority for his Koch benefactors — as well as sponsoring legislation to kill a consumer safety database, an effort begun by Koch lobbyists in years prior. As media outlets from MSNBC to the Los Angeles Times took note of our research and Pompeo’s brazen behavior in Congress (Pompeo even hired a Koch “government affairs” attorney as his chief of staff), the label “Congressman from Koch” began to stick.

Asked by the National Journal yesterday about his reputation as a pawn of the right-wing Koch empire, Pompeo did nothing to dissuade the notion that he’s bought by the company:

NJ: How do you respond to critics who say you’re being influenced by Koch Industries, given its owners’ contributions to your campaign?

POMPEO: What do you think? I’d say [I’ve been] a small-government guy for an awful long time, and I’ll be a small-government guy when the good Lord calls me home. Koch Industries is an amazing business that has succeeded by building a product that customers love dearly. The folks who run Koch are very clear. They would love to have government just get out of the way and allow companies to compete, whether in their particular sectors or other sectors. They are true believers in small government.

Koch has demonstrated a firm commitment to profits and little else. That’s why the company has a track record of demanding bailouts, collecting taxpayer subsidies, buying out politicians, and corrupting society with propaganda aimed at ensuring that polluters like Koch have a free hand to pollute the atmosphere and waterways with little to no accountability. Koch has many loyal foot soldiers in Congress, but Pompeo takes the cake as the most unapologetic Koch enabler in office these days.

Politics

VIDEO: Mississippi Gov. Barbour Argues President Obama Has Done More Harm To The Gulf Coast Economy Than BP

ThinkProgress filed this report from the Faith and Freedom Conference in Washington, DC.

A year ago, millions of barrels of oil were still flowing into the Gulf of Mexico following an explosion at the BP-run Deepwater Horizon drilling rig. The resulting three-month ordeal was the worst oil spill that has ever occurred.

The massive oil slick spread throughout the Gulf region, shut down beaches and hampered the vital fishing industry. Local wildlife was also significantly harmed as a result of the spill.

Despite the region’s vast devastation following the BP oil spill, Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour (R) pinpointed a different scapegoat in an interview with ThinkProgress: President Obama.

We asked the Barbour about the gravity of the economic harm caused by BP. Barbour avoided criticizing BP, arguing instead that “there’s no question” that President Obama has caused more harm to the Gulf Coast economy than the worst oil spill in history:

KEYES: Governor, you testified before Congress yesterday on the Gulf Coast. Who do you think has done more harm to the Gulf Coast economy, BP or President Obama?

BARBOUR: President Obama. There’s no question about that. The news media played their part by the way by giving the American people the impression that the whole Gulf Coast was knee-deep in oil and it wasn’t a good place to go for tourism. But the moratorium, $4 gasoline, 9.1 percent unemployment, record deficits, increasing public debt by $3 trillion in two years. Obama’s done more damage to the economy of the country than any private company could possibly do.

Watch it:

Barbour is not alone in his refusal to condemn BP while embracing criticism of President Obama. Last year, Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX), then-ranking member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, famously apologized to BP for what he deemed a “$20 billion shakedown” by the Obama administration.

Update

In 2010, Barbour praised the government’s response, saying, “As I’ve said before, and said to the president, I think the federal government’s done more right than wrong.”

Yglesias

Automakers Repay Obama Administration Rescue Of Car Industry By Battling Fuel Economy Standards

I’ve never really been the auto bailout enthusiast that some of my colleagues on the left were. America’s car-oriented industrial policy has been very bad for the environment, and as you can, see just because car companies owe their existence to political risks President Obama took on their behalf doesn’t mean they’re going to ease up on this:

Detroit’s major automakers are ready for Round Two in their battle with the Obama administration over fuel economy standards, and this time, they’re hoping new leverage will give them the punching power they need.

And so it goes. You can hardly blame them. A car company’s got to lobby for the interests of car companies. And in their defense, tighter fuel efficiency standards are hardly an optimal policy. I’d much rather see higher gasoline taxes. But of course you can guess who would lead the lobbying charge against that, too.

UpStarts: B Corporations are Maximizing Long-Term Social Good While Making a Profit

UpStart[uhp-stahrt] n. 1. A company or organization with innovative approaches to energy use, carbon pollution, resource consumption, and/or social equity, 2. A company or organization overcoming market barriers to build the new clean energy economy.

While playing an important role, governments and non-profits cannot build a “clean economy” on their own; rather, the private sector must lead the way. And thanks to a growing number of forward-thinking companies, the clean economy is already in the works. In this series, Lisbeth Kaufman of the Center for American Progress highlights “UpStarts” – companies that are shaking up the market, breaking down barriers and helping change the economy.

B Lab is creating a new type of company, the B Corporation, which modifies governance so that managers respond to long-term interests of investors, stakeholders, and the environment, rather than just focusing on short-term profits.

In a Harvard Business School case study on B Lab, co-founder Coen Gilbert explained B Lab’s goals and approach to overcoming market barriers for social entrepreneurs:

There are tons of individual companies that have managed to effectively balance social and business impact.  Still, we need to institutionalize the values, standards, and accountability that allow companies to do that.  We need systems in place.  We need to change the rules of the game instead of continuing to clean up the mess.

We want to look at the root causes.  The root causes are not evil people, but rather poor system design. Right now the system is designed to maximize short-term stock value; it does that well, but at the cost of everything else.  The question is: How do we have a system that facilitates long term value for the good of society? Read more

Mitt Romney: Reducing Global Warming Pollution Is ‘Important’

Mitt Romney at UNH town hall.

Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney told voters in New Hampshire that the pollution causing global warming needs to be reduced. Breaking with Tea Party Republicans who explicitly deny the overwhelming science, Romney said that it is “it’s important for us to reduce our emissions” that cause global warming:

I don’t speak for the scientific community, of course, but I believe the world’s getting warmer. I can’t prove that, but I believe based on what I read that the world is getting warmer. And number two, I believe that humans contribute to that. I don’t know how much our contribution is to that, because I know that there have been periods of greater heat and warmth in the past but I believe we contribute to that. And so I think it’s important for us to reduce our emissions of pollutants and greenhouse gases that may well be significant contributors to the climate change and the global warming that you’re seeing.

Watch it:

Romney has not, however, endorsed any policies that would actually achieve his supposed goal of reducing global warming pollution. In his book, No Apology, Romney endorses the climate policy of Bjorn Lomborg, who grossly misrepresents science to claim adaptation to rapid climate change will be a simple prospect.

Update

Enviroknow‘s Josh Nelson notes that six weeks ago, Mitt Romney told Fox News that he supports increased oil drilling and coal mining:

Well, you get the prices down by convincing people who are investing in gasoline futures, so to speak, the speculators — you let them understand that America is going to be producing enough energy for our needs. And that means we’re going to start drilling for oil. We’re going to use our natural gas resources, which are now extraordinarily plentiful, given new technology. We’re going to use our coal resources. Of course, we’re going to pursue all the renewables, but you have to have oil and gas to power America’s economy.

Palin’s Fishy Politics Hits New Hampshire

Our guest blogger is Michael Conathan, Center for American Progress Director of Oceans Policy.

Sarah Palin at Yankee Seafood Cooperative

After Sarah Palin left the governorship of Alaska in July 2009, more than a year before her term was to expire, her first move was to go fishing. Palin and her daughter Bristol — named after the fertile fishing ground of Bristol Bay — bonded on her reality show with even more fishing.

When Palin’s One Nation bus tour pulled into New Hampshire yesterday, it came as no surprise that one of her first stops was the Yankee Fishermen’s Cooperative in Seabrook. New England is home to America’s oldest fishing industry. Many of the region’s fisheries were overfished for decades until recent reductions in catch limits began rebuilding depleted fish populations. While these regulations will allow the fisheries to reverse decades of decline, the short-term economic sacrifices have hit some fishermen hard.

In New Hampshire, which has just 18 miles of coastline, fishermen have felt the pinch, while some of their counterparts in the larger Massachusetts fishing ports of Gloucester and New Bedford or Portland, Maine have thrived. As such, Palin found fertile ground for her anti-government pandering. Palin greeted fishermen by exclaiming “I love your industry!” She tied her visit to one of her major themes, excess government regulation:

Politics cannot play a part in the fisheries industry,” said Palin, rapping “overly cautious environmental concerns” for strangling the enterprise.

The “overly cautious” regulations Palin attacked are rebuilding fish populations and ensuring that the fisheries reverse decades of decline to once again become growth industries, sustainable for future generations.

Palin has a long track record of politicizing fisheries issues in her Alaskan homeland, to the detriment of both the wildlife and Alaska fishermen:

– Palin consistently opposed allowing native Alaskans to maintain their subsistence fishing rights, choosing instead to back commercial and sportfishing interests.

Testing the limits of campaign laws, Palin joined mining interests to actively oppose a state ballot measure that would have protected Bristol Bay’s abundant salmon populations from polluted runoff and habitat destruction that would come as a result of opening the Pebble Mine site, thought to contain up to half a trillion dollars of gold, silver, and copper ores.

– Palin attempted to block the endangerment listing of Cook Inlet beluga whales for economic reasons, despite the fact that the Endangered Species Act explicitly excludes consideration of economic factors from decisions about endangerment listings.

For Palin, it seems the only good fish is a dead fish. Honest politics and sound science can give us good fisheries policy. Let’s keep Palin’s political rapping out of the equation.

NEWS FLASH

Barbour: Cantor Is Wrong, Disaster Relief Should Not Be Contingent On Spending Cuts | As ThinkProgress reported, in the wake of the devastating tornadoes in the Missouri, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) called for withholding funding for disaster relief unless it was offset with spending cuts. Many critics slammed Cantor for his callous stance, and today at the Faith and Freedom conference in Washington, the Republican governor of another hard hit state — Mississippi’s Haley Barbour — joined the critics, saying Cantor was wrong. “Surely,” Congress can appropriate the funds, Barbour said in response to a question from the Huffington Post’s Sam Stein, even if it means increasing the deficit. Watch it:

Yglesias

CO2 Emissions Back On The Rise

The global recession managed to reduce the trend level of world greenhouse gas emissions and buy us all a bit more time to ward off planetary doom. That’s not the good way to avoid climate catastrophe, but it’s something. Now, though, Brad Plumer’s got the International Energy Agency data that says the breathing room is gone and we’re back on trend:

This is developed world growth + no global agreement on emissions.

Update

I should have noted that this chart comes originally from Dana Nuccitelli at Skeptical Science.

Bringing Fracking to the Surface: More Scrutiny Needed on Natural Gas Development

SOURCE: AP/Ralph Wilson

Is natural gas a tool in the fight against climate change or an environmental nightmare? CAP Senior Fellow Tom Kenworthy tries to figure out “what the frack is going on.”

The Obama administration is moving to examine more closely the environmental and health impacts of a surge in natural gas production across the country, particularly where hydraulic fracturing is used. But with the oil and gas industry enjoying numerous exemptions from some of our most important environmental laws, the administration can do more to assure the public that drilling for gas, particularly in shale formations, can be done in ways that protect our water, air, health, and climate.

Concerns intensify over natural gas development

It’s a pretty clear signal that the debate over natural gas development is heating up when a song about hydraulic fracturing, or fracking—a form of natural gas drilling—becomes a minor hit on YouTube. As suggested in the first two lines of the chorus of “The Fracking Song”—produced by a partnership between Pro Publica and New York University’s journalism school—the entire subject is in need of more clarity:

What the frack is going on with all this fracking going on?

I think we need some facts to come to light

In recent weeks the Obama administration took a number of steps to shed additional light on growing public concerns over natural gas drilling, in particular the widespread use of fracking. That technique, deployed in unconventional gas settings such as shale gas and coal bed methane gas formations, uses large volumes of water combined with sand and chemicals to fracture underground rock formations. Pumped deep underground at high pressures, the fracking fluid creates fissures in the rock so natural gas can escape from the rock. The gas is then transported to the surface. Read more

Fish on Fridays: The International Politics of Bluefin Tuna

As part of the “Fish on Fridays” series, Michael Conathan, director of oceans policy at the Center for American Progress, writes about the plummeting numbers of BlueFin Tuna — and the rancorous politics around trying to save them.

(AP Photo/Chris Park)

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or NOAA, drew ire from some environmental groups when it announced last week that the Atlantic bluefin tuna does not warrant a listing under the Endangered Species Act despite widespread decline the species over the past several decades. Despite its unpopularity, this is the correct decision from both a legal and a conservation standpoint.

The bluefin tuna is one of the most astounding creatures on the planet. Marine biologists frequently refer to sharks as perfect eating machines. If so, then the bluefin is a perfect swimming machine. Each fish is a tube of pure muscle that has evolved biological adaptations allowing it to swim faster, deeper, and farther than virtually any fish on the planet. Their circulatory systems make the cold-blooded fish operate with the power of a warm-blooded animal, and their fins are designed to retract into slots in their bodies, reducing drag and allowing them to travel through the water at speeds in excess of 45 miles per hour. Read more

June 3 Energy and Climate News: Experts Weigh Stimulus’ Impact on the Economy; Rising Temperatures Increase Smog

The Climate Progress news round-up is a daily look at the top climate and energy news from around the web. Do you have interesting stories to share? Post them in the comments below.

As Stimulus Funding Ends, Experts Weigh Law’s Impact on ‘Green Economy’

The debate over whether the stimulus created jobs is heated and endless, with lawmakers continuously arguing the merits of economic projections and clean energy investments.

But one thing is clear: As federal agencies run out of stimulus funds, temporary workers are seeing their jobs come to an end.

“As soon as the money stops, one imagines jobs stop being supported,” said Josh Bivens, an economist at the Economic Policy Institute. “My guess is we’ve passed the peak effect of the Recovery Act on jobs.” Read more

Why Feed-in Tariffs are an Important Climate Solution: They ‘Empower People’

Most readers probably know about Feed-in Tariffs (FITs) by now. While not popular in the U.S., the policy has gained traction in more than 50 countries. Climate Progress recently had a visit from German Parliamentarian Ulrich Kelber, who talked about the importance of FITs (video below). We thought it would be a good opportunity to explain the policy for all those who aren’t completely familiar.

FITs are considered by many to be the most successful instrument for promoting renewable energy. Despite the wonky name, it’s actually a very simple concept — which is why it’s been so effective. Read more

NEWS FLASH

The United States Undertaxes Pollution | A new International Monetary Fund working paper finds that the United States “gets, by far, the lowest percentage of revenue from environmental taxation of any OECD country,” less than 3 percent of total revenues, well below the industrialized-country average of six percent:

From "Reforming the Tax System to Promote Environmental Objectives," IMF.

(HT: Brad Plumer)

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up