ThinkProgress Logo

Climate Progress

Alyssa

The Book That Predicts Occupy Wall Street: Bruce Sterling’s ‘Distraction’

If you’re confused about the point of Occupy Wall Street, here’s a great essay by Matt Stoller.

Or you can go even deeper (and weirder) and read Distraction, Bruce Sterling’s wildly entertaining and spookily prescient 1998 satire of American society in 2044. The book begins with our protagonist, political operative Oscar Valparaiso, trying to understand a video that shows a group of seemingly uncoordinated people showing up in a town and working together to demolish a bank in just a few minutes. (Sterling was describing a political flash mob five years before the term “flash mob” was even coined.) Throughout the course of the book, Oscar comes to understand the power of social-network political action and its implications for American democracy.

Oscar and his campaign crew — having just won a U.S. Senate election and now at loose ends — cross over into Texas from Lousiana, where they’re stopped by members of the nearby Air Force base for “voluntary contributions” to their “Air Force bake sale,” because the federal government’s budget crisis is so bad it’s unclear whether the base is being funded any more:

It had never occured to the lords of the consumer society that consumerism as a political philosophy might one day manifest the same grave systemic instabilities that Communism had. But as those instabilities multiplied, the country had cracked. Civil society shriveled in the pitiless reign of cash. As the last public spaces were privatized, it became harder and harder for American culture to breathe. Not only were people broke, but they were taunted to madness by commercials, and pitilessly surveilled by privacy-invading hucksters. An ever more aggressive consumer-outreach apparatus cause large numbers of people to simply abandon their official identities.

It was no longer fun to be an American citizen. Bankruptcies multiplied beyond all reason, becoming a kind of commercial apostasy. Tax dodging became a spectator sport. The American people simply ceased to behave.

The American economy collapsed years before the book takes place, with a vast divide between the moneyed elite and nearly everyone else, whose abilities have been made economically obsolescent by computing technology, international competition, and the demise of intellectual property. In one exchange, the campaign bus driver tries to explain to Oscar that the forgotten Americans are figuring out how to “make their own lives by themselves”:

“Why are there millions of nomads now? They don’t have jobs, man! You don’t care about ‘em! You don’t have any use for ‘em! You can’t make any use for them! They’re just not necessary to you. Not at all. Okay? So, you’re not necessary to them, either. Okay? They got real tired of waiting for you to give them a life. So now, they just make their own life by themselves, out of stuff they find lying around. You think the government cares? The government can’t even pay their own Air Force.”

“A country that was better organized would have a decent role for all its citizens.”

“Man, that’s the creepy part — they’re a lot better organized than the government is. Organization is the only thing they’ve got! They don’t have money or jobs or a place to live, but organization, they sure got plenty of that stuff.”

And this is only one piece of Distraction‘s complex, silly, and dark world, which involves a war-time romance between Oscar and the brilliant neuroscientist Greta Penninger, whom he helps take over a scientific research facility on the budget chopping block as she works on remapping cognition. They then have to defend the facility from the takeover attempts of the insane governor of Louisiana, who is trying to save his state’s people as global warming puts it underwater. Meanwhile, the President is waging war against the Netherlands, and the senator Oscar elected, an eco-architecture billionaire, becomes mentally ill after conducting a hunger strike with all of his vital signs monitored by millions over the Internet.

Sterling’s extrapolations from 1998 into the near-distant future verge on the absurd, but it’s the absurdity of a world changing faster than most people can adapt, one where reputation on social networks can translate into real political power, where it’s hard to tell if things are working great or broken beyond repair. In other words, it’s a lot like the world we live in today.

Politics

Congressman From Koch Uninterested In Investigating Koch Industries’ Business Deals With Iran

ThinkProgress filed this report from the Values Voters Summit in Washington, DC.

Last week, Bloomberg released a bombshell report on Koch Industries, the oil conglomerate owned by the secretive conservative billionaires David and Charles Koch. The report revealed that Koch Industries subsidiaries were doing business in Iran and using bribes to win contracts elsewhere. The Koch Brothers were apparently alarmed enough about the report’s release that a blogger with extensive ties to the Kochs attempted to pre-but the allegations well before Bloomberg’s release.

Given these damning allegations – Koch Industries admitted the bribes were criminal and the United States has banned trade with Iran since 1995 – ThinkProgress asked the congressman whose district includes Koch Industries, Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-KS), whether he planned to open an investigation into the matter. Pompeo blew off the notion, walking away from reporters rather than answer the question. Despite being asked three times if he planned to open an investigation into Koch Industries’ dealings with Iran, Pompeo was silent, allowing his communications director to block ThinkProgress instead.

KEYES: Are you going to be leading an investigation into Koch Industries’ dealings with Iran?

POMPEO: [Silence.]

Watch it:

It’s not particularly surprising that Pompeo would resist opening an investigation into Koch Industries. His extensive ties to the Koch Brothers have earned him the title, “the congressman from Koch.” When Pompeo was confronted about undue influence that the Kochs have on his office, he responded, “Koch Industries is an amazing business.”

ABC News attempted to ask David Koch this week about the oil tycoon’s business deals in Iran and bribes used by Koch Industries. Like Pompeo, Koch was silent on the matter.

McKibben Links Tar Sands Pipeline to Occupy Wall Street: It’s the ‘Poster Child for Arrogant Corporate Power’

by Jessica Goad and Stephen Lacey

In keeping with the momentum of the Occupy Wall Street movement, activists took to the streets in Washington, DC today to protest the Keystone XL pipeline outside the State Department, where the final public hearing on the project took place.

Pipeline opponents are drawing a clear connection between the movements, calling their overnight stay at the building where the Keystone hearings were held #OccupyStateDepartment.  As activists explained to Climate Progress today, the climate movement and the Occupy Wall Street movement are both made up of a diverse group of people who feel shut out of the political system by the financial and corporate elite.

Tar Sands Action founder Bill McKibben told us that the pipeline is “sort of the poster child for the kind of arrogant corporate power that people are rightly taking to task on Wall Street and elsewhere”:

McKibben will be giving a climate teach-in at the Occupy Wall Street on Saturday at 5 pm:

Read more

NEWS FLASH

Bill McKibben To Deliver Teach-In At Occupy Wall Street On Saturday | Climate hawk Bill McKibben, founder of 350.org, will be giving a climate teach-in at the Occupy Wall Street on Saturday at 5 pm, ThinkProgress Green has learned. “You could even say Wall Street’s been occupying our atmosphere, since any attempt to do anything about climate change always runs afoul of the biggest corporations on the planet,” says McKibben. “So it’s a damned good thing the tables are starting to turn.”

VIDEO: People-Powered Testimony Against Keystone XL Tar Sands

Supported by hundreds of people who believe that the American people don’t need to destroy the planet in order to prosper, dozens spoke up against the construction of the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline at a State Department hearing today. Speakers concerned by the threat tar sands oil poses to our nation and our planet included priests and ministers, Obama campaign volunteers, and Nebraska ranchers.

In the video below, ThinkProgress Green excerpts statements from youth activists Ethan Nuss and Danielle Simms, indigenous leaders George Poitras and Debra White Plume, Friends of the Earth president Erich Pica, clean-tech investor Brig. Gen. Steven Anderson, and former pipeline inspector Mike Klink:

ETHAN NUSS: What we have here is a foreign company using foreign materials to pump foreign oil through America’s heartland.

BRIG. GEN. STEVEN ANDERSON (Ret.): This pipeline will set back the clock of 25 years of energy development in our nation.

MIKE KLINK: Maybe, just maybe, there won’t be 14 leaks in the first year, one of the worst pipeline disasters in history.

ERICH PICA: President Obama ran a campaign on trying to clean up Washington DC and cleaning up the lobby process. It is clear that this process is failing his promise, it is failing the American people, and it is failing the environment, and it is failing our need globally to fight climate change. This pipeline should and must be stopped.

GEORGE POITRAS: President Obama has a moral and ethical obligation to visit the tar sands, see the tar sands, to hear our people.

DANIELLE SIMMS: Either you will support the oligarchy and the oil industry, or you will stand with the American people, environmental and civil rights justice.

DEBRA WHITE PLUME: Our Lakota prophecy tells us, when mother earth cries we stand up or she will die and we will die. I ask everyone to remember: crying Earth, rise up. Rise up with Mother Earth and say no to this pipeline. No to death! No! No! No!

State Department officials Maryruth Coleman and Jim Steele heard the testimony without comment.

Tom Friedman on Climate: The Obama Administration “Fundamentally Failed to Speak Out in Favor of the Science”

In Greenbuild speech, NY Times columnist slams White House: “There are endangered species I’ve seen more of in the last two years than that climate team speaking out in defense of climate science and scientists.”

The last three years have been the most politically and economically turbulent that Americans have ever seen. And that has helped pushed environmental issues — particularly climate change — onto the back burner.

Author and New York Times Columnist Tom Friedman had a fantastic speech this week at the Greenbuild Conference in Toronto, in which he briefly summarized the recent history of our rising and falling hopes on U.S. climate action.  He also made clear the Obama White House shares some of the culpability for climate change  being put on a back burner.

We’ve edited the 30-minute speech down to an 8-minute segment featuring all his best quotes. It’s worth listening to the whole thing:

Here are some of the most quotable quotes, including his discussion of the powerful impact of the “totally bogus” Climategate affair:

Read more

NEWS FLASH

Keystone XL Hearing: Nebraskans Speak Out | At a State Department public hearing in Washington, DC, Nebraskans Randy Thompson and Susan Luebbe spoke out against the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline. Both are farmers and ranchers along the proposed path of TransCanada’s pipeline. “We have difficulty rationalizing how a pipeline pushing oil across our country to some unknown destination can be in our interest,” Thompson said. “If I can’t sell my cattle, if I can’t sell my land, if I can’t shower or drink the greatest tasting water on earth when there is a leak in our aquifer, where will I work?” asked Luebbe. “Madame Secretary of State Clinton, this is definitely in our nation’s worst interest. Please, for the sake of the children on our ranch, deny this permit.”

TV Media Hypes Solyndra Story, Ignores Keystone XL Scandal

The Solyndra bankruptcy and emails are the royal wedding of energy stories for many in TV media.  Just from August 31 to September 23, there were 190 mentions and 10 hours of coverage — 8 on Murdoch’s Fox News.  But, as Media Matters reports, TV news outlets have entirely ignored the scandalous emails showing bias for the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline within the State Department.

Here’s the scoop.

TV News Outlets Ignore Keystone XL Email Release

Read more

October 7 News: Climate Activists Occupy Keystone Pipeline Hearing

Today is the final public hearing on the Keystone XL Pipeline. Climate activists are showing up to make their voices heard in opposition to the pipeline. We’ll have coverage from that hearing later today. In the meantime, here are some top stories on Keystone XL (and other issues, too.) Please post additional stories below.

Photo courtesy of Energy Action Coalition


Final Keystone XL Pipeline Hearing Sees a Show of Force From Both Sides

Environmental groups and the oil industry will square off in their final public showdown on Friday before Barack Obama renders a decision on a controversial pipeline carrying crude from the Alberta tar sands to refineries in Texas.

The encounter promises to be contentious, with one activist Whit Jones (@whitjones) tweeting that the Occupy Wall Street movement had come to the state department.

By 9pm on Thursday night – more than 12 hours before the scheduled start of the public hearing in the basement of the Ronald Reagan trade centre in Washington – about two dozen activists had turned up with sleeping bags determined to camp on site to be the first in the room.

To their frustration, however, industry had a similar plan for the hearing, which was hosted by the state department. Activists said contractors for the TransCanada pipeline company had sent in a professional line-sitter who promptly claimed his spot in line – and then telephoned for reinforcements.

“The industry has done what they can to ensure that their voice is louder than ours at the hearing,” said Christine Irvine, an activist with 350.org.

Did TransCanada Remove Rare Beetles from Keystone XL Pipeline Route Illegally?

Read more

Landmark Shark Fin Bill Awaits Signature Of California Governor Jerry Brown

Our guest bloggers are Michael Conathan, Director of Ocean Policy at the Center for American Progress, and Rebecca Friendly, Special Assistant at CAP’s California Office.

In her book Demon Fish, Juliet Eilperin paints a vivid picture of how sharks continue to be objects of obsession worldwide and how this time-old vision could eventually contribute to their extinction. The demand for shark fin soup, a Chinese celebratory dish, has dramatically inflated the price for an ingredient that has no culinary or nutritional value. Shark fin soup can cost upwards of $80 a bowl in restaurants and has vitamin content less than that of a typical vegetable soup. The disproportionately high demand for shark fins has lead to irresponsible poaching, similar to practices used to exploit rhino horn and elephant ivory. More than 70 million sharks are harvested every year for their fins alone; a number equivalent to the population of California, Texas and Pennsylvania combined.

Earlier this year, President Obama signed federal legislation tightening a ban on shark finning in U.S. waters. The sale or trade of shark fins, however, is still legal in the majority of American states. California Assembly Bill 376 (AB 376) , introduced by State Assemblyman Paul Fong, a Chinese-American Californian, and supported in the legislature by Sen. Carol Liu, was overwhelmingly approved by the California state legislature with bipartisan support. The bill now awaits the signature of California Governor Jerry Brown, and would make it unlawful for any person to possess, sell, trade, or distribute a shark fin. If Governor Brown signs it, California will join neighboring Pacific states, Oregon, Washington, and Hawaii in banning sale of shark fins.

Because shark fin soup is a customary entrée often served at celebrations and associated with prestige in the Chinese culture, some groups have expressed concern that AB 376 could be considered a discriminatory and offensive law that disregards the customs and preferences of California’s Chinese community. However, it is important to highlight that the picture is not so cut-and-dried. In fact, there has been an outpouring of support for AB 376 from the Chinese-American community itself.

Many prominent Chinese-Americans support the ban and seven legislators of Asian and Pacific Islands descent voted in favor of AB 376. Additionally, a poll conducted last February by the independent opinion research group Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin, Metz & Associates found that 76 percent of California voters of all ages, regions, political affiliations, and cultures support the ban. Further, the research, conducted for the Monterey Bay Aquarium, shows that 70 percent of California Chinese American voters support legislation to ban shark finning.

Shark fins can sell for up to 60 times the value of other shark meat products—as much as $600 per pound. This discrepancy has led fishermen in many countries to engage in a practice known as shark finning, whereby they cut off the fins of live sharks and toss the remains back into the ocean to die. This practice, illegal in the U.S., allows fishermen to fill their boats with fins, rather than bulky, relatively valueless bodies. In addition to being incredibly cruel, finning has put shark populations on the brink of extinction, with some species declining as much as 90 percent in recent years.

Sharks play a vital role in maintaining the harmony of ocean ecosystems, and their diminishing populations could have severe environmental repercussions. The proposed ban on the sale or trade of fins in California, which is home to the largest market for the shark fin trade outside of Asia, would drastically reduce demand and have an immediate positive impact on the shark population and a long-term effect on safeguarding ocean ecosystems.

There’s also an economic incentive to keep sharks swimming in the ocean rather than steaming in a soup bowl. Recent research from the Australian Institute for Marine Science has shown that sharks have a greater economic value alive than dead. In ocean tourist hubs such as the Bahamas, the Maldives, and Palau, the income garnered from tourist expenditures, values each shark between $30,000 and $2 million over its lifetime—far less than the value they would fetch on at seafood counters.

A proliferation of California community groups, conservationists, and celebrities such as Yao Ming, Richard Branson, and Lisa Ling have joined forces to urge Governor Brown to approve the legislation. Over thirty organizations have come out in support of the ban including the Asian Pacific American Ocean Harmony Alliance, Oceana, Humane Society International, the Asian Law Alliance, and the Center for Oceanic Awareness, Research and Education. Additionally, an online petition hosted by change.org presented Governor Brown with the signatures of over 25,000 Californians in support of the shark fin ban last month.

Governor Brown has not indicated whether he plans to sign or veto the legislation. He has until October 9 to make a decision. We urge the Governor to take a major step in protecting California’s ocean ecosystem and shark populations by signing AB 376.

Contributions made by Katie Wilczak.

Clean Start: October 7, 2011

Welcome to Clean Start, ThinkProgress Green’s morning round-up of the latest in climate and clean energy. Here is what we’re reading. What are you?

The UK’s flagship carbon capture and storage project at Scottish Power’s Longannet coal-fired plant is understood to be close to financial collapse as the global economic slowdown limits the incentives for low-emissions electricity. [Utility Week]

Firefighters on Wednesday battled a wind-swept wildfire that has burned more than 40 square miles in central Nebraska, destroying one home and sending one man to the hospital with burns. [AP]

The EU remains on track to exceed the international carbon emissions targets imposed through the Kyoto Protocol, despite a 2.4 per cent increase in emissions last year driven by the bloc’s gradual economic recovery. [Business Green]

The Asian monsoon season has caused $7 billion in damages, killing 101 people in China, 206 in Thailand, 443 in Pakistan, and 97 in India while damaging hundreds of thousands of homes. [Insurance Journal]

The stubborn wildfire in the Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge has burned for more than two months, even after a hurricane and tropical storm dumped about four months’ worth of rain within weeks. [Washington Post]

The global warming-fueled heat wave that pushed Texas’ power grid to the brink of blackouts has faded, but the debate over how to keep the lights on next summer is just warming up. [Reuters]

As flooding continued in Cambodia on Thursday, killing 176 people and displacing 21,000, a group of high-ranking officials said they blamed regional climate change and urged Cambodia to find a response. [VOA News]

An impasse in global climate talks is casting a shadow on clean energy financing in the developing world, with growing doubts over a program that has funded billions of dollars in projects. [AFP]

As an export pipeline, Keystone XL will have no impact on U.S. dependence on Mideast and Venezuelan oil. [Price of Oil]

Rising world temperatures will cause most populations of herbivores – including plant-eating fish – to decline, according to a University of British Columbia biologist. [UBC]

Within 30 years, the areas where California can grow fine-wine grapes could shrink because of climate change, while little-known growing regions such as Seattle’s Puget Sound and Oregon’s Willamette Valley see growth, although increasingly extreme weather will affect all regions. [USA Today]

Drilling in the Arctic: Perspectives From an Alaska Native

“Climate change is already wreaking havoc in our environment….”

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2010/05/20/us/ALASKA/ALASKA-articleLarge.jpg

by Colleen Swan and Christine Shearer in a re-post

On October 3, 2011, the Obama administration said it was moving forward with oil-drilling leases off the coast of Alaska issued by the Bush administration in 2008. The leases had been challenged by environmental groups, opposition that gained momentum after the 2010 BP Deepwater Horizon disaster.

Yet the Interior Department said it would uphold nearly 500 leases issued in the Chukchi Sea, a victory for oil companies in the battle over Arctic Ocean drilling.

Those opposing the leases say there is no proven clean-up method for an oil spill in such harsh terrain and ice-choked waters, and that the environmental assessment done by oil companies for the area is inadequate.

There are also Alaska Natives living off the coast of the Chukchi Sea who worry about how the drilling and its impacts will affect their way of life. One of them is Colleen Swan, a resident of Kivalina, Alaska. Kivalina is a largely Inupiat community on a barrier reef island in the northwest of the state. The island already faces erosion from climate change, and its residents are trying to relocate. In the meantime, they are still dependent on the local environment. Colleen shared some of her thoughts on the oil leases:

Read more

EU High Court Upholds Law Limiting Global Warming Pollution from Aviation

by Rebecca Lefton

A cap on airline emissions is legal. That’s according to the European Court of Justice’s Advocate General Juliane Kokott in an opinion issued yesterday.

Beginning in January 2012, airlines landing in the European Union will begin paying for carbon emissions above a set cap under an EU directive. But that cap has faced legal resistance from international air carriers.

American Airlines, Continental Airlines, and United Airlines (Continental and United have since merged) and the Air Transport Association of America (ATA) filed legal suit against the law in December 2009. The case was referred to the European High Court of Justice and following a hearing on July 5, and yesterday’s opinion indicates that the US airline industry should expect to comply with the law.

“EU legislation does not infringe the sovereignty of other states or the freedom of the high seas guaranteed under international law, and is compatible with the relevant international agreements,” said Advocate General Kokott.

This decision is not binding but Advocate General opinions are usually indicative of the final ruling, which is expected early next year.

The European Union Emissions Trading System (ETS) requires a 3 percent reduction in global warming emissions from 2004-2006 levels in 2013 and 5 percent by 2020. Unchecked, global warming pollution from aviation will quadruple, accounting for one-fifth of the total budget for a safe increase in global emissions in 2050. The EU ETS program can achieve more than 70 million tons of carbon dioxide reductions annually in 2020.

Less than a week ago the U.S. signed a declaration opposing the EU ETS calling it “inconsistent with applicable international law” at a meeting hosted by the Indian Ministry of Civil Aviation. The US joined 20 other countries in opposition to the EU ETS: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia, Cuba, Egypt, India, Japan, Republic of Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, Nigeria, Paraguay, Qatar, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Africa, and the United Arab Emirates. Chile and Cuba are exempt from the EU ETS because they fall under de minimis provisions that applies to airlines with 2 flights or less a day or less than 10,0000 tons of carbon emissions annually.

Read more

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up