Tumblr Icon RSS Icon

Former Goldman executive can’t say whether bank should have sold what it knew was a ‘shi**y deal.’

Posted on

"Former Goldman executive can’t say whether bank should have sold what it knew was a ‘shi**y deal.’"

Share:

google plus icon

Today, a group of current and former Goldman Sachs employees are testifying before the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations regarding whether or not the investment bank misled investors by selling assets that it knew were junk and was actively betting against. One of these assets, known as Timberwolf, was a collateralized debt obligation that allowed investors to bet on subprime mortgages. According to emails obtained by the committee, Goldman executives acknowledged that Timberwolf “was one shi**y deal,” but the firm continued to sell the asset to investors. The subcommittee’s chairman, Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI), grilled former Goldman executive Dan Sparks for selling Timberwolf as a “top priority,” even after the “shi**y deal” email was written. Sparks repeatedly refused to answer the question, leading Levin to say that “if you can’t give a clear answer to that one, Mr. Sparks, I don’t think we’re going to get too many clear answers from you.” Watch it:

Timberwolf lost more than 80 percent of its value within five months of its issuance.

« »

By clicking and submitting a comment I acknowledge the ThinkProgress Privacy Policy and agree to the ThinkProgress Terms of Use. I understand that my comments are also being governed by Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policies as applicable, which can be found here.